blob: 8965446f0b71e9e82d9505fd3c1b8a05e352a5bd [file] [log] [blame]
Kees Cook84253c82018-10-17 16:45:32 -07001.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
2
Federico Vaga98348572019-02-24 21:05:27 +01003.. _deprecated:
4
Kees Cook84253c82018-10-17 16:45:32 -07005=====================================================================
6Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes, and Conventions
7=====================================================================
8
9In a perfect world, it would be possible to convert all instances of
10some deprecated API into the new API and entirely remove the old API in
11a single development cycle. However, due to the size of the kernel, the
12maintainership hierarchy, and timing, it's not always feasible to do these
13kinds of conversions at once. This means that new instances may sneak into
14the kernel while old ones are being removed, only making the amount of
15work to remove the API grow. In order to educate developers about what
16has been deprecated and why, this list has been created as a place to
17point when uses of deprecated things are proposed for inclusion in the
18kernel.
19
20__deprecated
21------------
22While this attribute does visually mark an interface as deprecated,
23it `does not produce warnings during builds any more
24<https://git.kernel.org/linus/771c035372a036f83353eef46dbb829780330234>`_
25because one of the standing goals of the kernel is to build without
26warnings and no one was actually doing anything to remove these deprecated
27interfaces. While using `__deprecated` is nice to note an old API in
28a header file, it isn't the full solution. Such interfaces must either
29be fully removed from the kernel, or added to this file to discourage
30others from using them in the future.
31
32open-coded arithmetic in allocator arguments
33--------------------------------------------
34Dynamic size calculations (especially multiplication) should not be
35performed in memory allocator (or similar) function arguments due to the
36risk of them overflowing. This could lead to values wrapping around and a
37smaller allocation being made than the caller was expecting. Using those
38allocations could lead to linear overflows of heap memory and other
39misbehaviors. (One exception to this is literal values where the compiler
40can warn if they might overflow. Though using literals for arguments as
41suggested below is also harmless.)
42
43For example, do not use ``count * size`` as an argument, as in::
44
45 foo = kmalloc(count * size, GFP_KERNEL);
46
47Instead, the 2-factor form of the allocator should be used::
48
49 foo = kmalloc_array(count, size, GFP_KERNEL);
50
51If no 2-factor form is available, the saturate-on-overflow helpers should
52be used::
53
54 bar = vmalloc(array_size(count, size));
55
56Another common case to avoid is calculating the size of a structure with
57a trailing array of others structures, as in::
58
59 header = kzalloc(sizeof(*header) + count * sizeof(*header->item),
60 GFP_KERNEL);
61
62Instead, use the helper::
63
64 header = kzalloc(struct_size(header, item, count), GFP_KERNEL);
65
66See :c:func:`array_size`, :c:func:`array3_size`, and :c:func:`struct_size`,
67for more details as well as the related :c:func:`check_add_overflow` and
68:c:func:`check_mul_overflow` family of functions.
69
70simple_strtol(), simple_strtoll(), simple_strtoul(), simple_strtoull()
71----------------------------------------------------------------------
72The :c:func:`simple_strtol`, :c:func:`simple_strtoll`,
73:c:func:`simple_strtoul`, and :c:func:`simple_strtoull` functions
74explicitly ignore overflows, which may lead to unexpected results
75in callers. The respective :c:func:`kstrtol`, :c:func:`kstrtoll`,
76:c:func:`kstrtoul`, and :c:func:`kstrtoull` functions tend to be the
77correct replacements, though note that those require the string to be
78NUL or newline terminated.
79
80strcpy()
81--------
82:c:func:`strcpy` performs no bounds checking on the destination
83buffer. This could result in linear overflows beyond the
84end of the buffer, leading to all kinds of misbehaviors. While
85`CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y` and various compiler flags help reduce the
86risk of using this function, there is no good reason to add new uses of
87this function. The safe replacement is :c:func:`strscpy`.
88
89strncpy() on NUL-terminated strings
90-----------------------------------
91Use of :c:func:`strncpy` does not guarantee that the destination buffer
92will be NUL terminated. This can lead to various linear read overflows
93and other misbehavior due to the missing termination. It also NUL-pads the
94destination buffer if the source contents are shorter than the destination
95buffer size, which may be a needless performance penalty for callers using
96only NUL-terminated strings. The safe replacement is :c:func:`strscpy`.
Kees Cook76136e02020-03-04 11:03:24 -080097(Users of :c:func:`strscpy` still needing NUL-padding should instead
98use strscpy_pad().)
Kees Cook84253c82018-10-17 16:45:32 -070099
100If a caller is using non-NUL-terminated strings, :c:func:`strncpy()` can
101still be used, but destinations should be marked with the `__nonstring
102<https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Variable-Attributes.html>`_
103attribute to avoid future compiler warnings.
104
105strlcpy()
106---------
107:c:func:`strlcpy` reads the entire source buffer first, possibly exceeding
108the given limit of bytes to copy. This is inefficient and can lead to
109linear read overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated. The
110safe replacement is :c:func:`strscpy`.
111
Kees Cookd8401f52020-03-04 23:03:47 -0800112%p format specifier
113-------------------
114Traditionally, using "%p" in format strings would lead to regular address
115exposure flaws in dmesg, proc, sysfs, etc. Instead of leaving these to
116be exploitable, all "%p" uses in the kernel are being printed as a hashed
117value, rendering them unusable for addressing. New uses of "%p" should not
118be added to the kernel. For text addresses, using "%pS" is likely better,
119as it produces the more useful symbol name instead. For nearly everything
120else, just do not add "%p" at all.
121
122Paraphrasing Linus's current `guidance <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwQEd_d40g4mUCSsVRZzrFPUJt74vc6PPpb675hYNXcKw@mail.gmail.com/>`_:
123
124- If the hashed "%p" value is pointless, ask yourself whether the pointer
125 itself is important. Maybe it should be removed entirely?
126- If you really think the true pointer value is important, why is some
127 system state or user privilege level considered "special"? If you think
128 you can justify it (in comments and commit log) well enough to stand
129 up to Linus's scrutiny, maybe you can use "%px", along with making sure
130 you have sensible permissions.
131
132And finally, know that a toggle for "%p" hashing will `not be accepted <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwieC1-nAs+NFq9RTwaR8ef9hWa4MjNBWL41F-8wM49eA@mail.gmail.com/>`_.
133
Kees Cook84253c82018-10-17 16:45:32 -0700134Variable Length Arrays (VLAs)
135-----------------------------
136Using stack VLAs produces much worse machine code than statically
137sized stack arrays. While these non-trivial `performance issues
138<https://git.kernel.org/linus/02361bc77888>`_ are reason enough to
139eliminate VLAs, they are also a security risk. Dynamic growth of a stack
140array may exceed the remaining memory in the stack segment. This could
141lead to a crash, possible overwriting sensitive contents at the end of the
142stack (when built without `CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK=y`), or overwriting
143memory adjacent to the stack (when built without `CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y`)
Gustavo A. R. Silvaa035d552019-06-06 19:46:17 -0500144
145Implicit switch case fall-through
146---------------------------------
Kees Cook76136e02020-03-04 11:03:24 -0800147The C language allows switch cases to fall through to the next case
148when a "break" statement is missing at the end of a case. This, however,
149introduces ambiguity in the code, as it's not always clear if the missing
150break is intentional or a bug. For example, it's not obvious just from
151looking at the code if `STATE_ONE` is intentionally designed to fall
152through into `STATE_TWO`::
153
154 switch (value) {
155 case STATE_ONE:
156 do_something();
157 case STATE_TWO:
158 do_other();
159 break;
160 default:
161 WARN("unknown state");
162 }
Joe Perchesb9918bd2019-10-05 09:46:43 -0700163
164As there have been a long list of flaws `due to missing "break" statements
Gustavo A. R. Silvaa035d552019-06-06 19:46:17 -0500165<https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/484.html>`_, we no longer allow
Kees Cook76136e02020-03-04 11:03:24 -0800166implicit fall-through. In order to identify intentional fall-through
167cases, we have adopted a pseudo-keyword macro "fallthrough" which
168expands to gcc's extension `__attribute__((__fallthrough__))
169<https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Statement-Attributes.html>`_.
170(When the C17/C18 `[[fallthrough]]` syntax is more commonly supported by
Joe Perchesb9918bd2019-10-05 09:46:43 -0700171C compilers, static analyzers, and IDEs, we can switch to using that syntax
Kees Cook76136e02020-03-04 11:03:24 -0800172for the macro pseudo-keyword.)
Joe Perchesb9918bd2019-10-05 09:46:43 -0700173
174All switch/case blocks must end in one of:
175
Kees Cook76136e02020-03-04 11:03:24 -0800176* break;
177* fallthrough;
178* continue;
179* goto <label>;
180* return [expression];