blob: 341a6c2340d5789f989a60e93077ba6a2d76948d [file] [log] [blame]
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002Control Group v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03003================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05004
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03005:Date: October, 2015
6:Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05007
8This is the authoritative documentation on the design, interface and
9conventions of cgroup v2. It describes all userland-visible aspects
10of cgroup including core and specific controller behaviors. All
11future changes must be reflected in this document. Documentation for
Jakub Kicinski373e8ff2020-02-27 16:06:53 -080012v1 is available under :ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/index.rst <cgroup-v1>`.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050013
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030014.. CONTENTS
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050015
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030016 1. Introduction
17 1-1. Terminology
18 1-2. What is cgroup?
19 2. Basic Operations
20 2-1. Mounting
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -040021 2-2. Organizing Processes and Threads
22 2-2-1. Processes
23 2-2-2. Threads
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030024 2-3. [Un]populated Notification
25 2-4. Controlling Controllers
26 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling
27 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint
28 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint
29 2-5. Delegation
30 2-5-1. Model of Delegation
31 2-5-2. Delegation Containment
32 2-6. Guidelines
33 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control
34 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions
35 3. Resource Distribution Models
36 3-1. Weights
37 3-2. Limits
38 3-3. Protections
39 3-4. Allocations
40 4. Interface Files
41 4-1. Format
42 4-2. Conventions
43 4-3. Core Interface Files
44 5. Controllers
45 5-1. CPU
46 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files
47 5-2. Memory
48 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files
49 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines
50 5-2-3. Memory Ownership
51 5-3. IO
52 5-3-1. IO Interface Files
53 5-3-2. Writeback
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -040054 5-3-3. IO Latency
55 5-3-3-1. How IO Latency Throttling Works
56 5-3-3-2. IO Latency Interface Files
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030057 5-4. PID
58 5-4-1. PID Interface Files
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -050059 5-5. Cpuset
60 5.5-1. Cpuset Interface Files
61 5-6. Device
62 5-7. RDMA
63 5-7-1. RDMA Interface Files
Giuseppe Scrivanofaced7e2019-12-16 20:38:31 +010064 5-8. HugeTLB
65 5.8-1. HugeTLB Interface Files
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -050066 5-8. Misc
67 5-8-1. perf_event
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +010068 5-N. Non-normative information
69 5-N-1. CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
70 5-N-2. IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030071 6. Namespace
72 6-1. Basics
73 6-2. The Root and Views
74 6-3. Migration and setns(2)
75 6-4. Interaction with Other Namespaces
76 P. Information on Kernel Programming
77 P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback
78 D. Deprecated v1 Core Features
79 R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
80 R-1. Multiple Hierarchies
81 R-2. Thread Granularity
82 R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
83 R-4. Other Interface Issues
84 R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies
85 R-5-1. Memory
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050086
87
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030088Introduction
89============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050090
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030091Terminology
92-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050093
94"cgroup" stands for "control group" and is never capitalized. The
95singular form is used to designate the whole feature and also as a
96qualifier as in "cgroup controllers". When explicitly referring to
97multiple individual control groups, the plural form "cgroups" is used.
98
99
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300100What is cgroup?
101---------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500102
103cgroup is a mechanism to organize processes hierarchically and
104distribute system resources along the hierarchy in a controlled and
105configurable manner.
106
107cgroup is largely composed of two parts - the core and controllers.
108cgroup core is primarily responsible for hierarchically organizing
109processes. A cgroup controller is usually responsible for
110distributing a specific type of system resource along the hierarchy
111although there are utility controllers which serve purposes other than
112resource distribution.
113
114cgroups form a tree structure and every process in the system belongs
115to one and only one cgroup. All threads of a process belong to the
116same cgroup. On creation, all processes are put in the cgroup that
117the parent process belongs to at the time. A process can be migrated
118to another cgroup. Migration of a process doesn't affect already
119existing descendant processes.
120
121Following certain structural constraints, controllers may be enabled or
122disabled selectively on a cgroup. All controller behaviors are
123hierarchical - if a controller is enabled on a cgroup, it affects all
124processes which belong to the cgroups consisting the inclusive
125sub-hierarchy of the cgroup. When a controller is enabled on a nested
126cgroup, it always restricts the resource distribution further. The
127restrictions set closer to the root in the hierarchy can not be
128overridden from further away.
129
130
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300131Basic Operations
132================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500133
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300134Mounting
135--------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500136
137Unlike v1, cgroup v2 has only single hierarchy. The cgroup v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300138hierarchy can be mounted with the following mount command::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500139
140 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
141
142cgroup2 filesystem has the magic number 0x63677270 ("cgrp"). All
143controllers which support v2 and are not bound to a v1 hierarchy are
144automatically bound to the v2 hierarchy and show up at the root.
145Controllers which are not in active use in the v2 hierarchy can be
146bound to other hierarchies. This allows mixing v2 hierarchy with the
147legacy v1 multiple hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way.
148
149A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller
150is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy. Because per-cgroup
151controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may
152have lingering references, a controller may not show up immediately on
153the v2 hierarchy after the final umount of the previous hierarchy.
154Similarly, a controller should be fully disabled to be moved out of
155the unified hierarchy and it may take some time for the disabled
156controller to become available for other hierarchies; furthermore, due
157to inter-controller dependencies, other controllers may need to be
158disabled too.
159
160While useful for development and manual configurations, moving
161controllers dynamically between the v2 and other hierarchies is
162strongly discouraged for production use. It is recommended to decide
163the hierarchies and controller associations before starting using the
164controllers after system boot.
165
Johannes Weiner1619b6d2016-02-16 13:21:14 -0500166During transition to v2, system management software might still
167automount the v1 cgroup filesystem and so hijack all controllers
168during boot, before manual intervention is possible. To make testing
169and experimenting easier, the kernel parameter cgroup_no_v1= allows
170disabling controllers in v1 and make them always available in v2.
171
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400172cgroup v2 currently supports the following mount options.
173
174 nsdelegate
175
176 Consider cgroup namespaces as delegation boundaries. This
177 option is system wide and can only be set on mount or modified
178 through remount from the init namespace. The mount option is
179 ignored on non-init namespace mounts. Please refer to the
180 Delegation section for details.
181
Chris Down9852ae32019-05-31 22:30:22 -0700182 memory_localevents
183
184 Only populate memory.events with data for the current cgroup,
185 and not any subtrees. This is legacy behaviour, the default
186 behaviour without this option is to include subtree counts.
187 This option is system wide and can only be set on mount or
188 modified through remount from the init namespace. The mount
189 option is ignored on non-init namespace mounts.
190
Johannes Weiner8a931f82020-04-01 21:07:07 -0700191 memory_recursiveprot
192
193 Recursively apply memory.min and memory.low protection to
194 entire subtrees, without requiring explicit downward
195 propagation into leaf cgroups. This allows protecting entire
196 subtrees from one another, while retaining free competition
197 within those subtrees. This should have been the default
198 behavior but is a mount-option to avoid regressing setups
199 relying on the original semantics (e.g. specifying bogusly
200 high 'bypass' protection values at higher tree levels).
201
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500202
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400203Organizing Processes and Threads
204--------------------------------
205
206Processes
207~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500208
209Initially, only the root cgroup exists to which all processes belong.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300210A child cgroup can be created by creating a sub-directory::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500211
212 # mkdir $CGROUP_NAME
213
214A given cgroup may have multiple child cgroups forming a tree
215structure. Each cgroup has a read-writable interface file
216"cgroup.procs". When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which
217belong to the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
218same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved to
219another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while reading.
220
221A process can be migrated into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
222target cgroup's "cgroup.procs" file. Only one process can be migrated
223on a single write(2) call. If a process is composed of multiple
224threads, writing the PID of any thread migrates all threads of the
225process.
226
227When a process forks a child process, the new process is born into the
228cgroup that the forking process belongs to at the time of the
229operation. After exit, a process stays associated with the cgroup
230that it belonged to at the time of exit until it's reaped; however, a
231zombie process does not appear in "cgroup.procs" and thus can't be
232moved to another cgroup.
233
234A cgroup which doesn't have any children or live processes can be
235destroyed by removing the directory. Note that a cgroup which doesn't
236have any children and is associated only with zombie processes is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300237considered empty and can be removed::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500238
239 # rmdir $CGROUP_NAME
240
241"/proc/$PID/cgroup" lists a process's cgroup membership. If legacy
242cgroup is in use in the system, this file may contain multiple lines,
243one for each hierarchy. The entry for cgroup v2 is always in the
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300244format "0::$PATH"::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500245
246 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
247 ...
248 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested
249
250If the process becomes a zombie and the cgroup it was associated with
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300251is removed subsequently, " (deleted)" is appended to the path::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500252
253 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
254 ...
255 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested (deleted)
256
257
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400258Threads
259~~~~~~~
260
261cgroup v2 supports thread granularity for a subset of controllers to
262support use cases requiring hierarchical resource distribution across
263the threads of a group of processes. By default, all threads of a
264process belong to the same cgroup, which also serves as the resource
265domain to host resource consumptions which are not specific to a
266process or thread. The thread mode allows threads to be spread across
267a subtree while still maintaining the common resource domain for them.
268
269Controllers which support thread mode are called threaded controllers.
270The ones which don't are called domain controllers.
271
272Marking a cgroup threaded makes it join the resource domain of its
273parent as a threaded cgroup. The parent may be another threaded
274cgroup whose resource domain is further up in the hierarchy. The root
275of a threaded subtree, that is, the nearest ancestor which is not
276threaded, is called threaded domain or thread root interchangeably and
277serves as the resource domain for the entire subtree.
278
279Inside a threaded subtree, threads of a process can be put in
280different cgroups and are not subject to the no internal process
281constraint - threaded controllers can be enabled on non-leaf cgroups
282whether they have threads in them or not.
283
284As the threaded domain cgroup hosts all the domain resource
285consumptions of the subtree, it is considered to have internal
286resource consumptions whether there are processes in it or not and
287can't have populated child cgroups which aren't threaded. Because the
288root cgroup is not subject to no internal process constraint, it can
289serve both as a threaded domain and a parent to domain cgroups.
290
291The current operation mode or type of the cgroup is shown in the
292"cgroup.type" file which indicates whether the cgroup is a normal
293domain, a domain which is serving as the domain of a threaded subtree,
294or a threaded cgroup.
295
296On creation, a cgroup is always a domain cgroup and can be made
297threaded by writing "threaded" to the "cgroup.type" file. The
298operation is single direction::
299
300 # echo threaded > cgroup.type
301
302Once threaded, the cgroup can't be made a domain again. To enable the
303thread mode, the following conditions must be met.
304
305- As the cgroup will join the parent's resource domain. The parent
306 must either be a valid (threaded) domain or a threaded cgroup.
307
Tejun Heo918a8c22017-07-23 08:18:26 -0400308- When the parent is an unthreaded domain, it must not have any domain
309 controllers enabled or populated domain children. The root is
310 exempt from this requirement.
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400311
312Topology-wise, a cgroup can be in an invalid state. Please consider
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +0100313the following topology::
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400314
315 A (threaded domain) - B (threaded) - C (domain, just created)
316
317C is created as a domain but isn't connected to a parent which can
318host child domains. C can't be used until it is turned into a
319threaded cgroup. "cgroup.type" file will report "domain (invalid)" in
320these cases. Operations which fail due to invalid topology use
321EOPNOTSUPP as the errno.
322
323A domain cgroup is turned into a threaded domain when one of its child
324cgroup becomes threaded or threaded controllers are enabled in the
325"cgroup.subtree_control" file while there are processes in the cgroup.
326A threaded domain reverts to a normal domain when the conditions
327clear.
328
329When read, "cgroup.threads" contains the list of the thread IDs of all
330threads in the cgroup. Except that the operations are per-thread
331instead of per-process, "cgroup.threads" has the same format and
332behaves the same way as "cgroup.procs". While "cgroup.threads" can be
333written to in any cgroup, as it can only move threads inside the same
334threaded domain, its operations are confined inside each threaded
335subtree.
336
337The threaded domain cgroup serves as the resource domain for the whole
338subtree, and, while the threads can be scattered across the subtree,
339all the processes are considered to be in the threaded domain cgroup.
340"cgroup.procs" in a threaded domain cgroup contains the PIDs of all
341processes in the subtree and is not readable in the subtree proper.
342However, "cgroup.procs" can be written to from anywhere in the subtree
343to migrate all threads of the matching process to the cgroup.
344
345Only threaded controllers can be enabled in a threaded subtree. When
346a threaded controller is enabled inside a threaded subtree, it only
347accounts for and controls resource consumptions associated with the
348threads in the cgroup and its descendants. All consumptions which
349aren't tied to a specific thread belong to the threaded domain cgroup.
350
351Because a threaded subtree is exempt from no internal process
352constraint, a threaded controller must be able to handle competition
353between threads in a non-leaf cgroup and its child cgroups. Each
354threaded controller defines how such competitions are handled.
355
356
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300357[Un]populated Notification
358--------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500359
360Each non-root cgroup has a "cgroup.events" file which contains
361"populated" field indicating whether the cgroup's sub-hierarchy has
362live processes in it. Its value is 0 if there is no live process in
363the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1. poll and [id]notify
364events are triggered when the value changes. This can be used, for
365example, to start a clean-up operation after all processes of a given
366sub-hierarchy have exited. The populated state updates and
367notifications are recursive. Consider the following sub-hierarchy
368where the numbers in the parentheses represent the numbers of processes
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300369in each cgroup::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500370
371 A(4) - B(0) - C(1)
372 \ D(0)
373
374A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0. After the one
375process in C exits, B and C's "populated" fields would flip to "0" and
376file modified events will be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of
377both cgroups.
378
379
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300380Controlling Controllers
381-----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500382
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300383Enabling and Disabling
384~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500385
386Each cgroup has a "cgroup.controllers" file which lists all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300387controllers available for the cgroup to enable::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500388
389 # cat cgroup.controllers
390 cpu io memory
391
392No controller is enabled by default. Controllers can be enabled and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300393disabled by writing to the "cgroup.subtree_control" file::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500394
395 # echo "+cpu +memory -io" > cgroup.subtree_control
396
397Only controllers which are listed in "cgroup.controllers" can be
398enabled. When multiple operations are specified as above, either they
399all succeed or fail. If multiple operations on the same controller
400are specified, the last one is effective.
401
402Enabling a controller in a cgroup indicates that the distribution of
403the target resource across its immediate children will be controlled.
404Consider the following sub-hierarchy. The enabled controllers are
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300405listed in parentheses::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500406
407 A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C()
408 \ D()
409
410As A has "cpu" and "memory" enabled, A will control the distribution
411of CPU cycles and memory to its children, in this case, B. As B has
412"memory" enabled but not "CPU", C and D will compete freely on CPU
413cycles but their division of memory available to B will be controlled.
414
415As a controller regulates the distribution of the target resource to
416the cgroup's children, enabling it creates the controller's interface
417files in the child cgroups. In the above example, enabling "cpu" on B
418would create the "cpu." prefixed controller interface files in C and
419D. Likewise, disabling "memory" from B would remove the "memory."
420prefixed controller interface files from C and D. This means that the
421controller interface files - anything which doesn't start with
422"cgroup." are owned by the parent rather than the cgroup itself.
423
424
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300425Top-down Constraint
426~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500427
428Resources are distributed top-down and a cgroup can further distribute
429a resource only if the resource has been distributed to it from the
430parent. This means that all non-root "cgroup.subtree_control" files
431can only contain controllers which are enabled in the parent's
432"cgroup.subtree_control" file. A controller can be enabled only if
433the parent has the controller enabled and a controller can't be
434disabled if one or more children have it enabled.
435
436
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300437No Internal Process Constraint
438~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500439
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400440Non-root cgroups can distribute domain resources to their children
441only when they don't have any processes of their own. In other words,
442only domain cgroups which don't contain any processes can have domain
443controllers enabled in their "cgroup.subtree_control" files.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500444
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400445This guarantees that, when a domain controller is looking at the part
446of the hierarchy which has it enabled, processes are always only on
447the leaves. This rules out situations where child cgroups compete
448against internal processes of the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500449
450The root cgroup is exempt from this restriction. Root contains
451processes and anonymous resource consumption which can't be associated
452with any other cgroups and requires special treatment from most
453controllers. How resource consumption in the root cgroup is governed
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +0100454is up to each controller (for more information on this topic please
455refer to the Non-normative information section in the Controllers
456chapter).
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500457
458Note that the restriction doesn't get in the way if there is no
459enabled controller in the cgroup's "cgroup.subtree_control". This is
460important as otherwise it wouldn't be possible to create children of a
461populated cgroup. To control resource distribution of a cgroup, the
462cgroup must create children and transfer all its processes to the
463children before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control"
464file.
465
466
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300467Delegation
468----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500469
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300470Model of Delegation
471~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500472
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400473A cgroup can be delegated in two ways. First, to a less privileged
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400474user by granting write access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs",
475"cgroup.threads" and "cgroup.subtree_control" files to the user.
476Second, if the "nsdelegate" mount option is set, automatically to a
477cgroup namespace on namespace creation.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500478
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400479Because the resource control interface files in a given directory
480control the distribution of the parent's resources, the delegatee
481shouldn't be allowed to write to them. For the first method, this is
482achieved by not granting access to these files. For the second, the
483kernel rejects writes to all files other than "cgroup.procs" and
484"cgroup.subtree_control" on a namespace root from inside the
485namespace.
486
487The end results are equivalent for both delegation types. Once
488delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory,
489organize processes inside it as it sees fit and further distribute the
490resources it received from the parent. The limits and other settings
491of all resource controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what
492happens in the delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the
493resource restrictions imposed by the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500494
495Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of
496cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however,
497this may be limited explicitly in the future.
498
499
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300500Delegation Containment
501~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500502
503A delegated sub-hierarchy is contained in the sense that processes
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400504can't be moved into or out of the sub-hierarchy by the delegatee.
505
506For delegations to a less privileged user, this is achieved by
507requiring the following conditions for a process with a non-root euid
508to migrate a target process into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
509"cgroup.procs" file.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500510
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500511- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
512
513- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
514 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
515
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500516The above two constraints ensure that while a delegatee may migrate
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500517processes around freely in the delegated sub-hierarchy it can't pull
518in from or push out to outside the sub-hierarchy.
519
520For an example, let's assume cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to
521user U0 who created C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300522all processes under C0 and C1 belong to U0::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500523
524 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00
525 ~ cgroup ~ \ C01
526 ~ hierarchy ~
527 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10
528
529Let's also say U0 wants to write the PID of a process which is
530currently in C10 into "C00/cgroup.procs". U0 has write access to the
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500531file; however, the common ancestor of the source cgroup C10 and the
532destination cgroup C00 is above the points of delegation and U0 would
533not have write access to its "cgroup.procs" files and thus the write
534will be denied with -EACCES.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500535
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400536For delegations to namespaces, containment is achieved by requiring
537that both the source and destination cgroups are reachable from the
538namespace of the process which is attempting the migration. If either
539is not reachable, the migration is rejected with -ENOENT.
540
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500541
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300542Guidelines
543----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500544
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300545Organize Once and Control
546~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500547
548Migrating a process across cgroups is a relatively expensive operation
549and stateful resources such as memory are not moved together with the
550process. This is an explicit design decision as there often exist
551inherent trade-offs between migration and various hot paths in terms
552of synchronization cost.
553
554As such, migrating processes across cgroups frequently as a means to
555apply different resource restrictions is discouraged. A workload
556should be assigned to a cgroup according to the system's logical and
557resource structure once on start-up. Dynamic adjustments to resource
558distribution can be made by changing controller configuration through
559the interface files.
560
561
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300562Avoid Name Collisions
563~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500564
565Interface files for a cgroup and its children cgroups occupy the same
566directory and it is possible to create children cgroups which collide
567with interface files.
568
569All cgroup core interface files are prefixed with "cgroup." and each
570controller's interface files are prefixed with the controller name and
571a dot. A controller's name is composed of lower case alphabets and
572'_'s but never begins with an '_' so it can be used as the prefix
573character for collision avoidance. Also, interface file names won't
574start or end with terms which are often used in categorizing workloads
575such as job, service, slice, unit or workload.
576
577cgroup doesn't do anything to prevent name collisions and it's the
578user's responsibility to avoid them.
579
580
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300581Resource Distribution Models
582============================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500583
584cgroup controllers implement several resource distribution schemes
585depending on the resource type and expected use cases. This section
586describes major schemes in use along with their expected behaviors.
587
588
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300589Weights
590-------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500591
592A parent's resource is distributed by adding up the weights of all
593active children and giving each the fraction matching the ratio of its
594weight against the sum. As only children which can make use of the
595resource at the moment participate in the distribution, this is
596work-conserving. Due to the dynamic nature, this model is usually
597used for stateless resources.
598
599All weights are in the range [1, 10000] with the default at 100. This
600allows symmetric multiplicative biases in both directions at fine
601enough granularity while staying in the intuitive range.
602
603As long as the weight is in range, all configuration combinations are
604valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
605process migrations.
606
607"cpu.weight" proportionally distributes CPU cycles to active children
608and is an example of this type.
609
610
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300611Limits
612------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500613
614A child can only consume upto the configured amount of the resource.
615Limits can be over-committed - the sum of the limits of children can
616exceed the amount of resource available to the parent.
617
618Limits are in the range [0, max] and defaults to "max", which is noop.
619
620As limits can be over-committed, all configuration combinations are
621valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
622process migrations.
623
624"io.max" limits the maximum BPS and/or IOPS that a cgroup can consume
625on an IO device and is an example of this type.
626
627
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300628Protections
629-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500630
Chris Down9783aa92019-10-06 17:58:32 -0700631A cgroup is protected upto the configured amount of the resource
632as long as the usages of all its ancestors are under their
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500633protected levels. Protections can be hard guarantees or best effort
634soft boundaries. Protections can also be over-committed in which case
635only upto the amount available to the parent is protected among
636children.
637
638Protections are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is
639noop.
640
641As protections can be over-committed, all configuration combinations
642are valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
643process migrations.
644
645"memory.low" implements best-effort memory protection and is an
646example of this type.
647
648
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300649Allocations
650-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500651
652A cgroup is exclusively allocated a certain amount of a finite
653resource. Allocations can't be over-committed - the sum of the
654allocations of children can not exceed the amount of resource
655available to the parent.
656
657Allocations are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is no
658resource.
659
660As allocations can't be over-committed, some configuration
661combinations are invalid and should be rejected. Also, if the
662resource is mandatory for execution of processes, process migrations
663may be rejected.
664
665"cpu.rt.max" hard-allocates realtime slices and is an example of this
666type.
667
668
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300669Interface Files
670===============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500671
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300672Format
673------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500674
675All interface files should be in one of the following formats whenever
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300676possible::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500677
678 New-line separated values
679 (when only one value can be written at once)
680
681 VAL0\n
682 VAL1\n
683 ...
684
685 Space separated values
686 (when read-only or multiple values can be written at once)
687
688 VAL0 VAL1 ...\n
689
690 Flat keyed
691
692 KEY0 VAL0\n
693 KEY1 VAL1\n
694 ...
695
696 Nested keyed
697
698 KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01...
699 KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11...
700 ...
701
702For a writable file, the format for writing should generally match
703reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or
704implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases.
705
706For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key
707can be written at a time. For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs
708may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified.
709
710
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300711Conventions
712-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500713
714- Settings for a single feature should be contained in a single file.
715
716- The root cgroup should be exempt from resource control and thus
Boris Burkov936f2a72020-05-27 14:43:19 -0700717 shouldn't have resource control interface files.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500718
Tejun Heoa5e112e2019-05-13 12:37:17 -0700719- The default time unit is microseconds. If a different unit is ever
720 used, an explicit unit suffix must be present.
721
722- A parts-per quantity should use a percentage decimal with at least
723 two digit fractional part - e.g. 13.40.
724
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500725- If a controller implements weight based resource distribution, its
726 interface file should be named "weight" and have the range [1,
727 10000] with 100 as the default. The values are chosen to allow
728 enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it
729 intuitive (the default is 100%).
730
731- If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or
732 limit, the interface files should be named "min" and "max"
733 respectively. If a controller implements best effort resource
734 guarantee and/or limit, the interface files should be named "low"
735 and "high" respectively.
736
737 In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be
738 used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing.
739
740- If a setting has a configurable default value and keyed specific
741 overrides, the default entry should be keyed with "default" and
742 appear as the first entry in the file.
743
744 The default value can be updated by writing either "default $VAL" or
745 "$VAL".
746
747 When writing to update a specific override, "default" can be used as
748 the value to indicate removal of the override. Override entries
749 with "default" as the value must not appear when read.
750
751 For example, a setting which is keyed by major:minor device numbers
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300752 with integer values may look like the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500753
754 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
755 default 150
756 8:0 300
757
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300758 The default value can be updated by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500759
760 # echo 125 > cgroup-example-interface-file
761
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300762 or::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500763
764 # echo "default 125" > cgroup-example-interface-file
765
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300766 An override can be set by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500767
768 # echo "8:16 170" > cgroup-example-interface-file
769
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300770 and cleared by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500771
772 # echo "8:0 default" > cgroup-example-interface-file
773 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
774 default 125
775 8:16 170
776
777- For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file
778 "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs.
779 Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be
780 generated on the file.
781
782
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300783Core Interface Files
784--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500785
786All cgroup core files are prefixed with "cgroup."
787
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400788 cgroup.type
789
790 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
791 cgroups.
792
793 When read, it indicates the current type of the cgroup, which
794 can be one of the following values.
795
796 - "domain" : A normal valid domain cgroup.
797
798 - "domain threaded" : A threaded domain cgroup which is
799 serving as the root of a threaded subtree.
800
801 - "domain invalid" : A cgroup which is in an invalid state.
802 It can't be populated or have controllers enabled. It may
803 be allowed to become a threaded cgroup.
804
805 - "threaded" : A threaded cgroup which is a member of a
806 threaded subtree.
807
808 A cgroup can be turned into a threaded cgroup by writing
809 "threaded" to this file.
810
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500811 cgroup.procs
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500812 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
813 all cgroups.
814
815 When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which belong to
816 the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
817 same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved
818 to another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while
819 reading.
820
821 A PID can be written to migrate the process associated with
822 the PID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
823 following conditions.
824
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500825 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
826
827 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
828 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
829
830 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
831 should be granted along with the containing directory.
832
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400833 In a threaded cgroup, reading this file fails with EOPNOTSUPP
834 as all the processes belong to the thread root. Writing is
835 supported and moves every thread of the process to the cgroup.
836
837 cgroup.threads
838 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
839 all cgroups.
840
841 When read, it lists the TIDs of all threads which belong to
842 the cgroup one-per-line. The TIDs are not ordered and the
843 same TID may show up more than once if the thread got moved to
844 another cgroup and then back or the TID got recycled while
845 reading.
846
847 A TID can be written to migrate the thread associated with the
848 TID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
849 following conditions.
850
851 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.threads" file.
852
853 - The cgroup that the thread is currently in must be in the
854 same resource domain as the destination cgroup.
855
856 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
857 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
858
859 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
860 should be granted along with the containing directory.
861
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500862 cgroup.controllers
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500863 A read-only space separated values file which exists on all
864 cgroups.
865
866 It shows space separated list of all controllers available to
867 the cgroup. The controllers are not ordered.
868
869 cgroup.subtree_control
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500870 A read-write space separated values file which exists on all
871 cgroups. Starts out empty.
872
873 When read, it shows space separated list of the controllers
874 which are enabled to control resource distribution from the
875 cgroup to its children.
876
877 Space separated list of controllers prefixed with '+' or '-'
878 can be written to enable or disable controllers. A controller
879 name prefixed with '+' enables the controller and '-'
880 disables. If a controller appears more than once on the list,
881 the last one is effective. When multiple enable and disable
882 operations are specified, either all succeed or all fail.
883
884 cgroup.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500885 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
886 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
887 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
888 modified event.
889
890 populated
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500891 1 if the cgroup or its descendants contains any live
892 processes; otherwise, 0.
Roman Gushchinafe471e2019-04-19 10:03:09 -0700893 frozen
894 1 if the cgroup is frozen; otherwise, 0.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500895
Roman Gushchin1a926e02017-07-28 18:28:44 +0100896 cgroup.max.descendants
897 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
898
899 Maximum allowed number of descent cgroups.
900 If the actual number of descendants is equal or larger,
901 an attempt to create a new cgroup in the hierarchy will fail.
902
903 cgroup.max.depth
904 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
905
906 Maximum allowed descent depth below the current cgroup.
907 If the actual descent depth is equal or larger,
908 an attempt to create a new child cgroup will fail.
909
Roman Gushchinec392252017-08-02 17:55:31 +0100910 cgroup.stat
911 A read-only flat-keyed file with the following entries:
912
913 nr_descendants
914 Total number of visible descendant cgroups.
915
916 nr_dying_descendants
917 Total number of dying descendant cgroups. A cgroup becomes
918 dying after being deleted by a user. The cgroup will remain
919 in dying state for some time undefined time (which can depend
920 on system load) before being completely destroyed.
921
922 A process can't enter a dying cgroup under any circumstances,
923 a dying cgroup can't revive.
924
925 A dying cgroup can consume system resources not exceeding
926 limits, which were active at the moment of cgroup deletion.
927
Roman Gushchinafe471e2019-04-19 10:03:09 -0700928 cgroup.freeze
929 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
930 Allowed values are "0" and "1". The default is "0".
931
932 Writing "1" to the file causes freezing of the cgroup and all
933 descendant cgroups. This means that all belonging processes will
934 be stopped and will not run until the cgroup will be explicitly
935 unfrozen. Freezing of the cgroup may take some time; when this action
936 is completed, the "frozen" value in the cgroup.events control file
937 will be updated to "1" and the corresponding notification will be
938 issued.
939
940 A cgroup can be frozen either by its own settings, or by settings
941 of any ancestor cgroups. If any of ancestor cgroups is frozen, the
942 cgroup will remain frozen.
943
944 Processes in the frozen cgroup can be killed by a fatal signal.
945 They also can enter and leave a frozen cgroup: either by an explicit
946 move by a user, or if freezing of the cgroup races with fork().
947 If a process is moved to a frozen cgroup, it stops. If a process is
948 moved out of a frozen cgroup, it becomes running.
949
950 Frozen status of a cgroup doesn't affect any cgroup tree operations:
951 it's possible to delete a frozen (and empty) cgroup, as well as
952 create new sub-cgroups.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500953
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300954Controllers
955===========
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500956
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300957CPU
958---
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500959
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500960The "cpu" controllers regulates distribution of CPU cycles. This
961controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for
962normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for
963realtime scheduling policy.
964
Patrick Bellasi2480c092019-08-22 14:28:06 +0100965In all the above models, cycles distribution is defined only on a temporal
966base and it does not account for the frequency at which tasks are executed.
967The (optional) utilization clamping support allows to hint the schedutil
968cpufreq governor about the minimum desired frequency which should always be
969provided by a CPU, as well as the maximum desired frequency, which should not
970be exceeded by a CPU.
971
Tejun Heoc2f31b72017-12-05 09:10:17 -0800972WARNING: cgroup2 doesn't yet support control of realtime processes and
973the cpu controller can only be enabled when all RT processes are in
974the root cgroup. Be aware that system management software may already
975have placed RT processes into nonroot cgroups during the system boot
976process, and these processes may need to be moved to the root cgroup
977before the cpu controller can be enabled.
978
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500979
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300980CPU Interface Files
981~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500982
983All time durations are in microseconds.
984
985 cpu.stat
Boris Burkov936f2a72020-05-27 14:43:19 -0700986 A read-only flat-keyed file.
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700987 This file exists whether the controller is enabled or not.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500988
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700989 It always reports the following three stats:
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500990
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300991 - usage_usec
992 - user_usec
993 - system_usec
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700994
995 and the following three when the controller is enabled:
996
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300997 - nr_periods
998 - nr_throttled
999 - throttled_usec
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001000
1001 cpu.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001002 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1003 cgroups. The default is "100".
1004
1005 The weight in the range [1, 10000].
1006
Tejun Heo0d593632017-09-25 09:00:19 -07001007 cpu.weight.nice
1008 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1009 cgroups. The default is "0".
1010
1011 The nice value is in the range [-20, 19].
1012
1013 This interface file is an alternative interface for
1014 "cpu.weight" and allows reading and setting weight using the
1015 same values used by nice(2). Because the range is smaller and
1016 granularity is coarser for the nice values, the read value is
1017 the closest approximation of the current weight.
1018
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001019 cpu.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001020 A read-write two value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1021 The default is "max 100000".
1022
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001023 The maximum bandwidth limit. It's in the following format::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001024
1025 $MAX $PERIOD
1026
1027 which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each
1028 $PERIOD duration. "max" for $MAX indicates no limit. If only
1029 one number is written, $MAX is updated.
1030
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001031 cpu.pressure
1032 A read-only nested-key file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1033
1034 Shows pressure stall information for CPU. See
Jakub Kicinski373e8ff2020-02-27 16:06:53 -08001035 :ref:`Documentation/accounting/psi.rst <psi>` for details.
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001036
Patrick Bellasi2480c092019-08-22 14:28:06 +01001037 cpu.uclamp.min
1038 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1039 The default is "0", i.e. no utilization boosting.
1040
1041 The requested minimum utilization (protection) as a percentage
1042 rational number, e.g. 12.34 for 12.34%.
1043
1044 This interface allows reading and setting minimum utilization clamp
1045 values similar to the sched_setattr(2). This minimum utilization
1046 value is used to clamp the task specific minimum utilization clamp.
1047
1048 The requested minimum utilization (protection) is always capped by
1049 the current value for the maximum utilization (limit), i.e.
1050 `cpu.uclamp.max`.
1051
1052 cpu.uclamp.max
1053 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1054 The default is "max". i.e. no utilization capping
1055
1056 The requested maximum utilization (limit) as a percentage rational
1057 number, e.g. 98.76 for 98.76%.
1058
1059 This interface allows reading and setting maximum utilization clamp
1060 values similar to the sched_setattr(2). This maximum utilization
1061 value is used to clamp the task specific maximum utilization clamp.
1062
1063
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001064
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001065Memory
1066------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001067
1068The "memory" controller regulates distribution of memory. Memory is
1069stateful and implements both limit and protection models. Due to the
1070intertwining between memory usage and reclaim pressure and the
1071stateful nature of memory, the distribution model is relatively
1072complex.
1073
1074While not completely water-tight, all major memory usages by a given
1075cgroup are tracked so that the total memory consumption can be
1076accounted and controlled to a reasonable extent. Currently, the
1077following types of memory usages are tracked.
1078
1079- Userland memory - page cache and anonymous memory.
1080
1081- Kernel data structures such as dentries and inodes.
1082
1083- TCP socket buffers.
1084
1085The above list may expand in the future for better coverage.
1086
1087
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001088Memory Interface Files
1089~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001090
1091All memory amounts are in bytes. If a value which is not aligned to
1092PAGE_SIZE is written, the value may be rounded up to the closest
1093PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
1094
1095 memory.current
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001096 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
1097 cgroups.
1098
1099 The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup
1100 and its descendants.
1101
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001102 memory.min
1103 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1104 cgroups. The default is "0".
1105
1106 Hard memory protection. If the memory usage of a cgroup
1107 is within its effective min boundary, the cgroup's memory
1108 won't be reclaimed under any conditions. If there is no
1109 unprotected reclaimable memory available, OOM killer
Chris Down9783aa92019-10-06 17:58:32 -07001110 is invoked. Above the effective min boundary (or
1111 effective low boundary if it is higher), pages are reclaimed
1112 proportionally to the overage, reducing reclaim pressure for
1113 smaller overages.
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001114
Jakub Kicinskid0c3bac2020-02-27 16:06:49 -08001115 Effective min boundary is limited by memory.min values of
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001116 all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.min overcommitment
1117 (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
1118 than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
1119 the part of parent's protection proportional to its
1120 actual memory usage below memory.min.
1121
1122 Putting more memory than generally available under this
1123 protection is discouraged and may lead to constant OOMs.
1124
1125 If a memory cgroup is not populated with processes,
1126 its memory.min is ignored.
1127
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001128 memory.low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001129 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1130 cgroups. The default is "0".
1131
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001132 Best-effort memory protection. If the memory usage of a
1133 cgroup is within its effective low boundary, the cgroup's
Jon Haslam6ee0fac2019-09-25 12:56:04 -07001134 memory won't be reclaimed unless there is no reclaimable
1135 memory available in unprotected cgroups.
Jonathan Corbet822bbba2019-10-29 04:43:29 -06001136 Above the effective low boundary (or
Chris Down9783aa92019-10-06 17:58:32 -07001137 effective min boundary if it is higher), pages are reclaimed
1138 proportionally to the overage, reducing reclaim pressure for
1139 smaller overages.
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001140
1141 Effective low boundary is limited by memory.low values of
1142 all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.low overcommitment
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001143 (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001144 than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001145 the part of parent's protection proportional to its
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001146 actual memory usage below memory.low.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001147
1148 Putting more memory than generally available under this
1149 protection is discouraged.
1150
1151 memory.high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001152 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1153 cgroups. The default is "max".
1154
1155 Memory usage throttle limit. This is the main mechanism to
1156 control memory usage of a cgroup. If a cgroup's usage goes
1157 over the high boundary, the processes of the cgroup are
1158 throttled and put under heavy reclaim pressure.
1159
1160 Going over the high limit never invokes the OOM killer and
1161 under extreme conditions the limit may be breached.
1162
1163 memory.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001164 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1165 cgroups. The default is "max".
1166
1167 Memory usage hard limit. This is the final protection
1168 mechanism. If a cgroup's memory usage reaches this limit and
1169 can't be reduced, the OOM killer is invoked in the cgroup.
1170 Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit
1171 temporarily.
1172
1173 This is the ultimate protection mechanism. As long as the
1174 high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's
1175 utility is limited to providing the final safety net.
1176
Roman Gushchin3d8b38e2018-08-21 21:53:54 -07001177 memory.oom.group
1178 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1179 cgroups. The default value is "0".
1180
1181 Determines whether the cgroup should be treated as
1182 an indivisible workload by the OOM killer. If set,
1183 all tasks belonging to the cgroup or to its descendants
1184 (if the memory cgroup is not a leaf cgroup) are killed
1185 together or not at all. This can be used to avoid
1186 partial kills to guarantee workload integrity.
1187
1188 Tasks with the OOM protection (oom_score_adj set to -1000)
1189 are treated as an exception and are never killed.
1190
1191 If the OOM killer is invoked in a cgroup, it's not going
1192 to kill any tasks outside of this cgroup, regardless
1193 memory.oom.group values of ancestor cgroups.
1194
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001195 memory.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001196 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1197 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
1198 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
1199 modified event.
1200
Shakeel Butt1e577f92019-07-11 20:55:55 -07001201 Note that all fields in this file are hierarchical and the
1202 file modified event can be generated due to an event down the
1203 hierarchy. For for the local events at the cgroup level see
1204 memory.events.local.
1205
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001206 low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001207 The number of times the cgroup is reclaimed due to
1208 high memory pressure even though its usage is under
1209 the low boundary. This usually indicates that the low
1210 boundary is over-committed.
1211
1212 high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001213 The number of times processes of the cgroup are
1214 throttled and routed to perform direct memory reclaim
1215 because the high memory boundary was exceeded. For a
1216 cgroup whose memory usage is capped by the high limit
1217 rather than global memory pressure, this event's
1218 occurrences are expected.
1219
1220 max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001221 The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was
1222 about to go over the max boundary. If direct reclaim
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001223 fails to bring it down, the cgroup goes to OOM state.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001224
1225 oom
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001226 The number of time the cgroup's memory usage was
1227 reached the limit and allocation was about to fail.
1228
1229 Depending on context result could be invocation of OOM
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001230 killer and retrying allocation or failing allocation.
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001231
1232 Failed allocation in its turn could be returned into
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001233 userspace as -ENOMEM or silently ignored in cases like
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001234 disk readahead. For now OOM in memory cgroup kills
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001235 tasks iff shortage has happened inside page fault.
1236
Roman Gushchin7a1adfd2018-10-26 15:09:48 -07001237 This event is not raised if the OOM killer is not
1238 considered as an option, e.g. for failed high-order
1239 allocations.
1240
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001241 oom_kill
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001242 The number of processes belonging to this cgroup
1243 killed by any kind of OOM killer.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001244
Shakeel Butt1e577f92019-07-11 20:55:55 -07001245 memory.events.local
1246 Similar to memory.events but the fields in the file are local
1247 to the cgroup i.e. not hierarchical. The file modified event
1248 generated on this file reflects only the local events.
1249
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001250 memory.stat
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001251 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1252
1253 This breaks down the cgroup's memory footprint into different
1254 types of memory, type-specific details, and other information
1255 on the state and past events of the memory management system.
1256
1257 All memory amounts are in bytes.
1258
1259 The entries are ordered to be human readable, and new entries
1260 can show up in the middle. Don't rely on items remaining in a
1261 fixed position; use the keys to look up specific values!
1262
1263 anon
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001264 Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings such as
1265 brk(), sbrk(), and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS)
1266
1267 file
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001268 Amount of memory used to cache filesystem data,
1269 including tmpfs and shared memory.
1270
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001271 kernel_stack
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001272 Amount of memory allocated to kernel stacks.
1273
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001274 slab
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001275 Amount of memory used for storing in-kernel data
1276 structures.
1277
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001278 sock
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001279 Amount of memory used in network transmission buffers
1280
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001281 shmem
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001282 Amount of cached filesystem data that is swap-backed,
1283 such as tmpfs, shm segments, shared anonymous mmap()s
1284
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001285 file_mapped
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001286 Amount of cached filesystem data mapped with mmap()
1287
1288 file_dirty
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001289 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified but
1290 not yet written back to disk
1291
1292 file_writeback
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001293 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified and
1294 is currently being written back to disk
1295
Chris Down1ff9e6e2019-03-05 15:48:09 -08001296 anon_thp
1297 Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings backed by
1298 transparent hugepages
1299
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001300 inactive_anon, active_anon, inactive_file, active_file, unevictable
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001301 Amount of memory, swap-backed and filesystem-backed,
1302 on the internal memory management lists used by the
Chris Down1603c8d2019-11-30 17:50:19 -08001303 page reclaim algorithm.
1304
1305 As these represent internal list state (eg. shmem pages are on anon
1306 memory management lists), inactive_foo + active_foo may not be equal to
1307 the value for the foo counter, since the foo counter is type-based, not
1308 list-based.
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001309
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001310 slab_reclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001311 Part of "slab" that might be reclaimed, such as
1312 dentries and inodes.
1313
1314 slab_unreclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001315 Part of "slab" that cannot be reclaimed on memory
1316 pressure.
1317
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001318 pgfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001319 Total number of page faults incurred
1320
1321 pgmajfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001322 Number of major page faults incurred
1323
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -07001324 workingset_refault
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -07001325 Number of refaults of previously evicted pages
1326
1327 workingset_activate
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -07001328 Number of refaulted pages that were immediately activated
1329
1330 workingset_nodereclaim
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -07001331 Number of times a shadow node has been reclaimed
1332
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001333 pgrefill
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001334 Amount of scanned pages (in an active LRU list)
1335
1336 pgscan
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001337 Amount of scanned pages (in an inactive LRU list)
1338
1339 pgsteal
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001340 Amount of reclaimed pages
1341
1342 pgactivate
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001343 Amount of pages moved to the active LRU list
1344
1345 pgdeactivate
Chris Down03189e82019-11-11 14:44:38 +00001346 Amount of pages moved to the inactive LRU list
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001347
1348 pglazyfree
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001349 Amount of pages postponed to be freed under memory pressure
1350
1351 pglazyfreed
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001352 Amount of reclaimed lazyfree pages
1353
Chris Down1ff9e6e2019-03-05 15:48:09 -08001354 thp_fault_alloc
Chris Down1ff9e6e2019-03-05 15:48:09 -08001355 Number of transparent hugepages which were allocated to satisfy
1356 a page fault, including COW faults. This counter is not present
1357 when CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is not set.
1358
1359 thp_collapse_alloc
Chris Down1ff9e6e2019-03-05 15:48:09 -08001360 Number of transparent hugepages which were allocated to allow
1361 collapsing an existing range of pages. This counter is not
1362 present when CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is not set.
1363
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001364 memory.swap.current
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001365 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
1366 cgroups.
1367
1368 The total amount of swap currently being used by the cgroup
1369 and its descendants.
1370
1371 memory.swap.max
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001372 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1373 cgroups. The default is "max".
1374
1375 Swap usage hard limit. If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001376 limit, anonymous memory of the cgroup will not be swapped out.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001377
Tejun Heof3a53a32018-06-07 17:05:35 -07001378 memory.swap.events
1379 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1380 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
1381 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
1382 modified event.
1383
1384 max
1385 The number of times the cgroup's swap usage was about
1386 to go over the max boundary and swap allocation
1387 failed.
1388
1389 fail
1390 The number of times swap allocation failed either
1391 because of running out of swap system-wide or max
1392 limit.
1393
Tejun Heobe091022018-06-07 17:09:21 -07001394 When reduced under the current usage, the existing swap
1395 entries are reclaimed gradually and the swap usage may stay
1396 higher than the limit for an extended period of time. This
1397 reduces the impact on the workload and memory management.
1398
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001399 memory.pressure
1400 A read-only nested-key file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1401
1402 Shows pressure stall information for memory. See
Jakub Kicinski373e8ff2020-02-27 16:06:53 -08001403 :ref:`Documentation/accounting/psi.rst <psi>` for details.
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001404
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001405
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001406Usage Guidelines
1407~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001408
1409"memory.high" is the main mechanism to control memory usage.
1410Over-committing on high limit (sum of high limits > available memory)
1411and letting global memory pressure to distribute memory according to
1412usage is a viable strategy.
1413
1414Because breach of the high limit doesn't trigger the OOM killer but
1415throttles the offending cgroup, a management agent has ample
1416opportunities to monitor and take appropriate actions such as granting
1417more memory or terminating the workload.
1418
1419Determining whether a cgroup has enough memory is not trivial as
1420memory usage doesn't indicate whether the workload can benefit from
1421more memory. For example, a workload which writes data received from
1422network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
1423performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
1424pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
1425memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
1426memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
1427implemented yet.
1428
1429
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001430Memory Ownership
1431~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001432
1433A memory area is charged to the cgroup which instantiated it and stays
1434charged to the cgroup until the area is released. Migrating a process
1435to a different cgroup doesn't move the memory usages that it
1436instantiated while in the previous cgroup to the new cgroup.
1437
1438A memory area may be used by processes belonging to different cgroups.
1439To which cgroup the area will be charged is in-deterministic; however,
1440over time, the memory area is likely to end up in a cgroup which has
1441enough memory allowance to avoid high reclaim pressure.
1442
1443If a cgroup sweeps a considerable amount of memory which is expected
1444to be accessed repeatedly by other cgroups, it may make sense to use
1445POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED to relinquish the ownership of memory areas
1446belonging to the affected files to ensure correct memory ownership.
1447
1448
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001449IO
1450--
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001451
1452The "io" controller regulates the distribution of IO resources. This
1453controller implements both weight based and absolute bandwidth or IOPS
1454limit distribution; however, weight based distribution is available
1455only if cfq-iosched is in use and neither scheme is available for
1456blk-mq devices.
1457
1458
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001459IO Interface Files
1460~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001461
1462 io.stat
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001463 A read-only nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1464 cgroups.
1465
1466 Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered.
1467 The following nested keys are defined.
1468
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001469 ====== =====================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001470 rbytes Bytes read
1471 wbytes Bytes written
1472 rios Number of read IOs
1473 wios Number of write IOs
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001474 dbytes Bytes discarded
1475 dios Number of discard IOs
1476 ====== =====================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001477
Jakub Kicinski69654d32020-02-27 16:06:51 -08001478 An example read output follows::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001479
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001480 8:16 rbytes=1459200 wbytes=314773504 rios=192 wios=353 dbytes=0 dios=0
1481 8:0 rbytes=90430464 wbytes=299008000 rios=8950 wios=1252 dbytes=50331648 dios=3021
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001482
Tejun Heo7caa4712019-08-28 15:05:58 -07001483 io.cost.qos
1484 A read-write nested-keyed file with exists only on the root
1485 cgroup.
1486
1487 This file configures the Quality of Service of the IO cost
1488 model based controller (CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_IOCOST) which
1489 currently implements "io.weight" proportional control. Lines
1490 are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The
1491 line for a given device is populated on the first write for
1492 the device on "io.cost.qos" or "io.cost.model". The following
1493 nested keys are defined.
1494
1495 ====== =====================================
1496 enable Weight-based control enable
1497 ctrl "auto" or "user"
1498 rpct Read latency percentile [0, 100]
1499 rlat Read latency threshold
1500 wpct Write latency percentile [0, 100]
1501 wlat Write latency threshold
1502 min Minimum scaling percentage [1, 10000]
1503 max Maximum scaling percentage [1, 10000]
1504 ====== =====================================
1505
1506 The controller is disabled by default and can be enabled by
1507 setting "enable" to 1. "rpct" and "wpct" parameters default
1508 to zero and the controller uses internal device saturation
1509 state to adjust the overall IO rate between "min" and "max".
1510
1511 When a better control quality is needed, latency QoS
1512 parameters can be configured. For example::
1513
1514 8:16 enable=1 ctrl=auto rpct=95.00 rlat=75000 wpct=95.00 wlat=150000 min=50.00 max=150.0
1515
1516 shows that on sdb, the controller is enabled, will consider
1517 the device saturated if the 95th percentile of read completion
1518 latencies is above 75ms or write 150ms, and adjust the overall
1519 IO issue rate between 50% and 150% accordingly.
1520
1521 The lower the saturation point, the better the latency QoS at
1522 the cost of aggregate bandwidth. The narrower the allowed
1523 adjustment range between "min" and "max", the more conformant
1524 to the cost model the IO behavior. Note that the IO issue
1525 base rate may be far off from 100% and setting "min" and "max"
1526 blindly can lead to a significant loss of device capacity or
1527 control quality. "min" and "max" are useful for regulating
1528 devices which show wide temporary behavior changes - e.g. a
1529 ssd which accepts writes at the line speed for a while and
1530 then completely stalls for multiple seconds.
1531
1532 When "ctrl" is "auto", the parameters are controlled by the
1533 kernel and may change automatically. Setting "ctrl" to "user"
1534 or setting any of the percentile and latency parameters puts
1535 it into "user" mode and disables the automatic changes. The
1536 automatic mode can be restored by setting "ctrl" to "auto".
1537
1538 io.cost.model
1539 A read-write nested-keyed file with exists only on the root
1540 cgroup.
1541
1542 This file configures the cost model of the IO cost model based
1543 controller (CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_IOCOST) which currently
1544 implements "io.weight" proportional control. Lines are keyed
1545 by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The line for a
1546 given device is populated on the first write for the device on
1547 "io.cost.qos" or "io.cost.model". The following nested keys
1548 are defined.
1549
1550 ===== ================================
1551 ctrl "auto" or "user"
1552 model The cost model in use - "linear"
1553 ===== ================================
1554
1555 When "ctrl" is "auto", the kernel may change all parameters
1556 dynamically. When "ctrl" is set to "user" or any other
1557 parameters are written to, "ctrl" become "user" and the
1558 automatic changes are disabled.
1559
1560 When "model" is "linear", the following model parameters are
1561 defined.
1562
1563 ============= ========================================
1564 [r|w]bps The maximum sequential IO throughput
1565 [r|w]seqiops The maximum 4k sequential IOs per second
1566 [r|w]randiops The maximum 4k random IOs per second
1567 ============= ========================================
1568
1569 From the above, the builtin linear model determines the base
1570 costs of a sequential and random IO and the cost coefficient
1571 for the IO size. While simple, this model can cover most
1572 common device classes acceptably.
1573
1574 The IO cost model isn't expected to be accurate in absolute
1575 sense and is scaled to the device behavior dynamically.
1576
Tejun Heo8504dea2019-08-28 15:06:00 -07001577 If needed, tools/cgroup/iocost_coef_gen.py can be used to
1578 generate device-specific coefficients.
1579
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001580 io.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001581 A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1582 The default is "default 100".
1583
1584 The first line is the default weight applied to devices
1585 without specific override. The rest are overrides keyed by
1586 $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The weights are in
1587 the range [1, 10000] and specifies the relative amount IO time
1588 the cgroup can use in relation to its siblings.
1589
1590 The default weight can be updated by writing either "default
1591 $WEIGHT" or simply "$WEIGHT". Overrides can be set by writing
1592 "$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" and unset by writing "$MAJ:$MIN default".
1593
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001594 An example read output follows::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001595
1596 default 100
1597 8:16 200
1598 8:0 50
1599
1600 io.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001601 A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1602 cgroups.
1603
1604 BPS and IOPS based IO limit. Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN
1605 device numbers and not ordered. The following nested keys are
1606 defined.
1607
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001608 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001609 rbps Max read bytes per second
1610 wbps Max write bytes per second
1611 riops Max read IO operations per second
1612 wiops Max write IO operations per second
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001613 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001614
1615 When writing, any number of nested key-value pairs can be
1616 specified in any order. "max" can be specified as the value
1617 to remove a specific limit. If the same key is specified
1618 multiple times, the outcome is undefined.
1619
1620 BPS and IOPS are measured in each IO direction and IOs are
1621 delayed if limit is reached. Temporary bursts are allowed.
1622
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001623 Setting read limit at 2M BPS and write at 120 IOPS for 8:16::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001624
1625 echo "8:16 rbps=2097152 wiops=120" > io.max
1626
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001627 Reading returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001628
1629 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=120
1630
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001631 Write IOPS limit can be removed by writing the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001632
1633 echo "8:16 wiops=max" > io.max
1634
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001635 Reading now returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001636
1637 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=max
1638
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001639 io.pressure
1640 A read-only nested-key file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1641
1642 Shows pressure stall information for IO. See
Jakub Kicinski373e8ff2020-02-27 16:06:53 -08001643 :ref:`Documentation/accounting/psi.rst <psi>` for details.
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001644
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001645
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001646Writeback
1647~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001648
1649Page cache is dirtied through buffered writes and shared mmaps and
1650written asynchronously to the backing filesystem by the writeback
1651mechanism. Writeback sits between the memory and IO domains and
1652regulates the proportion of dirty memory by balancing dirtying and
1653write IOs.
1654
1655The io controller, in conjunction with the memory controller,
1656implements control of page cache writeback IOs. The memory controller
1657defines the memory domain that dirty memory ratio is calculated and
1658maintained for and the io controller defines the io domain which
1659writes out dirty pages for the memory domain. Both system-wide and
1660per-cgroup dirty memory states are examined and the more restrictive
1661of the two is enforced.
1662
1663cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying
1664filesystem. Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4
1665and btrfs. On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are attributed to
1666the root cgroup.
1667
1668There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management
1669which affects how cgroup ownership is tracked. Memory is tracked per
1670page while writeback per inode. For the purpose of writeback, an
1671inode is assigned to a cgroup and all IO requests to write dirty pages
1672from the inode are attributed to that cgroup.
1673
1674As cgroup ownership for memory is tracked per page, there can be pages
1675which are associated with different cgroups than the one the inode is
1676associated with. These are called foreign pages. The writeback
1677constantly keeps track of foreign pages and, if a particular foreign
1678cgroup becomes the majority over a certain period of time, switches
1679the ownership of the inode to that cgroup.
1680
1681While this model is enough for most use cases where a given inode is
1682mostly dirtied by a single cgroup even when the main writing cgroup
1683changes over time, use cases where multiple cgroups write to a single
1684inode simultaneously are not supported well. In such circumstances, a
1685significant portion of IOs are likely to be attributed incorrectly.
1686As memory controller assigns page ownership on the first use and
1687doesn't update it until the page is released, even if writeback
1688strictly follows page ownership, multiple cgroups dirtying overlapping
1689areas wouldn't work as expected. It's recommended to avoid such usage
1690patterns.
1691
1692The sysctl knobs which affect writeback behavior are applied to cgroup
1693writeback as follows.
1694
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001695 vm.dirty_background_ratio, vm.dirty_ratio
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001696 These ratios apply the same to cgroup writeback with the
1697 amount of available memory capped by limits imposed by the
1698 memory controller and system-wide clean memory.
1699
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001700 vm.dirty_background_bytes, vm.dirty_bytes
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001701 For cgroup writeback, this is calculated into ratio against
1702 total available memory and applied the same way as
1703 vm.dirty[_background]_ratio.
1704
1705
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001706IO Latency
1707~~~~~~~~~~
1708
1709This is a cgroup v2 controller for IO workload protection. You provide a group
1710with a latency target, and if the average latency exceeds that target the
1711controller will throttle any peers that have a lower latency target than the
1712protected workload.
1713
1714The limits are only applied at the peer level in the hierarchy. This means that
1715in the diagram below, only groups A, B, and C will influence each other, and
Randy Dunlap34b43442019-02-06 16:59:00 -08001716groups D and F will influence each other. Group G will influence nobody::
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001717
1718 [root]
1719 / | \
1720 A B C
1721 / \ |
1722 D F G
1723
1724
1725So the ideal way to configure this is to set io.latency in groups A, B, and C.
1726Generally you do not want to set a value lower than the latency your device
1727supports. Experiment to find the value that works best for your workload.
1728Start at higher than the expected latency for your device and watch the
Dennis Zhou (Facebook)c480bcf2018-08-01 23:15:41 -07001729avg_lat value in io.stat for your workload group to get an idea of the
1730latency you see during normal operation. Use the avg_lat value as a basis for
1731your real setting, setting at 10-15% higher than the value in io.stat.
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001732
1733How IO Latency Throttling Works
1734~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1735
1736io.latency is work conserving; so as long as everybody is meeting their latency
1737target the controller doesn't do anything. Once a group starts missing its
1738target it begins throttling any peer group that has a higher target than itself.
1739This throttling takes 2 forms:
1740
1741- Queue depth throttling. This is the number of outstanding IO's a group is
1742 allowed to have. We will clamp down relatively quickly, starting at no limit
1743 and going all the way down to 1 IO at a time.
1744
1745- Artificial delay induction. There are certain types of IO that cannot be
1746 throttled without possibly adversely affecting higher priority groups. This
1747 includes swapping and metadata IO. These types of IO are allowed to occur
1748 normally, however they are "charged" to the originating group. If the
1749 originating group is being throttled you will see the use_delay and delay
1750 fields in io.stat increase. The delay value is how many microseconds that are
1751 being added to any process that runs in this group. Because this number can
1752 grow quite large if there is a lot of swapping or metadata IO occurring we
1753 limit the individual delay events to 1 second at a time.
1754
1755Once the victimized group starts meeting its latency target again it will start
1756unthrottling any peer groups that were throttled previously. If the victimized
1757group simply stops doing IO the global counter will unthrottle appropriately.
1758
1759IO Latency Interface Files
1760~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1761
1762 io.latency
1763 This takes a similar format as the other controllers.
1764
1765 "MAJOR:MINOR target=<target time in microseconds"
1766
1767 io.stat
1768 If the controller is enabled you will see extra stats in io.stat in
1769 addition to the normal ones.
1770
1771 depth
1772 This is the current queue depth for the group.
1773
1774 avg_lat
Dennis Zhou (Facebook)c480bcf2018-08-01 23:15:41 -07001775 This is an exponential moving average with a decay rate of 1/exp
1776 bound by the sampling interval. The decay rate interval can be
1777 calculated by multiplying the win value in io.stat by the
1778 corresponding number of samples based on the win value.
1779
1780 win
1781 The sampling window size in milliseconds. This is the minimum
1782 duration of time between evaluation events. Windows only elapse
1783 with IO activity. Idle periods extend the most recent window.
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001784
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001785PID
1786---
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001787
1788The process number controller is used to allow a cgroup to stop any
1789new tasks from being fork()'d or clone()'d after a specified limit is
1790reached.
1791
1792The number of tasks in a cgroup can be exhausted in ways which other
1793controllers cannot prevent, thus warranting its own controller. For
1794example, a fork bomb is likely to exhaust the number of tasks before
1795hitting memory restrictions.
1796
1797Note that PIDs used in this controller refer to TIDs, process IDs as
1798used by the kernel.
1799
1800
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001801PID Interface Files
1802~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001803
1804 pids.max
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001805 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1806 cgroups. The default is "max".
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001807
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001808 Hard limit of number of processes.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001809
1810 pids.current
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001811 A read-only single value file which exists on all cgroups.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001812
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001813 The number of processes currently in the cgroup and its
1814 descendants.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001815
1816Organisational operations are not blocked by cgroup policies, so it is
1817possible to have pids.current > pids.max. This can be done by either
1818setting the limit to be smaller than pids.current, or attaching enough
1819processes to the cgroup such that pids.current is larger than
1820pids.max. However, it is not possible to violate a cgroup PID policy
1821through fork() or clone(). These will return -EAGAIN if the creation
1822of a new process would cause a cgroup policy to be violated.
1823
1824
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001825Cpuset
1826------
1827
1828The "cpuset" controller provides a mechanism for constraining
1829the CPU and memory node placement of tasks to only the resources
1830specified in the cpuset interface files in a task's current cgroup.
1831This is especially valuable on large NUMA systems where placing jobs
1832on properly sized subsets of the systems with careful processor and
1833memory placement to reduce cross-node memory access and contention
1834can improve overall system performance.
1835
1836The "cpuset" controller is hierarchical. That means the controller
1837cannot use CPUs or memory nodes not allowed in its parent.
1838
1839
1840Cpuset Interface Files
1841~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1842
1843 cpuset.cpus
1844 A read-write multiple values file which exists on non-root
1845 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1846
1847 It lists the requested CPUs to be used by tasks within this
1848 cgroup. The actual list of CPUs to be granted, however, is
1849 subjected to constraints imposed by its parent and can differ
1850 from the requested CPUs.
1851
1852 The CPU numbers are comma-separated numbers or ranges.
Jakub Kicinskif3431ba2020-02-27 16:06:52 -08001853 For example::
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001854
1855 # cat cpuset.cpus
1856 0-4,6,8-10
1857
1858 An empty value indicates that the cgroup is using the same
1859 setting as the nearest cgroup ancestor with a non-empty
1860 "cpuset.cpus" or all the available CPUs if none is found.
1861
1862 The value of "cpuset.cpus" stays constant until the next update
1863 and won't be affected by any CPU hotplug events.
1864
1865 cpuset.cpus.effective
Waiman Long5776cec2018-11-08 10:08:43 -05001866 A read-only multiple values file which exists on all
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001867 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1868
1869 It lists the onlined CPUs that are actually granted to this
1870 cgroup by its parent. These CPUs are allowed to be used by
1871 tasks within the current cgroup.
1872
1873 If "cpuset.cpus" is empty, the "cpuset.cpus.effective" file shows
1874 all the CPUs from the parent cgroup that can be available to
1875 be used by this cgroup. Otherwise, it should be a subset of
1876 "cpuset.cpus" unless none of the CPUs listed in "cpuset.cpus"
1877 can be granted. In this case, it will be treated just like an
1878 empty "cpuset.cpus".
1879
1880 Its value will be affected by CPU hotplug events.
1881
1882 cpuset.mems
1883 A read-write multiple values file which exists on non-root
1884 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1885
1886 It lists the requested memory nodes to be used by tasks within
1887 this cgroup. The actual list of memory nodes granted, however,
1888 is subjected to constraints imposed by its parent and can differ
1889 from the requested memory nodes.
1890
1891 The memory node numbers are comma-separated numbers or ranges.
Jakub Kicinskif3431ba2020-02-27 16:06:52 -08001892 For example::
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001893
1894 # cat cpuset.mems
1895 0-1,3
1896
1897 An empty value indicates that the cgroup is using the same
1898 setting as the nearest cgroup ancestor with a non-empty
1899 "cpuset.mems" or all the available memory nodes if none
1900 is found.
1901
1902 The value of "cpuset.mems" stays constant until the next update
1903 and won't be affected by any memory nodes hotplug events.
1904
1905 cpuset.mems.effective
Waiman Long5776cec2018-11-08 10:08:43 -05001906 A read-only multiple values file which exists on all
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001907 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1908
1909 It lists the onlined memory nodes that are actually granted to
1910 this cgroup by its parent. These memory nodes are allowed to
1911 be used by tasks within the current cgroup.
1912
1913 If "cpuset.mems" is empty, it shows all the memory nodes from the
1914 parent cgroup that will be available to be used by this cgroup.
1915 Otherwise, it should be a subset of "cpuset.mems" unless none of
1916 the memory nodes listed in "cpuset.mems" can be granted. In this
1917 case, it will be treated just like an empty "cpuset.mems".
1918
1919 Its value will be affected by memory nodes hotplug events.
1920
Tejun Heob1e3aeb2018-11-13 12:03:33 -08001921 cpuset.cpus.partition
Waiman Long90e92f22018-11-08 10:08:45 -05001922 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1923 cpuset-enabled cgroups. This flag is owned by the parent cgroup
1924 and is not delegatable.
1925
1926 It accepts only the following input values when written to.
1927
Jon Haslam6ee0fac2019-09-25 12:56:04 -07001928 "root" - a partition root
Tejun Heob1e3aeb2018-11-13 12:03:33 -08001929 "member" - a non-root member of a partition
Waiman Long90e92f22018-11-08 10:08:45 -05001930
1931 When set to be a partition root, the current cgroup is the
1932 root of a new partition or scheduling domain that comprises
1933 itself and all its descendants except those that are separate
1934 partition roots themselves and their descendants. The root
1935 cgroup is always a partition root.
1936
1937 There are constraints on where a partition root can be set.
1938 It can only be set in a cgroup if all the following conditions
1939 are true.
1940
1941 1) The "cpuset.cpus" is not empty and the list of CPUs are
1942 exclusive, i.e. they are not shared by any of its siblings.
1943 2) The parent cgroup is a partition root.
1944 3) The "cpuset.cpus" is also a proper subset of the parent's
1945 "cpuset.cpus.effective".
1946 4) There is no child cgroups with cpuset enabled. This is for
1947 eliminating corner cases that have to be handled if such a
1948 condition is allowed.
1949
1950 Setting it to partition root will take the CPUs away from the
1951 effective CPUs of the parent cgroup. Once it is set, this
1952 file cannot be reverted back to "member" if there are any child
1953 cgroups with cpuset enabled.
1954
1955 A parent partition cannot distribute all its CPUs to its
1956 child partitions. There must be at least one cpu left in the
1957 parent partition.
1958
1959 Once becoming a partition root, changes to "cpuset.cpus" is
1960 generally allowed as long as the first condition above is true,
1961 the change will not take away all the CPUs from the parent
1962 partition and the new "cpuset.cpus" value is a superset of its
1963 children's "cpuset.cpus" values.
1964
1965 Sometimes, external factors like changes to ancestors'
1966 "cpuset.cpus" or cpu hotplug can cause the state of the partition
1967 root to change. On read, the "cpuset.sched.partition" file
1968 can show the following values.
1969
1970 "member" Non-root member of a partition
1971 "root" Partition root
1972 "root invalid" Invalid partition root
1973
1974 It is a partition root if the first 2 partition root conditions
1975 above are true and at least one CPU from "cpuset.cpus" is
1976 granted by the parent cgroup.
1977
1978 A partition root can become invalid if none of CPUs requested
1979 in "cpuset.cpus" can be granted by the parent cgroup or the
1980 parent cgroup is no longer a partition root itself. In this
1981 case, it is not a real partition even though the restriction
1982 of the first partition root condition above will still apply.
1983 The cpu affinity of all the tasks in the cgroup will then be
1984 associated with CPUs in the nearest ancestor partition.
1985
1986 An invalid partition root can be transitioned back to a
1987 real partition root if at least one of the requested CPUs
1988 can now be granted by its parent. In this case, the cpu
1989 affinity of all the tasks in the formerly invalid partition
1990 will be associated to the CPUs of the newly formed partition.
1991 Changing the partition state of an invalid partition root to
1992 "member" is always allowed even if child cpusets are present.
1993
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001994
Roman Gushchin4ad5a322017-12-13 19:49:03 +00001995Device controller
1996-----------------
1997
1998Device controller manages access to device files. It includes both
1999creation of new device files (using mknod), and access to the
2000existing device files.
2001
2002Cgroup v2 device controller has no interface files and is implemented
2003on top of cgroup BPF. To control access to device files, a user may
2004create bpf programs of the BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE type and attach them
2005to cgroups. On an attempt to access a device file, corresponding
2006BPF programs will be executed, and depending on the return value
2007the attempt will succeed or fail with -EPERM.
2008
2009A BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program takes a pointer to the bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx
2010structure, which describes the device access attempt: access type
2011(mknod/read/write) and device (type, major and minor numbers).
2012If the program returns 0, the attempt fails with -EPERM, otherwise
2013it succeeds.
2014
2015An example of BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program may be found in the kernel
2016source tree in the tools/testing/selftests/bpf/dev_cgroup.c file.
2017
2018
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002019RDMA
2020----
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05002021
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00002022The "rdma" controller regulates the distribution and accounting of
2023of RDMA resources.
2024
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002025RDMA Interface Files
2026~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00002027
2028 rdma.max
2029 A readwrite nested-keyed file that exists for all the cgroups
2030 except root that describes current configured resource limit
2031 for a RDMA/IB device.
2032
2033 Lines are keyed by device name and are not ordered.
2034 Each line contains space separated resource name and its configured
2035 limit that can be distributed.
2036
2037 The following nested keys are defined.
2038
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002039 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00002040 hca_handle Maximum number of HCA Handles
2041 hca_object Maximum number of HCA Objects
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002042 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00002043
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002044 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00002045
2046 mlx4_0 hca_handle=2 hca_object=2000
2047 ocrdma1 hca_handle=3 hca_object=max
2048
2049 rdma.current
2050 A read-only file that describes current resource usage.
2051 It exists for all the cgroup except root.
2052
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002053 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00002054
2055 mlx4_0 hca_handle=1 hca_object=20
2056 ocrdma1 hca_handle=1 hca_object=23
2057
Giuseppe Scrivanofaced7e2019-12-16 20:38:31 +01002058HugeTLB
2059-------
2060
2061The HugeTLB controller allows to limit the HugeTLB usage per control group and
2062enforces the controller limit during page fault.
2063
2064HugeTLB Interface Files
2065~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2066
2067 hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.current
2068 Show current usage for "hugepagesize" hugetlb. It exists for all
2069 the cgroup except root.
2070
2071 hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.max
2072 Set/show the hard limit of "hugepagesize" hugetlb usage.
2073 The default value is "max". It exists for all the cgroup except root.
2074
2075 hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.events
2076 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
2077
2078 max
2079 The number of allocation failure due to HugeTLB limit
2080
2081 hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.events.local
2082 Similar to hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.events but the fields in the file
2083 are local to the cgroup i.e. not hierarchical. The file modified event
2084 generated on this file reflects only the local events.
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00002085
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002086Misc
2087----
Tejun Heo63f1ca52017-02-02 13:50:35 -05002088
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002089perf_event
2090~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05002091
2092perf_event controller, if not mounted on a legacy hierarchy, is
2093automatically enabled on the v2 hierarchy so that perf events can
2094always be filtered by cgroup v2 path. The controller can still be
2095moved to a legacy hierarchy after v2 hierarchy is populated.
2096
2097
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +01002098Non-normative information
2099-------------------------
2100
2101This section contains information that isn't considered to be a part of
2102the stable kernel API and so is subject to change.
2103
2104
2105CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
2106~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2107
2108When distributing CPU cycles in the root cgroup each thread in this
2109cgroup is treated as if it was hosted in a separate child cgroup of the
2110root cgroup. This child cgroup weight is dependent on its thread nice
2111level.
2112
2113For details of this mapping see sched_prio_to_weight array in
2114kernel/sched/core.c file (values from this array should be scaled
2115appropriately so the neutral - nice 0 - value is 100 instead of 1024).
2116
2117
2118IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
2119~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2120
2121Root cgroup processes are hosted in an implicit leaf child node.
2122When distributing IO resources this implicit child node is taken into
2123account as if it was a normal child cgroup of the root cgroup with a
2124weight value of 200.
2125
2126
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002127Namespace
2128=========
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002129
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002130Basics
2131------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002132
2133cgroup namespace provides a mechanism to virtualize the view of the
2134"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file and cgroup mounts. The CLONE_NEWCGROUP clone
2135flag can be used with clone(2) and unshare(2) to create a new cgroup
2136namespace. The process running inside the cgroup namespace will have
2137its "/proc/$PID/cgroup" output restricted to cgroupns root. The
2138cgroupns root is the cgroup of the process at the time of creation of
2139the cgroup namespace.
2140
2141Without cgroup namespace, the "/proc/$PID/cgroup" file shows the
2142complete path of the cgroup of a process. In a container setup where
2143a set of cgroups and namespaces are intended to isolate processes the
2144"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file may leak potential system level information
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002145to the isolated processes. For Example::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002146
2147 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
2148 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
2149
2150The path '/batchjobs/container_id1' can be considered as system-data
2151and undesirable to expose to the isolated processes. cgroup namespace
2152can be used to restrict visibility of this path. For example, before
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002153creating a cgroup namespace, one would see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002154
2155 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
2156 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:37 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026531835]
2157 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
2158 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
2159
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002160After unsharing a new namespace, the view changes::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002161
2162 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
2163 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:35 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026532183]
2164 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
2165 0::/
2166
2167When some thread from a multi-threaded process unshares its cgroup
2168namespace, the new cgroupns gets applied to the entire process (all
2169the threads). This is natural for the v2 hierarchy; however, for the
2170legacy hierarchies, this may be unexpected.
2171
2172A cgroup namespace is alive as long as there are processes inside or
2173mounts pinning it. When the last usage goes away, the cgroup
2174namespace is destroyed. The cgroupns root and the actual cgroups
2175remain.
2176
2177
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002178The Root and Views
2179------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002180
2181The 'cgroupns root' for a cgroup namespace is the cgroup in which the
2182process calling unshare(2) is running. For example, if a process in
2183/batchjobs/container_id1 cgroup calls unshare, cgroup
2184/batchjobs/container_id1 becomes the cgroupns root. For the
2185init_cgroup_ns, this is the real root ('/') cgroup.
2186
2187The cgroupns root cgroup does not change even if the namespace creator
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002188process later moves to a different cgroup::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002189
2190 # ~/unshare -c # unshare cgroupns in some cgroup
2191 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
2192 0::/
2193 # mkdir sub_cgrp_1
2194 # echo 0 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
2195 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
2196 0::/sub_cgrp_1
2197
2198Each process gets its namespace-specific view of "/proc/$PID/cgroup"
2199
2200Processes running inside the cgroup namespace will be able to see
2201cgroup paths (in /proc/self/cgroup) only inside their root cgroup.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002202From within an unshared cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002203
2204 # sleep 100000 &
2205 [1] 7353
2206 # echo 7353 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
2207 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
2208 0::/sub_cgrp_1
2209
2210From the initial cgroup namespace, the real cgroup path will be
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002211visible::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002212
2213 $ cat /proc/7353/cgroup
2214 0::/batchjobs/container_id1/sub_cgrp_1
2215
2216From a sibling cgroup namespace (that is, a namespace rooted at a
2217different cgroup), the cgroup path relative to its own cgroup
2218namespace root will be shown. For instance, if PID 7353's cgroup
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002219namespace root is at '/batchjobs/container_id2', then it will see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002220
2221 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
2222 0::/../container_id2/sub_cgrp_1
2223
2224Note that the relative path always starts with '/' to indicate that
2225its relative to the cgroup namespace root of the caller.
2226
2227
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002228Migration and setns(2)
2229----------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002230
2231Processes inside a cgroup namespace can move into and out of the
2232namespace root if they have proper access to external cgroups. For
2233example, from inside a namespace with cgroupns root at
2234/batchjobs/container_id1, and assuming that the global hierarchy is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002235still accessible inside cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002236
2237 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
2238 0::/sub_cgrp_1
2239 # echo 7353 > batchjobs/container_id2/cgroup.procs
2240 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
2241 0::/../container_id2
2242
2243Note that this kind of setup is not encouraged. A task inside cgroup
2244namespace should only be exposed to its own cgroupns hierarchy.
2245
2246setns(2) to another cgroup namespace is allowed when:
2247
2248(a) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its current user namespace
2249(b) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against the target cgroup
2250 namespace's userns
2251
2252No implicit cgroup changes happen with attaching to another cgroup
2253namespace. It is expected that the someone moves the attaching
2254process under the target cgroup namespace root.
2255
2256
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002257Interaction with Other Namespaces
2258---------------------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002259
2260Namespace specific cgroup hierarchy can be mounted by a process
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002261running inside a non-init cgroup namespace::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002262
2263 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
2264
2265This will mount the unified cgroup hierarchy with cgroupns root as the
2266filesystem root. The process needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its user and
2267mount namespaces.
2268
2269The virtualization of /proc/self/cgroup file combined with restricting
2270the view of cgroup hierarchy by namespace-private cgroupfs mount
2271provides a properly isolated cgroup view inside the container.
2272
2273
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002274Information on Kernel Programming
2275=================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002276
2277This section contains kernel programming information in the areas
2278where interacting with cgroup is necessary. cgroup core and
2279controllers are not covered.
2280
2281
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002282Filesystem Support for Writeback
2283--------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002284
2285A filesystem can support cgroup writeback by updating
2286address_space_operations->writepage[s]() to annotate bio's using the
2287following two functions.
2288
2289 wbc_init_bio(@wbc, @bio)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002290 Should be called for each bio carrying writeback data and
Dennis Zhoufd42df32018-12-05 12:10:34 -05002291 associates the bio with the inode's owner cgroup and the
2292 corresponding request queue. This must be called after
2293 a queue (device) has been associated with the bio and
2294 before submission.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002295
Tejun Heo34e51a52019-06-27 13:39:49 -07002296 wbc_account_cgroup_owner(@wbc, @page, @bytes)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002297 Should be called for each data segment being written out.
2298 While this function doesn't care exactly when it's called
2299 during the writeback session, it's the easiest and most
2300 natural to call it as data segments are added to a bio.
2301
2302With writeback bio's annotated, cgroup support can be enabled per
2303super_block by setting SB_I_CGROUPWB in ->s_iflags. This allows for
2304selective disabling of cgroup writeback support which is helpful when
2305certain filesystem features, e.g. journaled data mode, are
2306incompatible.
2307
2308wbc_init_bio() binds the specified bio to its cgroup. Depending on
2309the configuration, the bio may be executed at a lower priority and if
2310the writeback session is holding shared resources, e.g. a journal
2311entry, may lead to priority inversion. There is no one easy solution
2312for the problem. Filesystems can try to work around specific problem
Dennis Zhoufd42df32018-12-05 12:10:34 -05002313cases by skipping wbc_init_bio() and using bio_associate_blkg()
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002314directly.
2315
2316
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002317Deprecated v1 Core Features
2318===========================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002319
2320- Multiple hierarchies including named ones are not supported.
2321
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -04002322- All v1 mount options are not supported.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002323
2324- The "tasks" file is removed and "cgroup.procs" is not sorted.
2325
2326- "cgroup.clone_children" is removed.
2327
2328- /proc/cgroups is meaningless for v2. Use "cgroup.controllers" file
2329 at the root instead.
2330
2331
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002332Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
2333====================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002334
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002335Multiple Hierarchies
2336--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002337
2338cgroup v1 allowed an arbitrary number of hierarchies and each
2339hierarchy could host any number of controllers. While this seemed to
2340provide a high level of flexibility, it wasn't useful in practice.
2341
2342For example, as there is only one instance of each controller, utility
2343type controllers such as freezer which can be useful in all
2344hierarchies could only be used in one. The issue is exacerbated by
2345the fact that controllers couldn't be moved to another hierarchy once
2346hierarchies were populated. Another issue was that all controllers
2347bound to a hierarchy were forced to have exactly the same view of the
2348hierarchy. It wasn't possible to vary the granularity depending on
2349the specific controller.
2350
2351In practice, these issues heavily limited which controllers could be
2352put on the same hierarchy and most configurations resorted to putting
2353each controller on its own hierarchy. Only closely related ones, such
2354as the cpu and cpuacct controllers, made sense to be put on the same
2355hierarchy. This often meant that userland ended up managing multiple
2356similar hierarchies repeating the same steps on each hierarchy
2357whenever a hierarchy management operation was necessary.
2358
2359Furthermore, support for multiple hierarchies came at a steep cost.
2360It greatly complicated cgroup core implementation but more importantly
2361the support for multiple hierarchies restricted how cgroup could be
2362used in general and what controllers was able to do.
2363
2364There was no limit on how many hierarchies there might be, which meant
2365that a thread's cgroup membership couldn't be described in finite
2366length. The key might contain any number of entries and was unlimited
2367in length, which made it highly awkward to manipulate and led to
2368addition of controllers which existed only to identify membership,
2369which in turn exacerbated the original problem of proliferating number
2370of hierarchies.
2371
2372Also, as a controller couldn't have any expectation regarding the
2373topologies of hierarchies other controllers might be on, each
2374controller had to assume that all other controllers were attached to
2375completely orthogonal hierarchies. This made it impossible, or at
2376least very cumbersome, for controllers to cooperate with each other.
2377
2378In most use cases, putting controllers on hierarchies which are
2379completely orthogonal to each other isn't necessary. What usually is
2380called for is the ability to have differing levels of granularity
2381depending on the specific controller. In other words, hierarchy may
2382be collapsed from leaf towards root when viewed from specific
2383controllers. For example, a given configuration might not care about
2384how memory is distributed beyond a certain level while still wanting
2385to control how CPU cycles are distributed.
2386
2387
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002388Thread Granularity
2389------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002390
2391cgroup v1 allowed threads of a process to belong to different cgroups.
2392This didn't make sense for some controllers and those controllers
2393ended up implementing different ways to ignore such situations but
2394much more importantly it blurred the line between API exposed to
2395individual applications and system management interface.
2396
2397Generally, in-process knowledge is available only to the process
2398itself; thus, unlike service-level organization of processes,
2399categorizing threads of a process requires active participation from
2400the application which owns the target process.
2401
2402cgroup v1 had an ambiguously defined delegation model which got abused
2403in combination with thread granularity. cgroups were delegated to
2404individual applications so that they can create and manage their own
2405sub-hierarchies and control resource distributions along them. This
2406effectively raised cgroup to the status of a syscall-like API exposed
2407to lay programs.
2408
2409First of all, cgroup has a fundamentally inadequate interface to be
2410exposed this way. For a process to access its own knobs, it has to
2411extract the path on the target hierarchy from /proc/self/cgroup,
2412construct the path by appending the name of the knob to the path, open
2413and then read and/or write to it. This is not only extremely clunky
2414and unusual but also inherently racy. There is no conventional way to
2415define transaction across the required steps and nothing can guarantee
2416that the process would actually be operating on its own sub-hierarchy.
2417
2418cgroup controllers implemented a number of knobs which would never be
2419accepted as public APIs because they were just adding control knobs to
2420system-management pseudo filesystem. cgroup ended up with interface
2421knobs which were not properly abstracted or refined and directly
2422revealed kernel internal details. These knobs got exposed to
2423individual applications through the ill-defined delegation mechanism
2424effectively abusing cgroup as a shortcut to implementing public APIs
2425without going through the required scrutiny.
2426
2427This was painful for both userland and kernel. Userland ended up with
2428misbehaving and poorly abstracted interfaces and kernel exposing and
2429locked into constructs inadvertently.
2430
2431
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002432Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
2433-------------------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002434
2435cgroup v1 allowed threads to be in any cgroups which created an
2436interesting problem where threads belonging to a parent cgroup and its
2437children cgroups competed for resources. This was nasty as two
2438different types of entities competed and there was no obvious way to
2439settle it. Different controllers did different things.
2440
2441The cpu controller considered threads and cgroups as equivalents and
2442mapped nice levels to cgroup weights. This worked for some cases but
2443fell flat when children wanted to be allocated specific ratios of CPU
2444cycles and the number of internal threads fluctuated - the ratios
2445constantly changed as the number of competing entities fluctuated.
2446There also were other issues. The mapping from nice level to weight
2447wasn't obvious or universal, and there were various other knobs which
2448simply weren't available for threads.
2449
2450The io controller implicitly created a hidden leaf node for each
2451cgroup to host the threads. The hidden leaf had its own copies of all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002452the knobs with ``leaf_`` prefixed. While this allowed equivalent
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002453control over internal threads, it was with serious drawbacks. It
2454always added an extra layer of nesting which wouldn't be necessary
2455otherwise, made the interface messy and significantly complicated the
2456implementation.
2457
2458The memory controller didn't have a way to control what happened
2459between internal tasks and child cgroups and the behavior was not
2460clearly defined. There were attempts to add ad-hoc behaviors and
2461knobs to tailor the behavior to specific workloads which would have
2462led to problems extremely difficult to resolve in the long term.
2463
2464Multiple controllers struggled with internal tasks and came up with
2465different ways to deal with it; unfortunately, all the approaches were
2466severely flawed and, furthermore, the widely different behaviors
2467made cgroup as a whole highly inconsistent.
2468
2469This clearly is a problem which needs to be addressed from cgroup core
2470in a uniform way.
2471
2472
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002473Other Interface Issues
2474----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002475
2476cgroup v1 grew without oversight and developed a large number of
2477idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies. One issue on the cgroup core side
2478was how an empty cgroup was notified - a userland helper binary was
2479forked and executed for each event. The event delivery wasn't
2480recursive or delegatable. The limitations of the mechanism also led
2481to in-kernel event delivery filtering mechanism further complicating
2482the interface.
2483
2484Controller interfaces were problematic too. An extreme example is
2485controllers completely ignoring hierarchical organization and treating
2486all cgroups as if they were all located directly under the root
2487cgroup. Some controllers exposed a large amount of inconsistent
2488implementation details to userland.
2489
2490There also was no consistency across controllers. When a new cgroup
2491was created, some controllers defaulted to not imposing extra
2492restrictions while others disallowed any resource usage until
2493explicitly configured. Configuration knobs for the same type of
2494control used widely differing naming schemes and formats. Statistics
2495and information knobs were named arbitrarily and used different
2496formats and units even in the same controller.
2497
2498cgroup v2 establishes common conventions where appropriate and updates
2499controllers so that they expose minimal and consistent interfaces.
2500
2501
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002502Controller Issues and Remedies
2503------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002504
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002505Memory
2506~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002507
2508The original lower boundary, the soft limit, is defined as a limit
2509that is per default unset. As a result, the set of cgroups that
2510global reclaim prefers is opt-in, rather than opt-out. The costs for
2511optimizing these mostly negative lookups are so high that the
2512implementation, despite its enormous size, does not even provide the
2513basic desirable behavior. First off, the soft limit has no
2514hierarchical meaning. All configured groups are organized in a global
2515rbtree and treated like equal peers, regardless where they are located
2516in the hierarchy. This makes subtree delegation impossible. Second,
2517the soft limit reclaim pass is so aggressive that it not just
2518introduces high allocation latencies into the system, but also impacts
2519system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature
2520becomes self-defeating.
2521
2522The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
Chris Down9783aa92019-10-06 17:58:32 -07002523reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it's within its
2524effective low, which makes delegation of subtrees possible. It also
2525enjoys having reclaim pressure proportional to its overage when
2526above its effective low.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002527
2528The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict
2529limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called.
2530But this generally goes against the goal of making the most out of the
2531available memory. The memory consumption of workloads varies during
2532runtime, and that requires users to overcommit. But doing that with a
2533strict upper limit requires either a fairly accurate prediction of the
2534working set size or adding slack to the limit. Since working set size
2535estimation is hard and error prone, and getting it wrong results in
2536OOM kills, most users tend to err on the side of a looser limit and
2537end up wasting precious resources.
2538
2539The memory.high boundary on the other hand can be set much more
2540conservatively. When hit, it throttles allocations by forcing them
2541into direct reclaim to work off the excess, but it never invokes the
2542OOM killer. As a result, a high boundary that is chosen too
2543aggressively will not terminate the processes, but instead it will
2544lead to gradual performance degradation. The user can monitor this
2545and make corrections until the minimal memory footprint that still
2546gives acceptable performance is found.
2547
2548In extreme cases, with many concurrent allocations and a complete
2549breakdown of reclaim progress within the group, the high boundary can
2550be exceeded. But even then it's mostly better to satisfy the
2551allocation from the slack available in other groups or the rest of the
2552system than killing the group. Otherwise, memory.max is there to
2553limit this type of spillover and ultimately contain buggy or even
2554malicious applications.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08002555
Johannes Weinerb6e6edc2016-03-17 14:20:28 -07002556Setting the original memory.limit_in_bytes below the current usage was
2557subject to a race condition, where concurrent charges could cause the
2558limit setting to fail. memory.max on the other hand will first set the
2559limit to prevent new charges, and then reclaim and OOM kill until the
2560new limit is met - or the task writing to memory.max is killed.
2561
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08002562The combined memory+swap accounting and limiting is replaced by real
2563control over swap space.
2564
2565The main argument for a combined memory+swap facility in the original
2566cgroup design was that global or parental pressure would always be
2567able to swap all anonymous memory of a child group, regardless of the
2568child's own (possibly untrusted) configuration. However, untrusted
2569groups can sabotage swapping by other means - such as referencing its
2570anonymous memory in a tight loop - and an admin can not assume full
2571swappability when overcommitting untrusted jobs.
2572
2573For trusted jobs, on the other hand, a combined counter is not an
2574intuitive userspace interface, and it flies in the face of the idea
2575that cgroup controllers should account and limit specific physical
2576resources. Swap space is a resource like all others in the system,
2577and that's why unified hierarchy allows distributing it separately.