Changbin Du | 28e21ea | 2019-05-08 23:21:26 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 1 | .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 |
| 2 | |
| 3 | ====================== |
| 4 | Memory Protection Keys |
| 5 | ====================== |
| 6 | |
Dave Hansen | c51ff2c | 2017-11-10 16:12:28 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 7 | Memory Protection Keys for Userspace (PKU aka PKEYs) is a feature |
| 8 | which is found on Intel's Skylake "Scalable Processor" Server CPUs. |
| 9 | It will be avalable in future non-server parts. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | For anyone wishing to test or use this feature, it is available in |
| 12 | Amazon's EC2 C5 instances and is known to work there using an Ubuntu |
| 13 | 17.04 image. |
Dave Hansen | 591b1d8 | 2015-12-14 11:06:34 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 14 | |
| 15 | Memory Protection Keys provides a mechanism for enforcing page-based |
| 16 | protections, but without requiring modification of the page tables |
| 17 | when an application changes protection domains. It works by |
| 18 | dedicating 4 previously ignored bits in each page table entry to a |
| 19 | "protection key", giving 16 possible keys. |
| 20 | |
| 21 | There is also a new user-accessible register (PKRU) with two separate |
| 22 | bits (Access Disable and Write Disable) for each key. Being a CPU |
| 23 | register, PKRU is inherently thread-local, potentially giving each |
| 24 | thread a different set of protections from every other thread. |
| 25 | |
| 26 | There are two new instructions (RDPKRU/WRPKRU) for reading and writing |
| 27 | to the new register. The feature is only available in 64-bit mode, |
| 28 | even though there is theoretically space in the PAE PTEs. These |
| 29 | permissions are enforced on data access only and have no effect on |
| 30 | instruction fetches. |
| 31 | |
Changbin Du | 28e21ea | 2019-05-08 23:21:26 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 32 | Syscalls |
| 33 | ======== |
Dave Hansen | c74fe39 | 2016-07-29 09:30:20 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 34 | |
Changbin Du | 28e21ea | 2019-05-08 23:21:26 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 35 | There are 3 system calls which directly interact with pkeys:: |
Dave Hansen | c74fe39 | 2016-07-29 09:30:20 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 36 | |
| 37 | int pkey_alloc(unsigned long flags, unsigned long init_access_rights) |
| 38 | int pkey_free(int pkey); |
| 39 | int pkey_mprotect(unsigned long start, size_t len, |
| 40 | unsigned long prot, int pkey); |
| 41 | |
| 42 | Before a pkey can be used, it must first be allocated with |
| 43 | pkey_alloc(). An application calls the WRPKRU instruction |
| 44 | directly in order to change access permissions to memory covered |
| 45 | with a key. In this example WRPKRU is wrapped by a C function |
| 46 | called pkey_set(). |
Changbin Du | 28e21ea | 2019-05-08 23:21:26 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 47 | :: |
Dave Hansen | c74fe39 | 2016-07-29 09:30:20 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 48 | |
| 49 | int real_prot = PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE; |
Wang Kai | f90e2d9 | 2017-07-24 21:03:46 +0800 | [diff] [blame] | 50 | pkey = pkey_alloc(0, PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE); |
Dave Hansen | c74fe39 | 2016-07-29 09:30:20 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 51 | ptr = mmap(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0); |
| 52 | ret = pkey_mprotect(ptr, PAGE_SIZE, real_prot, pkey); |
| 53 | ... application runs here |
| 54 | |
| 55 | Now, if the application needs to update the data at 'ptr', it can |
Changbin Du | 28e21ea | 2019-05-08 23:21:26 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 56 | gain access, do the update, then remove its write access:: |
Dave Hansen | c74fe39 | 2016-07-29 09:30:20 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 57 | |
Wang Kai | f90e2d9 | 2017-07-24 21:03:46 +0800 | [diff] [blame] | 58 | pkey_set(pkey, 0); // clear PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE |
Dave Hansen | c74fe39 | 2016-07-29 09:30:20 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 59 | *ptr = foo; // assign something |
Wang Kai | f90e2d9 | 2017-07-24 21:03:46 +0800 | [diff] [blame] | 60 | pkey_set(pkey, PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE); // set PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE again |
Dave Hansen | c74fe39 | 2016-07-29 09:30:20 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 61 | |
| 62 | Now when it frees the memory, it will also free the pkey since it |
Changbin Du | 28e21ea | 2019-05-08 23:21:26 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 63 | is no longer in use:: |
Dave Hansen | c74fe39 | 2016-07-29 09:30:20 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 64 | |
| 65 | munmap(ptr, PAGE_SIZE); |
| 66 | pkey_free(pkey); |
| 67 | |
Changbin Du | 28e21ea | 2019-05-08 23:21:26 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 68 | .. note:: pkey_set() is a wrapper for the RDPKRU and WRPKRU instructions. |
| 69 | An example implementation can be found in |
| 70 | tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c. |
Dave Hansen | 6679dac | 2016-10-04 09:38:57 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 71 | |
Changbin Du | 28e21ea | 2019-05-08 23:21:26 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 72 | Behavior |
| 73 | ======== |
Dave Hansen | c74fe39 | 2016-07-29 09:30:20 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 74 | |
| 75 | The kernel attempts to make protection keys consistent with the |
Changbin Du | 28e21ea | 2019-05-08 23:21:26 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 76 | behavior of a plain mprotect(). For instance if you do this:: |
Dave Hansen | c74fe39 | 2016-07-29 09:30:20 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 77 | |
| 78 | mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_NONE); |
| 79 | something(ptr); |
| 80 | |
Changbin Du | 28e21ea | 2019-05-08 23:21:26 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 81 | you can expect the same effects with protection keys when doing this:: |
Dave Hansen | c74fe39 | 2016-07-29 09:30:20 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 82 | |
| 83 | pkey = pkey_alloc(0, PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE | PKEY_DISABLE_READ); |
| 84 | pkey_mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, pkey); |
| 85 | something(ptr); |
| 86 | |
| 87 | That should be true whether something() is a direct access to 'ptr' |
Changbin Du | 28e21ea | 2019-05-08 23:21:26 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 88 | like:: |
Dave Hansen | c74fe39 | 2016-07-29 09:30:20 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 89 | |
| 90 | *ptr = foo; |
| 91 | |
| 92 | or when the kernel does the access on the application's behalf like |
Changbin Du | 28e21ea | 2019-05-08 23:21:26 +0800 | [diff] [blame^] | 93 | with a read():: |
Dave Hansen | c74fe39 | 2016-07-29 09:30:20 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 94 | |
| 95 | read(fd, ptr, 1); |
| 96 | |
| 97 | The kernel will send a SIGSEGV in both cases, but si_code will be set |
| 98 | to SEGV_PKERR when violating protection keys versus SEGV_ACCERR when |
| 99 | the plain mprotect() permissions are violated. |