Peter Zijlstra | 85dc28f | 2021-09-23 14:10:58 -0300 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later |
| 2 | |
| 3 | #include <linux/slab.h> |
| 4 | #include <linux/sched/task.h> |
| 5 | |
| 6 | #include "futex.h" |
| 7 | #include "../locking/rtmutex_common.h" |
| 8 | |
| 9 | /* |
| 10 | * PI code: |
| 11 | */ |
| 12 | int refill_pi_state_cache(void) |
| 13 | { |
| 14 | struct futex_pi_state *pi_state; |
| 15 | |
| 16 | if (likely(current->pi_state_cache)) |
| 17 | return 0; |
| 18 | |
| 19 | pi_state = kzalloc(sizeof(*pi_state), GFP_KERNEL); |
| 20 | |
| 21 | if (!pi_state) |
| 22 | return -ENOMEM; |
| 23 | |
| 24 | INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pi_state->list); |
| 25 | /* pi_mutex gets initialized later */ |
| 26 | pi_state->owner = NULL; |
| 27 | refcount_set(&pi_state->refcount, 1); |
| 28 | pi_state->key = FUTEX_KEY_INIT; |
| 29 | |
| 30 | current->pi_state_cache = pi_state; |
| 31 | |
| 32 | return 0; |
| 33 | } |
| 34 | |
| 35 | static struct futex_pi_state *alloc_pi_state(void) |
| 36 | { |
| 37 | struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = current->pi_state_cache; |
| 38 | |
| 39 | WARN_ON(!pi_state); |
| 40 | current->pi_state_cache = NULL; |
| 41 | |
| 42 | return pi_state; |
| 43 | } |
| 44 | |
| 45 | static void pi_state_update_owner(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state, |
| 46 | struct task_struct *new_owner) |
| 47 | { |
| 48 | struct task_struct *old_owner = pi_state->owner; |
| 49 | |
| 50 | lockdep_assert_held(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); |
| 51 | |
| 52 | if (old_owner) { |
| 53 | raw_spin_lock(&old_owner->pi_lock); |
| 54 | WARN_ON(list_empty(&pi_state->list)); |
| 55 | list_del_init(&pi_state->list); |
| 56 | raw_spin_unlock(&old_owner->pi_lock); |
| 57 | } |
| 58 | |
| 59 | if (new_owner) { |
| 60 | raw_spin_lock(&new_owner->pi_lock); |
| 61 | WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pi_state->list)); |
| 62 | list_add(&pi_state->list, &new_owner->pi_state_list); |
| 63 | pi_state->owner = new_owner; |
| 64 | raw_spin_unlock(&new_owner->pi_lock); |
| 65 | } |
| 66 | } |
| 67 | |
| 68 | void get_pi_state(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state) |
| 69 | { |
| 70 | WARN_ON_ONCE(!refcount_inc_not_zero(&pi_state->refcount)); |
| 71 | } |
| 72 | |
| 73 | /* |
| 74 | * Drops a reference to the pi_state object and frees or caches it |
| 75 | * when the last reference is gone. |
| 76 | */ |
| 77 | void put_pi_state(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state) |
| 78 | { |
| 79 | if (!pi_state) |
| 80 | return; |
| 81 | |
| 82 | if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&pi_state->refcount)) |
| 83 | return; |
| 84 | |
| 85 | /* |
| 86 | * If pi_state->owner is NULL, the owner is most probably dying |
| 87 | * and has cleaned up the pi_state already |
| 88 | */ |
| 89 | if (pi_state->owner) { |
| 90 | unsigned long flags; |
| 91 | |
| 92 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock, flags); |
| 93 | pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, NULL); |
| 94 | rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex); |
| 95 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock, flags); |
| 96 | } |
| 97 | |
| 98 | if (current->pi_state_cache) { |
| 99 | kfree(pi_state); |
| 100 | } else { |
| 101 | /* |
| 102 | * pi_state->list is already empty. |
| 103 | * clear pi_state->owner. |
| 104 | * refcount is at 0 - put it back to 1. |
| 105 | */ |
| 106 | pi_state->owner = NULL; |
| 107 | refcount_set(&pi_state->refcount, 1); |
| 108 | current->pi_state_cache = pi_state; |
| 109 | } |
| 110 | } |
| 111 | |
| 112 | /* |
| 113 | * We need to check the following states: |
| 114 | * |
| 115 | * Waiter | pi_state | pi->owner | uTID | uODIED | ? |
| 116 | * |
| 117 | * [1] NULL | --- | --- | 0 | 0/1 | Valid |
| 118 | * [2] NULL | --- | --- | >0 | 0/1 | Valid |
| 119 | * |
| 120 | * [3] Found | NULL | -- | Any | 0/1 | Invalid |
| 121 | * |
| 122 | * [4] Found | Found | NULL | 0 | 1 | Valid |
| 123 | * [5] Found | Found | NULL | >0 | 1 | Invalid |
| 124 | * |
| 125 | * [6] Found | Found | task | 0 | 1 | Valid |
| 126 | * |
| 127 | * [7] Found | Found | NULL | Any | 0 | Invalid |
| 128 | * |
| 129 | * [8] Found | Found | task | ==taskTID | 0/1 | Valid |
| 130 | * [9] Found | Found | task | 0 | 0 | Invalid |
| 131 | * [10] Found | Found | task | !=taskTID | 0/1 | Invalid |
| 132 | * |
| 133 | * [1] Indicates that the kernel can acquire the futex atomically. We |
| 134 | * came here due to a stale FUTEX_WAITERS/FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit. |
| 135 | * |
| 136 | * [2] Valid, if TID does not belong to a kernel thread. If no matching |
| 137 | * thread is found then it indicates that the owner TID has died. |
| 138 | * |
| 139 | * [3] Invalid. The waiter is queued on a non PI futex |
| 140 | * |
| 141 | * [4] Valid state after exit_robust_list(), which sets the user space |
| 142 | * value to FUTEX_WAITERS | FUTEX_OWNER_DIED. |
| 143 | * |
| 144 | * [5] The user space value got manipulated between exit_robust_list() |
| 145 | * and exit_pi_state_list() |
| 146 | * |
| 147 | * [6] Valid state after exit_pi_state_list() which sets the new owner in |
| 148 | * the pi_state but cannot access the user space value. |
| 149 | * |
| 150 | * [7] pi_state->owner can only be NULL when the OWNER_DIED bit is set. |
| 151 | * |
| 152 | * [8] Owner and user space value match |
| 153 | * |
| 154 | * [9] There is no transient state which sets the user space TID to 0 |
| 155 | * except exit_robust_list(), but this is indicated by the |
| 156 | * FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit. See [4] |
| 157 | * |
| 158 | * [10] There is no transient state which leaves owner and user space |
| 159 | * TID out of sync. Except one error case where the kernel is denied |
| 160 | * write access to the user address, see fixup_pi_state_owner(). |
| 161 | * |
| 162 | * |
| 163 | * Serialization and lifetime rules: |
| 164 | * |
| 165 | * hb->lock: |
| 166 | * |
| 167 | * hb -> futex_q, relation |
| 168 | * futex_q -> pi_state, relation |
| 169 | * |
| 170 | * (cannot be raw because hb can contain arbitrary amount |
| 171 | * of futex_q's) |
| 172 | * |
| 173 | * pi_mutex->wait_lock: |
| 174 | * |
| 175 | * {uval, pi_state} |
| 176 | * |
| 177 | * (and pi_mutex 'obviously') |
| 178 | * |
| 179 | * p->pi_lock: |
| 180 | * |
| 181 | * p->pi_state_list -> pi_state->list, relation |
| 182 | * pi_mutex->owner -> pi_state->owner, relation |
| 183 | * |
| 184 | * pi_state->refcount: |
| 185 | * |
| 186 | * pi_state lifetime |
| 187 | * |
| 188 | * |
| 189 | * Lock order: |
| 190 | * |
| 191 | * hb->lock |
| 192 | * pi_mutex->wait_lock |
| 193 | * p->pi_lock |
| 194 | * |
| 195 | */ |
| 196 | |
| 197 | /* |
| 198 | * Validate that the existing waiter has a pi_state and sanity check |
| 199 | * the pi_state against the user space value. If correct, attach to |
| 200 | * it. |
| 201 | */ |
| 202 | static int attach_to_pi_state(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, |
| 203 | struct futex_pi_state *pi_state, |
| 204 | struct futex_pi_state **ps) |
| 205 | { |
| 206 | pid_t pid = uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK; |
| 207 | u32 uval2; |
| 208 | int ret; |
| 209 | |
| 210 | /* |
| 211 | * Userspace might have messed up non-PI and PI futexes [3] |
| 212 | */ |
| 213 | if (unlikely(!pi_state)) |
| 214 | return -EINVAL; |
| 215 | |
| 216 | /* |
| 217 | * We get here with hb->lock held, and having found a |
| 218 | * futex_top_waiter(). This means that futex_lock_pi() of said futex_q |
| 219 | * has dropped the hb->lock in between futex_queue() and futex_unqueue_pi(), |
| 220 | * which in turn means that futex_lock_pi() still has a reference on |
| 221 | * our pi_state. |
| 222 | * |
| 223 | * The waiter holding a reference on @pi_state also protects against |
| 224 | * the unlocked put_pi_state() in futex_unlock_pi(), futex_lock_pi() |
| 225 | * and futex_wait_requeue_pi() as it cannot go to 0 and consequently |
| 226 | * free pi_state before we can take a reference ourselves. |
| 227 | */ |
| 228 | WARN_ON(!refcount_read(&pi_state->refcount)); |
| 229 | |
| 230 | /* |
| 231 | * Now that we have a pi_state, we can acquire wait_lock |
| 232 | * and do the state validation. |
| 233 | */ |
| 234 | raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); |
| 235 | |
| 236 | /* |
| 237 | * Since {uval, pi_state} is serialized by wait_lock, and our current |
| 238 | * uval was read without holding it, it can have changed. Verify it |
| 239 | * still is what we expect it to be, otherwise retry the entire |
| 240 | * operation. |
| 241 | */ |
| 242 | if (futex_get_value_locked(&uval2, uaddr)) |
| 243 | goto out_efault; |
| 244 | |
| 245 | if (uval != uval2) |
| 246 | goto out_eagain; |
| 247 | |
| 248 | /* |
| 249 | * Handle the owner died case: |
| 250 | */ |
| 251 | if (uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) { |
| 252 | /* |
| 253 | * exit_pi_state_list sets owner to NULL and wakes the |
| 254 | * topmost waiter. The task which acquires the |
| 255 | * pi_state->rt_mutex will fixup owner. |
| 256 | */ |
| 257 | if (!pi_state->owner) { |
| 258 | /* |
| 259 | * No pi state owner, but the user space TID |
| 260 | * is not 0. Inconsistent state. [5] |
| 261 | */ |
| 262 | if (pid) |
| 263 | goto out_einval; |
| 264 | /* |
| 265 | * Take a ref on the state and return success. [4] |
| 266 | */ |
| 267 | goto out_attach; |
| 268 | } |
| 269 | |
| 270 | /* |
| 271 | * If TID is 0, then either the dying owner has not |
| 272 | * yet executed exit_pi_state_list() or some waiter |
| 273 | * acquired the rtmutex in the pi state, but did not |
| 274 | * yet fixup the TID in user space. |
| 275 | * |
| 276 | * Take a ref on the state and return success. [6] |
| 277 | */ |
| 278 | if (!pid) |
| 279 | goto out_attach; |
| 280 | } else { |
| 281 | /* |
| 282 | * If the owner died bit is not set, then the pi_state |
| 283 | * must have an owner. [7] |
| 284 | */ |
| 285 | if (!pi_state->owner) |
| 286 | goto out_einval; |
| 287 | } |
| 288 | |
| 289 | /* |
| 290 | * Bail out if user space manipulated the futex value. If pi |
| 291 | * state exists then the owner TID must be the same as the |
| 292 | * user space TID. [9/10] |
| 293 | */ |
| 294 | if (pid != task_pid_vnr(pi_state->owner)) |
| 295 | goto out_einval; |
| 296 | |
| 297 | out_attach: |
| 298 | get_pi_state(pi_state); |
| 299 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); |
| 300 | *ps = pi_state; |
| 301 | return 0; |
| 302 | |
| 303 | out_einval: |
| 304 | ret = -EINVAL; |
| 305 | goto out_error; |
| 306 | |
| 307 | out_eagain: |
| 308 | ret = -EAGAIN; |
| 309 | goto out_error; |
| 310 | |
| 311 | out_efault: |
| 312 | ret = -EFAULT; |
| 313 | goto out_error; |
| 314 | |
| 315 | out_error: |
| 316 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); |
| 317 | return ret; |
| 318 | } |
| 319 | |
| 320 | static int handle_exit_race(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, |
| 321 | struct task_struct *tsk) |
| 322 | { |
| 323 | u32 uval2; |
| 324 | |
| 325 | /* |
| 326 | * If the futex exit state is not yet FUTEX_STATE_DEAD, tell the |
| 327 | * caller that the alleged owner is busy. |
| 328 | */ |
| 329 | if (tsk && tsk->futex_state != FUTEX_STATE_DEAD) |
| 330 | return -EBUSY; |
| 331 | |
| 332 | /* |
| 333 | * Reread the user space value to handle the following situation: |
| 334 | * |
| 335 | * CPU0 CPU1 |
| 336 | * |
| 337 | * sys_exit() sys_futex() |
| 338 | * do_exit() futex_lock_pi() |
| 339 | * futex_lock_pi_atomic() |
| 340 | * exit_signals(tsk) No waiters: |
| 341 | * tsk->flags |= PF_EXITING; *uaddr == 0x00000PID |
| 342 | * mm_release(tsk) Set waiter bit |
| 343 | * exit_robust_list(tsk) { *uaddr = 0x80000PID; |
| 344 | * Set owner died attach_to_pi_owner() { |
| 345 | * *uaddr = 0xC0000000; tsk = get_task(PID); |
| 346 | * } if (!tsk->flags & PF_EXITING) { |
| 347 | * ... attach(); |
| 348 | * tsk->futex_state = } else { |
| 349 | * FUTEX_STATE_DEAD; if (tsk->futex_state != |
| 350 | * FUTEX_STATE_DEAD) |
| 351 | * return -EAGAIN; |
| 352 | * return -ESRCH; <--- FAIL |
| 353 | * } |
| 354 | * |
| 355 | * Returning ESRCH unconditionally is wrong here because the |
| 356 | * user space value has been changed by the exiting task. |
| 357 | * |
| 358 | * The same logic applies to the case where the exiting task is |
| 359 | * already gone. |
| 360 | */ |
| 361 | if (futex_get_value_locked(&uval2, uaddr)) |
| 362 | return -EFAULT; |
| 363 | |
| 364 | /* If the user space value has changed, try again. */ |
| 365 | if (uval2 != uval) |
| 366 | return -EAGAIN; |
| 367 | |
| 368 | /* |
| 369 | * The exiting task did not have a robust list, the robust list was |
| 370 | * corrupted or the user space value in *uaddr is simply bogus. |
| 371 | * Give up and tell user space. |
| 372 | */ |
| 373 | return -ESRCH; |
| 374 | } |
| 375 | |
| 376 | static void __attach_to_pi_owner(struct task_struct *p, union futex_key *key, |
| 377 | struct futex_pi_state **ps) |
| 378 | { |
| 379 | /* |
| 380 | * No existing pi state. First waiter. [2] |
| 381 | * |
| 382 | * This creates pi_state, we have hb->lock held, this means nothing can |
| 383 | * observe this state, wait_lock is irrelevant. |
| 384 | */ |
| 385 | struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = alloc_pi_state(); |
| 386 | |
| 387 | /* |
| 388 | * Initialize the pi_mutex in locked state and make @p |
| 389 | * the owner of it: |
| 390 | */ |
| 391 | rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(&pi_state->pi_mutex, p); |
| 392 | |
| 393 | /* Store the key for possible exit cleanups: */ |
| 394 | pi_state->key = *key; |
| 395 | |
| 396 | WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pi_state->list)); |
| 397 | list_add(&pi_state->list, &p->pi_state_list); |
| 398 | /* |
| 399 | * Assignment without holding pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock is safe |
| 400 | * because there is no concurrency as the object is not published yet. |
| 401 | */ |
| 402 | pi_state->owner = p; |
| 403 | |
| 404 | *ps = pi_state; |
| 405 | } |
| 406 | /* |
| 407 | * Lookup the task for the TID provided from user space and attach to |
| 408 | * it after doing proper sanity checks. |
| 409 | */ |
| 410 | static int attach_to_pi_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, union futex_key *key, |
| 411 | struct futex_pi_state **ps, |
| 412 | struct task_struct **exiting) |
| 413 | { |
| 414 | pid_t pid = uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK; |
| 415 | struct task_struct *p; |
| 416 | |
| 417 | /* |
| 418 | * We are the first waiter - try to look up the real owner and attach |
| 419 | * the new pi_state to it, but bail out when TID = 0 [1] |
| 420 | * |
| 421 | * The !pid check is paranoid. None of the call sites should end up |
| 422 | * with pid == 0, but better safe than sorry. Let the caller retry |
| 423 | */ |
| 424 | if (!pid) |
| 425 | return -EAGAIN; |
| 426 | p = find_get_task_by_vpid(pid); |
| 427 | if (!p) |
| 428 | return handle_exit_race(uaddr, uval, NULL); |
| 429 | |
| 430 | if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) { |
| 431 | put_task_struct(p); |
| 432 | return -EPERM; |
| 433 | } |
| 434 | |
| 435 | /* |
| 436 | * We need to look at the task state to figure out, whether the |
| 437 | * task is exiting. To protect against the change of the task state |
| 438 | * in futex_exit_release(), we do this protected by p->pi_lock: |
| 439 | */ |
| 440 | raw_spin_lock_irq(&p->pi_lock); |
| 441 | if (unlikely(p->futex_state != FUTEX_STATE_OK)) { |
| 442 | /* |
| 443 | * The task is on the way out. When the futex state is |
| 444 | * FUTEX_STATE_DEAD, we know that the task has finished |
| 445 | * the cleanup: |
| 446 | */ |
| 447 | int ret = handle_exit_race(uaddr, uval, p); |
| 448 | |
| 449 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock); |
| 450 | /* |
| 451 | * If the owner task is between FUTEX_STATE_EXITING and |
| 452 | * FUTEX_STATE_DEAD then store the task pointer and keep |
| 453 | * the reference on the task struct. The calling code will |
| 454 | * drop all locks, wait for the task to reach |
| 455 | * FUTEX_STATE_DEAD and then drop the refcount. This is |
| 456 | * required to prevent a live lock when the current task |
| 457 | * preempted the exiting task between the two states. |
| 458 | */ |
| 459 | if (ret == -EBUSY) |
| 460 | *exiting = p; |
| 461 | else |
| 462 | put_task_struct(p); |
| 463 | return ret; |
| 464 | } |
| 465 | |
| 466 | __attach_to_pi_owner(p, key, ps); |
| 467 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock); |
| 468 | |
| 469 | put_task_struct(p); |
| 470 | |
| 471 | return 0; |
| 472 | } |
| 473 | |
| 474 | static int lock_pi_update_atomic(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, u32 newval) |
| 475 | { |
| 476 | int err; |
| 477 | u32 curval; |
| 478 | |
| 479 | if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(true))) |
| 480 | return -EFAULT; |
| 481 | |
| 482 | err = futex_cmpxchg_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval); |
| 483 | if (unlikely(err)) |
| 484 | return err; |
| 485 | |
| 486 | /* If user space value changed, let the caller retry */ |
| 487 | return curval != uval ? -EAGAIN : 0; |
| 488 | } |
| 489 | |
| 490 | /** |
| 491 | * futex_lock_pi_atomic() - Atomic work required to acquire a pi aware futex |
| 492 | * @uaddr: the pi futex user address |
| 493 | * @hb: the pi futex hash bucket |
| 494 | * @key: the futex key associated with uaddr and hb |
| 495 | * @ps: the pi_state pointer where we store the result of the |
| 496 | * lookup |
| 497 | * @task: the task to perform the atomic lock work for. This will |
| 498 | * be "current" except in the case of requeue pi. |
| 499 | * @exiting: Pointer to store the task pointer of the owner task |
| 500 | * which is in the middle of exiting |
| 501 | * @set_waiters: force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit (1) or not (0) |
| 502 | * |
| 503 | * Return: |
| 504 | * - 0 - ready to wait; |
| 505 | * - 1 - acquired the lock; |
| 506 | * - <0 - error |
| 507 | * |
| 508 | * The hb->lock must be held by the caller. |
| 509 | * |
| 510 | * @exiting is only set when the return value is -EBUSY. If so, this holds |
| 511 | * a refcount on the exiting task on return and the caller needs to drop it |
| 512 | * after waiting for the exit to complete. |
| 513 | */ |
| 514 | int futex_lock_pi_atomic(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, |
| 515 | union futex_key *key, |
| 516 | struct futex_pi_state **ps, |
| 517 | struct task_struct *task, |
| 518 | struct task_struct **exiting, |
| 519 | int set_waiters) |
| 520 | { |
| 521 | u32 uval, newval, vpid = task_pid_vnr(task); |
| 522 | struct futex_q *top_waiter; |
| 523 | int ret; |
| 524 | |
| 525 | /* |
| 526 | * Read the user space value first so we can validate a few |
| 527 | * things before proceeding further. |
| 528 | */ |
| 529 | if (futex_get_value_locked(&uval, uaddr)) |
| 530 | return -EFAULT; |
| 531 | |
| 532 | if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(true))) |
| 533 | return -EFAULT; |
| 534 | |
| 535 | /* |
| 536 | * Detect deadlocks. |
| 537 | */ |
| 538 | if ((unlikely((uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK) == vpid))) |
| 539 | return -EDEADLK; |
| 540 | |
| 541 | if ((unlikely(should_fail_futex(true)))) |
| 542 | return -EDEADLK; |
| 543 | |
| 544 | /* |
| 545 | * Lookup existing state first. If it exists, try to attach to |
| 546 | * its pi_state. |
| 547 | */ |
| 548 | top_waiter = futex_top_waiter(hb, key); |
| 549 | if (top_waiter) |
| 550 | return attach_to_pi_state(uaddr, uval, top_waiter->pi_state, ps); |
| 551 | |
| 552 | /* |
| 553 | * No waiter and user TID is 0. We are here because the |
| 554 | * waiters or the owner died bit is set or called from |
| 555 | * requeue_cmp_pi or for whatever reason something took the |
| 556 | * syscall. |
| 557 | */ |
| 558 | if (!(uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK)) { |
| 559 | /* |
| 560 | * We take over the futex. No other waiters and the user space |
| 561 | * TID is 0. We preserve the owner died bit. |
| 562 | */ |
| 563 | newval = uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED; |
| 564 | newval |= vpid; |
| 565 | |
| 566 | /* The futex requeue_pi code can enforce the waiters bit */ |
| 567 | if (set_waiters) |
| 568 | newval |= FUTEX_WAITERS; |
| 569 | |
| 570 | ret = lock_pi_update_atomic(uaddr, uval, newval); |
| 571 | if (ret) |
| 572 | return ret; |
| 573 | |
| 574 | /* |
| 575 | * If the waiter bit was requested the caller also needs PI |
| 576 | * state attached to the new owner of the user space futex. |
| 577 | * |
| 578 | * @task is guaranteed to be alive and it cannot be exiting |
| 579 | * because it is either sleeping or waiting in |
| 580 | * futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync(). |
| 581 | * |
| 582 | * No need to do the full attach_to_pi_owner() exercise |
| 583 | * because @task is known and valid. |
| 584 | */ |
| 585 | if (set_waiters) { |
| 586 | raw_spin_lock_irq(&task->pi_lock); |
| 587 | __attach_to_pi_owner(task, key, ps); |
| 588 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock); |
| 589 | } |
| 590 | return 1; |
| 591 | } |
| 592 | |
| 593 | /* |
| 594 | * First waiter. Set the waiters bit before attaching ourself to |
| 595 | * the owner. If owner tries to unlock, it will be forced into |
| 596 | * the kernel and blocked on hb->lock. |
| 597 | */ |
| 598 | newval = uval | FUTEX_WAITERS; |
| 599 | ret = lock_pi_update_atomic(uaddr, uval, newval); |
| 600 | if (ret) |
| 601 | return ret; |
| 602 | /* |
| 603 | * If the update of the user space value succeeded, we try to |
| 604 | * attach to the owner. If that fails, no harm done, we only |
| 605 | * set the FUTEX_WAITERS bit in the user space variable. |
| 606 | */ |
| 607 | return attach_to_pi_owner(uaddr, newval, key, ps, exiting); |
| 608 | } |
| 609 | |
| 610 | /* |
| 611 | * Caller must hold a reference on @pi_state. |
| 612 | */ |
| 613 | static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_pi_state *pi_state) |
| 614 | { |
| 615 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter; |
| 616 | struct task_struct *new_owner; |
| 617 | bool postunlock = false; |
| 618 | DEFINE_RT_WAKE_Q(wqh); |
| 619 | u32 curval, newval; |
| 620 | int ret = 0; |
| 621 | |
| 622 | top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(&pi_state->pi_mutex); |
| 623 | if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!top_waiter)) { |
| 624 | /* |
| 625 | * As per the comment in futex_unlock_pi() this should not happen. |
| 626 | * |
| 627 | * When this happens, give up our locks and try again, giving |
| 628 | * the futex_lock_pi() instance time to complete, either by |
| 629 | * waiting on the rtmutex or removing itself from the futex |
| 630 | * queue. |
| 631 | */ |
| 632 | ret = -EAGAIN; |
| 633 | goto out_unlock; |
| 634 | } |
| 635 | |
| 636 | new_owner = top_waiter->task; |
| 637 | |
| 638 | /* |
| 639 | * We pass it to the next owner. The WAITERS bit is always kept |
| 640 | * enabled while there is PI state around. We cleanup the owner |
| 641 | * died bit, because we are the owner. |
| 642 | */ |
| 643 | newval = FUTEX_WAITERS | task_pid_vnr(new_owner); |
| 644 | |
| 645 | if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(true))) { |
| 646 | ret = -EFAULT; |
| 647 | goto out_unlock; |
| 648 | } |
| 649 | |
| 650 | ret = futex_cmpxchg_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval); |
| 651 | if (!ret && (curval != uval)) { |
| 652 | /* |
| 653 | * If a unconditional UNLOCK_PI operation (user space did not |
| 654 | * try the TID->0 transition) raced with a waiter setting the |
| 655 | * FUTEX_WAITERS flag between get_user() and locking the hash |
| 656 | * bucket lock, retry the operation. |
| 657 | */ |
| 658 | if ((FUTEX_TID_MASK & curval) == uval) |
| 659 | ret = -EAGAIN; |
| 660 | else |
| 661 | ret = -EINVAL; |
| 662 | } |
| 663 | |
| 664 | if (!ret) { |
| 665 | /* |
| 666 | * This is a point of no return; once we modified the uval |
| 667 | * there is no going back and subsequent operations must |
| 668 | * not fail. |
| 669 | */ |
| 670 | pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, new_owner); |
| 671 | postunlock = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, &wqh); |
| 672 | } |
| 673 | |
| 674 | out_unlock: |
| 675 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); |
| 676 | |
| 677 | if (postunlock) |
| 678 | rt_mutex_postunlock(&wqh); |
| 679 | |
| 680 | return ret; |
| 681 | } |
| 682 | |
| 683 | static int __fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, |
| 684 | struct task_struct *argowner) |
| 685 | { |
| 686 | struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = q->pi_state; |
| 687 | struct task_struct *oldowner, *newowner; |
| 688 | u32 uval, curval, newval, newtid; |
| 689 | int err = 0; |
| 690 | |
| 691 | oldowner = pi_state->owner; |
| 692 | |
| 693 | /* |
| 694 | * We are here because either: |
| 695 | * |
| 696 | * - we stole the lock and pi_state->owner needs updating to reflect |
| 697 | * that (@argowner == current), |
| 698 | * |
| 699 | * or: |
| 700 | * |
| 701 | * - someone stole our lock and we need to fix things to point to the |
| 702 | * new owner (@argowner == NULL). |
| 703 | * |
| 704 | * Either way, we have to replace the TID in the user space variable. |
| 705 | * This must be atomic as we have to preserve the owner died bit here. |
| 706 | * |
| 707 | * Note: We write the user space value _before_ changing the pi_state |
| 708 | * because we can fault here. Imagine swapped out pages or a fork |
| 709 | * that marked all the anonymous memory readonly for cow. |
| 710 | * |
| 711 | * Modifying pi_state _before_ the user space value would leave the |
| 712 | * pi_state in an inconsistent state when we fault here, because we |
| 713 | * need to drop the locks to handle the fault. This might be observed |
| 714 | * in the PID checks when attaching to PI state . |
| 715 | */ |
| 716 | retry: |
| 717 | if (!argowner) { |
| 718 | if (oldowner != current) { |
| 719 | /* |
| 720 | * We raced against a concurrent self; things are |
| 721 | * already fixed up. Nothing to do. |
| 722 | */ |
| 723 | return 0; |
| 724 | } |
| 725 | |
| 726 | if (__rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&pi_state->pi_mutex)) { |
| 727 | /* We got the lock. pi_state is correct. Tell caller. */ |
| 728 | return 1; |
| 729 | } |
| 730 | |
| 731 | /* |
| 732 | * The trylock just failed, so either there is an owner or |
| 733 | * there is a higher priority waiter than this one. |
| 734 | */ |
| 735 | newowner = rt_mutex_owner(&pi_state->pi_mutex); |
| 736 | /* |
| 737 | * If the higher priority waiter has not yet taken over the |
| 738 | * rtmutex then newowner is NULL. We can't return here with |
| 739 | * that state because it's inconsistent vs. the user space |
| 740 | * state. So drop the locks and try again. It's a valid |
| 741 | * situation and not any different from the other retry |
| 742 | * conditions. |
| 743 | */ |
| 744 | if (unlikely(!newowner)) { |
| 745 | err = -EAGAIN; |
| 746 | goto handle_err; |
| 747 | } |
| 748 | } else { |
| 749 | WARN_ON_ONCE(argowner != current); |
| 750 | if (oldowner == current) { |
| 751 | /* |
| 752 | * We raced against a concurrent self; things are |
| 753 | * already fixed up. Nothing to do. |
| 754 | */ |
| 755 | return 1; |
| 756 | } |
| 757 | newowner = argowner; |
| 758 | } |
| 759 | |
| 760 | newtid = task_pid_vnr(newowner) | FUTEX_WAITERS; |
| 761 | /* Owner died? */ |
| 762 | if (!pi_state->owner) |
| 763 | newtid |= FUTEX_OWNER_DIED; |
| 764 | |
| 765 | err = futex_get_value_locked(&uval, uaddr); |
| 766 | if (err) |
| 767 | goto handle_err; |
| 768 | |
| 769 | for (;;) { |
| 770 | newval = (uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) | newtid; |
| 771 | |
| 772 | err = futex_cmpxchg_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval); |
| 773 | if (err) |
| 774 | goto handle_err; |
| 775 | |
| 776 | if (curval == uval) |
| 777 | break; |
| 778 | uval = curval; |
| 779 | } |
| 780 | |
| 781 | /* |
| 782 | * We fixed up user space. Now we need to fix the pi_state |
| 783 | * itself. |
| 784 | */ |
| 785 | pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, newowner); |
| 786 | |
| 787 | return argowner == current; |
| 788 | |
| 789 | /* |
| 790 | * In order to reschedule or handle a page fault, we need to drop the |
| 791 | * locks here. In the case of a fault, this gives the other task |
| 792 | * (either the highest priority waiter itself or the task which stole |
| 793 | * the rtmutex) the chance to try the fixup of the pi_state. So once we |
| 794 | * are back from handling the fault we need to check the pi_state after |
| 795 | * reacquiring the locks and before trying to do another fixup. When |
| 796 | * the fixup has been done already we simply return. |
| 797 | * |
| 798 | * Note: we hold both hb->lock and pi_mutex->wait_lock. We can safely |
| 799 | * drop hb->lock since the caller owns the hb -> futex_q relation. |
| 800 | * Dropping the pi_mutex->wait_lock requires the state revalidate. |
| 801 | */ |
| 802 | handle_err: |
| 803 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); |
| 804 | spin_unlock(q->lock_ptr); |
| 805 | |
| 806 | switch (err) { |
| 807 | case -EFAULT: |
| 808 | err = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr); |
| 809 | break; |
| 810 | |
| 811 | case -EAGAIN: |
| 812 | cond_resched(); |
| 813 | err = 0; |
| 814 | break; |
| 815 | |
| 816 | default: |
| 817 | WARN_ON_ONCE(1); |
| 818 | break; |
| 819 | } |
| 820 | |
| 821 | spin_lock(q->lock_ptr); |
| 822 | raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); |
| 823 | |
| 824 | /* |
| 825 | * Check if someone else fixed it for us: |
| 826 | */ |
| 827 | if (pi_state->owner != oldowner) |
| 828 | return argowner == current; |
| 829 | |
| 830 | /* Retry if err was -EAGAIN or the fault in succeeded */ |
| 831 | if (!err) |
| 832 | goto retry; |
| 833 | |
| 834 | /* |
| 835 | * fault_in_user_writeable() failed so user state is immutable. At |
| 836 | * best we can make the kernel state consistent but user state will |
| 837 | * be most likely hosed and any subsequent unlock operation will be |
| 838 | * rejected due to PI futex rule [10]. |
| 839 | * |
| 840 | * Ensure that the rtmutex owner is also the pi_state owner despite |
| 841 | * the user space value claiming something different. There is no |
| 842 | * point in unlocking the rtmutex if current is the owner as it |
| 843 | * would need to wait until the next waiter has taken the rtmutex |
| 844 | * to guarantee consistent state. Keep it simple. Userspace asked |
| 845 | * for this wreckaged state. |
| 846 | * |
| 847 | * The rtmutex has an owner - either current or some other |
| 848 | * task. See the EAGAIN loop above. |
| 849 | */ |
| 850 | pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, rt_mutex_owner(&pi_state->pi_mutex)); |
| 851 | |
| 852 | return err; |
| 853 | } |
| 854 | |
| 855 | static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, |
| 856 | struct task_struct *argowner) |
| 857 | { |
| 858 | struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = q->pi_state; |
| 859 | int ret; |
| 860 | |
| 861 | lockdep_assert_held(q->lock_ptr); |
| 862 | |
| 863 | raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); |
| 864 | ret = __fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, argowner); |
| 865 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); |
| 866 | return ret; |
| 867 | } |
| 868 | |
| 869 | /** |
| 870 | * fixup_pi_owner() - Post lock pi_state and corner case management |
| 871 | * @uaddr: user address of the futex |
| 872 | * @q: futex_q (contains pi_state and access to the rt_mutex) |
| 873 | * @locked: if the attempt to take the rt_mutex succeeded (1) or not (0) |
| 874 | * |
| 875 | * After attempting to lock an rt_mutex, this function is called to cleanup |
| 876 | * the pi_state owner as well as handle race conditions that may allow us to |
| 877 | * acquire the lock. Must be called with the hb lock held. |
| 878 | * |
| 879 | * Return: |
| 880 | * - 1 - success, lock taken; |
| 881 | * - 0 - success, lock not taken; |
| 882 | * - <0 - on error (-EFAULT) |
| 883 | */ |
| 884 | int fixup_pi_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, int locked) |
| 885 | { |
| 886 | if (locked) { |
| 887 | /* |
| 888 | * Got the lock. We might not be the anticipated owner if we |
| 889 | * did a lock-steal - fix up the PI-state in that case: |
| 890 | * |
| 891 | * Speculative pi_state->owner read (we don't hold wait_lock); |
| 892 | * since we own the lock pi_state->owner == current is the |
| 893 | * stable state, anything else needs more attention. |
| 894 | */ |
| 895 | if (q->pi_state->owner != current) |
| 896 | return fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, current); |
| 897 | return 1; |
| 898 | } |
| 899 | |
| 900 | /* |
| 901 | * If we didn't get the lock; check if anybody stole it from us. In |
| 902 | * that case, we need to fix up the uval to point to them instead of |
| 903 | * us, otherwise bad things happen. [10] |
| 904 | * |
| 905 | * Another speculative read; pi_state->owner == current is unstable |
| 906 | * but needs our attention. |
| 907 | */ |
| 908 | if (q->pi_state->owner == current) |
| 909 | return fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, NULL); |
| 910 | |
| 911 | /* |
| 912 | * Paranoia check. If we did not take the lock, then we should not be |
| 913 | * the owner of the rt_mutex. Warn and establish consistent state. |
| 914 | */ |
| 915 | if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rt_mutex_owner(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex) == current)) |
| 916 | return fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, current); |
| 917 | |
| 918 | return 0; |
| 919 | } |
| 920 | |
| 921 | /* |
| 922 | * Userspace tried a 0 -> TID atomic transition of the futex value |
| 923 | * and failed. The kernel side here does the whole locking operation: |
| 924 | * if there are waiters then it will block as a consequence of relying |
| 925 | * on rt-mutexes, it does PI, etc. (Due to races the kernel might see |
| 926 | * a 0 value of the futex too.). |
| 927 | * |
| 928 | * Also serves as futex trylock_pi()'ing, and due semantics. |
| 929 | */ |
| 930 | int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ktime_t *time, int trylock) |
| 931 | { |
| 932 | struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to; |
| 933 | struct task_struct *exiting = NULL; |
| 934 | struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter; |
| 935 | struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; |
| 936 | struct futex_q q = futex_q_init; |
| 937 | int res, ret; |
| 938 | |
| 939 | if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUTEX_PI)) |
| 940 | return -ENOSYS; |
| 941 | |
| 942 | if (refill_pi_state_cache()) |
| 943 | return -ENOMEM; |
| 944 | |
| 945 | to = futex_setup_timer(time, &timeout, flags, 0); |
| 946 | |
| 947 | retry: |
| 948 | ret = get_futex_key(uaddr, flags & FLAGS_SHARED, &q.key, FUTEX_WRITE); |
| 949 | if (unlikely(ret != 0)) |
| 950 | goto out; |
| 951 | |
| 952 | retry_private: |
| 953 | hb = futex_q_lock(&q); |
| 954 | |
| 955 | ret = futex_lock_pi_atomic(uaddr, hb, &q.key, &q.pi_state, current, |
| 956 | &exiting, 0); |
| 957 | if (unlikely(ret)) { |
| 958 | /* |
| 959 | * Atomic work succeeded and we got the lock, |
| 960 | * or failed. Either way, we do _not_ block. |
| 961 | */ |
| 962 | switch (ret) { |
| 963 | case 1: |
| 964 | /* We got the lock. */ |
| 965 | ret = 0; |
| 966 | goto out_unlock_put_key; |
| 967 | case -EFAULT: |
| 968 | goto uaddr_faulted; |
| 969 | case -EBUSY: |
| 970 | case -EAGAIN: |
| 971 | /* |
| 972 | * Two reasons for this: |
| 973 | * - EBUSY: Task is exiting and we just wait for the |
| 974 | * exit to complete. |
| 975 | * - EAGAIN: The user space value changed. |
| 976 | */ |
| 977 | futex_q_unlock(hb); |
| 978 | /* |
| 979 | * Handle the case where the owner is in the middle of |
| 980 | * exiting. Wait for the exit to complete otherwise |
| 981 | * this task might loop forever, aka. live lock. |
| 982 | */ |
| 983 | wait_for_owner_exiting(ret, exiting); |
| 984 | cond_resched(); |
| 985 | goto retry; |
| 986 | default: |
| 987 | goto out_unlock_put_key; |
| 988 | } |
| 989 | } |
| 990 | |
| 991 | WARN_ON(!q.pi_state); |
| 992 | |
| 993 | /* |
| 994 | * Only actually queue now that the atomic ops are done: |
| 995 | */ |
| 996 | __futex_queue(&q, hb); |
| 997 | |
| 998 | if (trylock) { |
| 999 | ret = rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex); |
| 1000 | /* Fixup the trylock return value: */ |
| 1001 | ret = ret ? 0 : -EWOULDBLOCK; |
| 1002 | goto no_block; |
| 1003 | } |
| 1004 | |
| 1005 | rt_mutex_init_waiter(&rt_waiter); |
| 1006 | |
| 1007 | /* |
| 1008 | * On PREEMPT_RT_FULL, when hb->lock becomes an rt_mutex, we must not |
| 1009 | * hold it while doing rt_mutex_start_proxy(), because then it will |
| 1010 | * include hb->lock in the blocking chain, even through we'll not in |
| 1011 | * fact hold it while blocking. This will lead it to report -EDEADLK |
| 1012 | * and BUG when futex_unlock_pi() interleaves with this. |
| 1013 | * |
| 1014 | * Therefore acquire wait_lock while holding hb->lock, but drop the |
| 1015 | * latter before calling __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(). This |
| 1016 | * interleaves with futex_unlock_pi() -- which does a similar lock |
| 1017 | * handoff -- such that the latter can observe the futex_q::pi_state |
| 1018 | * before __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() is done. |
| 1019 | */ |
| 1020 | raw_spin_lock_irq(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); |
| 1021 | spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr); |
| 1022 | /* |
| 1023 | * __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() unconditionally enqueues the @rt_waiter |
| 1024 | * such that futex_unlock_pi() is guaranteed to observe the waiter when |
| 1025 | * it sees the futex_q::pi_state. |
| 1026 | */ |
| 1027 | ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter, current); |
| 1028 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); |
| 1029 | |
| 1030 | if (ret) { |
| 1031 | if (ret == 1) |
| 1032 | ret = 0; |
| 1033 | goto cleanup; |
| 1034 | } |
| 1035 | |
| 1036 | if (unlikely(to)) |
| 1037 | hrtimer_sleeper_start_expires(to, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS); |
| 1038 | |
| 1039 | ret = rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter); |
| 1040 | |
| 1041 | cleanup: |
| 1042 | spin_lock(q.lock_ptr); |
| 1043 | /* |
| 1044 | * If we failed to acquire the lock (deadlock/signal/timeout), we must |
| 1045 | * first acquire the hb->lock before removing the lock from the |
| 1046 | * rt_mutex waitqueue, such that we can keep the hb and rt_mutex wait |
| 1047 | * lists consistent. |
| 1048 | * |
| 1049 | * In particular; it is important that futex_unlock_pi() can not |
| 1050 | * observe this inconsistency. |
| 1051 | */ |
| 1052 | if (ret && !rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter)) |
| 1053 | ret = 0; |
| 1054 | |
| 1055 | no_block: |
| 1056 | /* |
| 1057 | * Fixup the pi_state owner and possibly acquire the lock if we |
| 1058 | * haven't already. |
| 1059 | */ |
| 1060 | res = fixup_pi_owner(uaddr, &q, !ret); |
| 1061 | /* |
| 1062 | * If fixup_pi_owner() returned an error, propagate that. If it acquired |
| 1063 | * the lock, clear our -ETIMEDOUT or -EINTR. |
| 1064 | */ |
| 1065 | if (res) |
| 1066 | ret = (res < 0) ? res : 0; |
| 1067 | |
| 1068 | futex_unqueue_pi(&q); |
| 1069 | spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr); |
| 1070 | goto out; |
| 1071 | |
| 1072 | out_unlock_put_key: |
| 1073 | futex_q_unlock(hb); |
| 1074 | |
| 1075 | out: |
| 1076 | if (to) { |
| 1077 | hrtimer_cancel(&to->timer); |
| 1078 | destroy_hrtimer_on_stack(&to->timer); |
| 1079 | } |
| 1080 | return ret != -EINTR ? ret : -ERESTARTNOINTR; |
| 1081 | |
| 1082 | uaddr_faulted: |
| 1083 | futex_q_unlock(hb); |
| 1084 | |
| 1085 | ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr); |
| 1086 | if (ret) |
| 1087 | goto out; |
| 1088 | |
| 1089 | if (!(flags & FLAGS_SHARED)) |
| 1090 | goto retry_private; |
| 1091 | |
| 1092 | goto retry; |
| 1093 | } |
| 1094 | |
| 1095 | /* |
| 1096 | * Userspace attempted a TID -> 0 atomic transition, and failed. |
| 1097 | * This is the in-kernel slowpath: we look up the PI state (if any), |
| 1098 | * and do the rt-mutex unlock. |
| 1099 | */ |
| 1100 | int futex_unlock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags) |
| 1101 | { |
| 1102 | u32 curval, uval, vpid = task_pid_vnr(current); |
| 1103 | union futex_key key = FUTEX_KEY_INIT; |
| 1104 | struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; |
| 1105 | struct futex_q *top_waiter; |
| 1106 | int ret; |
| 1107 | |
| 1108 | if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUTEX_PI)) |
| 1109 | return -ENOSYS; |
| 1110 | |
| 1111 | retry: |
| 1112 | if (get_user(uval, uaddr)) |
| 1113 | return -EFAULT; |
| 1114 | /* |
| 1115 | * We release only a lock we actually own: |
| 1116 | */ |
| 1117 | if ((uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK) != vpid) |
| 1118 | return -EPERM; |
| 1119 | |
| 1120 | ret = get_futex_key(uaddr, flags & FLAGS_SHARED, &key, FUTEX_WRITE); |
| 1121 | if (ret) |
| 1122 | return ret; |
| 1123 | |
| 1124 | hb = futex_hash(&key); |
| 1125 | spin_lock(&hb->lock); |
| 1126 | |
| 1127 | /* |
| 1128 | * Check waiters first. We do not trust user space values at |
| 1129 | * all and we at least want to know if user space fiddled |
| 1130 | * with the futex value instead of blindly unlocking. |
| 1131 | */ |
| 1132 | top_waiter = futex_top_waiter(hb, &key); |
| 1133 | if (top_waiter) { |
| 1134 | struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = top_waiter->pi_state; |
| 1135 | |
| 1136 | ret = -EINVAL; |
| 1137 | if (!pi_state) |
| 1138 | goto out_unlock; |
| 1139 | |
| 1140 | /* |
| 1141 | * If current does not own the pi_state then the futex is |
| 1142 | * inconsistent and user space fiddled with the futex value. |
| 1143 | */ |
| 1144 | if (pi_state->owner != current) |
| 1145 | goto out_unlock; |
| 1146 | |
| 1147 | get_pi_state(pi_state); |
| 1148 | /* |
| 1149 | * By taking wait_lock while still holding hb->lock, we ensure |
| 1150 | * there is no point where we hold neither; and therefore |
| 1151 | * wake_futex_p() must observe a state consistent with what we |
| 1152 | * observed. |
| 1153 | * |
| 1154 | * In particular; this forces __rt_mutex_start_proxy() to |
| 1155 | * complete such that we're guaranteed to observe the |
| 1156 | * rt_waiter. Also see the WARN in wake_futex_pi(). |
| 1157 | */ |
| 1158 | raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); |
| 1159 | spin_unlock(&hb->lock); |
| 1160 | |
| 1161 | /* drops pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock */ |
| 1162 | ret = wake_futex_pi(uaddr, uval, pi_state); |
| 1163 | |
| 1164 | put_pi_state(pi_state); |
| 1165 | |
| 1166 | /* |
| 1167 | * Success, we're done! No tricky corner cases. |
| 1168 | */ |
| 1169 | if (!ret) |
| 1170 | return ret; |
| 1171 | /* |
| 1172 | * The atomic access to the futex value generated a |
| 1173 | * pagefault, so retry the user-access and the wakeup: |
| 1174 | */ |
| 1175 | if (ret == -EFAULT) |
| 1176 | goto pi_faulted; |
| 1177 | /* |
| 1178 | * A unconditional UNLOCK_PI op raced against a waiter |
| 1179 | * setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit. Try again. |
| 1180 | */ |
| 1181 | if (ret == -EAGAIN) |
| 1182 | goto pi_retry; |
| 1183 | /* |
| 1184 | * wake_futex_pi has detected invalid state. Tell user |
| 1185 | * space. |
| 1186 | */ |
| 1187 | return ret; |
| 1188 | } |
| 1189 | |
| 1190 | /* |
| 1191 | * We have no kernel internal state, i.e. no waiters in the |
| 1192 | * kernel. Waiters which are about to queue themselves are stuck |
| 1193 | * on hb->lock. So we can safely ignore them. We do neither |
| 1194 | * preserve the WAITERS bit not the OWNER_DIED one. We are the |
| 1195 | * owner. |
| 1196 | */ |
| 1197 | if ((ret = futex_cmpxchg_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, 0))) { |
| 1198 | spin_unlock(&hb->lock); |
| 1199 | switch (ret) { |
| 1200 | case -EFAULT: |
| 1201 | goto pi_faulted; |
| 1202 | |
| 1203 | case -EAGAIN: |
| 1204 | goto pi_retry; |
| 1205 | |
| 1206 | default: |
| 1207 | WARN_ON_ONCE(1); |
| 1208 | return ret; |
| 1209 | } |
| 1210 | } |
| 1211 | |
| 1212 | /* |
| 1213 | * If uval has changed, let user space handle it. |
| 1214 | */ |
| 1215 | ret = (curval == uval) ? 0 : -EAGAIN; |
| 1216 | |
| 1217 | out_unlock: |
| 1218 | spin_unlock(&hb->lock); |
| 1219 | return ret; |
| 1220 | |
| 1221 | pi_retry: |
| 1222 | cond_resched(); |
| 1223 | goto retry; |
| 1224 | |
| 1225 | pi_faulted: |
| 1226 | |
| 1227 | ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr); |
| 1228 | if (!ret) |
| 1229 | goto retry; |
| 1230 | |
| 1231 | return ret; |
| 1232 | } |
| 1233 | |