blob: 88e746074252298ecae8f0aab9db2bd1c9f4fb99 [file] [log] [blame]
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002Control Group v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03003================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05004
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03005:Date: October, 2015
6:Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05007
8This is the authoritative documentation on the design, interface and
9conventions of cgroup v2. It describes all userland-visible aspects
10of cgroup including core and specific controller behaviors. All
11future changes must be reflected in this document. Documentation for
W. Trevor King9a2ddda2016-01-27 13:01:52 -080012v1 is available under Documentation/cgroup-v1/.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050013
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030014.. CONTENTS
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050015
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030016 1. Introduction
17 1-1. Terminology
18 1-2. What is cgroup?
19 2. Basic Operations
20 2-1. Mounting
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -040021 2-2. Organizing Processes and Threads
22 2-2-1. Processes
23 2-2-2. Threads
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030024 2-3. [Un]populated Notification
25 2-4. Controlling Controllers
26 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling
27 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint
28 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint
29 2-5. Delegation
30 2-5-1. Model of Delegation
31 2-5-2. Delegation Containment
32 2-6. Guidelines
33 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control
34 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions
35 3. Resource Distribution Models
36 3-1. Weights
37 3-2. Limits
38 3-3. Protections
39 3-4. Allocations
40 4. Interface Files
41 4-1. Format
42 4-2. Conventions
43 4-3. Core Interface Files
44 5. Controllers
45 5-1. CPU
46 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files
47 5-2. Memory
48 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files
49 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines
50 5-2-3. Memory Ownership
51 5-3. IO
52 5-3-1. IO Interface Files
53 5-3-2. Writeback
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -040054 5-3-3. IO Latency
55 5-3-3-1. How IO Latency Throttling Works
56 5-3-3-2. IO Latency Interface Files
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030057 5-4. PID
58 5-4-1. PID Interface Files
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -050059 5-5. Cpuset
60 5.5-1. Cpuset Interface Files
61 5-6. Device
62 5-7. RDMA
63 5-7-1. RDMA Interface Files
64 5-8. Misc
65 5-8-1. perf_event
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +010066 5-N. Non-normative information
67 5-N-1. CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
68 5-N-2. IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030069 6. Namespace
70 6-1. Basics
71 6-2. The Root and Views
72 6-3. Migration and setns(2)
73 6-4. Interaction with Other Namespaces
74 P. Information on Kernel Programming
75 P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback
76 D. Deprecated v1 Core Features
77 R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
78 R-1. Multiple Hierarchies
79 R-2. Thread Granularity
80 R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
81 R-4. Other Interface Issues
82 R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies
83 R-5-1. Memory
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050084
85
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030086Introduction
87============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050088
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030089Terminology
90-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050091
92"cgroup" stands for "control group" and is never capitalized. The
93singular form is used to designate the whole feature and also as a
94qualifier as in "cgroup controllers". When explicitly referring to
95multiple individual control groups, the plural form "cgroups" is used.
96
97
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030098What is cgroup?
99---------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500100
101cgroup is a mechanism to organize processes hierarchically and
102distribute system resources along the hierarchy in a controlled and
103configurable manner.
104
105cgroup is largely composed of two parts - the core and controllers.
106cgroup core is primarily responsible for hierarchically organizing
107processes. A cgroup controller is usually responsible for
108distributing a specific type of system resource along the hierarchy
109although there are utility controllers which serve purposes other than
110resource distribution.
111
112cgroups form a tree structure and every process in the system belongs
113to one and only one cgroup. All threads of a process belong to the
114same cgroup. On creation, all processes are put in the cgroup that
115the parent process belongs to at the time. A process can be migrated
116to another cgroup. Migration of a process doesn't affect already
117existing descendant processes.
118
119Following certain structural constraints, controllers may be enabled or
120disabled selectively on a cgroup. All controller behaviors are
121hierarchical - if a controller is enabled on a cgroup, it affects all
122processes which belong to the cgroups consisting the inclusive
123sub-hierarchy of the cgroup. When a controller is enabled on a nested
124cgroup, it always restricts the resource distribution further. The
125restrictions set closer to the root in the hierarchy can not be
126overridden from further away.
127
128
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300129Basic Operations
130================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500131
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300132Mounting
133--------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500134
135Unlike v1, cgroup v2 has only single hierarchy. The cgroup v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300136hierarchy can be mounted with the following mount command::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500137
138 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
139
140cgroup2 filesystem has the magic number 0x63677270 ("cgrp"). All
141controllers which support v2 and are not bound to a v1 hierarchy are
142automatically bound to the v2 hierarchy and show up at the root.
143Controllers which are not in active use in the v2 hierarchy can be
144bound to other hierarchies. This allows mixing v2 hierarchy with the
145legacy v1 multiple hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way.
146
147A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller
148is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy. Because per-cgroup
149controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may
150have lingering references, a controller may not show up immediately on
151the v2 hierarchy after the final umount of the previous hierarchy.
152Similarly, a controller should be fully disabled to be moved out of
153the unified hierarchy and it may take some time for the disabled
154controller to become available for other hierarchies; furthermore, due
155to inter-controller dependencies, other controllers may need to be
156disabled too.
157
158While useful for development and manual configurations, moving
159controllers dynamically between the v2 and other hierarchies is
160strongly discouraged for production use. It is recommended to decide
161the hierarchies and controller associations before starting using the
162controllers after system boot.
163
Johannes Weiner1619b6d2016-02-16 13:21:14 -0500164During transition to v2, system management software might still
165automount the v1 cgroup filesystem and so hijack all controllers
166during boot, before manual intervention is possible. To make testing
167and experimenting easier, the kernel parameter cgroup_no_v1= allows
168disabling controllers in v1 and make them always available in v2.
169
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400170cgroup v2 currently supports the following mount options.
171
172 nsdelegate
173
174 Consider cgroup namespaces as delegation boundaries. This
175 option is system wide and can only be set on mount or modified
176 through remount from the init namespace. The mount option is
177 ignored on non-init namespace mounts. Please refer to the
178 Delegation section for details.
179
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500180
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400181Organizing Processes and Threads
182--------------------------------
183
184Processes
185~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500186
187Initially, only the root cgroup exists to which all processes belong.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300188A child cgroup can be created by creating a sub-directory::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500189
190 # mkdir $CGROUP_NAME
191
192A given cgroup may have multiple child cgroups forming a tree
193structure. Each cgroup has a read-writable interface file
194"cgroup.procs". When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which
195belong to the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
196same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved to
197another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while reading.
198
199A process can be migrated into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
200target cgroup's "cgroup.procs" file. Only one process can be migrated
201on a single write(2) call. If a process is composed of multiple
202threads, writing the PID of any thread migrates all threads of the
203process.
204
205When a process forks a child process, the new process is born into the
206cgroup that the forking process belongs to at the time of the
207operation. After exit, a process stays associated with the cgroup
208that it belonged to at the time of exit until it's reaped; however, a
209zombie process does not appear in "cgroup.procs" and thus can't be
210moved to another cgroup.
211
212A cgroup which doesn't have any children or live processes can be
213destroyed by removing the directory. Note that a cgroup which doesn't
214have any children and is associated only with zombie processes is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300215considered empty and can be removed::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500216
217 # rmdir $CGROUP_NAME
218
219"/proc/$PID/cgroup" lists a process's cgroup membership. If legacy
220cgroup is in use in the system, this file may contain multiple lines,
221one for each hierarchy. The entry for cgroup v2 is always in the
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300222format "0::$PATH"::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500223
224 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
225 ...
226 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested
227
228If the process becomes a zombie and the cgroup it was associated with
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300229is removed subsequently, " (deleted)" is appended to the path::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500230
231 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
232 ...
233 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested (deleted)
234
235
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400236Threads
237~~~~~~~
238
239cgroup v2 supports thread granularity for a subset of controllers to
240support use cases requiring hierarchical resource distribution across
241the threads of a group of processes. By default, all threads of a
242process belong to the same cgroup, which also serves as the resource
243domain to host resource consumptions which are not specific to a
244process or thread. The thread mode allows threads to be spread across
245a subtree while still maintaining the common resource domain for them.
246
247Controllers which support thread mode are called threaded controllers.
248The ones which don't are called domain controllers.
249
250Marking a cgroup threaded makes it join the resource domain of its
251parent as a threaded cgroup. The parent may be another threaded
252cgroup whose resource domain is further up in the hierarchy. The root
253of a threaded subtree, that is, the nearest ancestor which is not
254threaded, is called threaded domain or thread root interchangeably and
255serves as the resource domain for the entire subtree.
256
257Inside a threaded subtree, threads of a process can be put in
258different cgroups and are not subject to the no internal process
259constraint - threaded controllers can be enabled on non-leaf cgroups
260whether they have threads in them or not.
261
262As the threaded domain cgroup hosts all the domain resource
263consumptions of the subtree, it is considered to have internal
264resource consumptions whether there are processes in it or not and
265can't have populated child cgroups which aren't threaded. Because the
266root cgroup is not subject to no internal process constraint, it can
267serve both as a threaded domain and a parent to domain cgroups.
268
269The current operation mode or type of the cgroup is shown in the
270"cgroup.type" file which indicates whether the cgroup is a normal
271domain, a domain which is serving as the domain of a threaded subtree,
272or a threaded cgroup.
273
274On creation, a cgroup is always a domain cgroup and can be made
275threaded by writing "threaded" to the "cgroup.type" file. The
276operation is single direction::
277
278 # echo threaded > cgroup.type
279
280Once threaded, the cgroup can't be made a domain again. To enable the
281thread mode, the following conditions must be met.
282
283- As the cgroup will join the parent's resource domain. The parent
284 must either be a valid (threaded) domain or a threaded cgroup.
285
Tejun Heo918a8c22017-07-23 08:18:26 -0400286- When the parent is an unthreaded domain, it must not have any domain
287 controllers enabled or populated domain children. The root is
288 exempt from this requirement.
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400289
290Topology-wise, a cgroup can be in an invalid state. Please consider
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +0100291the following topology::
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400292
293 A (threaded domain) - B (threaded) - C (domain, just created)
294
295C is created as a domain but isn't connected to a parent which can
296host child domains. C can't be used until it is turned into a
297threaded cgroup. "cgroup.type" file will report "domain (invalid)" in
298these cases. Operations which fail due to invalid topology use
299EOPNOTSUPP as the errno.
300
301A domain cgroup is turned into a threaded domain when one of its child
302cgroup becomes threaded or threaded controllers are enabled in the
303"cgroup.subtree_control" file while there are processes in the cgroup.
304A threaded domain reverts to a normal domain when the conditions
305clear.
306
307When read, "cgroup.threads" contains the list of the thread IDs of all
308threads in the cgroup. Except that the operations are per-thread
309instead of per-process, "cgroup.threads" has the same format and
310behaves the same way as "cgroup.procs". While "cgroup.threads" can be
311written to in any cgroup, as it can only move threads inside the same
312threaded domain, its operations are confined inside each threaded
313subtree.
314
315The threaded domain cgroup serves as the resource domain for the whole
316subtree, and, while the threads can be scattered across the subtree,
317all the processes are considered to be in the threaded domain cgroup.
318"cgroup.procs" in a threaded domain cgroup contains the PIDs of all
319processes in the subtree and is not readable in the subtree proper.
320However, "cgroup.procs" can be written to from anywhere in the subtree
321to migrate all threads of the matching process to the cgroup.
322
323Only threaded controllers can be enabled in a threaded subtree. When
324a threaded controller is enabled inside a threaded subtree, it only
325accounts for and controls resource consumptions associated with the
326threads in the cgroup and its descendants. All consumptions which
327aren't tied to a specific thread belong to the threaded domain cgroup.
328
329Because a threaded subtree is exempt from no internal process
330constraint, a threaded controller must be able to handle competition
331between threads in a non-leaf cgroup and its child cgroups. Each
332threaded controller defines how such competitions are handled.
333
334
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300335[Un]populated Notification
336--------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500337
338Each non-root cgroup has a "cgroup.events" file which contains
339"populated" field indicating whether the cgroup's sub-hierarchy has
340live processes in it. Its value is 0 if there is no live process in
341the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1. poll and [id]notify
342events are triggered when the value changes. This can be used, for
343example, to start a clean-up operation after all processes of a given
344sub-hierarchy have exited. The populated state updates and
345notifications are recursive. Consider the following sub-hierarchy
346where the numbers in the parentheses represent the numbers of processes
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300347in each cgroup::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500348
349 A(4) - B(0) - C(1)
350 \ D(0)
351
352A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0. After the one
353process in C exits, B and C's "populated" fields would flip to "0" and
354file modified events will be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of
355both cgroups.
356
357
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300358Controlling Controllers
359-----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500360
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300361Enabling and Disabling
362~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500363
364Each cgroup has a "cgroup.controllers" file which lists all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300365controllers available for the cgroup to enable::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500366
367 # cat cgroup.controllers
368 cpu io memory
369
370No controller is enabled by default. Controllers can be enabled and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300371disabled by writing to the "cgroup.subtree_control" file::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500372
373 # echo "+cpu +memory -io" > cgroup.subtree_control
374
375Only controllers which are listed in "cgroup.controllers" can be
376enabled. When multiple operations are specified as above, either they
377all succeed or fail. If multiple operations on the same controller
378are specified, the last one is effective.
379
380Enabling a controller in a cgroup indicates that the distribution of
381the target resource across its immediate children will be controlled.
382Consider the following sub-hierarchy. The enabled controllers are
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300383listed in parentheses::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500384
385 A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C()
386 \ D()
387
388As A has "cpu" and "memory" enabled, A will control the distribution
389of CPU cycles and memory to its children, in this case, B. As B has
390"memory" enabled but not "CPU", C and D will compete freely on CPU
391cycles but their division of memory available to B will be controlled.
392
393As a controller regulates the distribution of the target resource to
394the cgroup's children, enabling it creates the controller's interface
395files in the child cgroups. In the above example, enabling "cpu" on B
396would create the "cpu." prefixed controller interface files in C and
397D. Likewise, disabling "memory" from B would remove the "memory."
398prefixed controller interface files from C and D. This means that the
399controller interface files - anything which doesn't start with
400"cgroup." are owned by the parent rather than the cgroup itself.
401
402
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300403Top-down Constraint
404~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500405
406Resources are distributed top-down and a cgroup can further distribute
407a resource only if the resource has been distributed to it from the
408parent. This means that all non-root "cgroup.subtree_control" files
409can only contain controllers which are enabled in the parent's
410"cgroup.subtree_control" file. A controller can be enabled only if
411the parent has the controller enabled and a controller can't be
412disabled if one or more children have it enabled.
413
414
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300415No Internal Process Constraint
416~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500417
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400418Non-root cgroups can distribute domain resources to their children
419only when they don't have any processes of their own. In other words,
420only domain cgroups which don't contain any processes can have domain
421controllers enabled in their "cgroup.subtree_control" files.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500422
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400423This guarantees that, when a domain controller is looking at the part
424of the hierarchy which has it enabled, processes are always only on
425the leaves. This rules out situations where child cgroups compete
426against internal processes of the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500427
428The root cgroup is exempt from this restriction. Root contains
429processes and anonymous resource consumption which can't be associated
430with any other cgroups and requires special treatment from most
431controllers. How resource consumption in the root cgroup is governed
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +0100432is up to each controller (for more information on this topic please
433refer to the Non-normative information section in the Controllers
434chapter).
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500435
436Note that the restriction doesn't get in the way if there is no
437enabled controller in the cgroup's "cgroup.subtree_control". This is
438important as otherwise it wouldn't be possible to create children of a
439populated cgroup. To control resource distribution of a cgroup, the
440cgroup must create children and transfer all its processes to the
441children before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control"
442file.
443
444
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300445Delegation
446----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500447
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300448Model of Delegation
449~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500450
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400451A cgroup can be delegated in two ways. First, to a less privileged
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400452user by granting write access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs",
453"cgroup.threads" and "cgroup.subtree_control" files to the user.
454Second, if the "nsdelegate" mount option is set, automatically to a
455cgroup namespace on namespace creation.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500456
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400457Because the resource control interface files in a given directory
458control the distribution of the parent's resources, the delegatee
459shouldn't be allowed to write to them. For the first method, this is
460achieved by not granting access to these files. For the second, the
461kernel rejects writes to all files other than "cgroup.procs" and
462"cgroup.subtree_control" on a namespace root from inside the
463namespace.
464
465The end results are equivalent for both delegation types. Once
466delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory,
467organize processes inside it as it sees fit and further distribute the
468resources it received from the parent. The limits and other settings
469of all resource controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what
470happens in the delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the
471resource restrictions imposed by the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500472
473Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of
474cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however,
475this may be limited explicitly in the future.
476
477
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300478Delegation Containment
479~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500480
481A delegated sub-hierarchy is contained in the sense that processes
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400482can't be moved into or out of the sub-hierarchy by the delegatee.
483
484For delegations to a less privileged user, this is achieved by
485requiring the following conditions for a process with a non-root euid
486to migrate a target process into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
487"cgroup.procs" file.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500488
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500489- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
490
491- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
492 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
493
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500494The above two constraints ensure that while a delegatee may migrate
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500495processes around freely in the delegated sub-hierarchy it can't pull
496in from or push out to outside the sub-hierarchy.
497
498For an example, let's assume cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to
499user U0 who created C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300500all processes under C0 and C1 belong to U0::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500501
502 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00
503 ~ cgroup ~ \ C01
504 ~ hierarchy ~
505 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10
506
507Let's also say U0 wants to write the PID of a process which is
508currently in C10 into "C00/cgroup.procs". U0 has write access to the
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500509file; however, the common ancestor of the source cgroup C10 and the
510destination cgroup C00 is above the points of delegation and U0 would
511not have write access to its "cgroup.procs" files and thus the write
512will be denied with -EACCES.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500513
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400514For delegations to namespaces, containment is achieved by requiring
515that both the source and destination cgroups are reachable from the
516namespace of the process which is attempting the migration. If either
517is not reachable, the migration is rejected with -ENOENT.
518
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500519
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300520Guidelines
521----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500522
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300523Organize Once and Control
524~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500525
526Migrating a process across cgroups is a relatively expensive operation
527and stateful resources such as memory are not moved together with the
528process. This is an explicit design decision as there often exist
529inherent trade-offs between migration and various hot paths in terms
530of synchronization cost.
531
532As such, migrating processes across cgroups frequently as a means to
533apply different resource restrictions is discouraged. A workload
534should be assigned to a cgroup according to the system's logical and
535resource structure once on start-up. Dynamic adjustments to resource
536distribution can be made by changing controller configuration through
537the interface files.
538
539
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300540Avoid Name Collisions
541~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500542
543Interface files for a cgroup and its children cgroups occupy the same
544directory and it is possible to create children cgroups which collide
545with interface files.
546
547All cgroup core interface files are prefixed with "cgroup." and each
548controller's interface files are prefixed with the controller name and
549a dot. A controller's name is composed of lower case alphabets and
550'_'s but never begins with an '_' so it can be used as the prefix
551character for collision avoidance. Also, interface file names won't
552start or end with terms which are often used in categorizing workloads
553such as job, service, slice, unit or workload.
554
555cgroup doesn't do anything to prevent name collisions and it's the
556user's responsibility to avoid them.
557
558
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300559Resource Distribution Models
560============================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500561
562cgroup controllers implement several resource distribution schemes
563depending on the resource type and expected use cases. This section
564describes major schemes in use along with their expected behaviors.
565
566
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300567Weights
568-------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500569
570A parent's resource is distributed by adding up the weights of all
571active children and giving each the fraction matching the ratio of its
572weight against the sum. As only children which can make use of the
573resource at the moment participate in the distribution, this is
574work-conserving. Due to the dynamic nature, this model is usually
575used for stateless resources.
576
577All weights are in the range [1, 10000] with the default at 100. This
578allows symmetric multiplicative biases in both directions at fine
579enough granularity while staying in the intuitive range.
580
581As long as the weight is in range, all configuration combinations are
582valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
583process migrations.
584
585"cpu.weight" proportionally distributes CPU cycles to active children
586and is an example of this type.
587
588
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300589Limits
590------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500591
592A child can only consume upto the configured amount of the resource.
593Limits can be over-committed - the sum of the limits of children can
594exceed the amount of resource available to the parent.
595
596Limits are in the range [0, max] and defaults to "max", which is noop.
597
598As limits can be over-committed, all configuration combinations are
599valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
600process migrations.
601
602"io.max" limits the maximum BPS and/or IOPS that a cgroup can consume
603on an IO device and is an example of this type.
604
605
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300606Protections
607-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500608
609A cgroup is protected to be allocated upto the configured amount of
610the resource if the usages of all its ancestors are under their
611protected levels. Protections can be hard guarantees or best effort
612soft boundaries. Protections can also be over-committed in which case
613only upto the amount available to the parent is protected among
614children.
615
616Protections are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is
617noop.
618
619As protections can be over-committed, all configuration combinations
620are valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
621process migrations.
622
623"memory.low" implements best-effort memory protection and is an
624example of this type.
625
626
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300627Allocations
628-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500629
630A cgroup is exclusively allocated a certain amount of a finite
631resource. Allocations can't be over-committed - the sum of the
632allocations of children can not exceed the amount of resource
633available to the parent.
634
635Allocations are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is no
636resource.
637
638As allocations can't be over-committed, some configuration
639combinations are invalid and should be rejected. Also, if the
640resource is mandatory for execution of processes, process migrations
641may be rejected.
642
643"cpu.rt.max" hard-allocates realtime slices and is an example of this
644type.
645
646
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300647Interface Files
648===============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500649
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300650Format
651------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500652
653All interface files should be in one of the following formats whenever
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300654possible::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500655
656 New-line separated values
657 (when only one value can be written at once)
658
659 VAL0\n
660 VAL1\n
661 ...
662
663 Space separated values
664 (when read-only or multiple values can be written at once)
665
666 VAL0 VAL1 ...\n
667
668 Flat keyed
669
670 KEY0 VAL0\n
671 KEY1 VAL1\n
672 ...
673
674 Nested keyed
675
676 KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01...
677 KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11...
678 ...
679
680For a writable file, the format for writing should generally match
681reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or
682implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases.
683
684For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key
685can be written at a time. For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs
686may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified.
687
688
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300689Conventions
690-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500691
692- Settings for a single feature should be contained in a single file.
693
694- The root cgroup should be exempt from resource control and thus
695 shouldn't have resource control interface files. Also,
696 informational files on the root cgroup which end up showing global
697 information available elsewhere shouldn't exist.
698
699- If a controller implements weight based resource distribution, its
700 interface file should be named "weight" and have the range [1,
701 10000] with 100 as the default. The values are chosen to allow
702 enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it
703 intuitive (the default is 100%).
704
705- If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or
706 limit, the interface files should be named "min" and "max"
707 respectively. If a controller implements best effort resource
708 guarantee and/or limit, the interface files should be named "low"
709 and "high" respectively.
710
711 In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be
712 used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing.
713
714- If a setting has a configurable default value and keyed specific
715 overrides, the default entry should be keyed with "default" and
716 appear as the first entry in the file.
717
718 The default value can be updated by writing either "default $VAL" or
719 "$VAL".
720
721 When writing to update a specific override, "default" can be used as
722 the value to indicate removal of the override. Override entries
723 with "default" as the value must not appear when read.
724
725 For example, a setting which is keyed by major:minor device numbers
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300726 with integer values may look like the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500727
728 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
729 default 150
730 8:0 300
731
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300732 The default value can be updated by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500733
734 # echo 125 > cgroup-example-interface-file
735
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300736 or::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500737
738 # echo "default 125" > cgroup-example-interface-file
739
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300740 An override can be set by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500741
742 # echo "8:16 170" > cgroup-example-interface-file
743
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300744 and cleared by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500745
746 # echo "8:0 default" > cgroup-example-interface-file
747 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
748 default 125
749 8:16 170
750
751- For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file
752 "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs.
753 Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be
754 generated on the file.
755
756
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300757Core Interface Files
758--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500759
760All cgroup core files are prefixed with "cgroup."
761
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400762 cgroup.type
763
764 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
765 cgroups.
766
767 When read, it indicates the current type of the cgroup, which
768 can be one of the following values.
769
770 - "domain" : A normal valid domain cgroup.
771
772 - "domain threaded" : A threaded domain cgroup which is
773 serving as the root of a threaded subtree.
774
775 - "domain invalid" : A cgroup which is in an invalid state.
776 It can't be populated or have controllers enabled. It may
777 be allowed to become a threaded cgroup.
778
779 - "threaded" : A threaded cgroup which is a member of a
780 threaded subtree.
781
782 A cgroup can be turned into a threaded cgroup by writing
783 "threaded" to this file.
784
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500785 cgroup.procs
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500786 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
787 all cgroups.
788
789 When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which belong to
790 the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
791 same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved
792 to another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while
793 reading.
794
795 A PID can be written to migrate the process associated with
796 the PID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
797 following conditions.
798
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500799 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
800
801 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
802 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
803
804 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
805 should be granted along with the containing directory.
806
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400807 In a threaded cgroup, reading this file fails with EOPNOTSUPP
808 as all the processes belong to the thread root. Writing is
809 supported and moves every thread of the process to the cgroup.
810
811 cgroup.threads
812 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
813 all cgroups.
814
815 When read, it lists the TIDs of all threads which belong to
816 the cgroup one-per-line. The TIDs are not ordered and the
817 same TID may show up more than once if the thread got moved to
818 another cgroup and then back or the TID got recycled while
819 reading.
820
821 A TID can be written to migrate the thread associated with the
822 TID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
823 following conditions.
824
825 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.threads" file.
826
827 - The cgroup that the thread is currently in must be in the
828 same resource domain as the destination cgroup.
829
830 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
831 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
832
833 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
834 should be granted along with the containing directory.
835
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500836 cgroup.controllers
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500837 A read-only space separated values file which exists on all
838 cgroups.
839
840 It shows space separated list of all controllers available to
841 the cgroup. The controllers are not ordered.
842
843 cgroup.subtree_control
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500844 A read-write space separated values file which exists on all
845 cgroups. Starts out empty.
846
847 When read, it shows space separated list of the controllers
848 which are enabled to control resource distribution from the
849 cgroup to its children.
850
851 Space separated list of controllers prefixed with '+' or '-'
852 can be written to enable or disable controllers. A controller
853 name prefixed with '+' enables the controller and '-'
854 disables. If a controller appears more than once on the list,
855 the last one is effective. When multiple enable and disable
856 operations are specified, either all succeed or all fail.
857
858 cgroup.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500859 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
860 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
861 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
862 modified event.
863
864 populated
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500865 1 if the cgroup or its descendants contains any live
866 processes; otherwise, 0.
Roman Gushchinafe471e2019-04-19 10:03:09 -0700867 frozen
868 1 if the cgroup is frozen; otherwise, 0.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500869
Roman Gushchin1a926e02017-07-28 18:28:44 +0100870 cgroup.max.descendants
871 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
872
873 Maximum allowed number of descent cgroups.
874 If the actual number of descendants is equal or larger,
875 an attempt to create a new cgroup in the hierarchy will fail.
876
877 cgroup.max.depth
878 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
879
880 Maximum allowed descent depth below the current cgroup.
881 If the actual descent depth is equal or larger,
882 an attempt to create a new child cgroup will fail.
883
Roman Gushchinec392252017-08-02 17:55:31 +0100884 cgroup.stat
885 A read-only flat-keyed file with the following entries:
886
887 nr_descendants
888 Total number of visible descendant cgroups.
889
890 nr_dying_descendants
891 Total number of dying descendant cgroups. A cgroup becomes
892 dying after being deleted by a user. The cgroup will remain
893 in dying state for some time undefined time (which can depend
894 on system load) before being completely destroyed.
895
896 A process can't enter a dying cgroup under any circumstances,
897 a dying cgroup can't revive.
898
899 A dying cgroup can consume system resources not exceeding
900 limits, which were active at the moment of cgroup deletion.
901
Roman Gushchinafe471e2019-04-19 10:03:09 -0700902 cgroup.freeze
903 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
904 Allowed values are "0" and "1". The default is "0".
905
906 Writing "1" to the file causes freezing of the cgroup and all
907 descendant cgroups. This means that all belonging processes will
908 be stopped and will not run until the cgroup will be explicitly
909 unfrozen. Freezing of the cgroup may take some time; when this action
910 is completed, the "frozen" value in the cgroup.events control file
911 will be updated to "1" and the corresponding notification will be
912 issued.
913
914 A cgroup can be frozen either by its own settings, or by settings
915 of any ancestor cgroups. If any of ancestor cgroups is frozen, the
916 cgroup will remain frozen.
917
918 Processes in the frozen cgroup can be killed by a fatal signal.
919 They also can enter and leave a frozen cgroup: either by an explicit
920 move by a user, or if freezing of the cgroup races with fork().
921 If a process is moved to a frozen cgroup, it stops. If a process is
922 moved out of a frozen cgroup, it becomes running.
923
924 Frozen status of a cgroup doesn't affect any cgroup tree operations:
925 it's possible to delete a frozen (and empty) cgroup, as well as
926 create new sub-cgroups.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500927
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300928Controllers
929===========
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500930
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300931CPU
932---
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500933
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500934The "cpu" controllers regulates distribution of CPU cycles. This
935controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for
936normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for
937realtime scheduling policy.
938
Tejun Heoc2f31b72017-12-05 09:10:17 -0800939WARNING: cgroup2 doesn't yet support control of realtime processes and
940the cpu controller can only be enabled when all RT processes are in
941the root cgroup. Be aware that system management software may already
942have placed RT processes into nonroot cgroups during the system boot
943process, and these processes may need to be moved to the root cgroup
944before the cpu controller can be enabled.
945
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500946
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300947CPU Interface Files
948~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500949
950All time durations are in microseconds.
951
952 cpu.stat
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500953 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700954 This file exists whether the controller is enabled or not.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500955
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700956 It always reports the following three stats:
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500957
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300958 - usage_usec
959 - user_usec
960 - system_usec
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700961
962 and the following three when the controller is enabled:
963
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300964 - nr_periods
965 - nr_throttled
966 - throttled_usec
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500967
968 cpu.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500969 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
970 cgroups. The default is "100".
971
972 The weight in the range [1, 10000].
973
Tejun Heo0d593632017-09-25 09:00:19 -0700974 cpu.weight.nice
975 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
976 cgroups. The default is "0".
977
978 The nice value is in the range [-20, 19].
979
980 This interface file is an alternative interface for
981 "cpu.weight" and allows reading and setting weight using the
982 same values used by nice(2). Because the range is smaller and
983 granularity is coarser for the nice values, the read value is
984 the closest approximation of the current weight.
985
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500986 cpu.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500987 A read-write two value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
988 The default is "max 100000".
989
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300990 The maximum bandwidth limit. It's in the following format::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500991
992 $MAX $PERIOD
993
994 which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each
995 $PERIOD duration. "max" for $MAX indicates no limit. If only
996 one number is written, $MAX is updated.
997
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -0700998 cpu.pressure
999 A read-only nested-key file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1000
1001 Shows pressure stall information for CPU. See
1002 Documentation/accounting/psi.txt for details.
1003
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001004
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001005Memory
1006------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001007
1008The "memory" controller regulates distribution of memory. Memory is
1009stateful and implements both limit and protection models. Due to the
1010intertwining between memory usage and reclaim pressure and the
1011stateful nature of memory, the distribution model is relatively
1012complex.
1013
1014While not completely water-tight, all major memory usages by a given
1015cgroup are tracked so that the total memory consumption can be
1016accounted and controlled to a reasonable extent. Currently, the
1017following types of memory usages are tracked.
1018
1019- Userland memory - page cache and anonymous memory.
1020
1021- Kernel data structures such as dentries and inodes.
1022
1023- TCP socket buffers.
1024
1025The above list may expand in the future for better coverage.
1026
1027
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001028Memory Interface Files
1029~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001030
1031All memory amounts are in bytes. If a value which is not aligned to
1032PAGE_SIZE is written, the value may be rounded up to the closest
1033PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
1034
1035 memory.current
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001036 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
1037 cgroups.
1038
1039 The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup
1040 and its descendants.
1041
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001042 memory.min
1043 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1044 cgroups. The default is "0".
1045
1046 Hard memory protection. If the memory usage of a cgroup
1047 is within its effective min boundary, the cgroup's memory
1048 won't be reclaimed under any conditions. If there is no
1049 unprotected reclaimable memory available, OOM killer
1050 is invoked.
1051
1052 Effective min boundary is limited by memory.min values of
1053 all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.min overcommitment
1054 (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
1055 than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
1056 the part of parent's protection proportional to its
1057 actual memory usage below memory.min.
1058
1059 Putting more memory than generally available under this
1060 protection is discouraged and may lead to constant OOMs.
1061
1062 If a memory cgroup is not populated with processes,
1063 its memory.min is ignored.
1064
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001065 memory.low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001066 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1067 cgroups. The default is "0".
1068
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001069 Best-effort memory protection. If the memory usage of a
1070 cgroup is within its effective low boundary, the cgroup's
1071 memory won't be reclaimed unless memory can be reclaimed
1072 from unprotected cgroups.
1073
1074 Effective low boundary is limited by memory.low values of
1075 all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.low overcommitment
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001076 (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001077 than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001078 the part of parent's protection proportional to its
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001079 actual memory usage below memory.low.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001080
1081 Putting more memory than generally available under this
1082 protection is discouraged.
1083
1084 memory.high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001085 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1086 cgroups. The default is "max".
1087
1088 Memory usage throttle limit. This is the main mechanism to
1089 control memory usage of a cgroup. If a cgroup's usage goes
1090 over the high boundary, the processes of the cgroup are
1091 throttled and put under heavy reclaim pressure.
1092
1093 Going over the high limit never invokes the OOM killer and
1094 under extreme conditions the limit may be breached.
1095
1096 memory.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001097 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1098 cgroups. The default is "max".
1099
1100 Memory usage hard limit. This is the final protection
1101 mechanism. If a cgroup's memory usage reaches this limit and
1102 can't be reduced, the OOM killer is invoked in the cgroup.
1103 Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit
1104 temporarily.
1105
1106 This is the ultimate protection mechanism. As long as the
1107 high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's
1108 utility is limited to providing the final safety net.
1109
Roman Gushchin3d8b38e2018-08-21 21:53:54 -07001110 memory.oom.group
1111 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1112 cgroups. The default value is "0".
1113
1114 Determines whether the cgroup should be treated as
1115 an indivisible workload by the OOM killer. If set,
1116 all tasks belonging to the cgroup or to its descendants
1117 (if the memory cgroup is not a leaf cgroup) are killed
1118 together or not at all. This can be used to avoid
1119 partial kills to guarantee workload integrity.
1120
1121 Tasks with the OOM protection (oom_score_adj set to -1000)
1122 are treated as an exception and are never killed.
1123
1124 If the OOM killer is invoked in a cgroup, it's not going
1125 to kill any tasks outside of this cgroup, regardless
1126 memory.oom.group values of ancestor cgroups.
1127
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001128 memory.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001129 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1130 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
1131 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
1132 modified event.
1133
1134 low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001135 The number of times the cgroup is reclaimed due to
1136 high memory pressure even though its usage is under
1137 the low boundary. This usually indicates that the low
1138 boundary is over-committed.
1139
1140 high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001141 The number of times processes of the cgroup are
1142 throttled and routed to perform direct memory reclaim
1143 because the high memory boundary was exceeded. For a
1144 cgroup whose memory usage is capped by the high limit
1145 rather than global memory pressure, this event's
1146 occurrences are expected.
1147
1148 max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001149 The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was
1150 about to go over the max boundary. If direct reclaim
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001151 fails to bring it down, the cgroup goes to OOM state.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001152
1153 oom
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001154 The number of time the cgroup's memory usage was
1155 reached the limit and allocation was about to fail.
1156
1157 Depending on context result could be invocation of OOM
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001158 killer and retrying allocation or failing allocation.
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001159
1160 Failed allocation in its turn could be returned into
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001161 userspace as -ENOMEM or silently ignored in cases like
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001162 disk readahead. For now OOM in memory cgroup kills
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001163 tasks iff shortage has happened inside page fault.
1164
Roman Gushchin7a1adfd2018-10-26 15:09:48 -07001165 This event is not raised if the OOM killer is not
1166 considered as an option, e.g. for failed high-order
1167 allocations.
1168
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001169 oom_kill
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001170 The number of processes belonging to this cgroup
1171 killed by any kind of OOM killer.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001172
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001173 memory.stat
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001174 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1175
1176 This breaks down the cgroup's memory footprint into different
1177 types of memory, type-specific details, and other information
1178 on the state and past events of the memory management system.
1179
1180 All memory amounts are in bytes.
1181
1182 The entries are ordered to be human readable, and new entries
1183 can show up in the middle. Don't rely on items remaining in a
1184 fixed position; use the keys to look up specific values!
1185
1186 anon
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001187 Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings such as
1188 brk(), sbrk(), and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS)
1189
1190 file
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001191 Amount of memory used to cache filesystem data,
1192 including tmpfs and shared memory.
1193
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001194 kernel_stack
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001195 Amount of memory allocated to kernel stacks.
1196
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001197 slab
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001198 Amount of memory used for storing in-kernel data
1199 structures.
1200
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001201 sock
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001202 Amount of memory used in network transmission buffers
1203
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001204 shmem
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001205 Amount of cached filesystem data that is swap-backed,
1206 such as tmpfs, shm segments, shared anonymous mmap()s
1207
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001208 file_mapped
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001209 Amount of cached filesystem data mapped with mmap()
1210
1211 file_dirty
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001212 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified but
1213 not yet written back to disk
1214
1215 file_writeback
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001216 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified and
1217 is currently being written back to disk
1218
Chris Down1ff9e6e2019-03-05 15:48:09 -08001219 anon_thp
1220 Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings backed by
1221 transparent hugepages
1222
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001223 inactive_anon, active_anon, inactive_file, active_file, unevictable
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001224 Amount of memory, swap-backed and filesystem-backed,
1225 on the internal memory management lists used by the
1226 page reclaim algorithm
1227
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001228 slab_reclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001229 Part of "slab" that might be reclaimed, such as
1230 dentries and inodes.
1231
1232 slab_unreclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001233 Part of "slab" that cannot be reclaimed on memory
1234 pressure.
1235
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001236 pgfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001237 Total number of page faults incurred
1238
1239 pgmajfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001240 Number of major page faults incurred
1241
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -07001242 workingset_refault
1243
1244 Number of refaults of previously evicted pages
1245
1246 workingset_activate
1247
1248 Number of refaulted pages that were immediately activated
1249
1250 workingset_nodereclaim
1251
1252 Number of times a shadow node has been reclaimed
1253
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001254 pgrefill
1255
1256 Amount of scanned pages (in an active LRU list)
1257
1258 pgscan
1259
1260 Amount of scanned pages (in an inactive LRU list)
1261
1262 pgsteal
1263
1264 Amount of reclaimed pages
1265
1266 pgactivate
1267
1268 Amount of pages moved to the active LRU list
1269
1270 pgdeactivate
1271
1272 Amount of pages moved to the inactive LRU lis
1273
1274 pglazyfree
1275
1276 Amount of pages postponed to be freed under memory pressure
1277
1278 pglazyfreed
1279
1280 Amount of reclaimed lazyfree pages
1281
Chris Down1ff9e6e2019-03-05 15:48:09 -08001282 thp_fault_alloc
1283
1284 Number of transparent hugepages which were allocated to satisfy
1285 a page fault, including COW faults. This counter is not present
1286 when CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is not set.
1287
1288 thp_collapse_alloc
1289
1290 Number of transparent hugepages which were allocated to allow
1291 collapsing an existing range of pages. This counter is not
1292 present when CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is not set.
1293
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001294 memory.swap.current
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001295 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
1296 cgroups.
1297
1298 The total amount of swap currently being used by the cgroup
1299 and its descendants.
1300
1301 memory.swap.max
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001302 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1303 cgroups. The default is "max".
1304
1305 Swap usage hard limit. If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001306 limit, anonymous memory of the cgroup will not be swapped out.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001307
Tejun Heof3a53a32018-06-07 17:05:35 -07001308 memory.swap.events
1309 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1310 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
1311 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
1312 modified event.
1313
1314 max
1315 The number of times the cgroup's swap usage was about
1316 to go over the max boundary and swap allocation
1317 failed.
1318
1319 fail
1320 The number of times swap allocation failed either
1321 because of running out of swap system-wide or max
1322 limit.
1323
Tejun Heobe091022018-06-07 17:09:21 -07001324 When reduced under the current usage, the existing swap
1325 entries are reclaimed gradually and the swap usage may stay
1326 higher than the limit for an extended period of time. This
1327 reduces the impact on the workload and memory management.
1328
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001329 memory.pressure
1330 A read-only nested-key file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1331
1332 Shows pressure stall information for memory. See
1333 Documentation/accounting/psi.txt for details.
1334
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001335
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001336Usage Guidelines
1337~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001338
1339"memory.high" is the main mechanism to control memory usage.
1340Over-committing on high limit (sum of high limits > available memory)
1341and letting global memory pressure to distribute memory according to
1342usage is a viable strategy.
1343
1344Because breach of the high limit doesn't trigger the OOM killer but
1345throttles the offending cgroup, a management agent has ample
1346opportunities to monitor and take appropriate actions such as granting
1347more memory or terminating the workload.
1348
1349Determining whether a cgroup has enough memory is not trivial as
1350memory usage doesn't indicate whether the workload can benefit from
1351more memory. For example, a workload which writes data received from
1352network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
1353performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
1354pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
1355memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
1356memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
1357implemented yet.
1358
1359
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001360Memory Ownership
1361~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001362
1363A memory area is charged to the cgroup which instantiated it and stays
1364charged to the cgroup until the area is released. Migrating a process
1365to a different cgroup doesn't move the memory usages that it
1366instantiated while in the previous cgroup to the new cgroup.
1367
1368A memory area may be used by processes belonging to different cgroups.
1369To which cgroup the area will be charged is in-deterministic; however,
1370over time, the memory area is likely to end up in a cgroup which has
1371enough memory allowance to avoid high reclaim pressure.
1372
1373If a cgroup sweeps a considerable amount of memory which is expected
1374to be accessed repeatedly by other cgroups, it may make sense to use
1375POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED to relinquish the ownership of memory areas
1376belonging to the affected files to ensure correct memory ownership.
1377
1378
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001379IO
1380--
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001381
1382The "io" controller regulates the distribution of IO resources. This
1383controller implements both weight based and absolute bandwidth or IOPS
1384limit distribution; however, weight based distribution is available
1385only if cfq-iosched is in use and neither scheme is available for
1386blk-mq devices.
1387
1388
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001389IO Interface Files
1390~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001391
1392 io.stat
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001393 A read-only nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1394 cgroups.
1395
1396 Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered.
1397 The following nested keys are defined.
1398
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001399 ====== =====================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001400 rbytes Bytes read
1401 wbytes Bytes written
1402 rios Number of read IOs
1403 wios Number of write IOs
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001404 dbytes Bytes discarded
1405 dios Number of discard IOs
1406 ====== =====================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001407
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001408 An example read output follows:
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001409
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001410 8:16 rbytes=1459200 wbytes=314773504 rios=192 wios=353 dbytes=0 dios=0
1411 8:0 rbytes=90430464 wbytes=299008000 rios=8950 wios=1252 dbytes=50331648 dios=3021
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001412
1413 io.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001414 A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1415 The default is "default 100".
1416
1417 The first line is the default weight applied to devices
1418 without specific override. The rest are overrides keyed by
1419 $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The weights are in
1420 the range [1, 10000] and specifies the relative amount IO time
1421 the cgroup can use in relation to its siblings.
1422
1423 The default weight can be updated by writing either "default
1424 $WEIGHT" or simply "$WEIGHT". Overrides can be set by writing
1425 "$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" and unset by writing "$MAJ:$MIN default".
1426
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001427 An example read output follows::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001428
1429 default 100
1430 8:16 200
1431 8:0 50
1432
1433 io.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001434 A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1435 cgroups.
1436
1437 BPS and IOPS based IO limit. Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN
1438 device numbers and not ordered. The following nested keys are
1439 defined.
1440
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001441 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001442 rbps Max read bytes per second
1443 wbps Max write bytes per second
1444 riops Max read IO operations per second
1445 wiops Max write IO operations per second
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001446 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001447
1448 When writing, any number of nested key-value pairs can be
1449 specified in any order. "max" can be specified as the value
1450 to remove a specific limit. If the same key is specified
1451 multiple times, the outcome is undefined.
1452
1453 BPS and IOPS are measured in each IO direction and IOs are
1454 delayed if limit is reached. Temporary bursts are allowed.
1455
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001456 Setting read limit at 2M BPS and write at 120 IOPS for 8:16::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001457
1458 echo "8:16 rbps=2097152 wiops=120" > io.max
1459
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001460 Reading returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001461
1462 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=120
1463
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001464 Write IOPS limit can be removed by writing the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001465
1466 echo "8:16 wiops=max" > io.max
1467
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001468 Reading now returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001469
1470 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=max
1471
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001472 io.pressure
1473 A read-only nested-key file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1474
1475 Shows pressure stall information for IO. See
1476 Documentation/accounting/psi.txt for details.
1477
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001478
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001479Writeback
1480~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001481
1482Page cache is dirtied through buffered writes and shared mmaps and
1483written asynchronously to the backing filesystem by the writeback
1484mechanism. Writeback sits between the memory and IO domains and
1485regulates the proportion of dirty memory by balancing dirtying and
1486write IOs.
1487
1488The io controller, in conjunction with the memory controller,
1489implements control of page cache writeback IOs. The memory controller
1490defines the memory domain that dirty memory ratio is calculated and
1491maintained for and the io controller defines the io domain which
1492writes out dirty pages for the memory domain. Both system-wide and
1493per-cgroup dirty memory states are examined and the more restrictive
1494of the two is enforced.
1495
1496cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying
1497filesystem. Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4
1498and btrfs. On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are attributed to
1499the root cgroup.
1500
1501There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management
1502which affects how cgroup ownership is tracked. Memory is tracked per
1503page while writeback per inode. For the purpose of writeback, an
1504inode is assigned to a cgroup and all IO requests to write dirty pages
1505from the inode are attributed to that cgroup.
1506
1507As cgroup ownership for memory is tracked per page, there can be pages
1508which are associated with different cgroups than the one the inode is
1509associated with. These are called foreign pages. The writeback
1510constantly keeps track of foreign pages and, if a particular foreign
1511cgroup becomes the majority over a certain period of time, switches
1512the ownership of the inode to that cgroup.
1513
1514While this model is enough for most use cases where a given inode is
1515mostly dirtied by a single cgroup even when the main writing cgroup
1516changes over time, use cases where multiple cgroups write to a single
1517inode simultaneously are not supported well. In such circumstances, a
1518significant portion of IOs are likely to be attributed incorrectly.
1519As memory controller assigns page ownership on the first use and
1520doesn't update it until the page is released, even if writeback
1521strictly follows page ownership, multiple cgroups dirtying overlapping
1522areas wouldn't work as expected. It's recommended to avoid such usage
1523patterns.
1524
1525The sysctl knobs which affect writeback behavior are applied to cgroup
1526writeback as follows.
1527
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001528 vm.dirty_background_ratio, vm.dirty_ratio
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001529 These ratios apply the same to cgroup writeback with the
1530 amount of available memory capped by limits imposed by the
1531 memory controller and system-wide clean memory.
1532
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001533 vm.dirty_background_bytes, vm.dirty_bytes
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001534 For cgroup writeback, this is calculated into ratio against
1535 total available memory and applied the same way as
1536 vm.dirty[_background]_ratio.
1537
1538
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001539IO Latency
1540~~~~~~~~~~
1541
1542This is a cgroup v2 controller for IO workload protection. You provide a group
1543with a latency target, and if the average latency exceeds that target the
1544controller will throttle any peers that have a lower latency target than the
1545protected workload.
1546
1547The limits are only applied at the peer level in the hierarchy. This means that
1548in the diagram below, only groups A, B, and C will influence each other, and
Randy Dunlap34b43442019-02-06 16:59:00 -08001549groups D and F will influence each other. Group G will influence nobody::
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001550
1551 [root]
1552 / | \
1553 A B C
1554 / \ |
1555 D F G
1556
1557
1558So the ideal way to configure this is to set io.latency in groups A, B, and C.
1559Generally you do not want to set a value lower than the latency your device
1560supports. Experiment to find the value that works best for your workload.
1561Start at higher than the expected latency for your device and watch the
Dennis Zhou (Facebook)c480bcf2018-08-01 23:15:41 -07001562avg_lat value in io.stat for your workload group to get an idea of the
1563latency you see during normal operation. Use the avg_lat value as a basis for
1564your real setting, setting at 10-15% higher than the value in io.stat.
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001565
1566How IO Latency Throttling Works
1567~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1568
1569io.latency is work conserving; so as long as everybody is meeting their latency
1570target the controller doesn't do anything. Once a group starts missing its
1571target it begins throttling any peer group that has a higher target than itself.
1572This throttling takes 2 forms:
1573
1574- Queue depth throttling. This is the number of outstanding IO's a group is
1575 allowed to have. We will clamp down relatively quickly, starting at no limit
1576 and going all the way down to 1 IO at a time.
1577
1578- Artificial delay induction. There are certain types of IO that cannot be
1579 throttled without possibly adversely affecting higher priority groups. This
1580 includes swapping and metadata IO. These types of IO are allowed to occur
1581 normally, however they are "charged" to the originating group. If the
1582 originating group is being throttled you will see the use_delay and delay
1583 fields in io.stat increase. The delay value is how many microseconds that are
1584 being added to any process that runs in this group. Because this number can
1585 grow quite large if there is a lot of swapping or metadata IO occurring we
1586 limit the individual delay events to 1 second at a time.
1587
1588Once the victimized group starts meeting its latency target again it will start
1589unthrottling any peer groups that were throttled previously. If the victimized
1590group simply stops doing IO the global counter will unthrottle appropriately.
1591
1592IO Latency Interface Files
1593~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1594
1595 io.latency
1596 This takes a similar format as the other controllers.
1597
1598 "MAJOR:MINOR target=<target time in microseconds"
1599
1600 io.stat
1601 If the controller is enabled you will see extra stats in io.stat in
1602 addition to the normal ones.
1603
1604 depth
1605 This is the current queue depth for the group.
1606
1607 avg_lat
Dennis Zhou (Facebook)c480bcf2018-08-01 23:15:41 -07001608 This is an exponential moving average with a decay rate of 1/exp
1609 bound by the sampling interval. The decay rate interval can be
1610 calculated by multiplying the win value in io.stat by the
1611 corresponding number of samples based on the win value.
1612
1613 win
1614 The sampling window size in milliseconds. This is the minimum
1615 duration of time between evaluation events. Windows only elapse
1616 with IO activity. Idle periods extend the most recent window.
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001617
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001618PID
1619---
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001620
1621The process number controller is used to allow a cgroup to stop any
1622new tasks from being fork()'d or clone()'d after a specified limit is
1623reached.
1624
1625The number of tasks in a cgroup can be exhausted in ways which other
1626controllers cannot prevent, thus warranting its own controller. For
1627example, a fork bomb is likely to exhaust the number of tasks before
1628hitting memory restrictions.
1629
1630Note that PIDs used in this controller refer to TIDs, process IDs as
1631used by the kernel.
1632
1633
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001634PID Interface Files
1635~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001636
1637 pids.max
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001638 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1639 cgroups. The default is "max".
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001640
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001641 Hard limit of number of processes.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001642
1643 pids.current
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001644 A read-only single value file which exists on all cgroups.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001645
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001646 The number of processes currently in the cgroup and its
1647 descendants.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001648
1649Organisational operations are not blocked by cgroup policies, so it is
1650possible to have pids.current > pids.max. This can be done by either
1651setting the limit to be smaller than pids.current, or attaching enough
1652processes to the cgroup such that pids.current is larger than
1653pids.max. However, it is not possible to violate a cgroup PID policy
1654through fork() or clone(). These will return -EAGAIN if the creation
1655of a new process would cause a cgroup policy to be violated.
1656
1657
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001658Cpuset
1659------
1660
1661The "cpuset" controller provides a mechanism for constraining
1662the CPU and memory node placement of tasks to only the resources
1663specified in the cpuset interface files in a task's current cgroup.
1664This is especially valuable on large NUMA systems where placing jobs
1665on properly sized subsets of the systems with careful processor and
1666memory placement to reduce cross-node memory access and contention
1667can improve overall system performance.
1668
1669The "cpuset" controller is hierarchical. That means the controller
1670cannot use CPUs or memory nodes not allowed in its parent.
1671
1672
1673Cpuset Interface Files
1674~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1675
1676 cpuset.cpus
1677 A read-write multiple values file which exists on non-root
1678 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1679
1680 It lists the requested CPUs to be used by tasks within this
1681 cgroup. The actual list of CPUs to be granted, however, is
1682 subjected to constraints imposed by its parent and can differ
1683 from the requested CPUs.
1684
1685 The CPU numbers are comma-separated numbers or ranges.
1686 For example:
1687
1688 # cat cpuset.cpus
1689 0-4,6,8-10
1690
1691 An empty value indicates that the cgroup is using the same
1692 setting as the nearest cgroup ancestor with a non-empty
1693 "cpuset.cpus" or all the available CPUs if none is found.
1694
1695 The value of "cpuset.cpus" stays constant until the next update
1696 and won't be affected by any CPU hotplug events.
1697
1698 cpuset.cpus.effective
Waiman Long5776cec2018-11-08 10:08:43 -05001699 A read-only multiple values file which exists on all
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001700 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1701
1702 It lists the onlined CPUs that are actually granted to this
1703 cgroup by its parent. These CPUs are allowed to be used by
1704 tasks within the current cgroup.
1705
1706 If "cpuset.cpus" is empty, the "cpuset.cpus.effective" file shows
1707 all the CPUs from the parent cgroup that can be available to
1708 be used by this cgroup. Otherwise, it should be a subset of
1709 "cpuset.cpus" unless none of the CPUs listed in "cpuset.cpus"
1710 can be granted. In this case, it will be treated just like an
1711 empty "cpuset.cpus".
1712
1713 Its value will be affected by CPU hotplug events.
1714
1715 cpuset.mems
1716 A read-write multiple values file which exists on non-root
1717 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1718
1719 It lists the requested memory nodes to be used by tasks within
1720 this cgroup. The actual list of memory nodes granted, however,
1721 is subjected to constraints imposed by its parent and can differ
1722 from the requested memory nodes.
1723
1724 The memory node numbers are comma-separated numbers or ranges.
1725 For example:
1726
1727 # cat cpuset.mems
1728 0-1,3
1729
1730 An empty value indicates that the cgroup is using the same
1731 setting as the nearest cgroup ancestor with a non-empty
1732 "cpuset.mems" or all the available memory nodes if none
1733 is found.
1734
1735 The value of "cpuset.mems" stays constant until the next update
1736 and won't be affected by any memory nodes hotplug events.
1737
1738 cpuset.mems.effective
Waiman Long5776cec2018-11-08 10:08:43 -05001739 A read-only multiple values file which exists on all
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001740 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1741
1742 It lists the onlined memory nodes that are actually granted to
1743 this cgroup by its parent. These memory nodes are allowed to
1744 be used by tasks within the current cgroup.
1745
1746 If "cpuset.mems" is empty, it shows all the memory nodes from the
1747 parent cgroup that will be available to be used by this cgroup.
1748 Otherwise, it should be a subset of "cpuset.mems" unless none of
1749 the memory nodes listed in "cpuset.mems" can be granted. In this
1750 case, it will be treated just like an empty "cpuset.mems".
1751
1752 Its value will be affected by memory nodes hotplug events.
1753
Tejun Heob1e3aeb2018-11-13 12:03:33 -08001754 cpuset.cpus.partition
Waiman Long90e92f22018-11-08 10:08:45 -05001755 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1756 cpuset-enabled cgroups. This flag is owned by the parent cgroup
1757 and is not delegatable.
1758
1759 It accepts only the following input values when written to.
1760
Tejun Heob1e3aeb2018-11-13 12:03:33 -08001761 "root" - a paritition root
1762 "member" - a non-root member of a partition
Waiman Long90e92f22018-11-08 10:08:45 -05001763
1764 When set to be a partition root, the current cgroup is the
1765 root of a new partition or scheduling domain that comprises
1766 itself and all its descendants except those that are separate
1767 partition roots themselves and their descendants. The root
1768 cgroup is always a partition root.
1769
1770 There are constraints on where a partition root can be set.
1771 It can only be set in a cgroup if all the following conditions
1772 are true.
1773
1774 1) The "cpuset.cpus" is not empty and the list of CPUs are
1775 exclusive, i.e. they are not shared by any of its siblings.
1776 2) The parent cgroup is a partition root.
1777 3) The "cpuset.cpus" is also a proper subset of the parent's
1778 "cpuset.cpus.effective".
1779 4) There is no child cgroups with cpuset enabled. This is for
1780 eliminating corner cases that have to be handled if such a
1781 condition is allowed.
1782
1783 Setting it to partition root will take the CPUs away from the
1784 effective CPUs of the parent cgroup. Once it is set, this
1785 file cannot be reverted back to "member" if there are any child
1786 cgroups with cpuset enabled.
1787
1788 A parent partition cannot distribute all its CPUs to its
1789 child partitions. There must be at least one cpu left in the
1790 parent partition.
1791
1792 Once becoming a partition root, changes to "cpuset.cpus" is
1793 generally allowed as long as the first condition above is true,
1794 the change will not take away all the CPUs from the parent
1795 partition and the new "cpuset.cpus" value is a superset of its
1796 children's "cpuset.cpus" values.
1797
1798 Sometimes, external factors like changes to ancestors'
1799 "cpuset.cpus" or cpu hotplug can cause the state of the partition
1800 root to change. On read, the "cpuset.sched.partition" file
1801 can show the following values.
1802
1803 "member" Non-root member of a partition
1804 "root" Partition root
1805 "root invalid" Invalid partition root
1806
1807 It is a partition root if the first 2 partition root conditions
1808 above are true and at least one CPU from "cpuset.cpus" is
1809 granted by the parent cgroup.
1810
1811 A partition root can become invalid if none of CPUs requested
1812 in "cpuset.cpus" can be granted by the parent cgroup or the
1813 parent cgroup is no longer a partition root itself. In this
1814 case, it is not a real partition even though the restriction
1815 of the first partition root condition above will still apply.
1816 The cpu affinity of all the tasks in the cgroup will then be
1817 associated with CPUs in the nearest ancestor partition.
1818
1819 An invalid partition root can be transitioned back to a
1820 real partition root if at least one of the requested CPUs
1821 can now be granted by its parent. In this case, the cpu
1822 affinity of all the tasks in the formerly invalid partition
1823 will be associated to the CPUs of the newly formed partition.
1824 Changing the partition state of an invalid partition root to
1825 "member" is always allowed even if child cpusets are present.
1826
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001827
Roman Gushchin4ad5a322017-12-13 19:49:03 +00001828Device controller
1829-----------------
1830
1831Device controller manages access to device files. It includes both
1832creation of new device files (using mknod), and access to the
1833existing device files.
1834
1835Cgroup v2 device controller has no interface files and is implemented
1836on top of cgroup BPF. To control access to device files, a user may
1837create bpf programs of the BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE type and attach them
1838to cgroups. On an attempt to access a device file, corresponding
1839BPF programs will be executed, and depending on the return value
1840the attempt will succeed or fail with -EPERM.
1841
1842A BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program takes a pointer to the bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx
1843structure, which describes the device access attempt: access type
1844(mknod/read/write) and device (type, major and minor numbers).
1845If the program returns 0, the attempt fails with -EPERM, otherwise
1846it succeeds.
1847
1848An example of BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program may be found in the kernel
1849source tree in the tools/testing/selftests/bpf/dev_cgroup.c file.
1850
1851
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001852RDMA
1853----
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05001854
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001855The "rdma" controller regulates the distribution and accounting of
1856of RDMA resources.
1857
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001858RDMA Interface Files
1859~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001860
1861 rdma.max
1862 A readwrite nested-keyed file that exists for all the cgroups
1863 except root that describes current configured resource limit
1864 for a RDMA/IB device.
1865
1866 Lines are keyed by device name and are not ordered.
1867 Each line contains space separated resource name and its configured
1868 limit that can be distributed.
1869
1870 The following nested keys are defined.
1871
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001872 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001873 hca_handle Maximum number of HCA Handles
1874 hca_object Maximum number of HCA Objects
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001875 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001876
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001877 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001878
1879 mlx4_0 hca_handle=2 hca_object=2000
1880 ocrdma1 hca_handle=3 hca_object=max
1881
1882 rdma.current
1883 A read-only file that describes current resource usage.
1884 It exists for all the cgroup except root.
1885
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001886 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001887
1888 mlx4_0 hca_handle=1 hca_object=20
1889 ocrdma1 hca_handle=1 hca_object=23
1890
1891
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001892Misc
1893----
Tejun Heo63f1ca52017-02-02 13:50:35 -05001894
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001895perf_event
1896~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05001897
1898perf_event controller, if not mounted on a legacy hierarchy, is
1899automatically enabled on the v2 hierarchy so that perf events can
1900always be filtered by cgroup v2 path. The controller can still be
1901moved to a legacy hierarchy after v2 hierarchy is populated.
1902
1903
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +01001904Non-normative information
1905-------------------------
1906
1907This section contains information that isn't considered to be a part of
1908the stable kernel API and so is subject to change.
1909
1910
1911CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
1912~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1913
1914When distributing CPU cycles in the root cgroup each thread in this
1915cgroup is treated as if it was hosted in a separate child cgroup of the
1916root cgroup. This child cgroup weight is dependent on its thread nice
1917level.
1918
1919For details of this mapping see sched_prio_to_weight array in
1920kernel/sched/core.c file (values from this array should be scaled
1921appropriately so the neutral - nice 0 - value is 100 instead of 1024).
1922
1923
1924IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
1925~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1926
1927Root cgroup processes are hosted in an implicit leaf child node.
1928When distributing IO resources this implicit child node is taken into
1929account as if it was a normal child cgroup of the root cgroup with a
1930weight value of 200.
1931
1932
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001933Namespace
1934=========
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001935
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001936Basics
1937------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001938
1939cgroup namespace provides a mechanism to virtualize the view of the
1940"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file and cgroup mounts. The CLONE_NEWCGROUP clone
1941flag can be used with clone(2) and unshare(2) to create a new cgroup
1942namespace. The process running inside the cgroup namespace will have
1943its "/proc/$PID/cgroup" output restricted to cgroupns root. The
1944cgroupns root is the cgroup of the process at the time of creation of
1945the cgroup namespace.
1946
1947Without cgroup namespace, the "/proc/$PID/cgroup" file shows the
1948complete path of the cgroup of a process. In a container setup where
1949a set of cgroups and namespaces are intended to isolate processes the
1950"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file may leak potential system level information
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001951to the isolated processes. For Example::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001952
1953 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1954 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
1955
1956The path '/batchjobs/container_id1' can be considered as system-data
1957and undesirable to expose to the isolated processes. cgroup namespace
1958can be used to restrict visibility of this path. For example, before
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001959creating a cgroup namespace, one would see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001960
1961 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
1962 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:37 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026531835]
1963 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1964 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
1965
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001966After unsharing a new namespace, the view changes::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001967
1968 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
1969 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:35 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026532183]
1970 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1971 0::/
1972
1973When some thread from a multi-threaded process unshares its cgroup
1974namespace, the new cgroupns gets applied to the entire process (all
1975the threads). This is natural for the v2 hierarchy; however, for the
1976legacy hierarchies, this may be unexpected.
1977
1978A cgroup namespace is alive as long as there are processes inside or
1979mounts pinning it. When the last usage goes away, the cgroup
1980namespace is destroyed. The cgroupns root and the actual cgroups
1981remain.
1982
1983
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001984The Root and Views
1985------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001986
1987The 'cgroupns root' for a cgroup namespace is the cgroup in which the
1988process calling unshare(2) is running. For example, if a process in
1989/batchjobs/container_id1 cgroup calls unshare, cgroup
1990/batchjobs/container_id1 becomes the cgroupns root. For the
1991init_cgroup_ns, this is the real root ('/') cgroup.
1992
1993The cgroupns root cgroup does not change even if the namespace creator
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001994process later moves to a different cgroup::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001995
1996 # ~/unshare -c # unshare cgroupns in some cgroup
1997 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1998 0::/
1999 # mkdir sub_cgrp_1
2000 # echo 0 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
2001 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
2002 0::/sub_cgrp_1
2003
2004Each process gets its namespace-specific view of "/proc/$PID/cgroup"
2005
2006Processes running inside the cgroup namespace will be able to see
2007cgroup paths (in /proc/self/cgroup) only inside their root cgroup.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002008From within an unshared cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002009
2010 # sleep 100000 &
2011 [1] 7353
2012 # echo 7353 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
2013 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
2014 0::/sub_cgrp_1
2015
2016From the initial cgroup namespace, the real cgroup path will be
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002017visible::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002018
2019 $ cat /proc/7353/cgroup
2020 0::/batchjobs/container_id1/sub_cgrp_1
2021
2022From a sibling cgroup namespace (that is, a namespace rooted at a
2023different cgroup), the cgroup path relative to its own cgroup
2024namespace root will be shown. For instance, if PID 7353's cgroup
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002025namespace root is at '/batchjobs/container_id2', then it will see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002026
2027 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
2028 0::/../container_id2/sub_cgrp_1
2029
2030Note that the relative path always starts with '/' to indicate that
2031its relative to the cgroup namespace root of the caller.
2032
2033
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002034Migration and setns(2)
2035----------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002036
2037Processes inside a cgroup namespace can move into and out of the
2038namespace root if they have proper access to external cgroups. For
2039example, from inside a namespace with cgroupns root at
2040/batchjobs/container_id1, and assuming that the global hierarchy is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002041still accessible inside cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002042
2043 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
2044 0::/sub_cgrp_1
2045 # echo 7353 > batchjobs/container_id2/cgroup.procs
2046 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
2047 0::/../container_id2
2048
2049Note that this kind of setup is not encouraged. A task inside cgroup
2050namespace should only be exposed to its own cgroupns hierarchy.
2051
2052setns(2) to another cgroup namespace is allowed when:
2053
2054(a) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its current user namespace
2055(b) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against the target cgroup
2056 namespace's userns
2057
2058No implicit cgroup changes happen with attaching to another cgroup
2059namespace. It is expected that the someone moves the attaching
2060process under the target cgroup namespace root.
2061
2062
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002063Interaction with Other Namespaces
2064---------------------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002065
2066Namespace specific cgroup hierarchy can be mounted by a process
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002067running inside a non-init cgroup namespace::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002068
2069 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
2070
2071This will mount the unified cgroup hierarchy with cgroupns root as the
2072filesystem root. The process needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its user and
2073mount namespaces.
2074
2075The virtualization of /proc/self/cgroup file combined with restricting
2076the view of cgroup hierarchy by namespace-private cgroupfs mount
2077provides a properly isolated cgroup view inside the container.
2078
2079
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002080Information on Kernel Programming
2081=================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002082
2083This section contains kernel programming information in the areas
2084where interacting with cgroup is necessary. cgroup core and
2085controllers are not covered.
2086
2087
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002088Filesystem Support for Writeback
2089--------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002090
2091A filesystem can support cgroup writeback by updating
2092address_space_operations->writepage[s]() to annotate bio's using the
2093following two functions.
2094
2095 wbc_init_bio(@wbc, @bio)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002096 Should be called for each bio carrying writeback data and
Dennis Zhoufd42df32018-12-05 12:10:34 -05002097 associates the bio with the inode's owner cgroup and the
2098 corresponding request queue. This must be called after
2099 a queue (device) has been associated with the bio and
2100 before submission.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002101
2102 wbc_account_io(@wbc, @page, @bytes)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002103 Should be called for each data segment being written out.
2104 While this function doesn't care exactly when it's called
2105 during the writeback session, it's the easiest and most
2106 natural to call it as data segments are added to a bio.
2107
2108With writeback bio's annotated, cgroup support can be enabled per
2109super_block by setting SB_I_CGROUPWB in ->s_iflags. This allows for
2110selective disabling of cgroup writeback support which is helpful when
2111certain filesystem features, e.g. journaled data mode, are
2112incompatible.
2113
2114wbc_init_bio() binds the specified bio to its cgroup. Depending on
2115the configuration, the bio may be executed at a lower priority and if
2116the writeback session is holding shared resources, e.g. a journal
2117entry, may lead to priority inversion. There is no one easy solution
2118for the problem. Filesystems can try to work around specific problem
Dennis Zhoufd42df32018-12-05 12:10:34 -05002119cases by skipping wbc_init_bio() and using bio_associate_blkg()
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002120directly.
2121
2122
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002123Deprecated v1 Core Features
2124===========================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002125
2126- Multiple hierarchies including named ones are not supported.
2127
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -04002128- All v1 mount options are not supported.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002129
2130- The "tasks" file is removed and "cgroup.procs" is not sorted.
2131
2132- "cgroup.clone_children" is removed.
2133
2134- /proc/cgroups is meaningless for v2. Use "cgroup.controllers" file
2135 at the root instead.
2136
2137
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002138Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
2139====================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002140
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002141Multiple Hierarchies
2142--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002143
2144cgroup v1 allowed an arbitrary number of hierarchies and each
2145hierarchy could host any number of controllers. While this seemed to
2146provide a high level of flexibility, it wasn't useful in practice.
2147
2148For example, as there is only one instance of each controller, utility
2149type controllers such as freezer which can be useful in all
2150hierarchies could only be used in one. The issue is exacerbated by
2151the fact that controllers couldn't be moved to another hierarchy once
2152hierarchies were populated. Another issue was that all controllers
2153bound to a hierarchy were forced to have exactly the same view of the
2154hierarchy. It wasn't possible to vary the granularity depending on
2155the specific controller.
2156
2157In practice, these issues heavily limited which controllers could be
2158put on the same hierarchy and most configurations resorted to putting
2159each controller on its own hierarchy. Only closely related ones, such
2160as the cpu and cpuacct controllers, made sense to be put on the same
2161hierarchy. This often meant that userland ended up managing multiple
2162similar hierarchies repeating the same steps on each hierarchy
2163whenever a hierarchy management operation was necessary.
2164
2165Furthermore, support for multiple hierarchies came at a steep cost.
2166It greatly complicated cgroup core implementation but more importantly
2167the support for multiple hierarchies restricted how cgroup could be
2168used in general and what controllers was able to do.
2169
2170There was no limit on how many hierarchies there might be, which meant
2171that a thread's cgroup membership couldn't be described in finite
2172length. The key might contain any number of entries and was unlimited
2173in length, which made it highly awkward to manipulate and led to
2174addition of controllers which existed only to identify membership,
2175which in turn exacerbated the original problem of proliferating number
2176of hierarchies.
2177
2178Also, as a controller couldn't have any expectation regarding the
2179topologies of hierarchies other controllers might be on, each
2180controller had to assume that all other controllers were attached to
2181completely orthogonal hierarchies. This made it impossible, or at
2182least very cumbersome, for controllers to cooperate with each other.
2183
2184In most use cases, putting controllers on hierarchies which are
2185completely orthogonal to each other isn't necessary. What usually is
2186called for is the ability to have differing levels of granularity
2187depending on the specific controller. In other words, hierarchy may
2188be collapsed from leaf towards root when viewed from specific
2189controllers. For example, a given configuration might not care about
2190how memory is distributed beyond a certain level while still wanting
2191to control how CPU cycles are distributed.
2192
2193
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002194Thread Granularity
2195------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002196
2197cgroup v1 allowed threads of a process to belong to different cgroups.
2198This didn't make sense for some controllers and those controllers
2199ended up implementing different ways to ignore such situations but
2200much more importantly it blurred the line between API exposed to
2201individual applications and system management interface.
2202
2203Generally, in-process knowledge is available only to the process
2204itself; thus, unlike service-level organization of processes,
2205categorizing threads of a process requires active participation from
2206the application which owns the target process.
2207
2208cgroup v1 had an ambiguously defined delegation model which got abused
2209in combination with thread granularity. cgroups were delegated to
2210individual applications so that they can create and manage their own
2211sub-hierarchies and control resource distributions along them. This
2212effectively raised cgroup to the status of a syscall-like API exposed
2213to lay programs.
2214
2215First of all, cgroup has a fundamentally inadequate interface to be
2216exposed this way. For a process to access its own knobs, it has to
2217extract the path on the target hierarchy from /proc/self/cgroup,
2218construct the path by appending the name of the knob to the path, open
2219and then read and/or write to it. This is not only extremely clunky
2220and unusual but also inherently racy. There is no conventional way to
2221define transaction across the required steps and nothing can guarantee
2222that the process would actually be operating on its own sub-hierarchy.
2223
2224cgroup controllers implemented a number of knobs which would never be
2225accepted as public APIs because they were just adding control knobs to
2226system-management pseudo filesystem. cgroup ended up with interface
2227knobs which were not properly abstracted or refined and directly
2228revealed kernel internal details. These knobs got exposed to
2229individual applications through the ill-defined delegation mechanism
2230effectively abusing cgroup as a shortcut to implementing public APIs
2231without going through the required scrutiny.
2232
2233This was painful for both userland and kernel. Userland ended up with
2234misbehaving and poorly abstracted interfaces and kernel exposing and
2235locked into constructs inadvertently.
2236
2237
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002238Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
2239-------------------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002240
2241cgroup v1 allowed threads to be in any cgroups which created an
2242interesting problem where threads belonging to a parent cgroup and its
2243children cgroups competed for resources. This was nasty as two
2244different types of entities competed and there was no obvious way to
2245settle it. Different controllers did different things.
2246
2247The cpu controller considered threads and cgroups as equivalents and
2248mapped nice levels to cgroup weights. This worked for some cases but
2249fell flat when children wanted to be allocated specific ratios of CPU
2250cycles and the number of internal threads fluctuated - the ratios
2251constantly changed as the number of competing entities fluctuated.
2252There also were other issues. The mapping from nice level to weight
2253wasn't obvious or universal, and there were various other knobs which
2254simply weren't available for threads.
2255
2256The io controller implicitly created a hidden leaf node for each
2257cgroup to host the threads. The hidden leaf had its own copies of all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002258the knobs with ``leaf_`` prefixed. While this allowed equivalent
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002259control over internal threads, it was with serious drawbacks. It
2260always added an extra layer of nesting which wouldn't be necessary
2261otherwise, made the interface messy and significantly complicated the
2262implementation.
2263
2264The memory controller didn't have a way to control what happened
2265between internal tasks and child cgroups and the behavior was not
2266clearly defined. There were attempts to add ad-hoc behaviors and
2267knobs to tailor the behavior to specific workloads which would have
2268led to problems extremely difficult to resolve in the long term.
2269
2270Multiple controllers struggled with internal tasks and came up with
2271different ways to deal with it; unfortunately, all the approaches were
2272severely flawed and, furthermore, the widely different behaviors
2273made cgroup as a whole highly inconsistent.
2274
2275This clearly is a problem which needs to be addressed from cgroup core
2276in a uniform way.
2277
2278
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002279Other Interface Issues
2280----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002281
2282cgroup v1 grew without oversight and developed a large number of
2283idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies. One issue on the cgroup core side
2284was how an empty cgroup was notified - a userland helper binary was
2285forked and executed for each event. The event delivery wasn't
2286recursive or delegatable. The limitations of the mechanism also led
2287to in-kernel event delivery filtering mechanism further complicating
2288the interface.
2289
2290Controller interfaces were problematic too. An extreme example is
2291controllers completely ignoring hierarchical organization and treating
2292all cgroups as if they were all located directly under the root
2293cgroup. Some controllers exposed a large amount of inconsistent
2294implementation details to userland.
2295
2296There also was no consistency across controllers. When a new cgroup
2297was created, some controllers defaulted to not imposing extra
2298restrictions while others disallowed any resource usage until
2299explicitly configured. Configuration knobs for the same type of
2300control used widely differing naming schemes and formats. Statistics
2301and information knobs were named arbitrarily and used different
2302formats and units even in the same controller.
2303
2304cgroup v2 establishes common conventions where appropriate and updates
2305controllers so that they expose minimal and consistent interfaces.
2306
2307
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002308Controller Issues and Remedies
2309------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002310
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002311Memory
2312~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002313
2314The original lower boundary, the soft limit, is defined as a limit
2315that is per default unset. As a result, the set of cgroups that
2316global reclaim prefers is opt-in, rather than opt-out. The costs for
2317optimizing these mostly negative lookups are so high that the
2318implementation, despite its enormous size, does not even provide the
2319basic desirable behavior. First off, the soft limit has no
2320hierarchical meaning. All configured groups are organized in a global
2321rbtree and treated like equal peers, regardless where they are located
2322in the hierarchy. This makes subtree delegation impossible. Second,
2323the soft limit reclaim pass is so aggressive that it not just
2324introduces high allocation latencies into the system, but also impacts
2325system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature
2326becomes self-defeating.
2327
2328The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07002329reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it's within its low,
2330which makes delegation of subtrees possible.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002331
2332The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict
2333limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called.
2334But this generally goes against the goal of making the most out of the
2335available memory. The memory consumption of workloads varies during
2336runtime, and that requires users to overcommit. But doing that with a
2337strict upper limit requires either a fairly accurate prediction of the
2338working set size or adding slack to the limit. Since working set size
2339estimation is hard and error prone, and getting it wrong results in
2340OOM kills, most users tend to err on the side of a looser limit and
2341end up wasting precious resources.
2342
2343The memory.high boundary on the other hand can be set much more
2344conservatively. When hit, it throttles allocations by forcing them
2345into direct reclaim to work off the excess, but it never invokes the
2346OOM killer. As a result, a high boundary that is chosen too
2347aggressively will not terminate the processes, but instead it will
2348lead to gradual performance degradation. The user can monitor this
2349and make corrections until the minimal memory footprint that still
2350gives acceptable performance is found.
2351
2352In extreme cases, with many concurrent allocations and a complete
2353breakdown of reclaim progress within the group, the high boundary can
2354be exceeded. But even then it's mostly better to satisfy the
2355allocation from the slack available in other groups or the rest of the
2356system than killing the group. Otherwise, memory.max is there to
2357limit this type of spillover and ultimately contain buggy or even
2358malicious applications.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08002359
Johannes Weinerb6e6edc2016-03-17 14:20:28 -07002360Setting the original memory.limit_in_bytes below the current usage was
2361subject to a race condition, where concurrent charges could cause the
2362limit setting to fail. memory.max on the other hand will first set the
2363limit to prevent new charges, and then reclaim and OOM kill until the
2364new limit is met - or the task writing to memory.max is killed.
2365
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08002366The combined memory+swap accounting and limiting is replaced by real
2367control over swap space.
2368
2369The main argument for a combined memory+swap facility in the original
2370cgroup design was that global or parental pressure would always be
2371able to swap all anonymous memory of a child group, regardless of the
2372child's own (possibly untrusted) configuration. However, untrusted
2373groups can sabotage swapping by other means - such as referencing its
2374anonymous memory in a tight loop - and an admin can not assume full
2375swappability when overcommitting untrusted jobs.
2376
2377For trusted jobs, on the other hand, a combined counter is not an
2378intuitive userspace interface, and it flies in the face of the idea
2379that cgroup controllers should account and limit specific physical
2380resources. Swap space is a resource like all others in the system,
2381and that's why unified hierarchy allows distributing it separately.