David Gow | c797997 | 2021-04-14 22:40:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 |
| 2 | |
| 3 | ==================== |
| 4 | Kernel Testing Guide |
| 5 | ==================== |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | There are a number of different tools for testing the Linux kernel, so knowing |
| 9 | when to use each of them can be a challenge. This document provides a rough |
| 10 | overview of their differences, and how they fit together. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Writing and Running Tests |
| 14 | ========================= |
| 15 | |
| 16 | The bulk of kernel tests are written using either the kselftest or KUnit |
| 17 | frameworks. These both provide infrastructure to help make running tests and |
| 18 | groups of tests easier, as well as providing helpers to aid in writing new |
| 19 | tests. |
| 20 | |
| 21 | If you're looking to verify the behaviour of the Kernel — particularly specific |
| 22 | parts of the kernel — then you'll want to use KUnit or kselftest. |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | The Difference Between KUnit and kselftest |
| 26 | ------------------------------------------ |
| 27 | |
| 28 | KUnit (Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst) is an entirely in-kernel system |
| 29 | for "white box" testing: because test code is part of the kernel, it can access |
| 30 | internal structures and functions which aren't exposed to userspace. |
| 31 | |
| 32 | KUnit tests therefore are best written against small, self-contained parts |
| 33 | of the kernel, which can be tested in isolation. This aligns well with the |
| 34 | concept of 'unit' testing. |
| 35 | |
| 36 | For example, a KUnit test might test an individual kernel function (or even a |
| 37 | single codepath through a function, such as an error handling case), rather |
| 38 | than a feature as a whole. |
| 39 | |
| 40 | This also makes KUnit tests very fast to build and run, allowing them to be |
| 41 | run frequently as part of the development process. |
| 42 | |
| 43 | There is a KUnit test style guide which may give further pointers in |
| 44 | Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst |
| 45 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | kselftest (Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst), on the other hand, is |
| 48 | largely implemented in userspace, and tests are normal userspace scripts or |
| 49 | programs. |
| 50 | |
| 51 | This makes it easier to write more complicated tests, or tests which need to |
| 52 | manipulate the overall system state more (e.g., spawning processes, etc.). |
| 53 | However, it's not possible to call kernel functions directly from kselftest. |
| 54 | This means that only kernel functionality which is exposed to userspace somehow |
| 55 | (e.g. by a syscall, device, filesystem, etc.) can be tested with kselftest. To |
| 56 | work around this, some tests include a companion kernel module which exposes |
| 57 | more information or functionality. If a test runs mostly or entirely within the |
| 58 | kernel, however, KUnit may be the more appropriate tool. |
| 59 | |
| 60 | kselftest is therefore suited well to tests of whole features, as these will |
| 61 | expose an interface to userspace, which can be tested, but not implementation |
| 62 | details. This aligns well with 'system' or 'end-to-end' testing. |
| 63 | |
| 64 | For example, all new system calls should be accompanied by kselftest tests. |
| 65 | |
| 66 | Code Coverage Tools |
| 67 | =================== |
| 68 | |
| 69 | The Linux Kernel supports two different code coverage measurement tools. These |
| 70 | can be used to verify that a test is executing particular functions or lines |
| 71 | of code. This is useful for determining how much of the kernel is being tested, |
| 72 | and for finding corner-cases which are not covered by the appropriate test. |
| 73 | |
Mauro Carvalho Chehab | 3a8b57d | 2021-06-16 08:27:24 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 74 | Documentation/dev-tools/gcov.rst is GCC's coverage testing tool, which can be |
| 75 | used with the kernel to get global or per-module coverage. Unlike KCOV, it |
| 76 | does not record per-task coverage. Coverage data can be read from debugfs, |
| 77 | and interpreted using the usual gcov tooling. |
David Gow | c797997 | 2021-04-14 22:40:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 78 | |
Mauro Carvalho Chehab | 3a8b57d | 2021-06-16 08:27:24 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 79 | Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst is a feature which can be built in to the |
| 80 | kernel to allow capturing coverage on a per-task level. It's therefore useful |
| 81 | for fuzzing and other situations where information about code executed during, |
| 82 | for example, a single syscall is useful. |
David Gow | c797997 | 2021-04-14 22:40:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 83 | |
| 84 | |
| 85 | Dynamic Analysis Tools |
| 86 | ====================== |
| 87 | |
| 88 | The kernel also supports a number of dynamic analysis tools, which attempt to |
| 89 | detect classes of issues when they occur in a running kernel. These typically |
| 90 | each look for a different class of bugs, such as invalid memory accesses, |
| 91 | concurrency issues such as data races, or other undefined behaviour like |
| 92 | integer overflows. |
| 93 | |
| 94 | Some of these tools are listed below: |
| 95 | |
| 96 | * kmemleak detects possible memory leaks. See |
| 97 | Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst |
| 98 | * KASAN detects invalid memory accesses such as out-of-bounds and |
| 99 | use-after-free errors. See Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst |
| 100 | * UBSAN detects behaviour that is undefined by the C standard, like integer |
| 101 | overflows. See Documentation/dev-tools/ubsan.rst |
| 102 | * KCSAN detects data races. See Documentation/dev-tools/kcsan.rst |
| 103 | * KFENCE is a low-overhead detector of memory issues, which is much faster than |
| 104 | KASAN and can be used in production. See Documentation/dev-tools/kfence.rst |
| 105 | * lockdep is a locking correctness validator. See |
| 106 | Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst |
| 107 | * There are several other pieces of debug instrumentation in the kernel, many |
| 108 | of which can be found in lib/Kconfig.debug |
| 109 | |
| 110 | These tools tend to test the kernel as a whole, and do not "pass" like |
| 111 | kselftest or KUnit tests. They can be combined with KUnit or kselftest by |
| 112 | running tests on a kernel with these tools enabled: you can then be sure |
| 113 | that none of these errors are occurring during the test. |
| 114 | |
| 115 | Some of these tools integrate with KUnit or kselftest and will |
| 116 | automatically fail tests if an issue is detected. |
| 117 | |