yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | =========== |
| 2 | SNMP counter |
| 3 | =========== |
| 4 | |
| 5 | This document explains the meaning of SNMP counters. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | General IPv4 counters |
| 8 | ==================== |
| 9 | All layer 4 packets and ICMP packets will change these counters, but |
| 10 | these counters won't be changed by layer 2 packets (such as STP) or |
| 11 | ARP packets. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | * IpInReceives |
| 14 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInReceives`_ |
| 15 | |
| 16 | .. _RFC1213 ipInReceives: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-26 |
| 17 | |
| 18 | The number of packets received by the IP layer. It gets increasing at the |
| 19 | beginning of ip_rcv function, always be updated together with |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 20 | IpExtInOctets. It will be increased even if the packet is dropped |
| 21 | later (e.g. due to the IP header is invalid or the checksum is wrong |
| 22 | and so on). It indicates the number of aggregated segments after |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 23 | GRO/LRO. |
| 24 | |
| 25 | * IpInDelivers |
| 26 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInDelivers`_ |
| 27 | |
| 28 | .. _RFC1213 ipInDelivers: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 |
| 29 | |
| 30 | The number of packets delivers to the upper layer protocols. E.g. TCP, UDP, |
| 31 | ICMP and so on. If no one listens on a raw socket, only kernel |
| 32 | supported protocols will be delivered, if someone listens on the raw |
| 33 | socket, all valid IP packets will be delivered. |
| 34 | |
| 35 | * IpOutRequests |
| 36 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipOutRequests`_ |
| 37 | |
| 38 | .. _RFC1213 ipOutRequests: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 |
| 39 | |
| 40 | The number of packets sent via IP layer, for both single cast and |
| 41 | multicast packets, and would always be updated together with |
| 42 | IpExtOutOctets. |
| 43 | |
| 44 | * IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 45 | They are Linux kernel extensions, no RFC definitions. Please note, |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 46 | RFC1213 indeed defines ifInOctets and ifOutOctets, but they |
| 47 | are different things. The ifInOctets and ifOutOctets include the MAC |
| 48 | layer header size but IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets don't, they |
| 49 | only include the IP layer header and the IP layer data. |
| 50 | |
| 51 | * IpExtInNoECTPkts, IpExtInECT1Pkts, IpExtInECT0Pkts, IpExtInCEPkts |
| 52 | They indicate the number of four kinds of ECN IP packets, please refer |
| 53 | `Explicit Congestion Notification`_ for more details. |
| 54 | |
| 55 | .. _Explicit Congestion Notification: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3168#page-6 |
| 56 | |
| 57 | These 4 counters calculate how many packets received per ECN |
| 58 | status. They count the real frame number regardless the LRO/GRO. So |
| 59 | for the same packet, you might find that IpInReceives count 1, but |
| 60 | IpExtInNoECTPkts counts 2 or more. |
| 61 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 62 | * IpInHdrErrors |
| 63 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInHdrErrors`_. It indicates the packet is |
| 64 | dropped due to the IP header error. It might happen in both IP input |
| 65 | and IP forward paths. |
| 66 | |
| 67 | .. _RFC1213 ipInHdrErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-27 |
| 68 | |
| 69 | * IpInAddrErrors |
| 70 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInAddrErrors`_. It will be increased in two |
| 71 | scenarios: (1) The IP address is invalid. (2) The destination IP |
| 72 | address is not a local address and IP forwarding is not enabled |
| 73 | |
| 74 | .. _RFC1213 ipInAddrErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-27 |
| 75 | |
| 76 | * IpExtInNoRoutes |
| 77 | This counter means the packet is dropped when the IP stack receives a |
| 78 | packet and can't find a route for it from the route table. It might |
| 79 | happen when IP forwarding is enabled and the destination IP address is |
| 80 | not a local address and there is no route for the destination IP |
| 81 | address. |
| 82 | |
| 83 | * IpInUnknownProtos |
| 84 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInUnknownProtos`_. It will be increased if the |
| 85 | layer 4 protocol is unsupported by kernel. If an application is using |
| 86 | raw socket, kernel will always deliver the packet to the raw socket |
| 87 | and this counter won't be increased. |
| 88 | |
| 89 | .. _RFC1213 ipInUnknownProtos: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-27 |
| 90 | |
| 91 | * IpExtInTruncatedPkts |
| 92 | For IPv4 packet, it means the actual data size is smaller than the |
| 93 | "Total Length" field in the IPv4 header. |
| 94 | |
| 95 | * IpInDiscards |
| 96 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInDiscards`_. It indicates the packet is dropped |
| 97 | in the IP receiving path and due to kernel internal reasons (e.g. no |
| 98 | enough memory). |
| 99 | |
| 100 | .. _RFC1213 ipInDiscards: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 |
| 101 | |
| 102 | * IpOutDiscards |
| 103 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipOutDiscards`_. It indicates the packet is |
| 104 | dropped in the IP sending path and due to kernel internal reasons. |
| 105 | |
| 106 | .. _RFC1213 ipOutDiscards: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 |
| 107 | |
| 108 | * IpOutNoRoutes |
| 109 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipOutNoRoutes`_. It indicates the packet is |
| 110 | dropped in the IP sending path and no route is found for it. |
| 111 | |
| 112 | .. _RFC1213 ipOutNoRoutes: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-29 |
| 113 | |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 114 | ICMP counters |
| 115 | ============ |
| 116 | * IcmpInMsgs and IcmpOutMsgs |
| 117 | Defined by `RFC1213 icmpInMsgs`_ and `RFC1213 icmpOutMsgs`_ |
| 118 | |
| 119 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInMsgs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 |
| 120 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutMsgs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 |
| 121 | |
| 122 | As mentioned in the RFC1213, these two counters include errors, they |
| 123 | would be increased even if the ICMP packet has an invalid type. The |
| 124 | ICMP output path will check the header of a raw socket, so the |
| 125 | IcmpOutMsgs would still be updated if the IP header is constructed by |
| 126 | a userspace program. |
| 127 | |
| 128 | * ICMP named types |
| 129 | | These counters include most of common ICMP types, they are: |
| 130 | | IcmpInDestUnreachs: `RFC1213 icmpInDestUnreachs`_ |
| 131 | | IcmpInTimeExcds: `RFC1213 icmpInTimeExcds`_ |
| 132 | | IcmpInParmProbs: `RFC1213 icmpInParmProbs`_ |
| 133 | | IcmpInSrcQuenchs: `RFC1213 icmpInSrcQuenchs`_ |
| 134 | | IcmpInRedirects: `RFC1213 icmpInRedirects`_ |
| 135 | | IcmpInEchos: `RFC1213 icmpInEchos`_ |
| 136 | | IcmpInEchoReps: `RFC1213 icmpInEchoReps`_ |
| 137 | | IcmpInTimestamps: `RFC1213 icmpInTimestamps`_ |
| 138 | | IcmpInTimestampReps: `RFC1213 icmpInTimestampReps`_ |
| 139 | | IcmpInAddrMasks: `RFC1213 icmpInAddrMasks`_ |
| 140 | | IcmpInAddrMaskReps: `RFC1213 icmpInAddrMaskReps`_ |
| 141 | | IcmpOutDestUnreachs: `RFC1213 icmpOutDestUnreachs`_ |
| 142 | | IcmpOutTimeExcds: `RFC1213 icmpOutTimeExcds`_ |
| 143 | | IcmpOutParmProbs: `RFC1213 icmpOutParmProbs`_ |
| 144 | | IcmpOutSrcQuenchs: `RFC1213 icmpOutSrcQuenchs`_ |
| 145 | | IcmpOutRedirects: `RFC1213 icmpOutRedirects`_ |
| 146 | | IcmpOutEchos: `RFC1213 icmpOutEchos`_ |
| 147 | | IcmpOutEchoReps: `RFC1213 icmpOutEchoReps`_ |
| 148 | | IcmpOutTimestamps: `RFC1213 icmpOutTimestamps`_ |
| 149 | | IcmpOutTimestampReps: `RFC1213 icmpOutTimestampReps`_ |
| 150 | | IcmpOutAddrMasks: `RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMasks`_ |
| 151 | | IcmpOutAddrMaskReps: `RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMaskReps`_ |
| 152 | |
| 153 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInDestUnreachs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 |
| 154 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInTimeExcds: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 |
| 155 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInParmProbs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| 156 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInSrcQuenchs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| 157 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInRedirects: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| 158 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInEchos: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| 159 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInEchoReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| 160 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInTimestamps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| 161 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInTimestampReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 |
| 162 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInAddrMasks: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 |
| 163 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInAddrMaskReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 |
| 164 | |
| 165 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutDestUnreachs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 |
| 166 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutTimeExcds: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 |
| 167 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutParmProbs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 |
| 168 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutSrcQuenchs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 |
| 169 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutRedirects: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 |
| 170 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutEchos: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 |
| 171 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutEchoReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 |
| 172 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutTimestamps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 |
| 173 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutTimestampReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 |
| 174 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMasks: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 |
| 175 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMaskReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-46 |
| 176 | |
| 177 | Every ICMP type has two counters: 'In' and 'Out'. E.g., for the ICMP |
| 178 | Echo packet, they are IcmpInEchos and IcmpOutEchos. Their meanings are |
| 179 | straightforward. The 'In' counter means kernel receives such a packet |
| 180 | and the 'Out' counter means kernel sends such a packet. |
| 181 | |
| 182 | * ICMP numeric types |
| 183 | They are IcmpMsgInType[N] and IcmpMsgOutType[N], the [N] indicates the |
| 184 | ICMP type number. These counters track all kinds of ICMP packets. The |
| 185 | ICMP type number definition could be found in the `ICMP parameters`_ |
| 186 | document. |
| 187 | |
| 188 | .. _ICMP parameters: https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmp-parameters/icmp-parameters.xhtml |
| 189 | |
| 190 | For example, if the Linux kernel sends an ICMP Echo packet, the |
| 191 | IcmpMsgOutType8 would increase 1. And if kernel gets an ICMP Echo Reply |
| 192 | packet, IcmpMsgInType0 would increase 1. |
| 193 | |
| 194 | * IcmpInCsumErrors |
| 195 | This counter indicates the checksum of the ICMP packet is |
| 196 | wrong. Kernel verifies the checksum after updating the IcmpInMsgs and |
| 197 | before updating IcmpMsgInType[N]. If a packet has bad checksum, the |
| 198 | IcmpInMsgs would be updated but none of IcmpMsgInType[N] would be updated. |
| 199 | |
| 200 | * IcmpInErrors and IcmpOutErrors |
| 201 | Defined by `RFC1213 icmpInErrors`_ and `RFC1213 icmpOutErrors`_ |
| 202 | |
| 203 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 |
| 204 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 |
| 205 | |
| 206 | When an error occurs in the ICMP packet handler path, these two |
| 207 | counters would be updated. The receiving packet path use IcmpInErrors |
| 208 | and the sending packet path use IcmpOutErrors. When IcmpInCsumErrors |
| 209 | is increased, IcmpInErrors would always be increased too. |
| 210 | |
| 211 | relationship of the ICMP counters |
| 212 | ------------------------------- |
| 213 | The sum of IcmpMsgOutType[N] is always equal to IcmpOutMsgs, as they |
| 214 | are updated at the same time. The sum of IcmpMsgInType[N] plus |
| 215 | IcmpInErrors should be equal or larger than IcmpInMsgs. When kernel |
| 216 | receives an ICMP packet, kernel follows below logic: |
| 217 | |
| 218 | 1. increase IcmpInMsgs |
| 219 | 2. if has any error, update IcmpInErrors and finish the process |
| 220 | 3. update IcmpMsgOutType[N] |
| 221 | 4. handle the packet depending on the type, if has any error, update |
| 222 | IcmpInErrors and finish the process |
| 223 | |
| 224 | So if all errors occur in step (2), IcmpInMsgs should be equal to the |
| 225 | sum of IcmpMsgOutType[N] plus IcmpInErrors. If all errors occur in |
| 226 | step (4), IcmpInMsgs should be equal to the sum of |
| 227 | IcmpMsgOutType[N]. If the errors occur in both step (2) and step (4), |
| 228 | IcmpInMsgs should be less than the sum of IcmpMsgOutType[N] plus |
| 229 | IcmpInErrors. |
| 230 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 231 | General TCP counters |
| 232 | ================== |
| 233 | * TcpInSegs |
| 234 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpInSegs`_ |
| 235 | |
| 236 | .. _RFC1213 tcpInSegs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48 |
| 237 | |
| 238 | The number of packets received by the TCP layer. As mentioned in |
| 239 | RFC1213, it includes the packets received in error, such as checksum |
| 240 | error, invalid TCP header and so on. Only one error won't be included: |
| 241 | if the layer 2 destination address is not the NIC's layer 2 |
| 242 | address. It might happen if the packet is a multicast or broadcast |
| 243 | packet, or the NIC is in promiscuous mode. In these situations, the |
| 244 | packets would be delivered to the TCP layer, but the TCP layer will discard |
| 245 | these packets before increasing TcpInSegs. The TcpInSegs counter |
| 246 | isn't aware of GRO. So if two packets are merged by GRO, the TcpInSegs |
| 247 | counter would only increase 1. |
| 248 | |
| 249 | * TcpOutSegs |
| 250 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpOutSegs`_ |
| 251 | |
| 252 | .. _RFC1213 tcpOutSegs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48 |
| 253 | |
| 254 | The number of packets sent by the TCP layer. As mentioned in RFC1213, |
| 255 | it excludes the retransmitted packets. But it includes the SYN, ACK |
| 256 | and RST packets. Doesn't like TcpInSegs, the TcpOutSegs is aware of |
| 257 | GSO, so if a packet would be split to 2 by GSO, TcpOutSegs will |
| 258 | increase 2. |
| 259 | |
| 260 | * TcpActiveOpens |
| 261 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpActiveOpens`_ |
| 262 | |
| 263 | .. _RFC1213 tcpActiveOpens: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-47 |
| 264 | |
| 265 | It means the TCP layer sends a SYN, and come into the SYN-SENT |
| 266 | state. Every time TcpActiveOpens increases 1, TcpOutSegs should always |
| 267 | increase 1. |
| 268 | |
| 269 | * TcpPassiveOpens |
| 270 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpPassiveOpens`_ |
| 271 | |
| 272 | .. _RFC1213 tcpPassiveOpens: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-47 |
| 273 | |
| 274 | It means the TCP layer receives a SYN, replies a SYN+ACK, come into |
| 275 | the SYN-RCVD state. |
| 276 | |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 277 | * TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce |
| 278 | When packets are received by the TCP layer and are not be read by the |
| 279 | application, the TCP layer will try to merge them. This counter |
| 280 | indicate how many packets are merged in such situation. If GRO is |
| 281 | enabled, lots of packets would be merged by GRO, these packets |
| 282 | wouldn't be counted to TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce. |
| 283 | |
| 284 | * TcpExtTCPAutoCorking |
| 285 | When sending packets, the TCP layer will try to merge small packets to |
| 286 | a bigger one. This counter increase 1 for every packet merged in such |
| 287 | situation. Please refer to the LWN article for more details: |
| 288 | https://lwn.net/Articles/576263/ |
| 289 | |
| 290 | * TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent |
| 291 | This counter is explained by `kernel commit f19c29e3e391`_, I pasted the |
| 292 | explaination below:: |
| 293 | |
| 294 | TCPOrigDataSent: number of outgoing packets with original data (excluding |
| 295 | retransmission but including data-in-SYN). This counter is different from |
| 296 | TcpOutSegs because TcpOutSegs also tracks pure ACKs. TCPOrigDataSent is |
| 297 | more useful to track the TCP retransmission rate. |
| 298 | |
| 299 | * TCPSynRetrans |
| 300 | This counter is explained by `kernel commit f19c29e3e391`_, I pasted the |
| 301 | explaination below:: |
| 302 | |
| 303 | TCPSynRetrans: number of SYN and SYN/ACK retransmits to break down |
| 304 | retransmissions into SYN, fast-retransmits, timeout retransmits, etc. |
| 305 | |
| 306 | * TCPFastOpenActiveFail |
| 307 | This counter is explained by `kernel commit f19c29e3e391`_, I pasted the |
| 308 | explaination below:: |
| 309 | |
| 310 | TCPFastOpenActiveFail: Fast Open attempts (SYN/data) failed because |
| 311 | the remote does not accept it or the attempts timed out. |
| 312 | |
| 313 | .. _kernel commit f19c29e3e391: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=f19c29e3e391a66a273e9afebaf01917245148cd |
| 314 | |
| 315 | * TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops |
| 316 | When kernel receives a SYN from a client, and if the TCP accept queue |
| 317 | is full, kernel will drop the SYN and add 1 to TcpExtListenOverflows. |
| 318 | At the same time kernel will also add 1 to TcpExtListenDrops. When a |
| 319 | TCP socket is in LISTEN state, and kernel need to drop a packet, |
| 320 | kernel would always add 1 to TcpExtListenDrops. So increase |
| 321 | TcpExtListenOverflows would let TcpExtListenDrops increasing at the |
| 322 | same time, but TcpExtListenDrops would also increase without |
| 323 | TcpExtListenOverflows increasing, e.g. a memory allocation fail would |
| 324 | also let TcpExtListenDrops increase. |
| 325 | |
| 326 | Note: The above explanation is based on kernel 4.10 or above version, on |
| 327 | an old kernel, the TCP stack has different behavior when TCP accept |
| 328 | queue is full. On the old kernel, TCP stack won't drop the SYN, it |
| 329 | would complete the 3-way handshake. As the accept queue is full, TCP |
| 330 | stack will keep the socket in the TCP half-open queue. As it is in the |
| 331 | half open queue, TCP stack will send SYN+ACK on an exponential backoff |
| 332 | timer, after client replies ACK, TCP stack checks whether the accept |
| 333 | queue is still full, if it is not full, moves the socket to the accept |
| 334 | queue, if it is full, keeps the socket in the half-open queue, at next |
| 335 | time client replies ACK, this socket will get another chance to move |
| 336 | to the accept queue. |
| 337 | |
| 338 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 339 | TCP Fast Open |
| 340 | ============ |
| 341 | When kernel receives a TCP packet, it has two paths to handler the |
| 342 | packet, one is fast path, another is slow path. The comment in kernel |
| 343 | code provides a good explanation of them, I pasted them below:: |
| 344 | |
| 345 | It is split into a fast path and a slow path. The fast path is |
| 346 | disabled when: |
| 347 | |
| 348 | - A zero window was announced from us |
| 349 | - zero window probing |
| 350 | is only handled properly on the slow path. |
| 351 | - Out of order segments arrived. |
| 352 | - Urgent data is expected. |
| 353 | - There is no buffer space left |
| 354 | - Unexpected TCP flags/window values/header lengths are received |
| 355 | (detected by checking the TCP header against pred_flags) |
| 356 | - Data is sent in both directions. The fast path only supports pure senders |
| 357 | or pure receivers (this means either the sequence number or the ack |
| 358 | value must stay constant) |
| 359 | - Unexpected TCP option. |
| 360 | |
| 361 | Kernel will try to use fast path unless any of the above conditions |
| 362 | are satisfied. If the packets are out of order, kernel will handle |
| 363 | them in slow path, which means the performance might be not very |
| 364 | good. Kernel would also come into slow path if the "Delayed ack" is |
| 365 | used, because when using "Delayed ack", the data is sent in both |
| 366 | directions. When the TCP window scale option is not used, kernel will |
| 367 | try to enable fast path immediately when the connection comes into the |
| 368 | established state, but if the TCP window scale option is used, kernel |
| 369 | will disable the fast path at first, and try to enable it after kernel |
| 370 | receives packets. |
| 371 | |
| 372 | * TcpExtTCPPureAcks and TcpExtTCPHPAcks |
| 373 | If a packet set ACK flag and has no data, it is a pure ACK packet, if |
| 374 | kernel handles it in the fast path, TcpExtTCPHPAcks will increase 1, |
| 375 | if kernel handles it in the slow path, TcpExtTCPPureAcks will |
| 376 | increase 1. |
| 377 | |
| 378 | * TcpExtTCPHPHits |
| 379 | If a TCP packet has data (which means it is not a pure ACK packet), |
| 380 | and this packet is handled in the fast path, TcpExtTCPHPHits will |
| 381 | increase 1. |
| 382 | |
| 383 | |
| 384 | TCP abort |
| 385 | ======== |
| 386 | |
| 387 | |
| 388 | * TcpExtTCPAbortOnData |
| 389 | It means TCP layer has data in flight, but need to close the |
| 390 | connection. So TCP layer sends a RST to the other side, indicate the |
| 391 | connection is not closed very graceful. An easy way to increase this |
| 392 | counter is using the SO_LINGER option. Please refer to the SO_LINGER |
| 393 | section of the `socket man page`_: |
| 394 | |
| 395 | .. _socket man page: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/socket.7.html |
| 396 | |
| 397 | By default, when an application closes a connection, the close function |
| 398 | will return immediately and kernel will try to send the in-flight data |
| 399 | async. If you use the SO_LINGER option, set l_onoff to 1, and l_linger |
| 400 | to a positive number, the close function won't return immediately, but |
| 401 | wait for the in-flight data are acked by the other side, the max wait |
| 402 | time is l_linger seconds. If set l_onoff to 1 and set l_linger to 0, |
| 403 | when the application closes a connection, kernel will send a RST |
| 404 | immediately and increase the TcpExtTCPAbortOnData counter. |
| 405 | |
| 406 | * TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose |
| 407 | This counter means the application has unread data in the TCP layer when |
| 408 | the application wants to close the TCP connection. In such a situation, |
| 409 | kernel will send a RST to the other side of the TCP connection. |
| 410 | |
| 411 | * TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory |
| 412 | When an application closes a TCP connection, kernel still need to track |
| 413 | the connection, let it complete the TCP disconnect process. E.g. an |
| 414 | app calls the close method of a socket, kernel sends fin to the other |
| 415 | side of the connection, then the app has no relationship with the |
| 416 | socket any more, but kernel need to keep the socket, this socket |
| 417 | becomes an orphan socket, kernel waits for the reply of the other side, |
| 418 | and would come to the TIME_WAIT state finally. When kernel has no |
| 419 | enough memory to keep the orphan socket, kernel would send an RST to |
| 420 | the other side, and delete the socket, in such situation, kernel will |
| 421 | increase 1 to the TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory. Two conditions would trigger |
| 422 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory: |
| 423 | |
| 424 | 1. the memory used by the TCP protocol is higher than the third value of |
| 425 | the tcp_mem. Please refer the tcp_mem section in the `TCP man page`_: |
| 426 | |
| 427 | .. _TCP man page: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/tcp.7.html |
| 428 | |
| 429 | 2. the orphan socket count is higher than net.ipv4.tcp_max_orphans |
| 430 | |
| 431 | |
| 432 | * TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout |
| 433 | This counter will increase when any of the TCP timers expire. In such |
| 434 | situation, kernel won't send RST, just give up the connection. |
| 435 | |
| 436 | * TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger |
| 437 | When a TCP connection comes into FIN_WAIT_2 state, instead of waiting |
| 438 | for the fin packet from the other side, kernel could send a RST and |
| 439 | delete the socket immediately. This is not the default behavior of |
| 440 | Linux kernel TCP stack. By configuring the TCP_LINGER2 socket option, |
| 441 | you could let kernel follow this behavior. |
| 442 | |
| 443 | * TcpExtTCPAbortFailed |
| 444 | The kernel TCP layer will send RST if the `RFC2525 2.17 section`_ is |
| 445 | satisfied. If an internal error occurs during this process, |
| 446 | TcpExtTCPAbortFailed will be increased. |
| 447 | |
| 448 | .. _RFC2525 2.17 section: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2525#page-50 |
| 449 | |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 450 | TCP Hybrid Slow Start |
| 451 | ==================== |
| 452 | The Hybrid Slow Start algorithm is an enhancement of the traditional |
| 453 | TCP congestion window Slow Start algorithm. It uses two pieces of |
| 454 | information to detect whether the max bandwidth of the TCP path is |
| 455 | approached. The two pieces of information are ACK train length and |
| 456 | increase in packet delay. For detail information, please refer the |
| 457 | `Hybrid Slow Start paper`_. Either ACK train length or packet delay |
| 458 | hits a specific threshold, the congestion control algorithm will come |
| 459 | into the Congestion Avoidance state. Until v4.20, two congestion |
| 460 | control algorithms are using Hybrid Slow Start, they are cubic (the |
| 461 | default congestion control algorithm) and cdg. Four snmp counters |
| 462 | relate with the Hybrid Slow Start algorithm. |
| 463 | |
| 464 | .. _Hybrid Slow Start paper: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/25e9/ef3f03315782c7f1cbcd31b587857adae7d1.pdf |
| 465 | |
| 466 | * TcpExtTCPHystartTrainDetect |
| 467 | How many times the ACK train length threshold is detected |
| 468 | |
| 469 | * TcpExtTCPHystartTrainCwnd |
| 470 | The sum of CWND detected by ACK train length. Dividing this value by |
| 471 | TcpExtTCPHystartTrainDetect is the average CWND which detected by the |
| 472 | ACK train length. |
| 473 | |
| 474 | * TcpExtTCPHystartDelayDetect |
| 475 | How many times the packet delay threshold is detected. |
| 476 | |
| 477 | * TcpExtTCPHystartDelayCwnd |
| 478 | The sum of CWND detected by packet delay. Dividing this value by |
| 479 | TcpExtTCPHystartDelayDetect is the average CWND which detected by the |
| 480 | packet delay. |
| 481 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 482 | TCP retransmission and congestion control |
| 483 | ====================================== |
| 484 | The TCP protocol has two retransmission mechanisms: SACK and fast |
| 485 | recovery. They are exclusive with each other. When SACK is enabled, |
| 486 | the kernel TCP stack would use SACK, or kernel would use fast |
| 487 | recovery. The SACK is a TCP option, which is defined in `RFC2018`_, |
| 488 | the fast recovery is defined in `RFC6582`_, which is also called |
| 489 | 'Reno'. |
| 490 | |
| 491 | The TCP congestion control is a big and complex topic. To understand |
| 492 | the related snmp counter, we need to know the states of the congestion |
| 493 | control state machine. There are 5 states: Open, Disorder, CWR, |
| 494 | Recovery and Loss. For details about these states, please refer page 5 |
| 495 | and page 6 of this document: |
| 496 | https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0e9c/968d09ab2e53e24c4dca5b2d67c7f7140f8e.pdf |
| 497 | |
| 498 | .. _RFC2018: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2018 |
| 499 | .. _RFC6582: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6582 |
| 500 | |
| 501 | * TcpExtTCPRenoRecovery and TcpExtTCPSackRecovery |
| 502 | When the congestion control comes into Recovery state, if sack is |
| 503 | used, TcpExtTCPSackRecovery increases 1, if sack is not used, |
| 504 | TcpExtTCPRenoRecovery increases 1. These two counters mean the TCP |
| 505 | stack begins to retransmit the lost packets. |
| 506 | |
| 507 | * TcpExtTCPSACKReneging |
| 508 | A packet was acknowledged by SACK, but the receiver has dropped this |
| 509 | packet, so the sender needs to retransmit this packet. In this |
| 510 | situation, the sender adds 1 to TcpExtTCPSACKReneging. A receiver |
| 511 | could drop a packet which has been acknowledged by SACK, although it is |
| 512 | unusual, it is allowed by the TCP protocol. The sender doesn't really |
| 513 | know what happened on the receiver side. The sender just waits until |
| 514 | the RTO expires for this packet, then the sender assumes this packet |
| 515 | has been dropped by the receiver. |
| 516 | |
| 517 | * TcpExtTCPRenoReorder |
| 518 | The reorder packet is detected by fast recovery. It would only be used |
| 519 | if SACK is disabled. The fast recovery algorithm detects recorder by |
| 520 | the duplicate ACK number. E.g., if retransmission is triggered, and |
| 521 | the original retransmitted packet is not lost, it is just out of |
| 522 | order, the receiver would acknowledge multiple times, one for the |
| 523 | retransmitted packet, another for the arriving of the original out of |
| 524 | order packet. Thus the sender would find more ACks than its |
| 525 | expectation, and the sender knows out of order occurs. |
| 526 | |
| 527 | * TcpExtTCPTSReorder |
| 528 | The reorder packet is detected when a hole is filled. E.g., assume the |
| 529 | sender sends packet 1,2,3,4,5, and the receiving order is |
| 530 | 1,2,4,5,3. When the sender receives the ACK of packet 3 (which will |
| 531 | fill the hole), two conditions will let TcpExtTCPTSReorder increase |
| 532 | 1: (1) if the packet 3 is not re-retransmitted yet. (2) if the packet |
| 533 | 3 is retransmitted but the timestamp of the packet 3's ACK is earlier |
| 534 | than the retransmission timestamp. |
| 535 | |
| 536 | * TcpExtTCPSACKReorder |
| 537 | The reorder packet detected by SACK. The SACK has two methods to |
| 538 | detect reorder: (1) DSACK is received by the sender. It means the |
| 539 | sender sends the same packet more than one times. And the only reason |
| 540 | is the sender believes an out of order packet is lost so it sends the |
| 541 | packet again. (2) Assume packet 1,2,3,4,5 are sent by the sender, and |
| 542 | the sender has received SACKs for packet 2 and 5, now the sender |
| 543 | receives SACK for packet 4 and the sender doesn't retransmit the |
| 544 | packet yet, the sender would know packet 4 is out of order. The TCP |
| 545 | stack of kernel will increase TcpExtTCPSACKReorder for both of the |
| 546 | above scenarios. |
| 547 | |
| 548 | |
| 549 | DSACK |
| 550 | ===== |
| 551 | The DSACK is defined in `RFC2883`_. The receiver uses DSACK to report |
| 552 | duplicate packets to the sender. There are two kinds of |
| 553 | duplications: (1) a packet which has been acknowledged is |
| 554 | duplicate. (2) an out of order packet is duplicate. The TCP stack |
| 555 | counts these two kinds of duplications on both receiver side and |
| 556 | sender side. |
| 557 | |
| 558 | .. _RFC2883 : https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2883 |
| 559 | |
| 560 | * TcpExtTCPDSACKOldSent |
| 561 | The TCP stack receives a duplicate packet which has been acked, so it |
| 562 | sends a DSACK to the sender. |
| 563 | |
| 564 | * TcpExtTCPDSACKOfoSent |
| 565 | The TCP stack receives an out of order duplicate packet, so it sends a |
| 566 | DSACK to the sender. |
| 567 | |
| 568 | * TcpExtTCPDSACKRecv |
| 569 | The TCP stack receives a DSACK, which indicate an acknowledged |
| 570 | duplicate packet is received. |
| 571 | |
| 572 | * TcpExtTCPDSACKOfoRecv |
| 573 | The TCP stack receives a DSACK, which indicate an out of order |
| 574 | duplciate packet is received. |
| 575 | |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 576 | examples |
| 577 | ======= |
| 578 | |
| 579 | ping test |
| 580 | -------- |
| 581 | Run the ping command against the public dns server 8.8.8.8:: |
| 582 | |
| 583 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ping 8.8.8.8 -c 1 |
| 584 | PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data. |
| 585 | 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=17.8 ms |
| 586 | |
| 587 | --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics --- |
| 588 | 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms |
| 589 | rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 17.875/17.875/17.875/0.000 ms |
| 590 | |
| 591 | The nstayt result:: |
| 592 | |
| 593 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat |
| 594 | #kernel |
| 595 | IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| 596 | IpInDelivers 1 0.0 |
| 597 | IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| 598 | IcmpInMsgs 1 0.0 |
| 599 | IcmpInEchoReps 1 0.0 |
| 600 | IcmpOutMsgs 1 0.0 |
| 601 | IcmpOutEchos 1 0.0 |
| 602 | IcmpMsgInType0 1 0.0 |
| 603 | IcmpMsgOutType8 1 0.0 |
| 604 | IpExtInOctets 84 0.0 |
| 605 | IpExtOutOctets 84 0.0 |
| 606 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| 607 | |
| 608 | The Linux server sent an ICMP Echo packet, so IpOutRequests, |
| 609 | IcmpOutMsgs, IcmpOutEchos and IcmpMsgOutType8 were increased 1. The |
| 610 | server got ICMP Echo Reply from 8.8.8.8, so IpInReceives, IcmpInMsgs, |
| 611 | IcmpInEchoReps and IcmpMsgInType0 were increased 1. The ICMP Echo Reply |
| 612 | was passed to the ICMP layer via IP layer, so IpInDelivers was |
| 613 | increased 1. The default ping data size is 48, so an ICMP Echo packet |
| 614 | and its corresponding Echo Reply packet are constructed by: |
| 615 | |
| 616 | * 14 bytes MAC header |
| 617 | * 20 bytes IP header |
| 618 | * 16 bytes ICMP header |
| 619 | * 48 bytes data (default value of the ping command) |
| 620 | |
| 621 | So the IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets are 20+16+48=84. |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 622 | |
| 623 | tcp 3-way handshake |
| 624 | ------------------ |
| 625 | On server side, we run:: |
| 626 | |
| 627 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lknv 0.0.0.0 9000 |
| 628 | Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) |
| 629 | |
| 630 | On client side, we run:: |
| 631 | |
| 632 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -nv 192.168.122.251 9000 |
| 633 | Connection to 192.168.122.251 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| 634 | |
| 635 | The server listened on tcp 9000 port, the client connected to it, they |
| 636 | completed the 3-way handshake. |
| 637 | |
| 638 | On server side, we can find below nstat output:: |
| 639 | |
| 640 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i tcp |
| 641 | TcpPassiveOpens 1 0.0 |
| 642 | TcpInSegs 2 0.0 |
| 643 | TcpOutSegs 1 0.0 |
| 644 | TcpExtTCPPureAcks 1 0.0 |
| 645 | |
| 646 | On client side, we can find below nstat output:: |
| 647 | |
| 648 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i tcp |
| 649 | TcpActiveOpens 1 0.0 |
| 650 | TcpInSegs 1 0.0 |
| 651 | TcpOutSegs 2 0.0 |
| 652 | |
| 653 | When the server received the first SYN, it replied a SYN+ACK, and came into |
| 654 | SYN-RCVD state, so TcpPassiveOpens increased 1. The server received |
| 655 | SYN, sent SYN+ACK, received ACK, so server sent 1 packet, received 2 |
| 656 | packets, TcpInSegs increased 2, TcpOutSegs increased 1. The last ACK |
| 657 | of the 3-way handshake is a pure ACK without data, so |
| 658 | TcpExtTCPPureAcks increased 1. |
| 659 | |
| 660 | When the client sent SYN, the client came into the SYN-SENT state, so |
| 661 | TcpActiveOpens increased 1, the client sent SYN, received SYN+ACK, sent |
| 662 | ACK, so client sent 2 packets, received 1 packet, TcpInSegs increased |
| 663 | 1, TcpOutSegs increased 2. |
| 664 | |
| 665 | TCP normal traffic |
| 666 | ----------------- |
| 667 | Run nc on server:: |
| 668 | |
| 669 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 0.0.0.0 9000 |
| 670 | Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) |
| 671 | |
| 672 | Run nc on client:: |
| 673 | |
| 674 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| 675 | Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| 676 | |
| 677 | Input a string in the nc client ('hello' in our example):: |
| 678 | |
| 679 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| 680 | Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| 681 | hello |
| 682 | |
| 683 | The client side nstat output:: |
| 684 | |
| 685 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat |
| 686 | #kernel |
| 687 | IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| 688 | IpInDelivers 1 0.0 |
| 689 | IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| 690 | TcpInSegs 1 0.0 |
| 691 | TcpOutSegs 1 0.0 |
| 692 | TcpExtTCPPureAcks 1 0.0 |
| 693 | TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent 1 0.0 |
| 694 | IpExtInOctets 52 0.0 |
| 695 | IpExtOutOctets 58 0.0 |
| 696 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| 697 | |
| 698 | The server side nstat output:: |
| 699 | |
| 700 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat |
| 701 | #kernel |
| 702 | IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| 703 | IpInDelivers 1 0.0 |
| 704 | IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| 705 | TcpInSegs 1 0.0 |
| 706 | TcpOutSegs 1 0.0 |
| 707 | IpExtInOctets 58 0.0 |
| 708 | IpExtOutOctets 52 0.0 |
| 709 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| 710 | |
| 711 | Input a string in nc client side again ('world' in our exmaple):: |
| 712 | |
| 713 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| 714 | Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| 715 | hello |
| 716 | world |
| 717 | |
| 718 | Client side nstat output:: |
| 719 | |
| 720 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat |
| 721 | #kernel |
| 722 | IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| 723 | IpInDelivers 1 0.0 |
| 724 | IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| 725 | TcpInSegs 1 0.0 |
| 726 | TcpOutSegs 1 0.0 |
| 727 | TcpExtTCPHPAcks 1 0.0 |
| 728 | TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent 1 0.0 |
| 729 | IpExtInOctets 52 0.0 |
| 730 | IpExtOutOctets 58 0.0 |
| 731 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| 732 | |
| 733 | |
| 734 | Server side nstat output:: |
| 735 | |
| 736 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat |
| 737 | #kernel |
| 738 | IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| 739 | IpInDelivers 1 0.0 |
| 740 | IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| 741 | TcpInSegs 1 0.0 |
| 742 | TcpOutSegs 1 0.0 |
| 743 | TcpExtTCPHPHits 1 0.0 |
| 744 | IpExtInOctets 58 0.0 |
| 745 | IpExtOutOctets 52 0.0 |
| 746 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| 747 | |
| 748 | Compare the first client-side nstat and the second client-side nstat, |
| 749 | we could find one difference: the first one had a 'TcpExtTCPPureAcks', |
| 750 | but the second one had a 'TcpExtTCPHPAcks'. The first server-side |
| 751 | nstat and the second server-side nstat had a difference too: the |
| 752 | second server-side nstat had a TcpExtTCPHPHits, but the first |
| 753 | server-side nstat didn't have it. The network traffic patterns were |
| 754 | exactly the same: the client sent a packet to the server, the server |
| 755 | replied an ACK. But kernel handled them in different ways. When the |
| 756 | TCP window scale option is not used, kernel will try to enable fast |
| 757 | path immediately when the connection comes into the established state, |
| 758 | but if the TCP window scale option is used, kernel will disable the |
| 759 | fast path at first, and try to enable it after kerenl receives |
| 760 | packets. We could use the 'ss' command to verify whether the window |
| 761 | scale option is used. e.g. run below command on either server or |
| 762 | client:: |
| 763 | |
| 764 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ss -o state established -i '( dport = :9000 or sport = :9000 ) |
| 765 | Netid Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port |
| 766 | tcp 0 0 192.168.122.250:40654 192.168.122.251:9000 |
| 767 | ts sack cubic wscale:7,7 rto:204 rtt:0.98/0.49 mss:1448 pmtu:1500 rcvmss:536 advmss:1448 cwnd:10 bytes_acked:1 segs_out:2 segs_in:1 send 118.2Mbps lastsnd:46572 lastrcv:46572 lastack:46572 pacing_rate 236.4Mbps rcv_space:29200 rcv_ssthresh:29200 minrtt:0.98 |
| 768 | |
| 769 | The 'wscale:7,7' means both server and client set the window scale |
| 770 | option to 7. Now we could explain the nstat output in our test: |
| 771 | |
| 772 | In the first nstat output of client side, the client sent a packet, server |
| 773 | reply an ACK, when kernel handled this ACK, the fast path was not |
| 774 | enabled, so the ACK was counted into 'TcpExtTCPPureAcks'. |
| 775 | |
| 776 | In the second nstat output of client side, the client sent a packet again, |
| 777 | and received another ACK from the server, in this time, the fast path is |
| 778 | enabled, and the ACK was qualified for fast path, so it was handled by |
| 779 | the fast path, so this ACK was counted into TcpExtTCPHPAcks. |
| 780 | |
| 781 | In the first nstat output of server side, fast path was not enabled, |
| 782 | so there was no 'TcpExtTCPHPHits'. |
| 783 | |
| 784 | In the second nstat output of server side, the fast path was enabled, |
| 785 | and the packet received from client qualified for fast path, so it |
| 786 | was counted into 'TcpExtTCPHPHits'. |
| 787 | |
| 788 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose |
| 789 | -------------------- |
| 790 | On the server side, we run below python script:: |
| 791 | |
| 792 | import socket |
| 793 | import time |
| 794 | |
| 795 | port = 9000 |
| 796 | |
| 797 | s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 798 | s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) |
| 799 | s.listen(1) |
| 800 | sock, addr = s.accept() |
| 801 | while True: |
| 802 | time.sleep(9999999) |
| 803 | |
| 804 | This python script listen on 9000 port, but doesn't read anything from |
| 805 | the connection. |
| 806 | |
| 807 | On the client side, we send the string "hello" by nc:: |
| 808 | |
| 809 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ echo "hello" | nc nstat-b 9000 |
| 810 | |
| 811 | Then, we come back to the server side, the server has received the "hello" |
| 812 | packet, and the TCP layer has acked this packet, but the application didn't |
| 813 | read it yet. We type Ctrl-C to terminate the server script. Then we |
| 814 | could find TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose increased 1 on the server side:: |
| 815 | |
| 816 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i abort |
| 817 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose 1 0.0 |
| 818 | |
| 819 | If we run tcpdump on the server side, we could find the server sent a |
| 820 | RST after we type Ctrl-C. |
| 821 | |
| 822 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory and TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout |
| 823 | ----------------------------------------------- |
| 824 | Below is an example which let the orphan socket count be higher than |
| 825 | net.ipv4.tcp_max_orphans. |
| 826 | Change tcp_max_orphans to a smaller value on client:: |
| 827 | |
| 828 | sudo bash -c "echo 10 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_orphans" |
| 829 | |
| 830 | Client code (create 64 connection to server):: |
| 831 | |
| 832 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ cat client_orphan.py |
| 833 | import socket |
| 834 | import time |
| 835 | |
| 836 | server = 'nstat-b' # server address |
| 837 | port = 9000 |
| 838 | |
| 839 | count = 64 |
| 840 | |
| 841 | connection_list = [] |
| 842 | |
| 843 | for i in range(64): |
| 844 | s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 845 | s.connect((server, port)) |
| 846 | connection_list.append(s) |
| 847 | print("connection_count: %d" % len(connection_list)) |
| 848 | |
| 849 | while True: |
| 850 | time.sleep(99999) |
| 851 | |
| 852 | Server code (accept 64 connection from client):: |
| 853 | |
| 854 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ cat server_orphan.py |
| 855 | import socket |
| 856 | import time |
| 857 | |
| 858 | port = 9000 |
| 859 | count = 64 |
| 860 | |
| 861 | s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 862 | s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) |
| 863 | s.listen(count) |
| 864 | connection_list = [] |
| 865 | while True: |
| 866 | sock, addr = s.accept() |
| 867 | connection_list.append((sock, addr)) |
| 868 | print("connection_count: %d" % len(connection_list)) |
| 869 | |
| 870 | Run the python scripts on server and client. |
| 871 | |
| 872 | On server:: |
| 873 | |
| 874 | python3 server_orphan.py |
| 875 | |
| 876 | On client:: |
| 877 | |
| 878 | python3 client_orphan.py |
| 879 | |
| 880 | Run iptables on server:: |
| 881 | |
| 882 | sudo iptables -A INPUT -i ens3 -p tcp --destination-port 9000 -j DROP |
| 883 | |
| 884 | Type Ctrl-C on client, stop client_orphan.py. |
| 885 | |
| 886 | Check TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory on client:: |
| 887 | |
| 888 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort |
| 889 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory 54 0.0 |
| 890 | |
| 891 | Check orphane socket count on client:: |
| 892 | |
| 893 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ss -s |
| 894 | Total: 131 (kernel 0) |
| 895 | TCP: 14 (estab 1, closed 0, orphaned 10, synrecv 0, timewait 0/0), ports 0 |
| 896 | |
| 897 | Transport Total IP IPv6 |
| 898 | * 0 - - |
| 899 | RAW 1 0 1 |
| 900 | UDP 1 1 0 |
| 901 | TCP 14 13 1 |
| 902 | INET 16 14 2 |
| 903 | FRAG 0 0 0 |
| 904 | |
| 905 | The explanation of the test: after run server_orphan.py and |
| 906 | client_orphan.py, we set up 64 connections between server and |
| 907 | client. Run the iptables command, the server will drop all packets from |
| 908 | the client, type Ctrl-C on client_orphan.py, the system of the client |
| 909 | would try to close these connections, and before they are closed |
| 910 | gracefully, these connections became orphan sockets. As the iptables |
| 911 | of the server blocked packets from the client, the server won't receive fin |
| 912 | from the client, so all connection on clients would be stuck on FIN_WAIT_1 |
| 913 | stage, so they will keep as orphan sockets until timeout. We have echo |
| 914 | 10 to /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_orphans, so the client system would |
| 915 | only keep 10 orphan sockets, for all other orphan sockets, the client |
| 916 | system sent RST for them and delete them. We have 64 connections, so |
| 917 | the 'ss -s' command shows the system has 10 orphan sockets, and the |
| 918 | value of TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory was 54. |
| 919 | |
| 920 | An additional explanation about orphan socket count: You could find the |
| 921 | exactly orphan socket count by the 'ss -s' command, but when kernel |
| 922 | decide whither increases TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory and sends RST, kernel |
| 923 | doesn't always check the exactly orphan socket count. For increasing |
| 924 | performance, kernel checks an approximate count firstly, if the |
| 925 | approximate count is more than tcp_max_orphans, kernel checks the |
| 926 | exact count again. So if the approximate count is less than |
| 927 | tcp_max_orphans, but exactly count is more than tcp_max_orphans, you |
| 928 | would find TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory is not increased at all. If |
| 929 | tcp_max_orphans is large enough, it won't occur, but if you decrease |
| 930 | tcp_max_orphans to a small value like our test, you might find this |
| 931 | issue. So in our test, the client set up 64 connections although the |
| 932 | tcp_max_orphans is 10. If the client only set up 11 connections, we |
| 933 | can't find the change of TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory. |
| 934 | |
| 935 | Continue the previous test, we wait for several minutes. Because of the |
| 936 | iptables on the server blocked the traffic, the server wouldn't receive |
| 937 | fin, and all the client's orphan sockets would timeout on the |
| 938 | FIN_WAIT_1 state finally. So we wait for a few minutes, we could find |
| 939 | 10 timeout on the client:: |
| 940 | |
| 941 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort |
| 942 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout 10 0.0 |
| 943 | |
| 944 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger |
| 945 | --------------------- |
| 946 | The server side code:: |
| 947 | |
| 948 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ cat server_linger.py |
| 949 | import socket |
| 950 | import time |
| 951 | |
| 952 | port = 9000 |
| 953 | |
| 954 | s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 955 | s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) |
| 956 | s.listen(1) |
| 957 | sock, addr = s.accept() |
| 958 | while True: |
| 959 | time.sleep(9999999) |
| 960 | |
| 961 | The client side code:: |
| 962 | |
| 963 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ cat client_linger.py |
| 964 | import socket |
| 965 | import struct |
| 966 | |
| 967 | server = 'nstat-b' # server address |
| 968 | port = 9000 |
| 969 | |
| 970 | s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 971 | s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_LINGER, struct.pack('ii', 1, 10)) |
| 972 | s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_TCP, socket.TCP_LINGER2, struct.pack('i', -1)) |
| 973 | s.connect((server, port)) |
| 974 | s.close() |
| 975 | |
| 976 | Run server_linger.py on server:: |
| 977 | |
| 978 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ python3 server_linger.py |
| 979 | |
| 980 | Run client_linger.py on client:: |
| 981 | |
| 982 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ python3 client_linger.py |
| 983 | |
| 984 | After run client_linger.py, check the output of nstat:: |
| 985 | |
| 986 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort |
| 987 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger 1 0.0 |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 988 | |
| 989 | TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce |
| 990 | ------------------- |
| 991 | On the server, we run a program which listen on TCP port 9000, but |
| 992 | doesn't read any data:: |
| 993 | |
| 994 | import socket |
| 995 | import time |
| 996 | port = 9000 |
| 997 | s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 998 | s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) |
| 999 | s.listen(1) |
| 1000 | sock, addr = s.accept() |
| 1001 | while True: |
| 1002 | time.sleep(9999999) |
| 1003 | |
| 1004 | Save the above code as server_coalesce.py, and run:: |
| 1005 | |
| 1006 | python3 server_coalesce.py |
| 1007 | |
| 1008 | On the client, save below code as client_coalesce.py:: |
| 1009 | |
| 1010 | import socket |
| 1011 | server = 'nstat-b' |
| 1012 | port = 9000 |
| 1013 | s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 1014 | s.connect((server, port)) |
| 1015 | |
| 1016 | Run:: |
| 1017 | |
| 1018 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ python3 -i client_coalesce.py |
| 1019 | |
| 1020 | We use '-i' to come into the interactive mode, then a packet:: |
| 1021 | |
| 1022 | >>> s.send(b'foo') |
| 1023 | 3 |
| 1024 | |
| 1025 | Send a packet again:: |
| 1026 | |
| 1027 | >>> s.send(b'bar') |
| 1028 | 3 |
| 1029 | |
| 1030 | On the server, run nstat:: |
| 1031 | |
| 1032 | ubuntu@nstat-b:~$ nstat |
| 1033 | #kernel |
| 1034 | IpInReceives 2 0.0 |
| 1035 | IpInDelivers 2 0.0 |
| 1036 | IpOutRequests 2 0.0 |
| 1037 | TcpInSegs 2 0.0 |
| 1038 | TcpOutSegs 2 0.0 |
| 1039 | TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce 1 0.0 |
| 1040 | IpExtInOctets 110 0.0 |
| 1041 | IpExtOutOctets 104 0.0 |
| 1042 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 2 0.0 |
| 1043 | |
| 1044 | The client sent two packets, server didn't read any data. When |
| 1045 | the second packet arrived at server, the first packet was still in |
| 1046 | the receiving queue. So the TCP layer merged the two packets, and we |
| 1047 | could find the TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce increased 1. |
| 1048 | |
| 1049 | TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops |
| 1050 | ---------------------------------------- |
| 1051 | On server, run the nc command, listen on port 9000:: |
| 1052 | |
| 1053 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 0.0.0.0 9000 |
| 1054 | Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) |
| 1055 | |
| 1056 | On client, run 3 nc commands in different terminals:: |
| 1057 | |
| 1058 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| 1059 | Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| 1060 | |
| 1061 | The nc command only accepts 1 connection, and the accept queue length |
| 1062 | is 1. On current linux implementation, set queue length to n means the |
| 1063 | actual queue length is n+1. Now we create 3 connections, 1 is accepted |
| 1064 | by nc, 2 in accepted queue, so the accept queue is full. |
| 1065 | |
| 1066 | Before running the 4th nc, we clean the nstat history on the server:: |
| 1067 | |
| 1068 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat -n |
| 1069 | |
| 1070 | Run the 4th nc on the client:: |
| 1071 | |
| 1072 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| 1073 | |
| 1074 | If the nc server is running on kernel 4.10 or higher version, you |
| 1075 | won't see the "Connection to ... succeeded!" string, because kernel |
| 1076 | will drop the SYN if the accept queue is full. If the nc client is running |
| 1077 | on an old kernel, you would see that the connection is succeeded, |
| 1078 | because kernel would complete the 3 way handshake and keep the socket |
| 1079 | on half open queue. I did the test on kernel 4.15. Below is the nstat |
| 1080 | on the server:: |
| 1081 | |
| 1082 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat |
| 1083 | #kernel |
| 1084 | IpInReceives 4 0.0 |
| 1085 | IpInDelivers 4 0.0 |
| 1086 | TcpInSegs 4 0.0 |
| 1087 | TcpExtListenOverflows 4 0.0 |
| 1088 | TcpExtListenDrops 4 0.0 |
| 1089 | IpExtInOctets 240 0.0 |
| 1090 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 4 0.0 |
| 1091 | |
| 1092 | Both TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops were 4. If the time |
| 1093 | between the 4th nc and the nstat was longer, the value of |
| 1094 | TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops would be larger, because |
| 1095 | the SYN of the 4th nc was dropped, the client was retrying. |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 1096 | |
| 1097 | IpInAddrErrors, IpExtInNoRoutes and IpOutNoRoutes |
| 1098 | ---------------------------------------------- |
| 1099 | server A IP address: 192.168.122.250 |
| 1100 | server B IP address: 192.168.122.251 |
| 1101 | Prepare on server A, add a route to server B:: |
| 1102 | |
| 1103 | $ sudo ip route add 8.8.8.8/32 via 192.168.122.251 |
| 1104 | |
| 1105 | Prepare on server B, disable send_redirects for all interfaces:: |
| 1106 | |
| 1107 | $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.send_redirects=0 |
| 1108 | $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.ens3.send_redirects=0 |
| 1109 | $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.lo.send_redirects=0 |
| 1110 | $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.default.send_redirects=0 |
| 1111 | |
| 1112 | We want to let sever A send a packet to 8.8.8.8, and route the packet |
| 1113 | to server B. When server B receives such packet, it might send a ICMP |
| 1114 | Redirect message to server A, set send_redirects to 0 will disable |
| 1115 | this behavior. |
| 1116 | |
| 1117 | First, generate InAddrErrors. On server B, we disable IP forwarding:: |
| 1118 | |
| 1119 | $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=0 |
| 1120 | |
| 1121 | On server A, we send packets to 8.8.8.8:: |
| 1122 | |
| 1123 | $ nc -v 8.8.8.8 53 |
| 1124 | |
| 1125 | On server B, we check the output of nstat:: |
| 1126 | |
| 1127 | $ nstat |
| 1128 | #kernel |
| 1129 | IpInReceives 3 0.0 |
| 1130 | IpInAddrErrors 3 0.0 |
| 1131 | IpExtInOctets 180 0.0 |
| 1132 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 3 0.0 |
| 1133 | |
| 1134 | As we have let server A route 8.8.8.8 to server B, and we disabled IP |
| 1135 | forwarding on server B, Server A sent packets to server B, then server B |
| 1136 | dropped packets and increased IpInAddrErrors. As the nc command would |
| 1137 | re-send the SYN packet if it didn't receive a SYN+ACK, we could find |
| 1138 | multiple IpInAddrErrors. |
| 1139 | |
| 1140 | Second, generate IpExtInNoRoutes. On server B, we enable IP |
| 1141 | forwarding:: |
| 1142 | |
| 1143 | $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=1 |
| 1144 | |
| 1145 | Check the route table of server B and remove the default route:: |
| 1146 | |
| 1147 | $ ip route show |
| 1148 | default via 192.168.122.1 dev ens3 proto static |
| 1149 | 192.168.122.0/24 dev ens3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.122.251 |
| 1150 | $ sudo ip route delete default via 192.168.122.1 dev ens3 proto static |
| 1151 | |
| 1152 | On server A, we contact 8.8.8.8 again:: |
| 1153 | |
| 1154 | $ nc -v 8.8.8.8 53 |
| 1155 | nc: connect to 8.8.8.8 port 53 (tcp) failed: Network is unreachable |
| 1156 | |
| 1157 | On server B, run nstat:: |
| 1158 | |
| 1159 | $ nstat |
| 1160 | #kernel |
| 1161 | IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| 1162 | IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| 1163 | IcmpOutMsgs 1 0.0 |
| 1164 | IcmpOutDestUnreachs 1 0.0 |
| 1165 | IcmpMsgOutType3 1 0.0 |
| 1166 | IpExtInNoRoutes 1 0.0 |
| 1167 | IpExtInOctets 60 0.0 |
| 1168 | IpExtOutOctets 88 0.0 |
| 1169 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| 1170 | |
| 1171 | We enabled IP forwarding on server B, when server B received a packet |
| 1172 | which destination IP address is 8.8.8.8, server B will try to forward |
| 1173 | this packet. We have deleted the default route, there was no route for |
| 1174 | 8.8.8.8, so server B increase IpExtInNoRoutes and sent the "ICMP |
| 1175 | Destination Unreachable" message to server A. |
| 1176 | |
| 1177 | Third, generate IpOutNoRoutes. Run ping command on server B:: |
| 1178 | |
| 1179 | $ ping -c 1 8.8.8.8 |
| 1180 | connect: Network is unreachable |
| 1181 | |
| 1182 | Run nstat on server B:: |
| 1183 | |
| 1184 | $ nstat |
| 1185 | #kernel |
| 1186 | IpOutNoRoutes 1 0.0 |
| 1187 | |
| 1188 | We have deleted the default route on server B. Server B couldn't find |
| 1189 | a route for the 8.8.8.8 IP address, so server B increased |
| 1190 | IpOutNoRoutes. |