blob: 5ac2fbde97e6aad20b8916d9904cb9e0d03e1831 [file] [log] [blame]
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001
2Control Group v2
3
4October, 2015 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
5
6This is the authoritative documentation on the design, interface and
7conventions of cgroup v2. It describes all userland-visible aspects
8of cgroup including core and specific controller behaviors. All
9future changes must be reflected in this document. Documentation for
W. Trevor King9a2ddda2016-01-27 13:01:52 -080010v1 is available under Documentation/cgroup-v1/.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050011
12CONTENTS
13
141. Introduction
15 1-1. Terminology
16 1-2. What is cgroup?
172. Basic Operations
18 2-1. Mounting
19 2-2. Organizing Processes
20 2-3. [Un]populated Notification
21 2-4. Controlling Controllers
22 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling
23 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint
24 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint
25 2-5. Delegation
26 2-5-1. Model of Delegation
27 2-5-2. Delegation Containment
28 2-6. Guidelines
29 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control
30 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions
313. Resource Distribution Models
32 3-1. Weights
33 3-2. Limits
34 3-3. Protections
35 3-4. Allocations
364. Interface Files
37 4-1. Format
38 4-2. Conventions
39 4-3. Core Interface Files
405. Controllers
41 5-1. CPU
42 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files
43 5-2. Memory
44 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files
45 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines
46 5-2-3. Memory Ownership
47 5-3. IO
48 5-3-1. IO Interface Files
49 5-3-2. Writeback
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +000050 5-4. PID
51 5-4-1. PID Interface Files
Tejun Heo63f1ca52017-02-02 13:50:35 -050052 5-5. RDMA
53 5-5-1. RDMA Interface Files
54 5-6. Misc
55 5-6-1. perf_event
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -0600566. Namespace
57 6-1. Basics
58 6-2. The Root and Views
59 6-3. Migration and setns(2)
60 6-4. Interaction with Other Namespaces
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050061P. Information on Kernel Programming
62 P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback
63D. Deprecated v1 Core Features
64R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
65 R-1. Multiple Hierarchies
66 R-2. Thread Granularity
67 R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
68 R-4. Other Interface Issues
69 R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies
70 R-5-1. Memory
71
72
731. Introduction
74
751-1. Terminology
76
77"cgroup" stands for "control group" and is never capitalized. The
78singular form is used to designate the whole feature and also as a
79qualifier as in "cgroup controllers". When explicitly referring to
80multiple individual control groups, the plural form "cgroups" is used.
81
82
831-2. What is cgroup?
84
85cgroup is a mechanism to organize processes hierarchically and
86distribute system resources along the hierarchy in a controlled and
87configurable manner.
88
89cgroup is largely composed of two parts - the core and controllers.
90cgroup core is primarily responsible for hierarchically organizing
91processes. A cgroup controller is usually responsible for
92distributing a specific type of system resource along the hierarchy
93although there are utility controllers which serve purposes other than
94resource distribution.
95
96cgroups form a tree structure and every process in the system belongs
97to one and only one cgroup. All threads of a process belong to the
98same cgroup. On creation, all processes are put in the cgroup that
99the parent process belongs to at the time. A process can be migrated
100to another cgroup. Migration of a process doesn't affect already
101existing descendant processes.
102
103Following certain structural constraints, controllers may be enabled or
104disabled selectively on a cgroup. All controller behaviors are
105hierarchical - if a controller is enabled on a cgroup, it affects all
106processes which belong to the cgroups consisting the inclusive
107sub-hierarchy of the cgroup. When a controller is enabled on a nested
108cgroup, it always restricts the resource distribution further. The
109restrictions set closer to the root in the hierarchy can not be
110overridden from further away.
111
112
1132. Basic Operations
114
1152-1. Mounting
116
117Unlike v1, cgroup v2 has only single hierarchy. The cgroup v2
118hierarchy can be mounted with the following mount command.
119
120 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
121
122cgroup2 filesystem has the magic number 0x63677270 ("cgrp"). All
123controllers which support v2 and are not bound to a v1 hierarchy are
124automatically bound to the v2 hierarchy and show up at the root.
125Controllers which are not in active use in the v2 hierarchy can be
126bound to other hierarchies. This allows mixing v2 hierarchy with the
127legacy v1 multiple hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way.
128
129A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller
130is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy. Because per-cgroup
131controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may
132have lingering references, a controller may not show up immediately on
133the v2 hierarchy after the final umount of the previous hierarchy.
134Similarly, a controller should be fully disabled to be moved out of
135the unified hierarchy and it may take some time for the disabled
136controller to become available for other hierarchies; furthermore, due
137to inter-controller dependencies, other controllers may need to be
138disabled too.
139
140While useful for development and manual configurations, moving
141controllers dynamically between the v2 and other hierarchies is
142strongly discouraged for production use. It is recommended to decide
143the hierarchies and controller associations before starting using the
144controllers after system boot.
145
Johannes Weiner1619b6d2016-02-16 13:21:14 -0500146During transition to v2, system management software might still
147automount the v1 cgroup filesystem and so hijack all controllers
148during boot, before manual intervention is possible. To make testing
149and experimenting easier, the kernel parameter cgroup_no_v1= allows
150disabling controllers in v1 and make them always available in v2.
151
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400152cgroup v2 currently supports the following mount options.
153
154 nsdelegate
155
156 Consider cgroup namespaces as delegation boundaries. This
157 option is system wide and can only be set on mount or modified
158 through remount from the init namespace. The mount option is
159 ignored on non-init namespace mounts. Please refer to the
160 Delegation section for details.
161
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500162
1632-2. Organizing Processes
164
165Initially, only the root cgroup exists to which all processes belong.
166A child cgroup can be created by creating a sub-directory.
167
168 # mkdir $CGROUP_NAME
169
170A given cgroup may have multiple child cgroups forming a tree
171structure. Each cgroup has a read-writable interface file
172"cgroup.procs". When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which
173belong to the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
174same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved to
175another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while reading.
176
177A process can be migrated into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
178target cgroup's "cgroup.procs" file. Only one process can be migrated
179on a single write(2) call. If a process is composed of multiple
180threads, writing the PID of any thread migrates all threads of the
181process.
182
183When a process forks a child process, the new process is born into the
184cgroup that the forking process belongs to at the time of the
185operation. After exit, a process stays associated with the cgroup
186that it belonged to at the time of exit until it's reaped; however, a
187zombie process does not appear in "cgroup.procs" and thus can't be
188moved to another cgroup.
189
190A cgroup which doesn't have any children or live processes can be
191destroyed by removing the directory. Note that a cgroup which doesn't
192have any children and is associated only with zombie processes is
193considered empty and can be removed.
194
195 # rmdir $CGROUP_NAME
196
197"/proc/$PID/cgroup" lists a process's cgroup membership. If legacy
198cgroup is in use in the system, this file may contain multiple lines,
199one for each hierarchy. The entry for cgroup v2 is always in the
200format "0::$PATH".
201
202 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
203 ...
204 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested
205
206If the process becomes a zombie and the cgroup it was associated with
207is removed subsequently, " (deleted)" is appended to the path.
208
209 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
210 ...
211 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested (deleted)
212
213
2142-3. [Un]populated Notification
215
216Each non-root cgroup has a "cgroup.events" file which contains
217"populated" field indicating whether the cgroup's sub-hierarchy has
218live processes in it. Its value is 0 if there is no live process in
219the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1. poll and [id]notify
220events are triggered when the value changes. This can be used, for
221example, to start a clean-up operation after all processes of a given
222sub-hierarchy have exited. The populated state updates and
223notifications are recursive. Consider the following sub-hierarchy
224where the numbers in the parentheses represent the numbers of processes
225in each cgroup.
226
227 A(4) - B(0) - C(1)
228 \ D(0)
229
230A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0. After the one
231process in C exits, B and C's "populated" fields would flip to "0" and
232file modified events will be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of
233both cgroups.
234
235
2362-4. Controlling Controllers
237
2382-4-1. Enabling and Disabling
239
240Each cgroup has a "cgroup.controllers" file which lists all
241controllers available for the cgroup to enable.
242
243 # cat cgroup.controllers
244 cpu io memory
245
246No controller is enabled by default. Controllers can be enabled and
247disabled by writing to the "cgroup.subtree_control" file.
248
249 # echo "+cpu +memory -io" > cgroup.subtree_control
250
251Only controllers which are listed in "cgroup.controllers" can be
252enabled. When multiple operations are specified as above, either they
253all succeed or fail. If multiple operations on the same controller
254are specified, the last one is effective.
255
256Enabling a controller in a cgroup indicates that the distribution of
257the target resource across its immediate children will be controlled.
258Consider the following sub-hierarchy. The enabled controllers are
259listed in parentheses.
260
261 A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C()
262 \ D()
263
264As A has "cpu" and "memory" enabled, A will control the distribution
265of CPU cycles and memory to its children, in this case, B. As B has
266"memory" enabled but not "CPU", C and D will compete freely on CPU
267cycles but their division of memory available to B will be controlled.
268
269As a controller regulates the distribution of the target resource to
270the cgroup's children, enabling it creates the controller's interface
271files in the child cgroups. In the above example, enabling "cpu" on B
272would create the "cpu." prefixed controller interface files in C and
273D. Likewise, disabling "memory" from B would remove the "memory."
274prefixed controller interface files from C and D. This means that the
275controller interface files - anything which doesn't start with
276"cgroup." are owned by the parent rather than the cgroup itself.
277
278
2792-4-2. Top-down Constraint
280
281Resources are distributed top-down and a cgroup can further distribute
282a resource only if the resource has been distributed to it from the
283parent. This means that all non-root "cgroup.subtree_control" files
284can only contain controllers which are enabled in the parent's
285"cgroup.subtree_control" file. A controller can be enabled only if
286the parent has the controller enabled and a controller can't be
287disabled if one or more children have it enabled.
288
289
2902-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint
291
292Non-root cgroups can only distribute resources to their children when
293they don't have any processes of their own. In other words, only
294cgroups which don't contain any processes can have controllers enabled
295in their "cgroup.subtree_control" files.
296
297This guarantees that, when a controller is looking at the part of the
298hierarchy which has it enabled, processes are always only on the
299leaves. This rules out situations where child cgroups compete against
300internal processes of the parent.
301
302The root cgroup is exempt from this restriction. Root contains
303processes and anonymous resource consumption which can't be associated
304with any other cgroups and requires special treatment from most
305controllers. How resource consumption in the root cgroup is governed
306is up to each controller.
307
308Note that the restriction doesn't get in the way if there is no
309enabled controller in the cgroup's "cgroup.subtree_control". This is
310important as otherwise it wouldn't be possible to create children of a
311populated cgroup. To control resource distribution of a cgroup, the
312cgroup must create children and transfer all its processes to the
313children before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control"
314file.
315
316
3172-5. Delegation
318
3192-5-1. Model of Delegation
320
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400321A cgroup can be delegated in two ways. First, to a less privileged
322user by granting write access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs"
323and "cgroup.subtree_control" files to the user. Second, if the
324"nsdelegate" mount option is set, automatically to a cgroup namespace
325on namespace creation.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500326
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400327Because the resource control interface files in a given directory
328control the distribution of the parent's resources, the delegatee
329shouldn't be allowed to write to them. For the first method, this is
330achieved by not granting access to these files. For the second, the
331kernel rejects writes to all files other than "cgroup.procs" and
332"cgroup.subtree_control" on a namespace root from inside the
333namespace.
334
335The end results are equivalent for both delegation types. Once
336delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory,
337organize processes inside it as it sees fit and further distribute the
338resources it received from the parent. The limits and other settings
339of all resource controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what
340happens in the delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the
341resource restrictions imposed by the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500342
343Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of
344cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however,
345this may be limited explicitly in the future.
346
347
3482-5-2. Delegation Containment
349
350A delegated sub-hierarchy is contained in the sense that processes
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400351can't be moved into or out of the sub-hierarchy by the delegatee.
352
353For delegations to a less privileged user, this is achieved by
354requiring the following conditions for a process with a non-root euid
355to migrate a target process into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
356"cgroup.procs" file.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500357
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500358- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
359
360- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
361 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
362
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500363The above two constraints ensure that while a delegatee may migrate
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500364processes around freely in the delegated sub-hierarchy it can't pull
365in from or push out to outside the sub-hierarchy.
366
367For an example, let's assume cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to
368user U0 who created C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows and
369all processes under C0 and C1 belong to U0.
370
371 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00
372 ~ cgroup ~ \ C01
373 ~ hierarchy ~
374 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10
375
376Let's also say U0 wants to write the PID of a process which is
377currently in C10 into "C00/cgroup.procs". U0 has write access to the
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500378file; however, the common ancestor of the source cgroup C10 and the
379destination cgroup C00 is above the points of delegation and U0 would
380not have write access to its "cgroup.procs" files and thus the write
381will be denied with -EACCES.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500382
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400383For delegations to namespaces, containment is achieved by requiring
384that both the source and destination cgroups are reachable from the
385namespace of the process which is attempting the migration. If either
386is not reachable, the migration is rejected with -ENOENT.
387
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500388
3892-6. Guidelines
390
3912-6-1. Organize Once and Control
392
393Migrating a process across cgroups is a relatively expensive operation
394and stateful resources such as memory are not moved together with the
395process. This is an explicit design decision as there often exist
396inherent trade-offs between migration and various hot paths in terms
397of synchronization cost.
398
399As such, migrating processes across cgroups frequently as a means to
400apply different resource restrictions is discouraged. A workload
401should be assigned to a cgroup according to the system's logical and
402resource structure once on start-up. Dynamic adjustments to resource
403distribution can be made by changing controller configuration through
404the interface files.
405
406
4072-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions
408
409Interface files for a cgroup and its children cgroups occupy the same
410directory and it is possible to create children cgroups which collide
411with interface files.
412
413All cgroup core interface files are prefixed with "cgroup." and each
414controller's interface files are prefixed with the controller name and
415a dot. A controller's name is composed of lower case alphabets and
416'_'s but never begins with an '_' so it can be used as the prefix
417character for collision avoidance. Also, interface file names won't
418start or end with terms which are often used in categorizing workloads
419such as job, service, slice, unit or workload.
420
421cgroup doesn't do anything to prevent name collisions and it's the
422user's responsibility to avoid them.
423
424
4253. Resource Distribution Models
426
427cgroup controllers implement several resource distribution schemes
428depending on the resource type and expected use cases. This section
429describes major schemes in use along with their expected behaviors.
430
431
4323-1. Weights
433
434A parent's resource is distributed by adding up the weights of all
435active children and giving each the fraction matching the ratio of its
436weight against the sum. As only children which can make use of the
437resource at the moment participate in the distribution, this is
438work-conserving. Due to the dynamic nature, this model is usually
439used for stateless resources.
440
441All weights are in the range [1, 10000] with the default at 100. This
442allows symmetric multiplicative biases in both directions at fine
443enough granularity while staying in the intuitive range.
444
445As long as the weight is in range, all configuration combinations are
446valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
447process migrations.
448
449"cpu.weight" proportionally distributes CPU cycles to active children
450and is an example of this type.
451
452
4533-2. Limits
454
455A child can only consume upto the configured amount of the resource.
456Limits can be over-committed - the sum of the limits of children can
457exceed the amount of resource available to the parent.
458
459Limits are in the range [0, max] and defaults to "max", which is noop.
460
461As limits can be over-committed, all configuration combinations are
462valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
463process migrations.
464
465"io.max" limits the maximum BPS and/or IOPS that a cgroup can consume
466on an IO device and is an example of this type.
467
468
4693-3. Protections
470
471A cgroup is protected to be allocated upto the configured amount of
472the resource if the usages of all its ancestors are under their
473protected levels. Protections can be hard guarantees or best effort
474soft boundaries. Protections can also be over-committed in which case
475only upto the amount available to the parent is protected among
476children.
477
478Protections are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is
479noop.
480
481As protections can be over-committed, all configuration combinations
482are valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
483process migrations.
484
485"memory.low" implements best-effort memory protection and is an
486example of this type.
487
488
4893-4. Allocations
490
491A cgroup is exclusively allocated a certain amount of a finite
492resource. Allocations can't be over-committed - the sum of the
493allocations of children can not exceed the amount of resource
494available to the parent.
495
496Allocations are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is no
497resource.
498
499As allocations can't be over-committed, some configuration
500combinations are invalid and should be rejected. Also, if the
501resource is mandatory for execution of processes, process migrations
502may be rejected.
503
504"cpu.rt.max" hard-allocates realtime slices and is an example of this
505type.
506
507
5084. Interface Files
509
5104-1. Format
511
512All interface files should be in one of the following formats whenever
513possible.
514
515 New-line separated values
516 (when only one value can be written at once)
517
518 VAL0\n
519 VAL1\n
520 ...
521
522 Space separated values
523 (when read-only or multiple values can be written at once)
524
525 VAL0 VAL1 ...\n
526
527 Flat keyed
528
529 KEY0 VAL0\n
530 KEY1 VAL1\n
531 ...
532
533 Nested keyed
534
535 KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01...
536 KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11...
537 ...
538
539For a writable file, the format for writing should generally match
540reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or
541implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases.
542
543For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key
544can be written at a time. For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs
545may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified.
546
547
5484-2. Conventions
549
550- Settings for a single feature should be contained in a single file.
551
552- The root cgroup should be exempt from resource control and thus
553 shouldn't have resource control interface files. Also,
554 informational files on the root cgroup which end up showing global
555 information available elsewhere shouldn't exist.
556
557- If a controller implements weight based resource distribution, its
558 interface file should be named "weight" and have the range [1,
559 10000] with 100 as the default. The values are chosen to allow
560 enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it
561 intuitive (the default is 100%).
562
563- If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or
564 limit, the interface files should be named "min" and "max"
565 respectively. If a controller implements best effort resource
566 guarantee and/or limit, the interface files should be named "low"
567 and "high" respectively.
568
569 In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be
570 used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing.
571
572- If a setting has a configurable default value and keyed specific
573 overrides, the default entry should be keyed with "default" and
574 appear as the first entry in the file.
575
576 The default value can be updated by writing either "default $VAL" or
577 "$VAL".
578
579 When writing to update a specific override, "default" can be used as
580 the value to indicate removal of the override. Override entries
581 with "default" as the value must not appear when read.
582
583 For example, a setting which is keyed by major:minor device numbers
584 with integer values may look like the following.
585
586 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
587 default 150
588 8:0 300
589
590 The default value can be updated by
591
592 # echo 125 > cgroup-example-interface-file
593
594 or
595
596 # echo "default 125" > cgroup-example-interface-file
597
598 An override can be set by
599
600 # echo "8:16 170" > cgroup-example-interface-file
601
602 and cleared by
603
604 # echo "8:0 default" > cgroup-example-interface-file
605 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
606 default 125
607 8:16 170
608
609- For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file
610 "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs.
611 Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be
612 generated on the file.
613
614
6154-3. Core Interface Files
616
617All cgroup core files are prefixed with "cgroup."
618
619 cgroup.procs
620
621 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
622 all cgroups.
623
624 When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which belong to
625 the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
626 same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved
627 to another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while
628 reading.
629
630 A PID can be written to migrate the process associated with
631 the PID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
632 following conditions.
633
634 - Its euid is either root or must match either uid or suid of
635 the target process.
636
637 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
638
639 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
640 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
641
642 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
643 should be granted along with the containing directory.
644
645 cgroup.controllers
646
647 A read-only space separated values file which exists on all
648 cgroups.
649
650 It shows space separated list of all controllers available to
651 the cgroup. The controllers are not ordered.
652
653 cgroup.subtree_control
654
655 A read-write space separated values file which exists on all
656 cgroups. Starts out empty.
657
658 When read, it shows space separated list of the controllers
659 which are enabled to control resource distribution from the
660 cgroup to its children.
661
662 Space separated list of controllers prefixed with '+' or '-'
663 can be written to enable or disable controllers. A controller
664 name prefixed with '+' enables the controller and '-'
665 disables. If a controller appears more than once on the list,
666 the last one is effective. When multiple enable and disable
667 operations are specified, either all succeed or all fail.
668
669 cgroup.events
670
671 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
672 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
673 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
674 modified event.
675
676 populated
677
678 1 if the cgroup or its descendants contains any live
679 processes; otherwise, 0.
680
681
6825. Controllers
683
6845-1. CPU
685
686[NOTE: The interface for the cpu controller hasn't been merged yet]
687
688The "cpu" controllers regulates distribution of CPU cycles. This
689controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for
690normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for
691realtime scheduling policy.
692
693
6945-1-1. CPU Interface Files
695
696All time durations are in microseconds.
697
698 cpu.stat
699
700 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
701
702 It reports the following six stats.
703
704 usage_usec
705 user_usec
706 system_usec
707 nr_periods
708 nr_throttled
709 throttled_usec
710
711 cpu.weight
712
713 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
714 cgroups. The default is "100".
715
716 The weight in the range [1, 10000].
717
718 cpu.max
719
720 A read-write two value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
721 The default is "max 100000".
722
723 The maximum bandwidth limit. It's in the following format.
724
725 $MAX $PERIOD
726
727 which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each
728 $PERIOD duration. "max" for $MAX indicates no limit. If only
729 one number is written, $MAX is updated.
730
731 cpu.rt.max
732
733 [NOTE: The semantics of this file is still under discussion and the
734 interface hasn't been merged yet]
735
736 A read-write two value file which exists on all cgroups.
737 The default is "0 100000".
738
739 The maximum realtime runtime allocation. Over-committing
740 configurations are disallowed and process migrations are
741 rejected if not enough bandwidth is available. It's in the
742 following format.
743
744 $MAX $PERIOD
745
746 which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each
747 $PERIOD duration. If only one number is written, $MAX is
748 updated.
749
750
7515-2. Memory
752
753The "memory" controller regulates distribution of memory. Memory is
754stateful and implements both limit and protection models. Due to the
755intertwining between memory usage and reclaim pressure and the
756stateful nature of memory, the distribution model is relatively
757complex.
758
759While not completely water-tight, all major memory usages by a given
760cgroup are tracked so that the total memory consumption can be
761accounted and controlled to a reasonable extent. Currently, the
762following types of memory usages are tracked.
763
764- Userland memory - page cache and anonymous memory.
765
766- Kernel data structures such as dentries and inodes.
767
768- TCP socket buffers.
769
770The above list may expand in the future for better coverage.
771
772
7735-2-1. Memory Interface Files
774
775All memory amounts are in bytes. If a value which is not aligned to
776PAGE_SIZE is written, the value may be rounded up to the closest
777PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
778
779 memory.current
780
781 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
782 cgroups.
783
784 The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup
785 and its descendants.
786
787 memory.low
788
789 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
790 cgroups. The default is "0".
791
792 Best-effort memory protection. If the memory usages of a
793 cgroup and all its ancestors are below their low boundaries,
794 the cgroup's memory won't be reclaimed unless memory can be
795 reclaimed from unprotected cgroups.
796
797 Putting more memory than generally available under this
798 protection is discouraged.
799
800 memory.high
801
802 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
803 cgroups. The default is "max".
804
805 Memory usage throttle limit. This is the main mechanism to
806 control memory usage of a cgroup. If a cgroup's usage goes
807 over the high boundary, the processes of the cgroup are
808 throttled and put under heavy reclaim pressure.
809
810 Going over the high limit never invokes the OOM killer and
811 under extreme conditions the limit may be breached.
812
813 memory.max
814
815 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
816 cgroups. The default is "max".
817
818 Memory usage hard limit. This is the final protection
819 mechanism. If a cgroup's memory usage reaches this limit and
820 can't be reduced, the OOM killer is invoked in the cgroup.
821 Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit
822 temporarily.
823
824 This is the ultimate protection mechanism. As long as the
825 high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's
826 utility is limited to providing the final safety net.
827
828 memory.events
829
830 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
831 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
832 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
833 modified event.
834
835 low
836
837 The number of times the cgroup is reclaimed due to
838 high memory pressure even though its usage is under
839 the low boundary. This usually indicates that the low
840 boundary is over-committed.
841
842 high
843
844 The number of times processes of the cgroup are
845 throttled and routed to perform direct memory reclaim
846 because the high memory boundary was exceeded. For a
847 cgroup whose memory usage is capped by the high limit
848 rather than global memory pressure, this event's
849 occurrences are expected.
850
851 max
852
853 The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was
854 about to go over the max boundary. If direct reclaim
855 fails to bring it down, the OOM killer is invoked.
856
857 oom
858
859 The number of times the OOM killer has been invoked in
860 the cgroup. This may not exactly match the number of
861 processes killed but should generally be close.
862
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -0800863 memory.stat
864
865 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
866
867 This breaks down the cgroup's memory footprint into different
868 types of memory, type-specific details, and other information
869 on the state and past events of the memory management system.
870
871 All memory amounts are in bytes.
872
873 The entries are ordered to be human readable, and new entries
874 can show up in the middle. Don't rely on items remaining in a
875 fixed position; use the keys to look up specific values!
876
877 anon
878
879 Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings such as
880 brk(), sbrk(), and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS)
881
882 file
883
884 Amount of memory used to cache filesystem data,
885 including tmpfs and shared memory.
886
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -0700887 kernel_stack
888
889 Amount of memory allocated to kernel stacks.
890
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -0700891 slab
892
893 Amount of memory used for storing in-kernel data
894 structures.
895
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -0800896 sock
897
898 Amount of memory used in network transmission buffers
899
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -0700900 shmem
901
902 Amount of cached filesystem data that is swap-backed,
903 such as tmpfs, shm segments, shared anonymous mmap()s
904
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -0800905 file_mapped
906
907 Amount of cached filesystem data mapped with mmap()
908
909 file_dirty
910
911 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified but
912 not yet written back to disk
913
914 file_writeback
915
916 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified and
917 is currently being written back to disk
918
919 inactive_anon
920 active_anon
921 inactive_file
922 active_file
923 unevictable
924
925 Amount of memory, swap-backed and filesystem-backed,
926 on the internal memory management lists used by the
927 page reclaim algorithm
928
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -0700929 slab_reclaimable
930
931 Part of "slab" that might be reclaimed, such as
932 dentries and inodes.
933
934 slab_unreclaimable
935
936 Part of "slab" that cannot be reclaimed on memory
937 pressure.
938
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -0800939 pgfault
940
941 Total number of page faults incurred
942
943 pgmajfault
944
945 Number of major page faults incurred
946
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -0700947 workingset_refault
948
949 Number of refaults of previously evicted pages
950
951 workingset_activate
952
953 Number of refaulted pages that were immediately activated
954
955 workingset_nodereclaim
956
957 Number of times a shadow node has been reclaimed
958
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -0700959 pgrefill
960
961 Amount of scanned pages (in an active LRU list)
962
963 pgscan
964
965 Amount of scanned pages (in an inactive LRU list)
966
967 pgsteal
968
969 Amount of reclaimed pages
970
971 pgactivate
972
973 Amount of pages moved to the active LRU list
974
975 pgdeactivate
976
977 Amount of pages moved to the inactive LRU lis
978
979 pglazyfree
980
981 Amount of pages postponed to be freed under memory pressure
982
983 pglazyfreed
984
985 Amount of reclaimed lazyfree pages
986
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -0800987 memory.swap.current
988
989 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
990 cgroups.
991
992 The total amount of swap currently being used by the cgroup
993 and its descendants.
994
995 memory.swap.max
996
997 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
998 cgroups. The default is "max".
999
1000 Swap usage hard limit. If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this
1001 limit, anonymous meomry of the cgroup will not be swapped out.
1002
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001003
Parav Pandit6c83e6cb2016-03-05 11:20:58 +053010045-2-2. Usage Guidelines
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001005
1006"memory.high" is the main mechanism to control memory usage.
1007Over-committing on high limit (sum of high limits > available memory)
1008and letting global memory pressure to distribute memory according to
1009usage is a viable strategy.
1010
1011Because breach of the high limit doesn't trigger the OOM killer but
1012throttles the offending cgroup, a management agent has ample
1013opportunities to monitor and take appropriate actions such as granting
1014more memory or terminating the workload.
1015
1016Determining whether a cgroup has enough memory is not trivial as
1017memory usage doesn't indicate whether the workload can benefit from
1018more memory. For example, a workload which writes data received from
1019network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
1020performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
1021pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
1022memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
1023memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
1024implemented yet.
1025
1026
10275-2-3. Memory Ownership
1028
1029A memory area is charged to the cgroup which instantiated it and stays
1030charged to the cgroup until the area is released. Migrating a process
1031to a different cgroup doesn't move the memory usages that it
1032instantiated while in the previous cgroup to the new cgroup.
1033
1034A memory area may be used by processes belonging to different cgroups.
1035To which cgroup the area will be charged is in-deterministic; however,
1036over time, the memory area is likely to end up in a cgroup which has
1037enough memory allowance to avoid high reclaim pressure.
1038
1039If a cgroup sweeps a considerable amount of memory which is expected
1040to be accessed repeatedly by other cgroups, it may make sense to use
1041POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED to relinquish the ownership of memory areas
1042belonging to the affected files to ensure correct memory ownership.
1043
1044
10455-3. IO
1046
1047The "io" controller regulates the distribution of IO resources. This
1048controller implements both weight based and absolute bandwidth or IOPS
1049limit distribution; however, weight based distribution is available
1050only if cfq-iosched is in use and neither scheme is available for
1051blk-mq devices.
1052
1053
10545-3-1. IO Interface Files
1055
1056 io.stat
1057
1058 A read-only nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1059 cgroups.
1060
1061 Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered.
1062 The following nested keys are defined.
1063
1064 rbytes Bytes read
1065 wbytes Bytes written
1066 rios Number of read IOs
1067 wios Number of write IOs
1068
1069 An example read output follows.
1070
1071 8:16 rbytes=1459200 wbytes=314773504 rios=192 wios=353
1072 8:0 rbytes=90430464 wbytes=299008000 rios=8950 wios=1252
1073
1074 io.weight
1075
1076 A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1077 The default is "default 100".
1078
1079 The first line is the default weight applied to devices
1080 without specific override. The rest are overrides keyed by
1081 $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The weights are in
1082 the range [1, 10000] and specifies the relative amount IO time
1083 the cgroup can use in relation to its siblings.
1084
1085 The default weight can be updated by writing either "default
1086 $WEIGHT" or simply "$WEIGHT". Overrides can be set by writing
1087 "$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" and unset by writing "$MAJ:$MIN default".
1088
1089 An example read output follows.
1090
1091 default 100
1092 8:16 200
1093 8:0 50
1094
1095 io.max
1096
1097 A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1098 cgroups.
1099
1100 BPS and IOPS based IO limit. Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN
1101 device numbers and not ordered. The following nested keys are
1102 defined.
1103
1104 rbps Max read bytes per second
1105 wbps Max write bytes per second
1106 riops Max read IO operations per second
1107 wiops Max write IO operations per second
1108
1109 When writing, any number of nested key-value pairs can be
1110 specified in any order. "max" can be specified as the value
1111 to remove a specific limit. If the same key is specified
1112 multiple times, the outcome is undefined.
1113
1114 BPS and IOPS are measured in each IO direction and IOs are
1115 delayed if limit is reached. Temporary bursts are allowed.
1116
1117 Setting read limit at 2M BPS and write at 120 IOPS for 8:16.
1118
1119 echo "8:16 rbps=2097152 wiops=120" > io.max
1120
1121 Reading returns the following.
1122
1123 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=120
1124
1125 Write IOPS limit can be removed by writing the following.
1126
1127 echo "8:16 wiops=max" > io.max
1128
1129 Reading now returns the following.
1130
1131 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=max
1132
1133
11345-3-2. Writeback
1135
1136Page cache is dirtied through buffered writes and shared mmaps and
1137written asynchronously to the backing filesystem by the writeback
1138mechanism. Writeback sits between the memory and IO domains and
1139regulates the proportion of dirty memory by balancing dirtying and
1140write IOs.
1141
1142The io controller, in conjunction with the memory controller,
1143implements control of page cache writeback IOs. The memory controller
1144defines the memory domain that dirty memory ratio is calculated and
1145maintained for and the io controller defines the io domain which
1146writes out dirty pages for the memory domain. Both system-wide and
1147per-cgroup dirty memory states are examined and the more restrictive
1148of the two is enforced.
1149
1150cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying
1151filesystem. Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4
1152and btrfs. On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are attributed to
1153the root cgroup.
1154
1155There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management
1156which affects how cgroup ownership is tracked. Memory is tracked per
1157page while writeback per inode. For the purpose of writeback, an
1158inode is assigned to a cgroup and all IO requests to write dirty pages
1159from the inode are attributed to that cgroup.
1160
1161As cgroup ownership for memory is tracked per page, there can be pages
1162which are associated with different cgroups than the one the inode is
1163associated with. These are called foreign pages. The writeback
1164constantly keeps track of foreign pages and, if a particular foreign
1165cgroup becomes the majority over a certain period of time, switches
1166the ownership of the inode to that cgroup.
1167
1168While this model is enough for most use cases where a given inode is
1169mostly dirtied by a single cgroup even when the main writing cgroup
1170changes over time, use cases where multiple cgroups write to a single
1171inode simultaneously are not supported well. In such circumstances, a
1172significant portion of IOs are likely to be attributed incorrectly.
1173As memory controller assigns page ownership on the first use and
1174doesn't update it until the page is released, even if writeback
1175strictly follows page ownership, multiple cgroups dirtying overlapping
1176areas wouldn't work as expected. It's recommended to avoid such usage
1177patterns.
1178
1179The sysctl knobs which affect writeback behavior are applied to cgroup
1180writeback as follows.
1181
1182 vm.dirty_background_ratio
1183 vm.dirty_ratio
1184
1185 These ratios apply the same to cgroup writeback with the
1186 amount of available memory capped by limits imposed by the
1187 memory controller and system-wide clean memory.
1188
1189 vm.dirty_background_bytes
1190 vm.dirty_bytes
1191
1192 For cgroup writeback, this is calculated into ratio against
1193 total available memory and applied the same way as
1194 vm.dirty[_background]_ratio.
1195
1196
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +000011975-4. PID
1198
1199The process number controller is used to allow a cgroup to stop any
1200new tasks from being fork()'d or clone()'d after a specified limit is
1201reached.
1202
1203The number of tasks in a cgroup can be exhausted in ways which other
1204controllers cannot prevent, thus warranting its own controller. For
1205example, a fork bomb is likely to exhaust the number of tasks before
1206hitting memory restrictions.
1207
1208Note that PIDs used in this controller refer to TIDs, process IDs as
1209used by the kernel.
1210
1211
12125-4-1. PID Interface Files
1213
1214 pids.max
1215
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001216 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1217 cgroups. The default is "max".
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001218
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001219 Hard limit of number of processes.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001220
1221 pids.current
1222
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001223 A read-only single value file which exists on all cgroups.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001224
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001225 The number of processes currently in the cgroup and its
1226 descendants.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001227
1228Organisational operations are not blocked by cgroup policies, so it is
1229possible to have pids.current > pids.max. This can be done by either
1230setting the limit to be smaller than pids.current, or attaching enough
1231processes to the cgroup such that pids.current is larger than
1232pids.max. However, it is not possible to violate a cgroup PID policy
1233through fork() or clone(). These will return -EAGAIN if the creation
1234of a new process would cause a cgroup policy to be violated.
1235
1236
Tejun Heo63f1ca52017-02-02 13:50:35 -050012375-5. RDMA
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05001238
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001239The "rdma" controller regulates the distribution and accounting of
1240of RDMA resources.
1241
Tejun Heo63f1ca52017-02-02 13:50:35 -050012425-5-1. RDMA Interface Files
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001243
1244 rdma.max
1245 A readwrite nested-keyed file that exists for all the cgroups
1246 except root that describes current configured resource limit
1247 for a RDMA/IB device.
1248
1249 Lines are keyed by device name and are not ordered.
1250 Each line contains space separated resource name and its configured
1251 limit that can be distributed.
1252
1253 The following nested keys are defined.
1254
1255 hca_handle Maximum number of HCA Handles
1256 hca_object Maximum number of HCA Objects
1257
1258 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows.
1259
1260 mlx4_0 hca_handle=2 hca_object=2000
1261 ocrdma1 hca_handle=3 hca_object=max
1262
1263 rdma.current
1264 A read-only file that describes current resource usage.
1265 It exists for all the cgroup except root.
1266
1267 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows.
1268
1269 mlx4_0 hca_handle=1 hca_object=20
1270 ocrdma1 hca_handle=1 hca_object=23
1271
1272
Tejun Heo63f1ca52017-02-02 13:50:35 -050012735-6. Misc
1274
12755-6-1. perf_event
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05001276
1277perf_event controller, if not mounted on a legacy hierarchy, is
1278automatically enabled on the v2 hierarchy so that perf events can
1279always be filtered by cgroup v2 path. The controller can still be
1280moved to a legacy hierarchy after v2 hierarchy is populated.
1281
1282
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -060012836. Namespace
1284
12856-1. Basics
1286
1287cgroup namespace provides a mechanism to virtualize the view of the
1288"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file and cgroup mounts. The CLONE_NEWCGROUP clone
1289flag can be used with clone(2) and unshare(2) to create a new cgroup
1290namespace. The process running inside the cgroup namespace will have
1291its "/proc/$PID/cgroup" output restricted to cgroupns root. The
1292cgroupns root is the cgroup of the process at the time of creation of
1293the cgroup namespace.
1294
1295Without cgroup namespace, the "/proc/$PID/cgroup" file shows the
1296complete path of the cgroup of a process. In a container setup where
1297a set of cgroups and namespaces are intended to isolate processes the
1298"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file may leak potential system level information
1299to the isolated processes. For Example:
1300
1301 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1302 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
1303
1304The path '/batchjobs/container_id1' can be considered as system-data
1305and undesirable to expose to the isolated processes. cgroup namespace
1306can be used to restrict visibility of this path. For example, before
1307creating a cgroup namespace, one would see:
1308
1309 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
1310 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:37 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026531835]
1311 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1312 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
1313
1314After unsharing a new namespace, the view changes.
1315
1316 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
1317 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:35 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026532183]
1318 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1319 0::/
1320
1321When some thread from a multi-threaded process unshares its cgroup
1322namespace, the new cgroupns gets applied to the entire process (all
1323the threads). This is natural for the v2 hierarchy; however, for the
1324legacy hierarchies, this may be unexpected.
1325
1326A cgroup namespace is alive as long as there are processes inside or
1327mounts pinning it. When the last usage goes away, the cgroup
1328namespace is destroyed. The cgroupns root and the actual cgroups
1329remain.
1330
1331
13326-2. The Root and Views
1333
1334The 'cgroupns root' for a cgroup namespace is the cgroup in which the
1335process calling unshare(2) is running. For example, if a process in
1336/batchjobs/container_id1 cgroup calls unshare, cgroup
1337/batchjobs/container_id1 becomes the cgroupns root. For the
1338init_cgroup_ns, this is the real root ('/') cgroup.
1339
1340The cgroupns root cgroup does not change even if the namespace creator
1341process later moves to a different cgroup.
1342
1343 # ~/unshare -c # unshare cgroupns in some cgroup
1344 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1345 0::/
1346 # mkdir sub_cgrp_1
1347 # echo 0 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
1348 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1349 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1350
1351Each process gets its namespace-specific view of "/proc/$PID/cgroup"
1352
1353Processes running inside the cgroup namespace will be able to see
1354cgroup paths (in /proc/self/cgroup) only inside their root cgroup.
1355From within an unshared cgroupns:
1356
1357 # sleep 100000 &
1358 [1] 7353
1359 # echo 7353 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
1360 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1361 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1362
1363From the initial cgroup namespace, the real cgroup path will be
1364visible:
1365
1366 $ cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1367 0::/batchjobs/container_id1/sub_cgrp_1
1368
1369From a sibling cgroup namespace (that is, a namespace rooted at a
1370different cgroup), the cgroup path relative to its own cgroup
1371namespace root will be shown. For instance, if PID 7353's cgroup
1372namespace root is at '/batchjobs/container_id2', then it will see
1373
1374 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1375 0::/../container_id2/sub_cgrp_1
1376
1377Note that the relative path always starts with '/' to indicate that
1378its relative to the cgroup namespace root of the caller.
1379
1380
13816-3. Migration and setns(2)
1382
1383Processes inside a cgroup namespace can move into and out of the
1384namespace root if they have proper access to external cgroups. For
1385example, from inside a namespace with cgroupns root at
1386/batchjobs/container_id1, and assuming that the global hierarchy is
1387still accessible inside cgroupns:
1388
1389 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1390 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1391 # echo 7353 > batchjobs/container_id2/cgroup.procs
1392 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1393 0::/../container_id2
1394
1395Note that this kind of setup is not encouraged. A task inside cgroup
1396namespace should only be exposed to its own cgroupns hierarchy.
1397
1398setns(2) to another cgroup namespace is allowed when:
1399
1400(a) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its current user namespace
1401(b) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against the target cgroup
1402 namespace's userns
1403
1404No implicit cgroup changes happen with attaching to another cgroup
1405namespace. It is expected that the someone moves the attaching
1406process under the target cgroup namespace root.
1407
1408
14096-4. Interaction with Other Namespaces
1410
1411Namespace specific cgroup hierarchy can be mounted by a process
1412running inside a non-init cgroup namespace.
1413
1414 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
1415
1416This will mount the unified cgroup hierarchy with cgroupns root as the
1417filesystem root. The process needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its user and
1418mount namespaces.
1419
1420The virtualization of /proc/self/cgroup file combined with restricting
1421the view of cgroup hierarchy by namespace-private cgroupfs mount
1422provides a properly isolated cgroup view inside the container.
1423
1424
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001425P. Information on Kernel Programming
1426
1427This section contains kernel programming information in the areas
1428where interacting with cgroup is necessary. cgroup core and
1429controllers are not covered.
1430
1431
1432P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback
1433
1434A filesystem can support cgroup writeback by updating
1435address_space_operations->writepage[s]() to annotate bio's using the
1436following two functions.
1437
1438 wbc_init_bio(@wbc, @bio)
1439
1440 Should be called for each bio carrying writeback data and
1441 associates the bio with the inode's owner cgroup. Can be
1442 called anytime between bio allocation and submission.
1443
1444 wbc_account_io(@wbc, @page, @bytes)
1445
1446 Should be called for each data segment being written out.
1447 While this function doesn't care exactly when it's called
1448 during the writeback session, it's the easiest and most
1449 natural to call it as data segments are added to a bio.
1450
1451With writeback bio's annotated, cgroup support can be enabled per
1452super_block by setting SB_I_CGROUPWB in ->s_iflags. This allows for
1453selective disabling of cgroup writeback support which is helpful when
1454certain filesystem features, e.g. journaled data mode, are
1455incompatible.
1456
1457wbc_init_bio() binds the specified bio to its cgroup. Depending on
1458the configuration, the bio may be executed at a lower priority and if
1459the writeback session is holding shared resources, e.g. a journal
1460entry, may lead to priority inversion. There is no one easy solution
1461for the problem. Filesystems can try to work around specific problem
1462cases by skipping wbc_init_bio() or using bio_associate_blkcg()
1463directly.
1464
1465
1466D. Deprecated v1 Core Features
1467
1468- Multiple hierarchies including named ones are not supported.
1469
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -04001470- All v1 mount options are not supported.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001471
1472- The "tasks" file is removed and "cgroup.procs" is not sorted.
1473
1474- "cgroup.clone_children" is removed.
1475
1476- /proc/cgroups is meaningless for v2. Use "cgroup.controllers" file
1477 at the root instead.
1478
1479
1480R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
1481
1482R-1. Multiple Hierarchies
1483
1484cgroup v1 allowed an arbitrary number of hierarchies and each
1485hierarchy could host any number of controllers. While this seemed to
1486provide a high level of flexibility, it wasn't useful in practice.
1487
1488For example, as there is only one instance of each controller, utility
1489type controllers such as freezer which can be useful in all
1490hierarchies could only be used in one. The issue is exacerbated by
1491the fact that controllers couldn't be moved to another hierarchy once
1492hierarchies were populated. Another issue was that all controllers
1493bound to a hierarchy were forced to have exactly the same view of the
1494hierarchy. It wasn't possible to vary the granularity depending on
1495the specific controller.
1496
1497In practice, these issues heavily limited which controllers could be
1498put on the same hierarchy and most configurations resorted to putting
1499each controller on its own hierarchy. Only closely related ones, such
1500as the cpu and cpuacct controllers, made sense to be put on the same
1501hierarchy. This often meant that userland ended up managing multiple
1502similar hierarchies repeating the same steps on each hierarchy
1503whenever a hierarchy management operation was necessary.
1504
1505Furthermore, support for multiple hierarchies came at a steep cost.
1506It greatly complicated cgroup core implementation but more importantly
1507the support for multiple hierarchies restricted how cgroup could be
1508used in general and what controllers was able to do.
1509
1510There was no limit on how many hierarchies there might be, which meant
1511that a thread's cgroup membership couldn't be described in finite
1512length. The key might contain any number of entries and was unlimited
1513in length, which made it highly awkward to manipulate and led to
1514addition of controllers which existed only to identify membership,
1515which in turn exacerbated the original problem of proliferating number
1516of hierarchies.
1517
1518Also, as a controller couldn't have any expectation regarding the
1519topologies of hierarchies other controllers might be on, each
1520controller had to assume that all other controllers were attached to
1521completely orthogonal hierarchies. This made it impossible, or at
1522least very cumbersome, for controllers to cooperate with each other.
1523
1524In most use cases, putting controllers on hierarchies which are
1525completely orthogonal to each other isn't necessary. What usually is
1526called for is the ability to have differing levels of granularity
1527depending on the specific controller. In other words, hierarchy may
1528be collapsed from leaf towards root when viewed from specific
1529controllers. For example, a given configuration might not care about
1530how memory is distributed beyond a certain level while still wanting
1531to control how CPU cycles are distributed.
1532
1533
1534R-2. Thread Granularity
1535
1536cgroup v1 allowed threads of a process to belong to different cgroups.
1537This didn't make sense for some controllers and those controllers
1538ended up implementing different ways to ignore such situations but
1539much more importantly it blurred the line between API exposed to
1540individual applications and system management interface.
1541
1542Generally, in-process knowledge is available only to the process
1543itself; thus, unlike service-level organization of processes,
1544categorizing threads of a process requires active participation from
1545the application which owns the target process.
1546
1547cgroup v1 had an ambiguously defined delegation model which got abused
1548in combination with thread granularity. cgroups were delegated to
1549individual applications so that they can create and manage their own
1550sub-hierarchies and control resource distributions along them. This
1551effectively raised cgroup to the status of a syscall-like API exposed
1552to lay programs.
1553
1554First of all, cgroup has a fundamentally inadequate interface to be
1555exposed this way. For a process to access its own knobs, it has to
1556extract the path on the target hierarchy from /proc/self/cgroup,
1557construct the path by appending the name of the knob to the path, open
1558and then read and/or write to it. This is not only extremely clunky
1559and unusual but also inherently racy. There is no conventional way to
1560define transaction across the required steps and nothing can guarantee
1561that the process would actually be operating on its own sub-hierarchy.
1562
1563cgroup controllers implemented a number of knobs which would never be
1564accepted as public APIs because they were just adding control knobs to
1565system-management pseudo filesystem. cgroup ended up with interface
1566knobs which were not properly abstracted or refined and directly
1567revealed kernel internal details. These knobs got exposed to
1568individual applications through the ill-defined delegation mechanism
1569effectively abusing cgroup as a shortcut to implementing public APIs
1570without going through the required scrutiny.
1571
1572This was painful for both userland and kernel. Userland ended up with
1573misbehaving and poorly abstracted interfaces and kernel exposing and
1574locked into constructs inadvertently.
1575
1576
1577R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
1578
1579cgroup v1 allowed threads to be in any cgroups which created an
1580interesting problem where threads belonging to a parent cgroup and its
1581children cgroups competed for resources. This was nasty as two
1582different types of entities competed and there was no obvious way to
1583settle it. Different controllers did different things.
1584
1585The cpu controller considered threads and cgroups as equivalents and
1586mapped nice levels to cgroup weights. This worked for some cases but
1587fell flat when children wanted to be allocated specific ratios of CPU
1588cycles and the number of internal threads fluctuated - the ratios
1589constantly changed as the number of competing entities fluctuated.
1590There also were other issues. The mapping from nice level to weight
1591wasn't obvious or universal, and there were various other knobs which
1592simply weren't available for threads.
1593
1594The io controller implicitly created a hidden leaf node for each
1595cgroup to host the threads. The hidden leaf had its own copies of all
1596the knobs with "leaf_" prefixed. While this allowed equivalent
1597control over internal threads, it was with serious drawbacks. It
1598always added an extra layer of nesting which wouldn't be necessary
1599otherwise, made the interface messy and significantly complicated the
1600implementation.
1601
1602The memory controller didn't have a way to control what happened
1603between internal tasks and child cgroups and the behavior was not
1604clearly defined. There were attempts to add ad-hoc behaviors and
1605knobs to tailor the behavior to specific workloads which would have
1606led to problems extremely difficult to resolve in the long term.
1607
1608Multiple controllers struggled with internal tasks and came up with
1609different ways to deal with it; unfortunately, all the approaches were
1610severely flawed and, furthermore, the widely different behaviors
1611made cgroup as a whole highly inconsistent.
1612
1613This clearly is a problem which needs to be addressed from cgroup core
1614in a uniform way.
1615
1616
1617R-4. Other Interface Issues
1618
1619cgroup v1 grew without oversight and developed a large number of
1620idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies. One issue on the cgroup core side
1621was how an empty cgroup was notified - a userland helper binary was
1622forked and executed for each event. The event delivery wasn't
1623recursive or delegatable. The limitations of the mechanism also led
1624to in-kernel event delivery filtering mechanism further complicating
1625the interface.
1626
1627Controller interfaces were problematic too. An extreme example is
1628controllers completely ignoring hierarchical organization and treating
1629all cgroups as if they were all located directly under the root
1630cgroup. Some controllers exposed a large amount of inconsistent
1631implementation details to userland.
1632
1633There also was no consistency across controllers. When a new cgroup
1634was created, some controllers defaulted to not imposing extra
1635restrictions while others disallowed any resource usage until
1636explicitly configured. Configuration knobs for the same type of
1637control used widely differing naming schemes and formats. Statistics
1638and information knobs were named arbitrarily and used different
1639formats and units even in the same controller.
1640
1641cgroup v2 establishes common conventions where appropriate and updates
1642controllers so that they expose minimal and consistent interfaces.
1643
1644
1645R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies
1646
1647R-5-1. Memory
1648
1649The original lower boundary, the soft limit, is defined as a limit
1650that is per default unset. As a result, the set of cgroups that
1651global reclaim prefers is opt-in, rather than opt-out. The costs for
1652optimizing these mostly negative lookups are so high that the
1653implementation, despite its enormous size, does not even provide the
1654basic desirable behavior. First off, the soft limit has no
1655hierarchical meaning. All configured groups are organized in a global
1656rbtree and treated like equal peers, regardless where they are located
1657in the hierarchy. This makes subtree delegation impossible. Second,
1658the soft limit reclaim pass is so aggressive that it not just
1659introduces high allocation latencies into the system, but also impacts
1660system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature
1661becomes self-defeating.
1662
1663The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
1664reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it and all its
1665ancestors are below their low boundaries, which makes delegation of
1666subtrees possible. Secondly, new cgroups have no reserve per default
1667and in the common case most cgroups are eligible for the preferred
1668reclaim pass. This allows the new low boundary to be efficiently
1669implemented with just a minor addition to the generic reclaim code,
1670without the need for out-of-band data structures and reclaim passes.
1671Because the generic reclaim code considers all cgroups except for the
1672ones running low in the preferred first reclaim pass, overreclaim of
1673individual groups is eliminated as well, resulting in much better
1674overall workload performance.
1675
1676The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict
1677limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called.
1678But this generally goes against the goal of making the most out of the
1679available memory. The memory consumption of workloads varies during
1680runtime, and that requires users to overcommit. But doing that with a
1681strict upper limit requires either a fairly accurate prediction of the
1682working set size or adding slack to the limit. Since working set size
1683estimation is hard and error prone, and getting it wrong results in
1684OOM kills, most users tend to err on the side of a looser limit and
1685end up wasting precious resources.
1686
1687The memory.high boundary on the other hand can be set much more
1688conservatively. When hit, it throttles allocations by forcing them
1689into direct reclaim to work off the excess, but it never invokes the
1690OOM killer. As a result, a high boundary that is chosen too
1691aggressively will not terminate the processes, but instead it will
1692lead to gradual performance degradation. The user can monitor this
1693and make corrections until the minimal memory footprint that still
1694gives acceptable performance is found.
1695
1696In extreme cases, with many concurrent allocations and a complete
1697breakdown of reclaim progress within the group, the high boundary can
1698be exceeded. But even then it's mostly better to satisfy the
1699allocation from the slack available in other groups or the rest of the
1700system than killing the group. Otherwise, memory.max is there to
1701limit this type of spillover and ultimately contain buggy or even
1702malicious applications.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001703
Johannes Weinerb6e6edc2016-03-17 14:20:28 -07001704Setting the original memory.limit_in_bytes below the current usage was
1705subject to a race condition, where concurrent charges could cause the
1706limit setting to fail. memory.max on the other hand will first set the
1707limit to prevent new charges, and then reclaim and OOM kill until the
1708new limit is met - or the task writing to memory.max is killed.
1709
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001710The combined memory+swap accounting and limiting is replaced by real
1711control over swap space.
1712
1713The main argument for a combined memory+swap facility in the original
1714cgroup design was that global or parental pressure would always be
1715able to swap all anonymous memory of a child group, regardless of the
1716child's own (possibly untrusted) configuration. However, untrusted
1717groups can sabotage swapping by other means - such as referencing its
1718anonymous memory in a tight loop - and an admin can not assume full
1719swappability when overcommitting untrusted jobs.
1720
1721For trusted jobs, on the other hand, a combined counter is not an
1722intuitive userspace interface, and it flies in the face of the idea
1723that cgroup controllers should account and limit specific physical
1724resources. Swap space is a resource like all others in the system,
1725and that's why unified hierarchy allows distributing it separately.