Greg Kroah-Hartman | e2be04c | 2017-11-01 15:09:13 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note */ |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 2 | /* |
| 3 | * FC Transport BSG Interface |
| 4 | * |
| 5 | * Copyright (C) 2008 James Smart, Emulex Corporation |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 6 | */ |
| 7 | |
| 8 | #ifndef SCSI_BSG_FC_H |
| 9 | #define SCSI_BSG_FC_H |
| 10 | |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 11 | #include <linux/types.h> |
| 12 | |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 13 | /* |
| 14 | * This file intended to be included by both kernel and user space |
| 15 | */ |
| 16 | |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 17 | /* |
| 18 | * FC Transport SGIO v4 BSG Message Support |
| 19 | */ |
| 20 | |
| 21 | /* Default BSG request timeout (in seconds) */ |
| 22 | #define FC_DEFAULT_BSG_TIMEOUT (10 * HZ) |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | /* |
| 26 | * Request Message Codes supported by the FC Transport |
| 27 | */ |
| 28 | |
| 29 | /* define the class masks for the message codes */ |
| 30 | #define FC_BSG_CLS_MASK 0xF0000000 /* find object class */ |
| 31 | #define FC_BSG_HST_MASK 0x80000000 /* fc host class */ |
| 32 | #define FC_BSG_RPT_MASK 0x40000000 /* fc rport class */ |
| 33 | |
| 34 | /* fc_host Message Codes */ |
| 35 | #define FC_BSG_HST_ADD_RPORT (FC_BSG_HST_MASK | 0x00000001) |
| 36 | #define FC_BSG_HST_DEL_RPORT (FC_BSG_HST_MASK | 0x00000002) |
| 37 | #define FC_BSG_HST_ELS_NOLOGIN (FC_BSG_HST_MASK | 0x00000003) |
| 38 | #define FC_BSG_HST_CT (FC_BSG_HST_MASK | 0x00000004) |
| 39 | #define FC_BSG_HST_VENDOR (FC_BSG_HST_MASK | 0x000000FF) |
| 40 | |
| 41 | /* fc_rport Message Codes */ |
| 42 | #define FC_BSG_RPT_ELS (FC_BSG_RPT_MASK | 0x00000001) |
| 43 | #define FC_BSG_RPT_CT (FC_BSG_RPT_MASK | 0x00000002) |
| 44 | |
| 45 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | /* |
| 48 | * FC Address Identifiers in Message Structures : |
| 49 | * |
| 50 | * Whenever a command payload contains a FC Address Identifier |
| 51 | * (aka port_id), the value is effectively in big-endian |
| 52 | * order, thus the array elements are decoded as follows: |
| 53 | * element [0] is bits 23:16 of the FC Address Identifier |
| 54 | * element [1] is bits 15:8 of the FC Address Identifier |
| 55 | * element [2] is bits 7:0 of the FC Address Identifier |
| 56 | */ |
| 57 | |
| 58 | |
| 59 | /* |
| 60 | * FC Host Messages |
| 61 | */ |
| 62 | |
| 63 | /* FC_BSG_HST_ADDR_PORT : */ |
| 64 | |
| 65 | /* Request: |
| 66 | * This message requests the FC host to login to the remote port |
| 67 | * at the specified N_Port_Id. The remote port is to be enumerated |
| 68 | * with the transport upon completion of the login. |
| 69 | */ |
| 70 | struct fc_bsg_host_add_rport { |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 71 | __u8 reserved; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 72 | |
| 73 | /* FC Address Identier of the remote port to login to */ |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 74 | __u8 port_id[3]; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 75 | }; |
| 76 | |
| 77 | /* Response: |
| 78 | * There is no additional response data - fc_bsg_reply->result is sufficient |
| 79 | */ |
| 80 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | /* FC_BSG_HST_DEL_RPORT : */ |
| 83 | |
| 84 | /* Request: |
| 85 | * This message requests the FC host to remove an enumerated |
| 86 | * remote port and to terminate the login to it. |
| 87 | * |
| 88 | * Note: The driver is free to reject this request if it desires to |
| 89 | * remain logged in with the remote port. |
| 90 | */ |
| 91 | struct fc_bsg_host_del_rport { |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 92 | __u8 reserved; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 93 | |
| 94 | /* FC Address Identier of the remote port to logout of */ |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 95 | __u8 port_id[3]; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 96 | }; |
| 97 | |
| 98 | /* Response: |
| 99 | * There is no additional response data - fc_bsg_reply->result is sufficient |
| 100 | */ |
| 101 | |
| 102 | |
| 103 | /* FC_BSG_HST_ELS_NOLOGIN : */ |
| 104 | |
| 105 | /* Request: |
| 106 | * This message requests the FC_Host to send an ELS to a specific |
| 107 | * N_Port_ID. The host does not need to log into the remote port, |
| 108 | * nor does it need to enumerate the rport for further traffic |
| 109 | * (although, the FC host is free to do so if it desires). |
| 110 | */ |
| 111 | struct fc_bsg_host_els { |
| 112 | /* |
| 113 | * ELS Command Code being sent (must be the same as byte 0 |
| 114 | * of the payload) |
| 115 | */ |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 116 | __u8 command_code; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 117 | |
| 118 | /* FC Address Identier of the remote port to send the ELS to */ |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 119 | __u8 port_id[3]; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 120 | }; |
| 121 | |
| 122 | /* Response: |
| 123 | */ |
| 124 | /* fc_bsg_ctels_reply->status values */ |
| 125 | #define FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK 0x00000000 |
| 126 | #define FC_CTELS_STATUS_REJECT 0x00000001 |
| 127 | #define FC_CTELS_STATUS_P_RJT 0x00000002 |
| 128 | #define FC_CTELS_STATUS_F_RJT 0x00000003 |
| 129 | #define FC_CTELS_STATUS_P_BSY 0x00000004 |
| 130 | #define FC_CTELS_STATUS_F_BSY 0x00000006 |
| 131 | struct fc_bsg_ctels_reply { |
| 132 | /* |
| 133 | * Note: An ELS LS_RJT may be reported in 2 ways: |
| 134 | * a) A status of FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK is returned. The caller |
| 135 | * is to look into the ELS receive payload to determine |
| 136 | * LS_ACC or LS_RJT (by contents of word 0). The reject |
| 137 | * data will be in word 1. |
| 138 | * b) A status of FC_CTELS_STATUS_REJECT is returned, The |
| 139 | * rjt_data field will contain valid data. |
| 140 | * |
| 141 | * Note: ELS LS_ACC is determined by an FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK, and |
| 142 | * the receive payload word 0 indicates LS_ACC |
| 143 | * (e.g. value is 0x02xxxxxx). |
| 144 | * |
| 145 | * Note: Similarly, a CT Reject may be reported in 2 ways: |
| 146 | * a) A status of FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK is returned. The caller |
| 147 | * is to look into the CT receive payload to determine |
| 148 | * Accept or Reject (by contents of word 2). The reject |
| 149 | * data will be in word 3. |
| 150 | * b) A status of FC_CTELS_STATUS_REJECT is returned, The |
| 151 | * rjt_data field will contain valid data. |
| 152 | * |
| 153 | * Note: x_RJT/BSY status will indicae that the rjt_data field |
| 154 | * is valid and contains the reason/explanation values. |
| 155 | */ |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 156 | __u32 status; /* See FC_CTELS_STATUS_xxx */ |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 157 | |
| 158 | /* valid if status is not FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK */ |
| 159 | struct { |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 160 | __u8 action; /* fragment_id for CT REJECT */ |
| 161 | __u8 reason_code; |
| 162 | __u8 reason_explanation; |
| 163 | __u8 vendor_unique; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 164 | } rjt_data; |
| 165 | }; |
| 166 | |
| 167 | |
| 168 | /* FC_BSG_HST_CT : */ |
| 169 | |
| 170 | /* Request: |
| 171 | * This message requests that a CT Request be performed with the |
| 172 | * indicated N_Port_ID. The driver is responsible for logging in with |
| 173 | * the fabric and/or N_Port_ID, etc as per FC rules. This request does |
| 174 | * not mandate that the driver must enumerate the destination in the |
| 175 | * transport. The driver is allowed to decide whether to enumerate it, |
| 176 | * and whether to tear it down after the request. |
| 177 | */ |
| 178 | struct fc_bsg_host_ct { |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 179 | __u8 reserved; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 180 | |
| 181 | /* FC Address Identier of the remote port to send the ELS to */ |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 182 | __u8 port_id[3]; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 183 | |
| 184 | /* |
| 185 | * We need words 0-2 of the generic preamble for the LLD's |
| 186 | */ |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 187 | __u32 preamble_word0; /* revision & IN_ID */ |
| 188 | __u32 preamble_word1; /* GS_Type, GS_SubType, Options, Rsvd */ |
| 189 | __u32 preamble_word2; /* Cmd Code, Max Size */ |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 190 | |
| 191 | }; |
| 192 | /* Response: |
| 193 | * |
| 194 | * The reply structure is an fc_bsg_ctels_reply structure |
| 195 | */ |
| 196 | |
| 197 | |
| 198 | /* FC_BSG_HST_VENDOR : */ |
| 199 | |
| 200 | /* Request: |
| 201 | * Note: When specifying vendor_id, be sure to read the Vendor Type and ID |
| 202 | * formatting requirements specified in scsi_netlink.h |
| 203 | */ |
| 204 | struct fc_bsg_host_vendor { |
| 205 | /* |
| 206 | * Identifies the vendor that the message is formatted for. This |
| 207 | * should be the recipient of the message. |
| 208 | */ |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 209 | __u64 vendor_id; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 210 | |
| 211 | /* start of vendor command area */ |
Gustavo A. R. Silva | 1e6e9d0 | 2020-04-24 10:50:00 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 212 | __u32 vendor_cmd[0]; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 213 | }; |
| 214 | |
| 215 | /* Response: |
| 216 | */ |
| 217 | struct fc_bsg_host_vendor_reply { |
| 218 | /* start of vendor response area */ |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 219 | __u32 vendor_rsp[0]; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 220 | }; |
| 221 | |
| 222 | |
| 223 | |
| 224 | /* |
| 225 | * FC Remote Port Messages |
| 226 | */ |
| 227 | |
| 228 | /* FC_BSG_RPT_ELS : */ |
| 229 | |
| 230 | /* Request: |
| 231 | * This message requests that an ELS be performed with the rport. |
| 232 | */ |
| 233 | struct fc_bsg_rport_els { |
| 234 | /* |
| 235 | * ELS Command Code being sent (must be the same as |
| 236 | * byte 0 of the payload) |
| 237 | */ |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 238 | __u8 els_code; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 239 | }; |
| 240 | |
| 241 | /* Response: |
| 242 | * |
| 243 | * The reply structure is an fc_bsg_ctels_reply structure |
| 244 | */ |
| 245 | |
| 246 | |
| 247 | /* FC_BSG_RPT_CT : */ |
| 248 | |
| 249 | /* Request: |
| 250 | * This message requests that a CT Request be performed with the rport. |
| 251 | */ |
| 252 | struct fc_bsg_rport_ct { |
| 253 | /* |
| 254 | * We need words 0-2 of the generic preamble for the LLD's |
| 255 | */ |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 256 | __u32 preamble_word0; /* revision & IN_ID */ |
| 257 | __u32 preamble_word1; /* GS_Type, GS_SubType, Options, Rsvd */ |
| 258 | __u32 preamble_word2; /* Cmd Code, Max Size */ |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 259 | }; |
| 260 | /* Response: |
| 261 | * |
| 262 | * The reply structure is an fc_bsg_ctels_reply structure |
| 263 | */ |
| 264 | |
| 265 | |
| 266 | |
| 267 | |
| 268 | /* request (CDB) structure of the sg_io_v4 */ |
| 269 | struct fc_bsg_request { |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 270 | __u32 msgcode; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 271 | union { |
| 272 | struct fc_bsg_host_add_rport h_addrport; |
| 273 | struct fc_bsg_host_del_rport h_delrport; |
| 274 | struct fc_bsg_host_els h_els; |
| 275 | struct fc_bsg_host_ct h_ct; |
| 276 | struct fc_bsg_host_vendor h_vendor; |
| 277 | |
| 278 | struct fc_bsg_rport_els r_els; |
| 279 | struct fc_bsg_rport_ct r_ct; |
| 280 | } rqst_data; |
Harish Zunjarrao | eda05a2 | 2010-01-12 12:59:50 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 281 | } __attribute__((packed)); |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 282 | |
| 283 | |
| 284 | /* response (request sense data) structure of the sg_io_v4 */ |
| 285 | struct fc_bsg_reply { |
| 286 | /* |
| 287 | * The completion result. Result exists in two forms: |
| 288 | * if negative, it is an -Exxx system errno value. There will |
| 289 | * be no further reply information supplied. |
| 290 | * else, it's the 4-byte scsi error result, with driver, host, |
| 291 | * msg and status fields. The per-msgcode reply structure |
| 292 | * will contain valid data. |
| 293 | */ |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 294 | __u32 result; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 295 | |
| 296 | /* If there was reply_payload, how much was recevied ? */ |
Masahiro Yamada | 075c2b6 | 2019-07-21 23:25:02 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 297 | __u32 reply_payload_rcv_len; |
James Smart | 9e4f5e2 | 2009-03-26 13:33:19 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 298 | |
| 299 | union { |
| 300 | struct fc_bsg_host_vendor_reply vendor_reply; |
| 301 | |
| 302 | struct fc_bsg_ctels_reply ctels_reply; |
| 303 | } reply_data; |
| 304 | }; |
| 305 | |
| 306 | |
| 307 | #endif /* SCSI_BSG_FC_H */ |
| 308 | |