Steven Rostedt | a6537be | 2006-06-27 02:54:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | RT-mutex subsystem with PI support |
| 2 | ---------------------------------- |
| 3 | |
| 4 | RT-mutexes with priority inheritance are used to support PI-futexes, |
| 5 | which enable pthread_mutex_t priority inheritance attributes |
| 6 | (PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT). [See Documentation/pi-futex.txt for more details |
| 7 | about PI-futexes.] |
| 8 | |
| 9 | This technology was developed in the -rt tree and streamlined for |
| 10 | pthread_mutex support. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Basic principles: |
| 13 | ----------------- |
| 14 | |
| 15 | RT-mutexes extend the semantics of simple mutexes by the priority |
| 16 | inheritance protocol. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | A low priority owner of a rt-mutex inherits the priority of a higher |
| 19 | priority waiter until the rt-mutex is released. If the temporarily |
| 20 | boosted owner blocks on a rt-mutex itself it propagates the priority |
| 21 | boosting to the owner of the other rt_mutex it gets blocked on. The |
| 22 | priority boosting is immediately removed once the rt_mutex has been |
| 23 | unlocked. |
| 24 | |
| 25 | This approach allows us to shorten the block of high-prio tasks on |
| 26 | mutexes which protect shared resources. Priority inheritance is not a |
| 27 | magic bullet for poorly designed applications, but it allows |
| 28 | well-designed applications to use userspace locks in critical parts of |
| 29 | an high priority thread, without losing determinism. |
| 30 | |
Alex Shi | 68a1e34 | 2017-07-31 09:50:54 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 31 | The enqueueing of the waiters into the rtmutex waiter tree is done in |
Steven Rostedt | a6537be | 2006-06-27 02:54:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 32 | priority order. For same priorities FIFO order is chosen. For each |
| 33 | rtmutex, only the top priority waiter is enqueued into the owner's |
Alex Shi | 68a1e34 | 2017-07-31 09:50:54 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 34 | priority waiters tree. This tree too queues in priority order. Whenever |
Steven Rostedt | a6537be | 2006-06-27 02:54:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 35 | the top priority waiter of a task changes (for example it timed out or |
Alex Shi | 68a1e34 | 2017-07-31 09:50:54 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 36 | got a signal), the priority of the owner task is readjusted. The |
| 37 | priority enqueueing is handled by "pi_waiters". |
Steven Rostedt | a6537be | 2006-06-27 02:54:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 38 | |
| 39 | RT-mutexes are optimized for fastpath operations and have no internal |
| 40 | locking overhead when locking an uncontended mutex or unlocking a mutex |
| 41 | without waiters. The optimized fastpath operations require cmpxchg |
| 42 | support. [If that is not available then the rt-mutex internal spinlock |
| 43 | is used] |
| 44 | |
| 45 | The state of the rt-mutex is tracked via the owner field of the rt-mutex |
| 46 | structure: |
| 47 | |
Alex Shi | 68a1e34 | 2017-07-31 09:50:54 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 48 | lock->owner holds the task_struct pointer of the owner. Bit 0 is used to |
| 49 | keep track of the "lock has waiters" state. |
Steven Rostedt | a6537be | 2006-06-27 02:54:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 50 | |
Alex Shi | 68a1e34 | 2017-07-31 09:50:54 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 51 | owner bit0 |
| 52 | NULL 0 lock is free (fast acquire possible) |
| 53 | NULL 1 lock is free and has waiters and the top waiter |
| 54 | is going to take the lock* |
| 55 | taskpointer 0 lock is held (fast release possible) |
| 56 | taskpointer 1 lock is held and has waiters** |
Steven Rostedt | a6537be | 2006-06-27 02:54:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 57 | |
Alex Shi | 68a1e34 | 2017-07-31 09:50:54 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 58 | The fast atomic compare exchange based acquire and release is only |
| 59 | possible when bit 0 of lock->owner is 0. |
Steven Rostedt | a6537be | 2006-06-27 02:54:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 60 | |
Alex Shi | 68a1e34 | 2017-07-31 09:50:54 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 61 | (*) It also can be a transitional state when grabbing the lock |
| 62 | with ->wait_lock is held. To prevent any fast path cmpxchg to the lock, |
| 63 | we need to set the bit0 before looking at the lock, and the owner may be |
| 64 | NULL in this small time, hence this can be a transitional state. |
Steven Rostedt | a6537be | 2006-06-27 02:54:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 65 | |
Alex Shi | 68a1e34 | 2017-07-31 09:50:54 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 66 | (**) There is a small time when bit 0 is set but there are no |
| 67 | waiters. This can happen when grabbing the lock in the slow path. |
| 68 | To prevent a cmpxchg of the owner releasing the lock, we need to |
| 69 | set this bit before looking at the lock. |
| 70 | |
| 71 | BTW, there is still technically a "Pending Owner", it's just not called |
| 72 | that anymore. The pending owner happens to be the top_waiter of a lock |
| 73 | that has no owner and has been woken up to grab the lock. |