blob: 1746131bc9cb315dca4d4b03b23678cece518727 [file] [log] [blame]
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002Control Group v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03003================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05004
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03005:Date: October, 2015
6:Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05007
8This is the authoritative documentation on the design, interface and
9conventions of cgroup v2. It describes all userland-visible aspects
10of cgroup including core and specific controller behaviors. All
11future changes must be reflected in this document. Documentation for
W. Trevor King9a2ddda2016-01-27 13:01:52 -080012v1 is available under Documentation/cgroup-v1/.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050013
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030014.. CONTENTS
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050015
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030016 1. Introduction
17 1-1. Terminology
18 1-2. What is cgroup?
19 2. Basic Operations
20 2-1. Mounting
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -040021 2-2. Organizing Processes and Threads
22 2-2-1. Processes
23 2-2-2. Threads
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030024 2-3. [Un]populated Notification
25 2-4. Controlling Controllers
26 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling
27 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint
28 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint
29 2-5. Delegation
30 2-5-1. Model of Delegation
31 2-5-2. Delegation Containment
32 2-6. Guidelines
33 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control
34 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions
35 3. Resource Distribution Models
36 3-1. Weights
37 3-2. Limits
38 3-3. Protections
39 3-4. Allocations
40 4. Interface Files
41 4-1. Format
42 4-2. Conventions
43 4-3. Core Interface Files
44 5. Controllers
45 5-1. CPU
46 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files
47 5-2. Memory
48 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files
49 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines
50 5-2-3. Memory Ownership
51 5-3. IO
52 5-3-1. IO Interface Files
53 5-3-2. Writeback
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -040054 5-3-3. IO Latency
55 5-3-3-1. How IO Latency Throttling Works
56 5-3-3-2. IO Latency Interface Files
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030057 5-4. PID
58 5-4-1. PID Interface Files
Roman Gushchin4ad5a322017-12-13 19:49:03 +000059 5-5. Device
60 5-6. RDMA
61 5-6-1. RDMA Interface Files
62 5-7. Misc
63 5-7-1. perf_event
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +010064 5-N. Non-normative information
65 5-N-1. CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
66 5-N-2. IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030067 6. Namespace
68 6-1. Basics
69 6-2. The Root and Views
70 6-3. Migration and setns(2)
71 6-4. Interaction with Other Namespaces
72 P. Information on Kernel Programming
73 P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback
74 D. Deprecated v1 Core Features
75 R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
76 R-1. Multiple Hierarchies
77 R-2. Thread Granularity
78 R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
79 R-4. Other Interface Issues
80 R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies
81 R-5-1. Memory
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050082
83
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030084Introduction
85============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050086
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030087Terminology
88-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050089
90"cgroup" stands for "control group" and is never capitalized. The
91singular form is used to designate the whole feature and also as a
92qualifier as in "cgroup controllers". When explicitly referring to
93multiple individual control groups, the plural form "cgroups" is used.
94
95
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030096What is cgroup?
97---------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050098
99cgroup is a mechanism to organize processes hierarchically and
100distribute system resources along the hierarchy in a controlled and
101configurable manner.
102
103cgroup is largely composed of two parts - the core and controllers.
104cgroup core is primarily responsible for hierarchically organizing
105processes. A cgroup controller is usually responsible for
106distributing a specific type of system resource along the hierarchy
107although there are utility controllers which serve purposes other than
108resource distribution.
109
110cgroups form a tree structure and every process in the system belongs
111to one and only one cgroup. All threads of a process belong to the
112same cgroup. On creation, all processes are put in the cgroup that
113the parent process belongs to at the time. A process can be migrated
114to another cgroup. Migration of a process doesn't affect already
115existing descendant processes.
116
117Following certain structural constraints, controllers may be enabled or
118disabled selectively on a cgroup. All controller behaviors are
119hierarchical - if a controller is enabled on a cgroup, it affects all
120processes which belong to the cgroups consisting the inclusive
121sub-hierarchy of the cgroup. When a controller is enabled on a nested
122cgroup, it always restricts the resource distribution further. The
123restrictions set closer to the root in the hierarchy can not be
124overridden from further away.
125
126
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300127Basic Operations
128================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500129
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300130Mounting
131--------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500132
133Unlike v1, cgroup v2 has only single hierarchy. The cgroup v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300134hierarchy can be mounted with the following mount command::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500135
136 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
137
138cgroup2 filesystem has the magic number 0x63677270 ("cgrp"). All
139controllers which support v2 and are not bound to a v1 hierarchy are
140automatically bound to the v2 hierarchy and show up at the root.
141Controllers which are not in active use in the v2 hierarchy can be
142bound to other hierarchies. This allows mixing v2 hierarchy with the
143legacy v1 multiple hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way.
144
145A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller
146is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy. Because per-cgroup
147controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may
148have lingering references, a controller may not show up immediately on
149the v2 hierarchy after the final umount of the previous hierarchy.
150Similarly, a controller should be fully disabled to be moved out of
151the unified hierarchy and it may take some time for the disabled
152controller to become available for other hierarchies; furthermore, due
153to inter-controller dependencies, other controllers may need to be
154disabled too.
155
156While useful for development and manual configurations, moving
157controllers dynamically between the v2 and other hierarchies is
158strongly discouraged for production use. It is recommended to decide
159the hierarchies and controller associations before starting using the
160controllers after system boot.
161
Johannes Weiner1619b6d2016-02-16 13:21:14 -0500162During transition to v2, system management software might still
163automount the v1 cgroup filesystem and so hijack all controllers
164during boot, before manual intervention is possible. To make testing
165and experimenting easier, the kernel parameter cgroup_no_v1= allows
166disabling controllers in v1 and make them always available in v2.
167
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400168cgroup v2 currently supports the following mount options.
169
170 nsdelegate
171
172 Consider cgroup namespaces as delegation boundaries. This
173 option is system wide and can only be set on mount or modified
174 through remount from the init namespace. The mount option is
175 ignored on non-init namespace mounts. Please refer to the
176 Delegation section for details.
177
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500178
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400179Organizing Processes and Threads
180--------------------------------
181
182Processes
183~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500184
185Initially, only the root cgroup exists to which all processes belong.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300186A child cgroup can be created by creating a sub-directory::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500187
188 # mkdir $CGROUP_NAME
189
190A given cgroup may have multiple child cgroups forming a tree
191structure. Each cgroup has a read-writable interface file
192"cgroup.procs". When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which
193belong to the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
194same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved to
195another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while reading.
196
197A process can be migrated into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
198target cgroup's "cgroup.procs" file. Only one process can be migrated
199on a single write(2) call. If a process is composed of multiple
200threads, writing the PID of any thread migrates all threads of the
201process.
202
203When a process forks a child process, the new process is born into the
204cgroup that the forking process belongs to at the time of the
205operation. After exit, a process stays associated with the cgroup
206that it belonged to at the time of exit until it's reaped; however, a
207zombie process does not appear in "cgroup.procs" and thus can't be
208moved to another cgroup.
209
210A cgroup which doesn't have any children or live processes can be
211destroyed by removing the directory. Note that a cgroup which doesn't
212have any children and is associated only with zombie processes is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300213considered empty and can be removed::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500214
215 # rmdir $CGROUP_NAME
216
217"/proc/$PID/cgroup" lists a process's cgroup membership. If legacy
218cgroup is in use in the system, this file may contain multiple lines,
219one for each hierarchy. The entry for cgroup v2 is always in the
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300220format "0::$PATH"::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500221
222 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
223 ...
224 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested
225
226If the process becomes a zombie and the cgroup it was associated with
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300227is removed subsequently, " (deleted)" is appended to the path::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500228
229 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
230 ...
231 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested (deleted)
232
233
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400234Threads
235~~~~~~~
236
237cgroup v2 supports thread granularity for a subset of controllers to
238support use cases requiring hierarchical resource distribution across
239the threads of a group of processes. By default, all threads of a
240process belong to the same cgroup, which also serves as the resource
241domain to host resource consumptions which are not specific to a
242process or thread. The thread mode allows threads to be spread across
243a subtree while still maintaining the common resource domain for them.
244
245Controllers which support thread mode are called threaded controllers.
246The ones which don't are called domain controllers.
247
248Marking a cgroup threaded makes it join the resource domain of its
249parent as a threaded cgroup. The parent may be another threaded
250cgroup whose resource domain is further up in the hierarchy. The root
251of a threaded subtree, that is, the nearest ancestor which is not
252threaded, is called threaded domain or thread root interchangeably and
253serves as the resource domain for the entire subtree.
254
255Inside a threaded subtree, threads of a process can be put in
256different cgroups and are not subject to the no internal process
257constraint - threaded controllers can be enabled on non-leaf cgroups
258whether they have threads in them or not.
259
260As the threaded domain cgroup hosts all the domain resource
261consumptions of the subtree, it is considered to have internal
262resource consumptions whether there are processes in it or not and
263can't have populated child cgroups which aren't threaded. Because the
264root cgroup is not subject to no internal process constraint, it can
265serve both as a threaded domain and a parent to domain cgroups.
266
267The current operation mode or type of the cgroup is shown in the
268"cgroup.type" file which indicates whether the cgroup is a normal
269domain, a domain which is serving as the domain of a threaded subtree,
270or a threaded cgroup.
271
272On creation, a cgroup is always a domain cgroup and can be made
273threaded by writing "threaded" to the "cgroup.type" file. The
274operation is single direction::
275
276 # echo threaded > cgroup.type
277
278Once threaded, the cgroup can't be made a domain again. To enable the
279thread mode, the following conditions must be met.
280
281- As the cgroup will join the parent's resource domain. The parent
282 must either be a valid (threaded) domain or a threaded cgroup.
283
Tejun Heo918a8c22017-07-23 08:18:26 -0400284- When the parent is an unthreaded domain, it must not have any domain
285 controllers enabled or populated domain children. The root is
286 exempt from this requirement.
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400287
288Topology-wise, a cgroup can be in an invalid state. Please consider
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +0100289the following topology::
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400290
291 A (threaded domain) - B (threaded) - C (domain, just created)
292
293C is created as a domain but isn't connected to a parent which can
294host child domains. C can't be used until it is turned into a
295threaded cgroup. "cgroup.type" file will report "domain (invalid)" in
296these cases. Operations which fail due to invalid topology use
297EOPNOTSUPP as the errno.
298
299A domain cgroup is turned into a threaded domain when one of its child
300cgroup becomes threaded or threaded controllers are enabled in the
301"cgroup.subtree_control" file while there are processes in the cgroup.
302A threaded domain reverts to a normal domain when the conditions
303clear.
304
305When read, "cgroup.threads" contains the list of the thread IDs of all
306threads in the cgroup. Except that the operations are per-thread
307instead of per-process, "cgroup.threads" has the same format and
308behaves the same way as "cgroup.procs". While "cgroup.threads" can be
309written to in any cgroup, as it can only move threads inside the same
310threaded domain, its operations are confined inside each threaded
311subtree.
312
313The threaded domain cgroup serves as the resource domain for the whole
314subtree, and, while the threads can be scattered across the subtree,
315all the processes are considered to be in the threaded domain cgroup.
316"cgroup.procs" in a threaded domain cgroup contains the PIDs of all
317processes in the subtree and is not readable in the subtree proper.
318However, "cgroup.procs" can be written to from anywhere in the subtree
319to migrate all threads of the matching process to the cgroup.
320
321Only threaded controllers can be enabled in a threaded subtree. When
322a threaded controller is enabled inside a threaded subtree, it only
323accounts for and controls resource consumptions associated with the
324threads in the cgroup and its descendants. All consumptions which
325aren't tied to a specific thread belong to the threaded domain cgroup.
326
327Because a threaded subtree is exempt from no internal process
328constraint, a threaded controller must be able to handle competition
329between threads in a non-leaf cgroup and its child cgroups. Each
330threaded controller defines how such competitions are handled.
331
332
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300333[Un]populated Notification
334--------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500335
336Each non-root cgroup has a "cgroup.events" file which contains
337"populated" field indicating whether the cgroup's sub-hierarchy has
338live processes in it. Its value is 0 if there is no live process in
339the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1. poll and [id]notify
340events are triggered when the value changes. This can be used, for
341example, to start a clean-up operation after all processes of a given
342sub-hierarchy have exited. The populated state updates and
343notifications are recursive. Consider the following sub-hierarchy
344where the numbers in the parentheses represent the numbers of processes
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300345in each cgroup::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500346
347 A(4) - B(0) - C(1)
348 \ D(0)
349
350A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0. After the one
351process in C exits, B and C's "populated" fields would flip to "0" and
352file modified events will be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of
353both cgroups.
354
355
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300356Controlling Controllers
357-----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500358
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300359Enabling and Disabling
360~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500361
362Each cgroup has a "cgroup.controllers" file which lists all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300363controllers available for the cgroup to enable::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500364
365 # cat cgroup.controllers
366 cpu io memory
367
368No controller is enabled by default. Controllers can be enabled and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300369disabled by writing to the "cgroup.subtree_control" file::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500370
371 # echo "+cpu +memory -io" > cgroup.subtree_control
372
373Only controllers which are listed in "cgroup.controllers" can be
374enabled. When multiple operations are specified as above, either they
375all succeed or fail. If multiple operations on the same controller
376are specified, the last one is effective.
377
378Enabling a controller in a cgroup indicates that the distribution of
379the target resource across its immediate children will be controlled.
380Consider the following sub-hierarchy. The enabled controllers are
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300381listed in parentheses::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500382
383 A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C()
384 \ D()
385
386As A has "cpu" and "memory" enabled, A will control the distribution
387of CPU cycles and memory to its children, in this case, B. As B has
388"memory" enabled but not "CPU", C and D will compete freely on CPU
389cycles but their division of memory available to B will be controlled.
390
391As a controller regulates the distribution of the target resource to
392the cgroup's children, enabling it creates the controller's interface
393files in the child cgroups. In the above example, enabling "cpu" on B
394would create the "cpu." prefixed controller interface files in C and
395D. Likewise, disabling "memory" from B would remove the "memory."
396prefixed controller interface files from C and D. This means that the
397controller interface files - anything which doesn't start with
398"cgroup." are owned by the parent rather than the cgroup itself.
399
400
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300401Top-down Constraint
402~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500403
404Resources are distributed top-down and a cgroup can further distribute
405a resource only if the resource has been distributed to it from the
406parent. This means that all non-root "cgroup.subtree_control" files
407can only contain controllers which are enabled in the parent's
408"cgroup.subtree_control" file. A controller can be enabled only if
409the parent has the controller enabled and a controller can't be
410disabled if one or more children have it enabled.
411
412
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300413No Internal Process Constraint
414~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500415
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400416Non-root cgroups can distribute domain resources to their children
417only when they don't have any processes of their own. In other words,
418only domain cgroups which don't contain any processes can have domain
419controllers enabled in their "cgroup.subtree_control" files.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500420
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400421This guarantees that, when a domain controller is looking at the part
422of the hierarchy which has it enabled, processes are always only on
423the leaves. This rules out situations where child cgroups compete
424against internal processes of the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500425
426The root cgroup is exempt from this restriction. Root contains
427processes and anonymous resource consumption which can't be associated
428with any other cgroups and requires special treatment from most
429controllers. How resource consumption in the root cgroup is governed
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +0100430is up to each controller (for more information on this topic please
431refer to the Non-normative information section in the Controllers
432chapter).
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500433
434Note that the restriction doesn't get in the way if there is no
435enabled controller in the cgroup's "cgroup.subtree_control". This is
436important as otherwise it wouldn't be possible to create children of a
437populated cgroup. To control resource distribution of a cgroup, the
438cgroup must create children and transfer all its processes to the
439children before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control"
440file.
441
442
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300443Delegation
444----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500445
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300446Model of Delegation
447~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500448
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400449A cgroup can be delegated in two ways. First, to a less privileged
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400450user by granting write access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs",
451"cgroup.threads" and "cgroup.subtree_control" files to the user.
452Second, if the "nsdelegate" mount option is set, automatically to a
453cgroup namespace on namespace creation.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500454
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400455Because the resource control interface files in a given directory
456control the distribution of the parent's resources, the delegatee
457shouldn't be allowed to write to them. For the first method, this is
458achieved by not granting access to these files. For the second, the
459kernel rejects writes to all files other than "cgroup.procs" and
460"cgroup.subtree_control" on a namespace root from inside the
461namespace.
462
463The end results are equivalent for both delegation types. Once
464delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory,
465organize processes inside it as it sees fit and further distribute the
466resources it received from the parent. The limits and other settings
467of all resource controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what
468happens in the delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the
469resource restrictions imposed by the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500470
471Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of
472cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however,
473this may be limited explicitly in the future.
474
475
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300476Delegation Containment
477~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500478
479A delegated sub-hierarchy is contained in the sense that processes
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400480can't be moved into or out of the sub-hierarchy by the delegatee.
481
482For delegations to a less privileged user, this is achieved by
483requiring the following conditions for a process with a non-root euid
484to migrate a target process into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
485"cgroup.procs" file.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500486
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500487- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
488
489- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
490 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
491
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500492The above two constraints ensure that while a delegatee may migrate
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500493processes around freely in the delegated sub-hierarchy it can't pull
494in from or push out to outside the sub-hierarchy.
495
496For an example, let's assume cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to
497user U0 who created C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300498all processes under C0 and C1 belong to U0::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500499
500 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00
501 ~ cgroup ~ \ C01
502 ~ hierarchy ~
503 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10
504
505Let's also say U0 wants to write the PID of a process which is
506currently in C10 into "C00/cgroup.procs". U0 has write access to the
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500507file; however, the common ancestor of the source cgroup C10 and the
508destination cgroup C00 is above the points of delegation and U0 would
509not have write access to its "cgroup.procs" files and thus the write
510will be denied with -EACCES.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500511
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400512For delegations to namespaces, containment is achieved by requiring
513that both the source and destination cgroups are reachable from the
514namespace of the process which is attempting the migration. If either
515is not reachable, the migration is rejected with -ENOENT.
516
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500517
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300518Guidelines
519----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500520
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300521Organize Once and Control
522~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500523
524Migrating a process across cgroups is a relatively expensive operation
525and stateful resources such as memory are not moved together with the
526process. This is an explicit design decision as there often exist
527inherent trade-offs between migration and various hot paths in terms
528of synchronization cost.
529
530As such, migrating processes across cgroups frequently as a means to
531apply different resource restrictions is discouraged. A workload
532should be assigned to a cgroup according to the system's logical and
533resource structure once on start-up. Dynamic adjustments to resource
534distribution can be made by changing controller configuration through
535the interface files.
536
537
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300538Avoid Name Collisions
539~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500540
541Interface files for a cgroup and its children cgroups occupy the same
542directory and it is possible to create children cgroups which collide
543with interface files.
544
545All cgroup core interface files are prefixed with "cgroup." and each
546controller's interface files are prefixed with the controller name and
547a dot. A controller's name is composed of lower case alphabets and
548'_'s but never begins with an '_' so it can be used as the prefix
549character for collision avoidance. Also, interface file names won't
550start or end with terms which are often used in categorizing workloads
551such as job, service, slice, unit or workload.
552
553cgroup doesn't do anything to prevent name collisions and it's the
554user's responsibility to avoid them.
555
556
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300557Resource Distribution Models
558============================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500559
560cgroup controllers implement several resource distribution schemes
561depending on the resource type and expected use cases. This section
562describes major schemes in use along with their expected behaviors.
563
564
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300565Weights
566-------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500567
568A parent's resource is distributed by adding up the weights of all
569active children and giving each the fraction matching the ratio of its
570weight against the sum. As only children which can make use of the
571resource at the moment participate in the distribution, this is
572work-conserving. Due to the dynamic nature, this model is usually
573used for stateless resources.
574
575All weights are in the range [1, 10000] with the default at 100. This
576allows symmetric multiplicative biases in both directions at fine
577enough granularity while staying in the intuitive range.
578
579As long as the weight is in range, all configuration combinations are
580valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
581process migrations.
582
583"cpu.weight" proportionally distributes CPU cycles to active children
584and is an example of this type.
585
586
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300587Limits
588------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500589
590A child can only consume upto the configured amount of the resource.
591Limits can be over-committed - the sum of the limits of children can
592exceed the amount of resource available to the parent.
593
594Limits are in the range [0, max] and defaults to "max", which is noop.
595
596As limits can be over-committed, all configuration combinations are
597valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
598process migrations.
599
600"io.max" limits the maximum BPS and/or IOPS that a cgroup can consume
601on an IO device and is an example of this type.
602
603
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300604Protections
605-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500606
607A cgroup is protected to be allocated upto the configured amount of
608the resource if the usages of all its ancestors are under their
609protected levels. Protections can be hard guarantees or best effort
610soft boundaries. Protections can also be over-committed in which case
611only upto the amount available to the parent is protected among
612children.
613
614Protections are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is
615noop.
616
617As protections can be over-committed, all configuration combinations
618are valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
619process migrations.
620
621"memory.low" implements best-effort memory protection and is an
622example of this type.
623
624
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300625Allocations
626-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500627
628A cgroup is exclusively allocated a certain amount of a finite
629resource. Allocations can't be over-committed - the sum of the
630allocations of children can not exceed the amount of resource
631available to the parent.
632
633Allocations are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is no
634resource.
635
636As allocations can't be over-committed, some configuration
637combinations are invalid and should be rejected. Also, if the
638resource is mandatory for execution of processes, process migrations
639may be rejected.
640
641"cpu.rt.max" hard-allocates realtime slices and is an example of this
642type.
643
644
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300645Interface Files
646===============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500647
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300648Format
649------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500650
651All interface files should be in one of the following formats whenever
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300652possible::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500653
654 New-line separated values
655 (when only one value can be written at once)
656
657 VAL0\n
658 VAL1\n
659 ...
660
661 Space separated values
662 (when read-only or multiple values can be written at once)
663
664 VAL0 VAL1 ...\n
665
666 Flat keyed
667
668 KEY0 VAL0\n
669 KEY1 VAL1\n
670 ...
671
672 Nested keyed
673
674 KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01...
675 KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11...
676 ...
677
678For a writable file, the format for writing should generally match
679reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or
680implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases.
681
682For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key
683can be written at a time. For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs
684may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified.
685
686
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300687Conventions
688-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500689
690- Settings for a single feature should be contained in a single file.
691
692- The root cgroup should be exempt from resource control and thus
693 shouldn't have resource control interface files. Also,
694 informational files on the root cgroup which end up showing global
695 information available elsewhere shouldn't exist.
696
697- If a controller implements weight based resource distribution, its
698 interface file should be named "weight" and have the range [1,
699 10000] with 100 as the default. The values are chosen to allow
700 enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it
701 intuitive (the default is 100%).
702
703- If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or
704 limit, the interface files should be named "min" and "max"
705 respectively. If a controller implements best effort resource
706 guarantee and/or limit, the interface files should be named "low"
707 and "high" respectively.
708
709 In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be
710 used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing.
711
712- If a setting has a configurable default value and keyed specific
713 overrides, the default entry should be keyed with "default" and
714 appear as the first entry in the file.
715
716 The default value can be updated by writing either "default $VAL" or
717 "$VAL".
718
719 When writing to update a specific override, "default" can be used as
720 the value to indicate removal of the override. Override entries
721 with "default" as the value must not appear when read.
722
723 For example, a setting which is keyed by major:minor device numbers
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300724 with integer values may look like the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500725
726 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
727 default 150
728 8:0 300
729
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300730 The default value can be updated by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500731
732 # echo 125 > cgroup-example-interface-file
733
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300734 or::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500735
736 # echo "default 125" > cgroup-example-interface-file
737
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300738 An override can be set by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500739
740 # echo "8:16 170" > cgroup-example-interface-file
741
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300742 and cleared by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500743
744 # echo "8:0 default" > cgroup-example-interface-file
745 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
746 default 125
747 8:16 170
748
749- For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file
750 "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs.
751 Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be
752 generated on the file.
753
754
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300755Core Interface Files
756--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500757
758All cgroup core files are prefixed with "cgroup."
759
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400760 cgroup.type
761
762 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
763 cgroups.
764
765 When read, it indicates the current type of the cgroup, which
766 can be one of the following values.
767
768 - "domain" : A normal valid domain cgroup.
769
770 - "domain threaded" : A threaded domain cgroup which is
771 serving as the root of a threaded subtree.
772
773 - "domain invalid" : A cgroup which is in an invalid state.
774 It can't be populated or have controllers enabled. It may
775 be allowed to become a threaded cgroup.
776
777 - "threaded" : A threaded cgroup which is a member of a
778 threaded subtree.
779
780 A cgroup can be turned into a threaded cgroup by writing
781 "threaded" to this file.
782
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500783 cgroup.procs
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500784 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
785 all cgroups.
786
787 When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which belong to
788 the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
789 same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved
790 to another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while
791 reading.
792
793 A PID can be written to migrate the process associated with
794 the PID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
795 following conditions.
796
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500797 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
798
799 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
800 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
801
802 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
803 should be granted along with the containing directory.
804
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400805 In a threaded cgroup, reading this file fails with EOPNOTSUPP
806 as all the processes belong to the thread root. Writing is
807 supported and moves every thread of the process to the cgroup.
808
809 cgroup.threads
810 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
811 all cgroups.
812
813 When read, it lists the TIDs of all threads which belong to
814 the cgroup one-per-line. The TIDs are not ordered and the
815 same TID may show up more than once if the thread got moved to
816 another cgroup and then back or the TID got recycled while
817 reading.
818
819 A TID can be written to migrate the thread associated with the
820 TID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
821 following conditions.
822
823 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.threads" file.
824
825 - The cgroup that the thread is currently in must be in the
826 same resource domain as the destination cgroup.
827
828 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
829 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
830
831 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
832 should be granted along with the containing directory.
833
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500834 cgroup.controllers
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500835 A read-only space separated values file which exists on all
836 cgroups.
837
838 It shows space separated list of all controllers available to
839 the cgroup. The controllers are not ordered.
840
841 cgroup.subtree_control
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500842 A read-write space separated values file which exists on all
843 cgroups. Starts out empty.
844
845 When read, it shows space separated list of the controllers
846 which are enabled to control resource distribution from the
847 cgroup to its children.
848
849 Space separated list of controllers prefixed with '+' or '-'
850 can be written to enable or disable controllers. A controller
851 name prefixed with '+' enables the controller and '-'
852 disables. If a controller appears more than once on the list,
853 the last one is effective. When multiple enable and disable
854 operations are specified, either all succeed or all fail.
855
856 cgroup.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500857 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
858 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
859 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
860 modified event.
861
862 populated
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500863 1 if the cgroup or its descendants contains any live
864 processes; otherwise, 0.
865
Roman Gushchin1a926e02017-07-28 18:28:44 +0100866 cgroup.max.descendants
867 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
868
869 Maximum allowed number of descent cgroups.
870 If the actual number of descendants is equal or larger,
871 an attempt to create a new cgroup in the hierarchy will fail.
872
873 cgroup.max.depth
874 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
875
876 Maximum allowed descent depth below the current cgroup.
877 If the actual descent depth is equal or larger,
878 an attempt to create a new child cgroup will fail.
879
Roman Gushchinec392252017-08-02 17:55:31 +0100880 cgroup.stat
881 A read-only flat-keyed file with the following entries:
882
883 nr_descendants
884 Total number of visible descendant cgroups.
885
886 nr_dying_descendants
887 Total number of dying descendant cgroups. A cgroup becomes
888 dying after being deleted by a user. The cgroup will remain
889 in dying state for some time undefined time (which can depend
890 on system load) before being completely destroyed.
891
892 A process can't enter a dying cgroup under any circumstances,
893 a dying cgroup can't revive.
894
895 A dying cgroup can consume system resources not exceeding
896 limits, which were active at the moment of cgroup deletion.
897
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500898
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300899Controllers
900===========
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500901
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300902CPU
903---
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500904
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500905The "cpu" controllers regulates distribution of CPU cycles. This
906controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for
907normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for
908realtime scheduling policy.
909
Tejun Heoc2f31b72017-12-05 09:10:17 -0800910WARNING: cgroup2 doesn't yet support control of realtime processes and
911the cpu controller can only be enabled when all RT processes are in
912the root cgroup. Be aware that system management software may already
913have placed RT processes into nonroot cgroups during the system boot
914process, and these processes may need to be moved to the root cgroup
915before the cpu controller can be enabled.
916
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500917
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300918CPU Interface Files
919~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500920
921All time durations are in microseconds.
922
923 cpu.stat
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500924 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700925 This file exists whether the controller is enabled or not.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500926
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700927 It always reports the following three stats:
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500928
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300929 - usage_usec
930 - user_usec
931 - system_usec
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700932
933 and the following three when the controller is enabled:
934
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300935 - nr_periods
936 - nr_throttled
937 - throttled_usec
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500938
939 cpu.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500940 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
941 cgroups. The default is "100".
942
943 The weight in the range [1, 10000].
944
Tejun Heo0d593632017-09-25 09:00:19 -0700945 cpu.weight.nice
946 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
947 cgroups. The default is "0".
948
949 The nice value is in the range [-20, 19].
950
951 This interface file is an alternative interface for
952 "cpu.weight" and allows reading and setting weight using the
953 same values used by nice(2). Because the range is smaller and
954 granularity is coarser for the nice values, the read value is
955 the closest approximation of the current weight.
956
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500957 cpu.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500958 A read-write two value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
959 The default is "max 100000".
960
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300961 The maximum bandwidth limit. It's in the following format::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500962
963 $MAX $PERIOD
964
965 which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each
966 $PERIOD duration. "max" for $MAX indicates no limit. If only
967 one number is written, $MAX is updated.
968
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500969
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300970Memory
971------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500972
973The "memory" controller regulates distribution of memory. Memory is
974stateful and implements both limit and protection models. Due to the
975intertwining between memory usage and reclaim pressure and the
976stateful nature of memory, the distribution model is relatively
977complex.
978
979While not completely water-tight, all major memory usages by a given
980cgroup are tracked so that the total memory consumption can be
981accounted and controlled to a reasonable extent. Currently, the
982following types of memory usages are tracked.
983
984- Userland memory - page cache and anonymous memory.
985
986- Kernel data structures such as dentries and inodes.
987
988- TCP socket buffers.
989
990The above list may expand in the future for better coverage.
991
992
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300993Memory Interface Files
994~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500995
996All memory amounts are in bytes. If a value which is not aligned to
997PAGE_SIZE is written, the value may be rounded up to the closest
998PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
999
1000 memory.current
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001001 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
1002 cgroups.
1003
1004 The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup
1005 and its descendants.
1006
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001007 memory.min
1008 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1009 cgroups. The default is "0".
1010
1011 Hard memory protection. If the memory usage of a cgroup
1012 is within its effective min boundary, the cgroup's memory
1013 won't be reclaimed under any conditions. If there is no
1014 unprotected reclaimable memory available, OOM killer
1015 is invoked.
1016
1017 Effective min boundary is limited by memory.min values of
1018 all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.min overcommitment
1019 (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
1020 than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
1021 the part of parent's protection proportional to its
1022 actual memory usage below memory.min.
1023
1024 Putting more memory than generally available under this
1025 protection is discouraged and may lead to constant OOMs.
1026
1027 If a memory cgroup is not populated with processes,
1028 its memory.min is ignored.
1029
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001030 memory.low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001031 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1032 cgroups. The default is "0".
1033
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001034 Best-effort memory protection. If the memory usage of a
1035 cgroup is within its effective low boundary, the cgroup's
1036 memory won't be reclaimed unless memory can be reclaimed
1037 from unprotected cgroups.
1038
1039 Effective low boundary is limited by memory.low values of
1040 all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.low overcommitment
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001041 (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001042 than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001043 the part of parent's protection proportional to its
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001044 actual memory usage below memory.low.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001045
1046 Putting more memory than generally available under this
1047 protection is discouraged.
1048
1049 memory.high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001050 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1051 cgroups. The default is "max".
1052
1053 Memory usage throttle limit. This is the main mechanism to
1054 control memory usage of a cgroup. If a cgroup's usage goes
1055 over the high boundary, the processes of the cgroup are
1056 throttled and put under heavy reclaim pressure.
1057
1058 Going over the high limit never invokes the OOM killer and
1059 under extreme conditions the limit may be breached.
1060
1061 memory.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001062 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1063 cgroups. The default is "max".
1064
1065 Memory usage hard limit. This is the final protection
1066 mechanism. If a cgroup's memory usage reaches this limit and
1067 can't be reduced, the OOM killer is invoked in the cgroup.
1068 Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit
1069 temporarily.
1070
1071 This is the ultimate protection mechanism. As long as the
1072 high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's
1073 utility is limited to providing the final safety net.
1074
1075 memory.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001076 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1077 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
1078 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
1079 modified event.
1080
1081 low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001082 The number of times the cgroup is reclaimed due to
1083 high memory pressure even though its usage is under
1084 the low boundary. This usually indicates that the low
1085 boundary is over-committed.
1086
1087 high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001088 The number of times processes of the cgroup are
1089 throttled and routed to perform direct memory reclaim
1090 because the high memory boundary was exceeded. For a
1091 cgroup whose memory usage is capped by the high limit
1092 rather than global memory pressure, this event's
1093 occurrences are expected.
1094
1095 max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001096 The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was
1097 about to go over the max boundary. If direct reclaim
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001098 fails to bring it down, the cgroup goes to OOM state.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001099
1100 oom
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001101 The number of time the cgroup's memory usage was
1102 reached the limit and allocation was about to fail.
1103
1104 Depending on context result could be invocation of OOM
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001105 killer and retrying allocation or failing allocation.
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001106
1107 Failed allocation in its turn could be returned into
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001108 userspace as -ENOMEM or silently ignored in cases like
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001109 disk readahead. For now OOM in memory cgroup kills
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001110 tasks iff shortage has happened inside page fault.
1111
1112 oom_kill
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001113 The number of processes belonging to this cgroup
1114 killed by any kind of OOM killer.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001115
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001116 memory.stat
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001117 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1118
1119 This breaks down the cgroup's memory footprint into different
1120 types of memory, type-specific details, and other information
1121 on the state and past events of the memory management system.
1122
1123 All memory amounts are in bytes.
1124
1125 The entries are ordered to be human readable, and new entries
1126 can show up in the middle. Don't rely on items remaining in a
1127 fixed position; use the keys to look up specific values!
1128
1129 anon
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001130 Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings such as
1131 brk(), sbrk(), and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS)
1132
1133 file
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001134 Amount of memory used to cache filesystem data,
1135 including tmpfs and shared memory.
1136
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001137 kernel_stack
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001138 Amount of memory allocated to kernel stacks.
1139
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001140 slab
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001141 Amount of memory used for storing in-kernel data
1142 structures.
1143
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001144 sock
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001145 Amount of memory used in network transmission buffers
1146
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001147 shmem
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001148 Amount of cached filesystem data that is swap-backed,
1149 such as tmpfs, shm segments, shared anonymous mmap()s
1150
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001151 file_mapped
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001152 Amount of cached filesystem data mapped with mmap()
1153
1154 file_dirty
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001155 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified but
1156 not yet written back to disk
1157
1158 file_writeback
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001159 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified and
1160 is currently being written back to disk
1161
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001162 inactive_anon, active_anon, inactive_file, active_file, unevictable
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001163 Amount of memory, swap-backed and filesystem-backed,
1164 on the internal memory management lists used by the
1165 page reclaim algorithm
1166
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001167 slab_reclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001168 Part of "slab" that might be reclaimed, such as
1169 dentries and inodes.
1170
1171 slab_unreclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001172 Part of "slab" that cannot be reclaimed on memory
1173 pressure.
1174
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001175 pgfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001176 Total number of page faults incurred
1177
1178 pgmajfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001179 Number of major page faults incurred
1180
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -07001181 workingset_refault
1182
1183 Number of refaults of previously evicted pages
1184
1185 workingset_activate
1186
1187 Number of refaulted pages that were immediately activated
1188
1189 workingset_nodereclaim
1190
1191 Number of times a shadow node has been reclaimed
1192
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001193 pgrefill
1194
1195 Amount of scanned pages (in an active LRU list)
1196
1197 pgscan
1198
1199 Amount of scanned pages (in an inactive LRU list)
1200
1201 pgsteal
1202
1203 Amount of reclaimed pages
1204
1205 pgactivate
1206
1207 Amount of pages moved to the active LRU list
1208
1209 pgdeactivate
1210
1211 Amount of pages moved to the inactive LRU lis
1212
1213 pglazyfree
1214
1215 Amount of pages postponed to be freed under memory pressure
1216
1217 pglazyfreed
1218
1219 Amount of reclaimed lazyfree pages
1220
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001221 memory.swap.current
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001222 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
1223 cgroups.
1224
1225 The total amount of swap currently being used by the cgroup
1226 and its descendants.
1227
1228 memory.swap.max
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001229 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1230 cgroups. The default is "max".
1231
1232 Swap usage hard limit. If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001233 limit, anonymous memory of the cgroup will not be swapped out.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001234
Tejun Heof3a53a32018-06-07 17:05:35 -07001235 memory.swap.events
1236 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1237 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
1238 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
1239 modified event.
1240
1241 max
1242 The number of times the cgroup's swap usage was about
1243 to go over the max boundary and swap allocation
1244 failed.
1245
1246 fail
1247 The number of times swap allocation failed either
1248 because of running out of swap system-wide or max
1249 limit.
1250
Tejun Heobe091022018-06-07 17:09:21 -07001251 When reduced under the current usage, the existing swap
1252 entries are reclaimed gradually and the swap usage may stay
1253 higher than the limit for an extended period of time. This
1254 reduces the impact on the workload and memory management.
1255
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001256
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001257Usage Guidelines
1258~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001259
1260"memory.high" is the main mechanism to control memory usage.
1261Over-committing on high limit (sum of high limits > available memory)
1262and letting global memory pressure to distribute memory according to
1263usage is a viable strategy.
1264
1265Because breach of the high limit doesn't trigger the OOM killer but
1266throttles the offending cgroup, a management agent has ample
1267opportunities to monitor and take appropriate actions such as granting
1268more memory or terminating the workload.
1269
1270Determining whether a cgroup has enough memory is not trivial as
1271memory usage doesn't indicate whether the workload can benefit from
1272more memory. For example, a workload which writes data received from
1273network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
1274performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
1275pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
1276memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
1277memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
1278implemented yet.
1279
1280
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001281Memory Ownership
1282~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001283
1284A memory area is charged to the cgroup which instantiated it and stays
1285charged to the cgroup until the area is released. Migrating a process
1286to a different cgroup doesn't move the memory usages that it
1287instantiated while in the previous cgroup to the new cgroup.
1288
1289A memory area may be used by processes belonging to different cgroups.
1290To which cgroup the area will be charged is in-deterministic; however,
1291over time, the memory area is likely to end up in a cgroup which has
1292enough memory allowance to avoid high reclaim pressure.
1293
1294If a cgroup sweeps a considerable amount of memory which is expected
1295to be accessed repeatedly by other cgroups, it may make sense to use
1296POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED to relinquish the ownership of memory areas
1297belonging to the affected files to ensure correct memory ownership.
1298
1299
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001300IO
1301--
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001302
1303The "io" controller regulates the distribution of IO resources. This
1304controller implements both weight based and absolute bandwidth or IOPS
1305limit distribution; however, weight based distribution is available
1306only if cfq-iosched is in use and neither scheme is available for
1307blk-mq devices.
1308
1309
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001310IO Interface Files
1311~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001312
1313 io.stat
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001314 A read-only nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1315 cgroups.
1316
1317 Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered.
1318 The following nested keys are defined.
1319
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001320 ====== =====================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001321 rbytes Bytes read
1322 wbytes Bytes written
1323 rios Number of read IOs
1324 wios Number of write IOs
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001325 dbytes Bytes discarded
1326 dios Number of discard IOs
1327 ====== =====================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001328
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001329 An example read output follows:
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001330
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001331 8:16 rbytes=1459200 wbytes=314773504 rios=192 wios=353 dbytes=0 dios=0
1332 8:0 rbytes=90430464 wbytes=299008000 rios=8950 wios=1252 dbytes=50331648 dios=3021
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001333
1334 io.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001335 A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1336 The default is "default 100".
1337
1338 The first line is the default weight applied to devices
1339 without specific override. The rest are overrides keyed by
1340 $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The weights are in
1341 the range [1, 10000] and specifies the relative amount IO time
1342 the cgroup can use in relation to its siblings.
1343
1344 The default weight can be updated by writing either "default
1345 $WEIGHT" or simply "$WEIGHT". Overrides can be set by writing
1346 "$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" and unset by writing "$MAJ:$MIN default".
1347
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001348 An example read output follows::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001349
1350 default 100
1351 8:16 200
1352 8:0 50
1353
1354 io.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001355 A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1356 cgroups.
1357
1358 BPS and IOPS based IO limit. Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN
1359 device numbers and not ordered. The following nested keys are
1360 defined.
1361
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001362 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001363 rbps Max read bytes per second
1364 wbps Max write bytes per second
1365 riops Max read IO operations per second
1366 wiops Max write IO operations per second
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001367 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001368
1369 When writing, any number of nested key-value pairs can be
1370 specified in any order. "max" can be specified as the value
1371 to remove a specific limit. If the same key is specified
1372 multiple times, the outcome is undefined.
1373
1374 BPS and IOPS are measured in each IO direction and IOs are
1375 delayed if limit is reached. Temporary bursts are allowed.
1376
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001377 Setting read limit at 2M BPS and write at 120 IOPS for 8:16::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001378
1379 echo "8:16 rbps=2097152 wiops=120" > io.max
1380
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001381 Reading returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001382
1383 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=120
1384
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001385 Write IOPS limit can be removed by writing the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001386
1387 echo "8:16 wiops=max" > io.max
1388
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001389 Reading now returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001390
1391 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=max
1392
1393
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001394Writeback
1395~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001396
1397Page cache is dirtied through buffered writes and shared mmaps and
1398written asynchronously to the backing filesystem by the writeback
1399mechanism. Writeback sits between the memory and IO domains and
1400regulates the proportion of dirty memory by balancing dirtying and
1401write IOs.
1402
1403The io controller, in conjunction with the memory controller,
1404implements control of page cache writeback IOs. The memory controller
1405defines the memory domain that dirty memory ratio is calculated and
1406maintained for and the io controller defines the io domain which
1407writes out dirty pages for the memory domain. Both system-wide and
1408per-cgroup dirty memory states are examined and the more restrictive
1409of the two is enforced.
1410
1411cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying
1412filesystem. Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4
1413and btrfs. On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are attributed to
1414the root cgroup.
1415
1416There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management
1417which affects how cgroup ownership is tracked. Memory is tracked per
1418page while writeback per inode. For the purpose of writeback, an
1419inode is assigned to a cgroup and all IO requests to write dirty pages
1420from the inode are attributed to that cgroup.
1421
1422As cgroup ownership for memory is tracked per page, there can be pages
1423which are associated with different cgroups than the one the inode is
1424associated with. These are called foreign pages. The writeback
1425constantly keeps track of foreign pages and, if a particular foreign
1426cgroup becomes the majority over a certain period of time, switches
1427the ownership of the inode to that cgroup.
1428
1429While this model is enough for most use cases where a given inode is
1430mostly dirtied by a single cgroup even when the main writing cgroup
1431changes over time, use cases where multiple cgroups write to a single
1432inode simultaneously are not supported well. In such circumstances, a
1433significant portion of IOs are likely to be attributed incorrectly.
1434As memory controller assigns page ownership on the first use and
1435doesn't update it until the page is released, even if writeback
1436strictly follows page ownership, multiple cgroups dirtying overlapping
1437areas wouldn't work as expected. It's recommended to avoid such usage
1438patterns.
1439
1440The sysctl knobs which affect writeback behavior are applied to cgroup
1441writeback as follows.
1442
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001443 vm.dirty_background_ratio, vm.dirty_ratio
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001444 These ratios apply the same to cgroup writeback with the
1445 amount of available memory capped by limits imposed by the
1446 memory controller and system-wide clean memory.
1447
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001448 vm.dirty_background_bytes, vm.dirty_bytes
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001449 For cgroup writeback, this is calculated into ratio against
1450 total available memory and applied the same way as
1451 vm.dirty[_background]_ratio.
1452
1453
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001454IO Latency
1455~~~~~~~~~~
1456
1457This is a cgroup v2 controller for IO workload protection. You provide a group
1458with a latency target, and if the average latency exceeds that target the
1459controller will throttle any peers that have a lower latency target than the
1460protected workload.
1461
1462The limits are only applied at the peer level in the hierarchy. This means that
1463in the diagram below, only groups A, B, and C will influence each other, and
1464groups D and F will influence each other. Group G will influence nobody.
1465
1466 [root]
1467 / | \
1468 A B C
1469 / \ |
1470 D F G
1471
1472
1473So the ideal way to configure this is to set io.latency in groups A, B, and C.
1474Generally you do not want to set a value lower than the latency your device
1475supports. Experiment to find the value that works best for your workload.
1476Start at higher than the expected latency for your device and watch the
Dennis Zhou (Facebook)c480bcf2018-08-01 23:15:41 -07001477avg_lat value in io.stat for your workload group to get an idea of the
1478latency you see during normal operation. Use the avg_lat value as a basis for
1479your real setting, setting at 10-15% higher than the value in io.stat.
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001480
1481How IO Latency Throttling Works
1482~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1483
1484io.latency is work conserving; so as long as everybody is meeting their latency
1485target the controller doesn't do anything. Once a group starts missing its
1486target it begins throttling any peer group that has a higher target than itself.
1487This throttling takes 2 forms:
1488
1489- Queue depth throttling. This is the number of outstanding IO's a group is
1490 allowed to have. We will clamp down relatively quickly, starting at no limit
1491 and going all the way down to 1 IO at a time.
1492
1493- Artificial delay induction. There are certain types of IO that cannot be
1494 throttled without possibly adversely affecting higher priority groups. This
1495 includes swapping and metadata IO. These types of IO are allowed to occur
1496 normally, however they are "charged" to the originating group. If the
1497 originating group is being throttled you will see the use_delay and delay
1498 fields in io.stat increase. The delay value is how many microseconds that are
1499 being added to any process that runs in this group. Because this number can
1500 grow quite large if there is a lot of swapping or metadata IO occurring we
1501 limit the individual delay events to 1 second at a time.
1502
1503Once the victimized group starts meeting its latency target again it will start
1504unthrottling any peer groups that were throttled previously. If the victimized
1505group simply stops doing IO the global counter will unthrottle appropriately.
1506
1507IO Latency Interface Files
1508~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1509
1510 io.latency
1511 This takes a similar format as the other controllers.
1512
1513 "MAJOR:MINOR target=<target time in microseconds"
1514
1515 io.stat
1516 If the controller is enabled you will see extra stats in io.stat in
1517 addition to the normal ones.
1518
1519 depth
1520 This is the current queue depth for the group.
1521
1522 avg_lat
Dennis Zhou (Facebook)c480bcf2018-08-01 23:15:41 -07001523 This is an exponential moving average with a decay rate of 1/exp
1524 bound by the sampling interval. The decay rate interval can be
1525 calculated by multiplying the win value in io.stat by the
1526 corresponding number of samples based on the win value.
1527
1528 win
1529 The sampling window size in milliseconds. This is the minimum
1530 duration of time between evaluation events. Windows only elapse
1531 with IO activity. Idle periods extend the most recent window.
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001532
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001533PID
1534---
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001535
1536The process number controller is used to allow a cgroup to stop any
1537new tasks from being fork()'d or clone()'d after a specified limit is
1538reached.
1539
1540The number of tasks in a cgroup can be exhausted in ways which other
1541controllers cannot prevent, thus warranting its own controller. For
1542example, a fork bomb is likely to exhaust the number of tasks before
1543hitting memory restrictions.
1544
1545Note that PIDs used in this controller refer to TIDs, process IDs as
1546used by the kernel.
1547
1548
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001549PID Interface Files
1550~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001551
1552 pids.max
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001553 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1554 cgroups. The default is "max".
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001555
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001556 Hard limit of number of processes.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001557
1558 pids.current
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001559 A read-only single value file which exists on all cgroups.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001560
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001561 The number of processes currently in the cgroup and its
1562 descendants.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001563
1564Organisational operations are not blocked by cgroup policies, so it is
1565possible to have pids.current > pids.max. This can be done by either
1566setting the limit to be smaller than pids.current, or attaching enough
1567processes to the cgroup such that pids.current is larger than
1568pids.max. However, it is not possible to violate a cgroup PID policy
1569through fork() or clone(). These will return -EAGAIN if the creation
1570of a new process would cause a cgroup policy to be violated.
1571
1572
Roman Gushchin4ad5a322017-12-13 19:49:03 +00001573Device controller
1574-----------------
1575
1576Device controller manages access to device files. It includes both
1577creation of new device files (using mknod), and access to the
1578existing device files.
1579
1580Cgroup v2 device controller has no interface files and is implemented
1581on top of cgroup BPF. To control access to device files, a user may
1582create bpf programs of the BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE type and attach them
1583to cgroups. On an attempt to access a device file, corresponding
1584BPF programs will be executed, and depending on the return value
1585the attempt will succeed or fail with -EPERM.
1586
1587A BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program takes a pointer to the bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx
1588structure, which describes the device access attempt: access type
1589(mknod/read/write) and device (type, major and minor numbers).
1590If the program returns 0, the attempt fails with -EPERM, otherwise
1591it succeeds.
1592
1593An example of BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program may be found in the kernel
1594source tree in the tools/testing/selftests/bpf/dev_cgroup.c file.
1595
1596
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001597RDMA
1598----
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05001599
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001600The "rdma" controller regulates the distribution and accounting of
1601of RDMA resources.
1602
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001603RDMA Interface Files
1604~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001605
1606 rdma.max
1607 A readwrite nested-keyed file that exists for all the cgroups
1608 except root that describes current configured resource limit
1609 for a RDMA/IB device.
1610
1611 Lines are keyed by device name and are not ordered.
1612 Each line contains space separated resource name and its configured
1613 limit that can be distributed.
1614
1615 The following nested keys are defined.
1616
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001617 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001618 hca_handle Maximum number of HCA Handles
1619 hca_object Maximum number of HCA Objects
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001620 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001621
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001622 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001623
1624 mlx4_0 hca_handle=2 hca_object=2000
1625 ocrdma1 hca_handle=3 hca_object=max
1626
1627 rdma.current
1628 A read-only file that describes current resource usage.
1629 It exists for all the cgroup except root.
1630
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001631 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001632
1633 mlx4_0 hca_handle=1 hca_object=20
1634 ocrdma1 hca_handle=1 hca_object=23
1635
1636
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001637Misc
1638----
Tejun Heo63f1ca52017-02-02 13:50:35 -05001639
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001640perf_event
1641~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05001642
1643perf_event controller, if not mounted on a legacy hierarchy, is
1644automatically enabled on the v2 hierarchy so that perf events can
1645always be filtered by cgroup v2 path. The controller can still be
1646moved to a legacy hierarchy after v2 hierarchy is populated.
1647
1648
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +01001649Non-normative information
1650-------------------------
1651
1652This section contains information that isn't considered to be a part of
1653the stable kernel API and so is subject to change.
1654
1655
1656CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
1657~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1658
1659When distributing CPU cycles in the root cgroup each thread in this
1660cgroup is treated as if it was hosted in a separate child cgroup of the
1661root cgroup. This child cgroup weight is dependent on its thread nice
1662level.
1663
1664For details of this mapping see sched_prio_to_weight array in
1665kernel/sched/core.c file (values from this array should be scaled
1666appropriately so the neutral - nice 0 - value is 100 instead of 1024).
1667
1668
1669IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
1670~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1671
1672Root cgroup processes are hosted in an implicit leaf child node.
1673When distributing IO resources this implicit child node is taken into
1674account as if it was a normal child cgroup of the root cgroup with a
1675weight value of 200.
1676
1677
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001678Namespace
1679=========
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001680
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001681Basics
1682------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001683
1684cgroup namespace provides a mechanism to virtualize the view of the
1685"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file and cgroup mounts. The CLONE_NEWCGROUP clone
1686flag can be used with clone(2) and unshare(2) to create a new cgroup
1687namespace. The process running inside the cgroup namespace will have
1688its "/proc/$PID/cgroup" output restricted to cgroupns root. The
1689cgroupns root is the cgroup of the process at the time of creation of
1690the cgroup namespace.
1691
1692Without cgroup namespace, the "/proc/$PID/cgroup" file shows the
1693complete path of the cgroup of a process. In a container setup where
1694a set of cgroups and namespaces are intended to isolate processes the
1695"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file may leak potential system level information
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001696to the isolated processes. For Example::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001697
1698 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1699 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
1700
1701The path '/batchjobs/container_id1' can be considered as system-data
1702and undesirable to expose to the isolated processes. cgroup namespace
1703can be used to restrict visibility of this path. For example, before
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001704creating a cgroup namespace, one would see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001705
1706 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
1707 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:37 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026531835]
1708 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1709 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
1710
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001711After unsharing a new namespace, the view changes::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001712
1713 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
1714 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:35 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026532183]
1715 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1716 0::/
1717
1718When some thread from a multi-threaded process unshares its cgroup
1719namespace, the new cgroupns gets applied to the entire process (all
1720the threads). This is natural for the v2 hierarchy; however, for the
1721legacy hierarchies, this may be unexpected.
1722
1723A cgroup namespace is alive as long as there are processes inside or
1724mounts pinning it. When the last usage goes away, the cgroup
1725namespace is destroyed. The cgroupns root and the actual cgroups
1726remain.
1727
1728
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001729The Root and Views
1730------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001731
1732The 'cgroupns root' for a cgroup namespace is the cgroup in which the
1733process calling unshare(2) is running. For example, if a process in
1734/batchjobs/container_id1 cgroup calls unshare, cgroup
1735/batchjobs/container_id1 becomes the cgroupns root. For the
1736init_cgroup_ns, this is the real root ('/') cgroup.
1737
1738The cgroupns root cgroup does not change even if the namespace creator
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001739process later moves to a different cgroup::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001740
1741 # ~/unshare -c # unshare cgroupns in some cgroup
1742 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1743 0::/
1744 # mkdir sub_cgrp_1
1745 # echo 0 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
1746 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1747 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1748
1749Each process gets its namespace-specific view of "/proc/$PID/cgroup"
1750
1751Processes running inside the cgroup namespace will be able to see
1752cgroup paths (in /proc/self/cgroup) only inside their root cgroup.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001753From within an unshared cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001754
1755 # sleep 100000 &
1756 [1] 7353
1757 # echo 7353 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
1758 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1759 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1760
1761From the initial cgroup namespace, the real cgroup path will be
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001762visible::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001763
1764 $ cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1765 0::/batchjobs/container_id1/sub_cgrp_1
1766
1767From a sibling cgroup namespace (that is, a namespace rooted at a
1768different cgroup), the cgroup path relative to its own cgroup
1769namespace root will be shown. For instance, if PID 7353's cgroup
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001770namespace root is at '/batchjobs/container_id2', then it will see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001771
1772 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1773 0::/../container_id2/sub_cgrp_1
1774
1775Note that the relative path always starts with '/' to indicate that
1776its relative to the cgroup namespace root of the caller.
1777
1778
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001779Migration and setns(2)
1780----------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001781
1782Processes inside a cgroup namespace can move into and out of the
1783namespace root if they have proper access to external cgroups. For
1784example, from inside a namespace with cgroupns root at
1785/batchjobs/container_id1, and assuming that the global hierarchy is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001786still accessible inside cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001787
1788 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1789 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1790 # echo 7353 > batchjobs/container_id2/cgroup.procs
1791 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1792 0::/../container_id2
1793
1794Note that this kind of setup is not encouraged. A task inside cgroup
1795namespace should only be exposed to its own cgroupns hierarchy.
1796
1797setns(2) to another cgroup namespace is allowed when:
1798
1799(a) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its current user namespace
1800(b) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against the target cgroup
1801 namespace's userns
1802
1803No implicit cgroup changes happen with attaching to another cgroup
1804namespace. It is expected that the someone moves the attaching
1805process under the target cgroup namespace root.
1806
1807
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001808Interaction with Other Namespaces
1809---------------------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001810
1811Namespace specific cgroup hierarchy can be mounted by a process
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001812running inside a non-init cgroup namespace::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001813
1814 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
1815
1816This will mount the unified cgroup hierarchy with cgroupns root as the
1817filesystem root. The process needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its user and
1818mount namespaces.
1819
1820The virtualization of /proc/self/cgroup file combined with restricting
1821the view of cgroup hierarchy by namespace-private cgroupfs mount
1822provides a properly isolated cgroup view inside the container.
1823
1824
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001825Information on Kernel Programming
1826=================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001827
1828This section contains kernel programming information in the areas
1829where interacting with cgroup is necessary. cgroup core and
1830controllers are not covered.
1831
1832
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001833Filesystem Support for Writeback
1834--------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001835
1836A filesystem can support cgroup writeback by updating
1837address_space_operations->writepage[s]() to annotate bio's using the
1838following two functions.
1839
1840 wbc_init_bio(@wbc, @bio)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001841 Should be called for each bio carrying writeback data and
1842 associates the bio with the inode's owner cgroup. Can be
1843 called anytime between bio allocation and submission.
1844
1845 wbc_account_io(@wbc, @page, @bytes)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001846 Should be called for each data segment being written out.
1847 While this function doesn't care exactly when it's called
1848 during the writeback session, it's the easiest and most
1849 natural to call it as data segments are added to a bio.
1850
1851With writeback bio's annotated, cgroup support can be enabled per
1852super_block by setting SB_I_CGROUPWB in ->s_iflags. This allows for
1853selective disabling of cgroup writeback support which is helpful when
1854certain filesystem features, e.g. journaled data mode, are
1855incompatible.
1856
1857wbc_init_bio() binds the specified bio to its cgroup. Depending on
1858the configuration, the bio may be executed at a lower priority and if
1859the writeback session is holding shared resources, e.g. a journal
1860entry, may lead to priority inversion. There is no one easy solution
1861for the problem. Filesystems can try to work around specific problem
1862cases by skipping wbc_init_bio() or using bio_associate_blkcg()
1863directly.
1864
1865
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001866Deprecated v1 Core Features
1867===========================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001868
1869- Multiple hierarchies including named ones are not supported.
1870
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -04001871- All v1 mount options are not supported.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001872
1873- The "tasks" file is removed and "cgroup.procs" is not sorted.
1874
1875- "cgroup.clone_children" is removed.
1876
1877- /proc/cgroups is meaningless for v2. Use "cgroup.controllers" file
1878 at the root instead.
1879
1880
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001881Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
1882====================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001883
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001884Multiple Hierarchies
1885--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001886
1887cgroup v1 allowed an arbitrary number of hierarchies and each
1888hierarchy could host any number of controllers. While this seemed to
1889provide a high level of flexibility, it wasn't useful in practice.
1890
1891For example, as there is only one instance of each controller, utility
1892type controllers such as freezer which can be useful in all
1893hierarchies could only be used in one. The issue is exacerbated by
1894the fact that controllers couldn't be moved to another hierarchy once
1895hierarchies were populated. Another issue was that all controllers
1896bound to a hierarchy were forced to have exactly the same view of the
1897hierarchy. It wasn't possible to vary the granularity depending on
1898the specific controller.
1899
1900In practice, these issues heavily limited which controllers could be
1901put on the same hierarchy and most configurations resorted to putting
1902each controller on its own hierarchy. Only closely related ones, such
1903as the cpu and cpuacct controllers, made sense to be put on the same
1904hierarchy. This often meant that userland ended up managing multiple
1905similar hierarchies repeating the same steps on each hierarchy
1906whenever a hierarchy management operation was necessary.
1907
1908Furthermore, support for multiple hierarchies came at a steep cost.
1909It greatly complicated cgroup core implementation but more importantly
1910the support for multiple hierarchies restricted how cgroup could be
1911used in general and what controllers was able to do.
1912
1913There was no limit on how many hierarchies there might be, which meant
1914that a thread's cgroup membership couldn't be described in finite
1915length. The key might contain any number of entries and was unlimited
1916in length, which made it highly awkward to manipulate and led to
1917addition of controllers which existed only to identify membership,
1918which in turn exacerbated the original problem of proliferating number
1919of hierarchies.
1920
1921Also, as a controller couldn't have any expectation regarding the
1922topologies of hierarchies other controllers might be on, each
1923controller had to assume that all other controllers were attached to
1924completely orthogonal hierarchies. This made it impossible, or at
1925least very cumbersome, for controllers to cooperate with each other.
1926
1927In most use cases, putting controllers on hierarchies which are
1928completely orthogonal to each other isn't necessary. What usually is
1929called for is the ability to have differing levels of granularity
1930depending on the specific controller. In other words, hierarchy may
1931be collapsed from leaf towards root when viewed from specific
1932controllers. For example, a given configuration might not care about
1933how memory is distributed beyond a certain level while still wanting
1934to control how CPU cycles are distributed.
1935
1936
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001937Thread Granularity
1938------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001939
1940cgroup v1 allowed threads of a process to belong to different cgroups.
1941This didn't make sense for some controllers and those controllers
1942ended up implementing different ways to ignore such situations but
1943much more importantly it blurred the line between API exposed to
1944individual applications and system management interface.
1945
1946Generally, in-process knowledge is available only to the process
1947itself; thus, unlike service-level organization of processes,
1948categorizing threads of a process requires active participation from
1949the application which owns the target process.
1950
1951cgroup v1 had an ambiguously defined delegation model which got abused
1952in combination with thread granularity. cgroups were delegated to
1953individual applications so that they can create and manage their own
1954sub-hierarchies and control resource distributions along them. This
1955effectively raised cgroup to the status of a syscall-like API exposed
1956to lay programs.
1957
1958First of all, cgroup has a fundamentally inadequate interface to be
1959exposed this way. For a process to access its own knobs, it has to
1960extract the path on the target hierarchy from /proc/self/cgroup,
1961construct the path by appending the name of the knob to the path, open
1962and then read and/or write to it. This is not only extremely clunky
1963and unusual but also inherently racy. There is no conventional way to
1964define transaction across the required steps and nothing can guarantee
1965that the process would actually be operating on its own sub-hierarchy.
1966
1967cgroup controllers implemented a number of knobs which would never be
1968accepted as public APIs because they were just adding control knobs to
1969system-management pseudo filesystem. cgroup ended up with interface
1970knobs which were not properly abstracted or refined and directly
1971revealed kernel internal details. These knobs got exposed to
1972individual applications through the ill-defined delegation mechanism
1973effectively abusing cgroup as a shortcut to implementing public APIs
1974without going through the required scrutiny.
1975
1976This was painful for both userland and kernel. Userland ended up with
1977misbehaving and poorly abstracted interfaces and kernel exposing and
1978locked into constructs inadvertently.
1979
1980
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001981Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
1982-------------------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001983
1984cgroup v1 allowed threads to be in any cgroups which created an
1985interesting problem where threads belonging to a parent cgroup and its
1986children cgroups competed for resources. This was nasty as two
1987different types of entities competed and there was no obvious way to
1988settle it. Different controllers did different things.
1989
1990The cpu controller considered threads and cgroups as equivalents and
1991mapped nice levels to cgroup weights. This worked for some cases but
1992fell flat when children wanted to be allocated specific ratios of CPU
1993cycles and the number of internal threads fluctuated - the ratios
1994constantly changed as the number of competing entities fluctuated.
1995There also were other issues. The mapping from nice level to weight
1996wasn't obvious or universal, and there were various other knobs which
1997simply weren't available for threads.
1998
1999The io controller implicitly created a hidden leaf node for each
2000cgroup to host the threads. The hidden leaf had its own copies of all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002001the knobs with ``leaf_`` prefixed. While this allowed equivalent
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002002control over internal threads, it was with serious drawbacks. It
2003always added an extra layer of nesting which wouldn't be necessary
2004otherwise, made the interface messy and significantly complicated the
2005implementation.
2006
2007The memory controller didn't have a way to control what happened
2008between internal tasks and child cgroups and the behavior was not
2009clearly defined. There were attempts to add ad-hoc behaviors and
2010knobs to tailor the behavior to specific workloads which would have
2011led to problems extremely difficult to resolve in the long term.
2012
2013Multiple controllers struggled with internal tasks and came up with
2014different ways to deal with it; unfortunately, all the approaches were
2015severely flawed and, furthermore, the widely different behaviors
2016made cgroup as a whole highly inconsistent.
2017
2018This clearly is a problem which needs to be addressed from cgroup core
2019in a uniform way.
2020
2021
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002022Other Interface Issues
2023----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002024
2025cgroup v1 grew without oversight and developed a large number of
2026idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies. One issue on the cgroup core side
2027was how an empty cgroup was notified - a userland helper binary was
2028forked and executed for each event. The event delivery wasn't
2029recursive or delegatable. The limitations of the mechanism also led
2030to in-kernel event delivery filtering mechanism further complicating
2031the interface.
2032
2033Controller interfaces were problematic too. An extreme example is
2034controllers completely ignoring hierarchical organization and treating
2035all cgroups as if they were all located directly under the root
2036cgroup. Some controllers exposed a large amount of inconsistent
2037implementation details to userland.
2038
2039There also was no consistency across controllers. When a new cgroup
2040was created, some controllers defaulted to not imposing extra
2041restrictions while others disallowed any resource usage until
2042explicitly configured. Configuration knobs for the same type of
2043control used widely differing naming schemes and formats. Statistics
2044and information knobs were named arbitrarily and used different
2045formats and units even in the same controller.
2046
2047cgroup v2 establishes common conventions where appropriate and updates
2048controllers so that they expose minimal and consistent interfaces.
2049
2050
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002051Controller Issues and Remedies
2052------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002053
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002054Memory
2055~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002056
2057The original lower boundary, the soft limit, is defined as a limit
2058that is per default unset. As a result, the set of cgroups that
2059global reclaim prefers is opt-in, rather than opt-out. The costs for
2060optimizing these mostly negative lookups are so high that the
2061implementation, despite its enormous size, does not even provide the
2062basic desirable behavior. First off, the soft limit has no
2063hierarchical meaning. All configured groups are organized in a global
2064rbtree and treated like equal peers, regardless where they are located
2065in the hierarchy. This makes subtree delegation impossible. Second,
2066the soft limit reclaim pass is so aggressive that it not just
2067introduces high allocation latencies into the system, but also impacts
2068system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature
2069becomes self-defeating.
2070
2071The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07002072reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it's within its low,
2073which makes delegation of subtrees possible.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002074
2075The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict
2076limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called.
2077But this generally goes against the goal of making the most out of the
2078available memory. The memory consumption of workloads varies during
2079runtime, and that requires users to overcommit. But doing that with a
2080strict upper limit requires either a fairly accurate prediction of the
2081working set size or adding slack to the limit. Since working set size
2082estimation is hard and error prone, and getting it wrong results in
2083OOM kills, most users tend to err on the side of a looser limit and
2084end up wasting precious resources.
2085
2086The memory.high boundary on the other hand can be set much more
2087conservatively. When hit, it throttles allocations by forcing them
2088into direct reclaim to work off the excess, but it never invokes the
2089OOM killer. As a result, a high boundary that is chosen too
2090aggressively will not terminate the processes, but instead it will
2091lead to gradual performance degradation. The user can monitor this
2092and make corrections until the minimal memory footprint that still
2093gives acceptable performance is found.
2094
2095In extreme cases, with many concurrent allocations and a complete
2096breakdown of reclaim progress within the group, the high boundary can
2097be exceeded. But even then it's mostly better to satisfy the
2098allocation from the slack available in other groups or the rest of the
2099system than killing the group. Otherwise, memory.max is there to
2100limit this type of spillover and ultimately contain buggy or even
2101malicious applications.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08002102
Johannes Weinerb6e6edc2016-03-17 14:20:28 -07002103Setting the original memory.limit_in_bytes below the current usage was
2104subject to a race condition, where concurrent charges could cause the
2105limit setting to fail. memory.max on the other hand will first set the
2106limit to prevent new charges, and then reclaim and OOM kill until the
2107new limit is met - or the task writing to memory.max is killed.
2108
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08002109The combined memory+swap accounting and limiting is replaced by real
2110control over swap space.
2111
2112The main argument for a combined memory+swap facility in the original
2113cgroup design was that global or parental pressure would always be
2114able to swap all anonymous memory of a child group, regardless of the
2115child's own (possibly untrusted) configuration. However, untrusted
2116groups can sabotage swapping by other means - such as referencing its
2117anonymous memory in a tight loop - and an admin can not assume full
2118swappability when overcommitting untrusted jobs.
2119
2120For trusted jobs, on the other hand, a combined counter is not an
2121intuitive userspace interface, and it flies in the face of the idea
2122that cgroup controllers should account and limit specific physical
2123resources. Swap space is a resource like all others in the system,
2124and that's why unified hierarchy allows distributing it separately.