Mauro Carvalho Chehab | d6a3b24 | 2019-06-12 14:53:03 -0300 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | ================================================================= |
| 2 | CPU Scheduler implementation hints for architecture specific code |
| 3 | ================================================================= |
Nick Piggin | 64c7c8f | 2005-11-08 21:39:04 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 4 | |
| 5 | Nick Piggin, 2005 |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Context switch |
| 8 | ============== |
| 9 | 1. Runqueue locking |
| 10 | By default, the switch_to arch function is called with the runqueue |
| 11 | locked. This is usually not a problem unless switch_to may need to |
| 12 | take the runqueue lock. This is usually due to a wake up operation in |
David Howells | 9566328 | 2014-04-07 15:39:21 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 13 | the context switch. See arch/ia64/include/asm/switch_to.h for an example. |
Nick Piggin | 64c7c8f | 2005-11-08 21:39:04 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 14 | |
| 15 | To request the scheduler call switch_to with the runqueue unlocked, |
| 16 | you must `#define __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW` in a header file |
| 17 | (typically the one where switch_to is defined). |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Unlocked context switches introduce only a very minor performance |
| 20 | penalty to the core scheduler implementation in the CONFIG_SMP case. |
| 21 | |
Nick Piggin | 64c7c8f | 2005-11-08 21:39:04 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 22 | CPU idle |
| 23 | ======== |
| 24 | Your cpu_idle routines need to obey the following rules: |
| 25 | |
| 26 | 1. Preempt should now disabled over idle routines. Should only |
| 27 | be enabled to call schedule() then disabled again. |
| 28 | |
| 29 | 2. need_resched/TIF_NEED_RESCHED is only ever set, and will never |
| 30 | be cleared until the running task has called schedule(). Idle |
| 31 | threads need only ever query need_resched, and may never set or |
| 32 | clear it. |
| 33 | |
| 34 | 3. When cpu_idle finds (need_resched() == 'true'), it should call |
| 35 | schedule(). It should not call schedule() otherwise. |
| 36 | |
| 37 | 4. The only time interrupts need to be disabled when checking |
| 38 | need_resched is if we are about to sleep the processor until |
| 39 | the next interrupt (this doesn't provide any protection of |
Mauro Carvalho Chehab | d6a3b24 | 2019-06-12 14:53:03 -0300 | [diff] [blame] | 40 | need_resched, it prevents losing an interrupt): |
Nick Piggin | 64c7c8f | 2005-11-08 21:39:04 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 41 | |
Mauro Carvalho Chehab | d6a3b24 | 2019-06-12 14:53:03 -0300 | [diff] [blame] | 42 | 4a. Common problem with this type of sleep appears to be:: |
| 43 | |
Nick Piggin | 64c7c8f | 2005-11-08 21:39:04 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 44 | local_irq_disable(); |
| 45 | if (!need_resched()) { |
| 46 | local_irq_enable(); |
| 47 | *** resched interrupt arrives here *** |
| 48 | __asm__("sleep until next interrupt"); |
| 49 | } |
| 50 | |
| 51 | 5. TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG can be set by idle routines that do not |
| 52 | need an interrupt to wake them up when need_resched goes high. |
| 53 | In other words, they must be periodically polling need_resched, |
| 54 | although it may be reasonable to do some background work or enter |
| 55 | a low CPU priority. |
| 56 | |
Mauro Carvalho Chehab | d6a3b24 | 2019-06-12 14:53:03 -0300 | [diff] [blame] | 57 | - 5a. If TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is set, and we do decide to enter |
| 58 | an interrupt sleep, it needs to be cleared then a memory |
| 59 | barrier issued (followed by a test of need_resched with |
| 60 | interrupts disabled, as explained in 3). |
Nick Piggin | 64c7c8f | 2005-11-08 21:39:04 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 61 | |
Wanlong Gao | 25eb650 | 2011-06-13 17:53:53 +0800 | [diff] [blame] | 62 | arch/x86/kernel/process.c has examples of both polling and |
Nick Piggin | 64c7c8f | 2005-11-08 21:39:04 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 63 | sleeping idle functions. |
| 64 | |
| 65 | |
| 66 | Possible arch/ problems |
| 67 | ======================= |
| 68 | |
| 69 | Possible arch problems I found (and either tried to fix or didn't): |
| 70 | |
Nick Piggin | 64c7c8f | 2005-11-08 21:39:04 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 71 | ia64 - is safe_halt call racy vs interrupts? (does it sleep?) (See #4a) |
| 72 | |
| 73 | sh64 - Is sleeping racy vs interrupts? (See #4a) |
| 74 | |
| 75 | sparc - IRQs on at this point(?), change local_irq_save to _disable. |
| 76 | - TODO: needs secondary CPUs to disable preempt (See #1) |