blob: 9803e14639bfcd3336f5687fa29fb875d736144d [file] [log] [blame]
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -03001===========
2Static Keys
3===========
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -05004
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -03005.. warning::
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +00006
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -03007 DEPRECATED API:
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +00008
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -03009 The use of 'struct static_key' directly, is now DEPRECATED. In addition
10 static_key_{true,false}() is also DEPRECATED. IE DO NOT use the following::
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +000011
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -030012 struct static_key false = STATIC_KEY_INIT_FALSE;
13 struct static_key true = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE;
14 static_key_true()
15 static_key_false()
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +000016
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -030017 The updated API replacements are::
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -050018
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -030019 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(key);
20 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(key);
21 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_ARRAY_TRUE(keys, count);
22 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_ARRAY_FALSE(keys, count);
23 static_branch_likely()
24 static_branch_unlikely()
25
26Abstract
27========
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -050028
29Static keys allows the inclusion of seldom used features in
30performance-sensitive fast-path kernel code, via a GCC feature and a code
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -030031patching technique. A quick example::
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -050032
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +000033 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(key);
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -050034
35 ...
36
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +000037 if (static_branch_unlikely(&key))
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -050038 do unlikely code
39 else
40 do likely code
41
42 ...
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +000043 static_branch_enable(&key);
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -050044 ...
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +000045 static_branch_disable(&key);
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -050046 ...
47
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +000048The static_branch_unlikely() branch will be generated into the code with as little
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -050049impact to the likely code path as possible.
50
51
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -030052Motivation
53==========
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -050054
55
56Currently, tracepoints are implemented using a conditional branch. The
57conditional check requires checking a global variable for each tracepoint.
58Although the overhead of this check is small, it increases when the memory
59cache comes under pressure (memory cache lines for these global variables may
60be shared with other memory accesses). As we increase the number of tracepoints
61in the kernel this overhead may become more of an issue. In addition,
62tracepoints are often dormant (disabled) and provide no direct kernel
63functionality. Thus, it is highly desirable to reduce their impact as much as
64possible. Although tracepoints are the original motivation for this work, other
65kernel code paths should be able to make use of the static keys facility.
66
67
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -030068Solution
69========
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -050070
71
72gcc (v4.5) adds a new 'asm goto' statement that allows branching to a label:
73
74http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-07/msg01556.html
75
76Using the 'asm goto', we can create branches that are either taken or not taken
77by default, without the need to check memory. Then, at run-time, we can patch
78the branch site to change the branch direction.
79
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -030080For example, if we have a simple branch that is disabled by default::
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -050081
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +000082 if (static_branch_unlikely(&key))
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -050083 printk("I am the true branch\n");
84
85Thus, by default the 'printk' will not be emitted. And the code generated will
86consist of a single atomic 'no-op' instruction (5 bytes on x86), in the
87straight-line code path. When the branch is 'flipped', we will patch the
88'no-op' in the straight-line codepath with a 'jump' instruction to the
89out-of-line true branch. Thus, changing branch direction is expensive but
90branch selection is basically 'free'. That is the basic tradeoff of this
91optimization.
92
93This lowlevel patching mechanism is called 'jump label patching', and it gives
94the basis for the static keys facility.
95
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -030096Static key label API, usage and examples
97========================================
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -050098
99
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300100In order to make use of this optimization you must first define a key::
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500101
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +0000102 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(key);
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500103
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300104or::
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500105
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +0000106 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(key);
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500107
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +0000108
109The key must be global, that is, it can't be allocated on the stack or dynamically
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500110allocated at run-time.
111
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300112The key is then used in code as::
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500113
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +0000114 if (static_branch_unlikely(&key))
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500115 do unlikely code
116 else
117 do likely code
118
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300119Or::
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500120
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +0000121 if (static_branch_likely(&key))
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500122 do likely code
123 else
124 do unlikely code
125
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +0000126Keys defined via DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(), or DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE, may
127be used in either static_branch_likely() or static_branch_unlikely()
Stan Drozd9bb0e9c2017-04-21 13:16:03 +0200128statements.
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500129
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300130Branch(es) can be set true via::
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500131
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300132 static_branch_enable(&key);
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +0000133
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300134or false via::
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +0000135
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300136 static_branch_disable(&key);
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +0000137
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300138The branch(es) can then be switched via reference counts::
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +0000139
140 static_branch_inc(&key);
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500141 ...
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +0000142 static_branch_dec(&key);
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500143
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +0000144Thus, 'static_branch_inc()' means 'make the branch true', and
145'static_branch_dec()' means 'make the branch false' with appropriate
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500146reference counting. For example, if the key is initialized true, a
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +0000147static_branch_dec(), will switch the branch to false. And a subsequent
148static_branch_inc(), will change the branch back to true. Likewise, if the
149key is initialized false, a 'static_branch_inc()', will change the branch to
150true. And then a 'static_branch_dec()', will again make the branch false.
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500151
Paolo Bonzini7a34bcb2017-08-01 17:24:05 +0200152The state and the reference count can be retrieved with 'static_key_enabled()'
153and 'static_key_count()'. In general, if you use these functions, they
154should be protected with the same mutex used around the enable/disable
155or increment/decrement function.
156
Marc Zyngier5a405272017-08-01 09:02:56 +0100157Note that switching branches results in some locks being taken,
158particularly the CPU hotplug lock (in order to avoid races against
Will Deacon806654a2018-11-19 11:02:45 +0000159CPUs being brought in the kernel while the kernel is getting
Marc Zyngier5a405272017-08-01 09:02:56 +0100160patched). Calling the static key API from within a hotplug notifier is
161thus a sure deadlock recipe. In order to still allow use of the
Kamalesh Babulal560f28b2019-02-04 14:16:57 +0530162functionality, the following functions are provided:
Marc Zyngier5a405272017-08-01 09:02:56 +0100163
164 static_key_enable_cpuslocked()
165 static_key_disable_cpuslocked()
166 static_branch_enable_cpuslocked()
167 static_branch_disable_cpuslocked()
168
169These functions are *not* general purpose, and must only be used when
170you really know that you're in the above context, and no other.
171
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300172Where an array of keys is required, it can be defined as::
Catalin Marinasef0da552016-09-05 18:25:47 +0100173
174 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_ARRAY_TRUE(keys, count);
175
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300176or::
Catalin Marinasef0da552016-09-05 18:25:47 +0100177
178 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_ARRAY_FALSE(keys, count);
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500179
1804) Architecture level code patching interface, 'jump labels'
181
182
183There are a few functions and macros that architectures must implement in order
184to take advantage of this optimization. If there is no architecture support, we
Jason Baron3821fd32017-02-03 15:42:24 -0500185simply fall back to a traditional, load, test, and jump sequence. Also, the
186struct jump_entry table must be at least 4-byte aligned because the
187static_key->entry field makes use of the two least significant bits.
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500188
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300189* ``select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL``,
190 see: arch/x86/Kconfig
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500191
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300192* ``#define JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE``,
193 see: arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500194
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300195* ``__always_inline bool arch_static_branch(struct static_key *key, bool branch)``,
196 see: arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500197
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300198* ``__always_inline bool arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key *key, bool branch)``,
199 see: arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h
Jason Baron412758c2015-07-30 03:59:48 +0000200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300201* ``void arch_jump_label_transform(struct jump_entry *entry, enum jump_label_type type)``,
202 see: arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500203
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300204* ``__init_or_module void arch_jump_label_transform_static(struct jump_entry *entry, enum jump_label_type type)``,
205 see: arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500206
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300207* ``struct jump_entry``,
208 see: arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500209
210
2115) Static keys / jump label analysis, results (x86_64):
212
213
214As an example, let's add the following branch to 'getppid()', such that the
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300215system call now looks like::
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500216
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300217 SYSCALL_DEFINE0(getppid)
218 {
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500219 int pid;
220
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300221 + if (static_branch_unlikely(&key))
222 + printk("I am the true branch\n");
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500223
224 rcu_read_lock();
225 pid = task_tgid_vnr(rcu_dereference(current->real_parent));
226 rcu_read_unlock();
227
228 return pid;
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300229 }
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500230
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300231The resulting instructions with jump labels generated by GCC is::
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500232
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300233 ffffffff81044290 <sys_getppid>:
234 ffffffff81044290: 55 push %rbp
235 ffffffff81044291: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
236 ffffffff81044294: e9 00 00 00 00 jmpq ffffffff81044299 <sys_getppid+0x9>
237 ffffffff81044299: 65 48 8b 04 25 c0 b6 mov %gs:0xb6c0,%rax
238 ffffffff810442a0: 00 00
239 ffffffff810442a2: 48 8b 80 80 02 00 00 mov 0x280(%rax),%rax
240 ffffffff810442a9: 48 8b 80 b0 02 00 00 mov 0x2b0(%rax),%rax
241 ffffffff810442b0: 48 8b b8 e8 02 00 00 mov 0x2e8(%rax),%rdi
242 ffffffff810442b7: e8 f4 d9 00 00 callq ffffffff81051cb0 <pid_vnr>
243 ffffffff810442bc: 5d pop %rbp
244 ffffffff810442bd: 48 98 cltq
245 ffffffff810442bf: c3 retq
246 ffffffff810442c0: 48 c7 c7 e3 54 98 81 mov $0xffffffff819854e3,%rdi
247 ffffffff810442c7: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
248 ffffffff810442c9: e8 71 13 6d 00 callq ffffffff8171563f <printk>
249 ffffffff810442ce: eb c9 jmp ffffffff81044299 <sys_getppid+0x9>
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500250
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300251Without the jump label optimization it looks like::
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500252
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300253 ffffffff810441f0 <sys_getppid>:
254 ffffffff810441f0: 8b 05 8a 52 d8 00 mov 0xd8528a(%rip),%eax # ffffffff81dc9480 <key>
255 ffffffff810441f6: 55 push %rbp
256 ffffffff810441f7: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
257 ffffffff810441fa: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
258 ffffffff810441fc: 75 27 jne ffffffff81044225 <sys_getppid+0x35>
259 ffffffff810441fe: 65 48 8b 04 25 c0 b6 mov %gs:0xb6c0,%rax
260 ffffffff81044205: 00 00
261 ffffffff81044207: 48 8b 80 80 02 00 00 mov 0x280(%rax),%rax
262 ffffffff8104420e: 48 8b 80 b0 02 00 00 mov 0x2b0(%rax),%rax
263 ffffffff81044215: 48 8b b8 e8 02 00 00 mov 0x2e8(%rax),%rdi
264 ffffffff8104421c: e8 2f da 00 00 callq ffffffff81051c50 <pid_vnr>
265 ffffffff81044221: 5d pop %rbp
266 ffffffff81044222: 48 98 cltq
267 ffffffff81044224: c3 retq
268 ffffffff81044225: 48 c7 c7 13 53 98 81 mov $0xffffffff81985313,%rdi
269 ffffffff8104422c: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
270 ffffffff8104422e: e8 60 0f 6d 00 callq ffffffff81715193 <printk>
271 ffffffff81044233: eb c9 jmp ffffffff810441fe <sys_getppid+0xe>
272 ffffffff81044235: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 data32 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
273 ffffffff8104423c: 00 00 00 00
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500274
275Thus, the disable jump label case adds a 'mov', 'test' and 'jne' instruction
276vs. the jump label case just has a 'no-op' or 'jmp 0'. (The jmp 0, is patched
277to a 5 byte atomic no-op instruction at boot-time.) Thus, the disabled jump
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300278label case adds::
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500279
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300280 6 (mov) + 2 (test) + 2 (jne) = 10 - 5 (5 byte jump 0) = 5 addition bytes.
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500281
282If we then include the padding bytes, the jump label code saves, 16 total bytes
Masanari Iidac94bed8e2012-04-10 00:22:13 +0900283of instruction memory for this small function. In this case the non-jump label
Xishi Qiuc79a8d82013-11-06 13:18:21 -0800284function is 80 bytes long. Thus, we have saved 20% of the instruction
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500285footprint. We can in fact improve this even further, since the 5-byte no-op
286really can be a 2-byte no-op since we can reach the branch with a 2-byte jmp.
287However, we have not yet implemented optimal no-op sizes (they are currently
288hard-coded).
289
290Since there are a number of static key API uses in the scheduler paths,
291'pipe-test' (also known as 'perf bench sched pipe') can be used to show the
292performance improvement. Testing done on 3.3.0-rc2:
293
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300294jump label disabled::
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500295
296 Performance counter stats for 'bash -c /tmp/pipe-test' (50 runs):
297
298 855.700314 task-clock # 0.534 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.11% )
299 200,003 context-switches # 0.234 M/sec ( +- 0.00% )
300 0 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec ( +- 39.58% )
301 487 page-faults # 0.001 M/sec ( +- 0.02% )
302 1,474,374,262 cycles # 1.723 GHz ( +- 0.17% )
303 <not supported> stalled-cycles-frontend
304 <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
305 1,178,049,567 instructions # 0.80 insns per cycle ( +- 0.06% )
306 208,368,926 branches # 243.507 M/sec ( +- 0.06% )
307 5,569,188 branch-misses # 2.67% of all branches ( +- 0.54% )
308
309 1.601607384 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.07% )
310
Mauro Carvalho Chehab603699b2017-05-17 08:19:34 -0300311jump label enabled::
Jason Baron1cfa60d2012-02-21 15:03:30 -0500312
313 Performance counter stats for 'bash -c /tmp/pipe-test' (50 runs):
314
315 841.043185 task-clock # 0.533 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.12% )
316 200,004 context-switches # 0.238 M/sec ( +- 0.00% )
317 0 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec ( +- 40.87% )
318 487 page-faults # 0.001 M/sec ( +- 0.05% )
319 1,432,559,428 cycles # 1.703 GHz ( +- 0.18% )
320 <not supported> stalled-cycles-frontend
321 <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
322 1,175,363,994 instructions # 0.82 insns per cycle ( +- 0.04% )
323 206,859,359 branches # 245.956 M/sec ( +- 0.04% )
324 4,884,119 branch-misses # 2.36% of all branches ( +- 0.85% )
325
326 1.579384366 seconds time elapsed
327
328The percentage of saved branches is .7%, and we've saved 12% on
329'branch-misses'. This is where we would expect to get the most savings, since
330this optimization is about reducing the number of branches. In addition, we've
331saved .2% on instructions, and 2.8% on cycles and 1.4% on elapsed time.