blob: ce77f02656603d473ae0091a365f22061be3acc0 [file] [log] [blame]
Thomas Gleixnerec8f24b2019-05-19 13:07:45 +01001# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
Ingo Molnarcc19ca82005-06-25 14:57:36 -07002
Valentin Schneidera8b76912021-11-10 20:24:44 +00003config PREEMPT_NONE_BUILD
4 bool
5
6config PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY_BUILD
7 bool
8
9config PREEMPT_BUILD
10 bool
11 select PREEMPTION
12 select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK if !ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
13
Ingo Molnarf8cbd992005-06-25 14:57:39 -070014choice
15 prompt "Preemption Model"
Valentin Schneidera8b76912021-11-10 20:24:44 +000016 default PREEMPT_NONE
Ingo Molnarf8cbd992005-06-25 14:57:39 -070017
Valentin Schneidera8b76912021-11-10 20:24:44 +000018config PREEMPT_NONE
Ingo Molnarf8cbd992005-06-25 14:57:39 -070019 bool "No Forced Preemption (Server)"
Valentin Schneidera8b76912021-11-10 20:24:44 +000020 select PREEMPT_NONE_BUILD if !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
Ingo Molnarcc19ca82005-06-25 14:57:36 -070021 help
Ingo Molnarf8cbd992005-06-25 14:57:39 -070022 This is the traditional Linux preemption model, geared towards
23 throughput. It will still provide good latencies most of the
24 time, but there are no guarantees and occasional longer delays
25 are possible.
26
27 Select this option if you are building a kernel for a server or
28 scientific/computation system, or if you want to maximize the
29 raw processing power of the kernel, irrespective of scheduling
30 latencies.
31
Valentin Schneidera8b76912021-11-10 20:24:44 +000032config PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY
Ingo Molnarf8cbd992005-06-25 14:57:39 -070033 bool "Voluntary Kernel Preemption (Desktop)"
Christoph Hellwig87a4c372018-07-31 13:39:32 +020034 depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
Valentin Schneidera8b76912021-11-10 20:24:44 +000035 select PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY_BUILD if !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
Ingo Molnarf8cbd992005-06-25 14:57:39 -070036 help
37 This option reduces the latency of the kernel by adding more
38 "explicit preemption points" to the kernel code. These new
39 preemption points have been selected to reduce the maximum
40 latency of rescheduling, providing faster application reactions,
David Sterba3dde6ad2007-05-09 07:12:20 +020041 at the cost of slightly lower throughput.
Ingo Molnarf8cbd992005-06-25 14:57:39 -070042
43 This allows reaction to interactive events by allowing a
44 low priority process to voluntarily preempt itself even if it
45 is in kernel mode executing a system call. This allows
46 applications to run more 'smoothly' even when the system is
Ingo Molnarcc19ca82005-06-25 14:57:36 -070047 under load.
48
Ingo Molnarf8cbd992005-06-25 14:57:39 -070049 Select this if you are building a kernel for a desktop system.
50
Valentin Schneidera8b76912021-11-10 20:24:44 +000051config PREEMPT
Ingo Molnarf8cbd992005-06-25 14:57:39 -070052 bool "Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)"
Christoph Hellwig87a4c372018-07-31 13:39:32 +020053 depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
Valentin Schneidera8b76912021-11-10 20:24:44 +000054 select PREEMPT_BUILD
Ingo Molnarf8cbd992005-06-25 14:57:39 -070055 help
56 This option reduces the latency of the kernel by making
57 all kernel code (that is not executing in a critical section)
58 preemptible. This allows reaction to interactive events by
59 permitting a low priority process to be preempted involuntarily
60 even if it is in kernel mode executing a system call and would
61 otherwise not be about to reach a natural preemption point.
62 This allows applications to run more 'smoothly' even when the
David Sterba3dde6ad2007-05-09 07:12:20 +020063 system is under load, at the cost of slightly lower throughput
Ingo Molnarf8cbd992005-06-25 14:57:39 -070064 and a slight runtime overhead to kernel code.
65
66 Select this if you are building a kernel for a desktop or
67 embedded system with latency requirements in the milliseconds
68 range.
69
Thomas Gleixnera50a3f42019-07-17 22:01:49 +020070config PREEMPT_RT
71 bool "Fully Preemptible Kernel (Real-Time)"
Valentin Schneidera8b76912021-11-10 20:24:44 +000072 depends on EXPERT && ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT
Thomas Gleixnerb8d33492019-07-22 17:59:19 +020073 select PREEMPTION
Thomas Gleixnera50a3f42019-07-17 22:01:49 +020074 help
75 This option turns the kernel into a real-time kernel by replacing
76 various locking primitives (spinlocks, rwlocks, etc.) with
77 preemptible priority-inheritance aware variants, enforcing
78 interrupt threading and introducing mechanisms to break up long
79 non-preemptible sections. This makes the kernel, except for very
Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware)d61ca3c2019-10-25 16:02:07 -070080 low level and critical code paths (entry code, scheduler, low
Thomas Gleixnera50a3f42019-07-17 22:01:49 +020081 level interrupt handling) fully preemptible and brings most
82 execution contexts under scheduler control.
83
84 Select this if you are building a kernel for systems which
85 require real-time guarantees.
86
Ingo Molnarf8cbd992005-06-25 14:57:39 -070087endchoice
Ingo Molnarcc19ca82005-06-25 14:57:36 -070088
Frederic Weisbeckerbdd4e852011-06-08 01:13:27 +020089config PREEMPT_COUNT
Masahiro Yamada72367932018-12-11 20:00:51 +090090 bool
Thomas Gleixnera50a3f42019-07-17 22:01:49 +020091
Thomas Gleixnerb8d33492019-07-22 17:59:19 +020092config PREEMPTION
Thomas Gleixnera50a3f42019-07-17 22:01:49 +020093 bool
94 select PREEMPT_COUNT
Michal Hocko6ef869e2021-01-18 15:12:19 +010095
96config PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
Frederic Weisbeckerc597bfd2021-09-14 12:31:34 +020097 bool "Preemption behaviour defined on boot"
Valentin Schneidera8b76912021-11-10 20:24:44 +000098 depends on HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC && !PREEMPT_RT
99 select PREEMPT_BUILD
Frederic Weisbeckerc597bfd2021-09-14 12:31:34 +0200100 default y
Michal Hocko6ef869e2021-01-18 15:12:19 +0100101 help
102 This option allows to define the preemption model on the kernel
103 command line parameter and thus override the default preemption
104 model defined during compile time.
105
106 The feature is primarily interesting for Linux distributions which
107 provide a pre-built kernel binary to reduce the number of kernel
108 flavors they offer while still offering different usecases.
109
110 The runtime overhead is negligible with HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE enabled
111 but if runtime patching is not available for the specific architecture
112 then the potential overhead should be considered.
113
114 Interesting if you want the same pre-built kernel should be used for
115 both Server and Desktop workloads.
Peter Zijlstra9edeaea2020-11-17 18:19:34 -0500116
117config SCHED_CORE
118 bool "Core Scheduling for SMT"
Peter Zijlstra9edeaea2020-11-17 18:19:34 -0500119 depends on SCHED_SMT
Peter Zijlstra7b419f42021-05-25 08:53:28 +0200120 help
121 This option permits Core Scheduling, a means of coordinated task
122 selection across SMT siblings. When enabled -- see
123 prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE) -- task selection ensures that all SMT siblings
124 will execute a task from the same 'core group', forcing idle when no
125 matching task is found.
126
127 Use of this feature includes:
128 - mitigation of some (not all) SMT side channels;
129 - limiting SMT interference to improve determinism and/or performance.
130
Ingo Molnard2343cb2021-06-28 21:55:16 +0200131 SCHED_CORE is default disabled. When it is enabled and unused,
132 which is the likely usage by Linux distributions, there should
133 be no measurable impact on performance.
Peter Zijlstra7b419f42021-05-25 08:53:28 +0200134
Peter Zijlstra9edeaea2020-11-17 18:19:34 -0500135