blob: cbff6ba53d563634791e27ad8d11e7a683065679 [file] [log] [blame]
Thomas Gleixnerc942fdd2019-05-27 08:55:06 +02001// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -04002/*
3 * Queued spinlock
4 *
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -04005 * (C) Copyright 2013-2015 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
Waiman Long81d3dc92018-04-26 11:34:27 +01006 * (C) Copyright 2013-2014,2018 Red Hat, Inc.
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -04007 * (C) Copyright 2015 Intel Corp.
Waiman Long64d816c2015-11-09 19:09:21 -05008 * (C) Copyright 2015 Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Development LP
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -04009 *
Waiman Long81d3dc92018-04-26 11:34:27 +010010 * Authors: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -040011 * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
12 */
Waiman Longa23db282015-04-24 14:56:37 -040013
14#ifndef _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH
15
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -040016#include <linux/smp.h>
17#include <linux/bug.h>
18#include <linux/cpumask.h>
19#include <linux/percpu.h>
20#include <linux/hardirq.h>
21#include <linux/mutex.h>
Stafford Horne56713602017-07-08 04:56:58 +090022#include <linux/prefetch.h>
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)69f9cae2015-04-24 14:56:34 -040023#include <asm/byteorder.h>
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -040024#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
25
26/*
Waiman Long81d3dc92018-04-26 11:34:27 +010027 * Include queued spinlock statistics code
28 */
29#include "qspinlock_stat.h"
30
31/*
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -040032 * The basic principle of a queue-based spinlock can best be understood
33 * by studying a classic queue-based spinlock implementation called the
Waiman Long57097122020-01-07 12:49:14 -050034 * MCS lock. A copy of the original MCS lock paper ("Algorithms for Scalable
35 * Synchronization on Shared-Memory Multiprocessors by Mellor-Crummey and
36 * Scott") is available at
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -040037 *
Waiman Long57097122020-01-07 12:49:14 -050038 * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206115
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -040039 *
Waiman Long57097122020-01-07 12:49:14 -050040 * This queued spinlock implementation is based on the MCS lock, however to
41 * make it fit the 4 bytes we assume spinlock_t to be, and preserve its
42 * existing API, we must modify it somehow.
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -040043 *
44 * In particular; where the traditional MCS lock consists of a tail pointer
45 * (8 bytes) and needs the next pointer (another 8 bytes) of its own node to
46 * unlock the next pending (next->locked), we compress both these: {tail,
47 * next->locked} into a single u32 value.
48 *
49 * Since a spinlock disables recursion of its own context and there is a limit
50 * to the contexts that can nest; namely: task, softirq, hardirq, nmi. As there
51 * are at most 4 nesting levels, it can be encoded by a 2-bit number. Now
52 * we can encode the tail by combining the 2-bit nesting level with the cpu
53 * number. With one byte for the lock value and 3 bytes for the tail, only a
54 * 32-bit word is now needed. Even though we only need 1 bit for the lock,
55 * we extend it to a full byte to achieve better performance for architectures
56 * that support atomic byte write.
57 *
58 * We also change the first spinner to spin on the lock bit instead of its
59 * node; whereby avoiding the need to carry a node from lock to unlock, and
60 * preserving existing lock API. This also makes the unlock code simpler and
61 * faster.
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)69f9cae2015-04-24 14:56:34 -040062 *
63 * N.B. The current implementation only supports architectures that allow
64 * atomic operations on smaller 8-bit and 16-bit data types.
65 *
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -040066 */
67
68#include "mcs_spinlock.h"
Waiman Longa23db282015-04-24 14:56:37 -040069#define MAX_NODES 4
Waiman Long0fa809c2018-10-16 09:45:07 -040070
71/*
72 * On 64-bit architectures, the mcs_spinlock structure will be 16 bytes in
73 * size and four of them will fit nicely in one 64-byte cacheline. For
74 * pvqspinlock, however, we need more space for extra data. To accommodate
75 * that, we insert two more long words to pad it up to 32 bytes. IOW, only
76 * two of them can fit in a cacheline in this case. That is OK as it is rare
77 * to have more than 2 levels of slowpath nesting in actual use. We don't
78 * want to penalize pvqspinlocks to optimize for a rare case in native
79 * qspinlocks.
80 */
81struct qnode {
82 struct mcs_spinlock mcs;
83#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
84 long reserved[2];
Waiman Longa23db282015-04-24 14:56:37 -040085#endif
Waiman Long0fa809c2018-10-16 09:45:07 -040086};
Waiman Longa23db282015-04-24 14:56:37 -040087
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -040088/*
Will Deacon65122762018-04-26 11:34:17 +010089 * The pending bit spinning loop count.
90 * This heuristic is used to limit the number of lockword accesses
91 * made by atomic_cond_read_relaxed when waiting for the lock to
92 * transition out of the "== _Q_PENDING_VAL" state. We don't spin
93 * indefinitely because there's no guarantee that we'll make forward
94 * progress.
95 */
96#ifndef _Q_PENDING_LOOPS
97#define _Q_PENDING_LOOPS 1
98#endif
99
100/*
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400101 * Per-CPU queue node structures; we can never have more than 4 nested
102 * contexts: task, softirq, hardirq, nmi.
103 *
104 * Exactly fits one 64-byte cacheline on a 64-bit architecture.
Waiman Longa23db282015-04-24 14:56:37 -0400105 *
106 * PV doubles the storage and uses the second cacheline for PV state.
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400107 */
Waiman Long0fa809c2018-10-16 09:45:07 -0400108static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct qnode, qnodes[MAX_NODES]);
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400109
110/*
111 * We must be able to distinguish between no-tail and the tail at 0:0,
112 * therefore increment the cpu number by one.
113 */
114
Peter Zijlstra8d53fa12016-06-08 09:12:30 +0200115static inline __pure u32 encode_tail(int cpu, int idx)
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400116{
117 u32 tail;
118
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400119 tail = (cpu + 1) << _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET;
120 tail |= idx << _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET; /* assume < 4 */
121
122 return tail;
123}
124
Peter Zijlstra8d53fa12016-06-08 09:12:30 +0200125static inline __pure struct mcs_spinlock *decode_tail(u32 tail)
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400126{
127 int cpu = (tail >> _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET) - 1;
128 int idx = (tail & _Q_TAIL_IDX_MASK) >> _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET;
129
Waiman Long0fa809c2018-10-16 09:45:07 -0400130 return per_cpu_ptr(&qnodes[idx].mcs, cpu);
131}
132
133static inline __pure
134struct mcs_spinlock *grab_mcs_node(struct mcs_spinlock *base, int idx)
135{
136 return &((struct qnode *)base + idx)->mcs;
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400137}
138
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)c1fb1592015-04-24 14:56:32 -0400139#define _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK (_Q_LOCKED_MASK | _Q_PENDING_MASK)
140
Waiman Long2c83e8e2015-04-24 14:56:35 -0400141#if _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)69f9cae2015-04-24 14:56:34 -0400142/**
Will Deacon59fb5862018-04-26 11:34:19 +0100143 * clear_pending - clear the pending bit.
144 * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
145 *
146 * *,1,* -> *,0,*
147 */
148static __always_inline void clear_pending(struct qspinlock *lock)
149{
150 WRITE_ONCE(lock->pending, 0);
151}
152
153/**
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)69f9cae2015-04-24 14:56:34 -0400154 * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit.
155 * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
156 *
157 * *,1,0 -> *,0,1
158 *
159 * Lock stealing is not allowed if this function is used.
160 */
161static __always_inline void clear_pending_set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
162{
Will Deacon625e88b2018-04-26 11:34:16 +0100163 WRITE_ONCE(lock->locked_pending, _Q_LOCKED_VAL);
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)69f9cae2015-04-24 14:56:34 -0400164}
165
166/*
167 * xchg_tail - Put in the new queue tail code word & retrieve previous one
168 * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure
169 * @tail : The new queue tail code word
170 * Return: The previous queue tail code word
171 *
Paul E. McKenney548095d2017-10-09 11:22:50 -0700172 * xchg(lock, tail), which heads an address dependency
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)69f9cae2015-04-24 14:56:34 -0400173 *
174 * p,*,* -> n,*,* ; prev = xchg(lock, node)
175 */
176static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 tail)
177{
Waiman Long64d816c2015-11-09 19:09:21 -0500178 /*
Will Deacon9d4646d2018-04-26 11:34:25 +0100179 * We can use relaxed semantics since the caller ensures that the
180 * MCS node is properly initialized before updating the tail.
Waiman Long64d816c2015-11-09 19:09:21 -0500181 */
Will Deacon9d4646d2018-04-26 11:34:25 +0100182 return (u32)xchg_relaxed(&lock->tail,
Waiman Long64d816c2015-11-09 19:09:21 -0500183 tail >> _Q_TAIL_OFFSET) << _Q_TAIL_OFFSET;
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)69f9cae2015-04-24 14:56:34 -0400184}
185
186#else /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */
187
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400188/**
Will Deacon59fb5862018-04-26 11:34:19 +0100189 * clear_pending - clear the pending bit.
190 * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
191 *
192 * *,1,* -> *,0,*
193 */
194static __always_inline void clear_pending(struct qspinlock *lock)
195{
196 atomic_andnot(_Q_PENDING_VAL, &lock->val);
197}
198
199/**
Waiman Long6403bd72015-04-24 14:56:33 -0400200 * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit.
201 * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
202 *
203 * *,1,0 -> *,0,1
204 */
205static __always_inline void clear_pending_set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
206{
207 atomic_add(-_Q_PENDING_VAL + _Q_LOCKED_VAL, &lock->val);
208}
209
210/**
211 * xchg_tail - Put in the new queue tail code word & retrieve previous one
212 * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure
213 * @tail : The new queue tail code word
214 * Return: The previous queue tail code word
215 *
216 * xchg(lock, tail)
217 *
218 * p,*,* -> n,*,* ; prev = xchg(lock, node)
219 */
220static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 tail)
221{
222 u32 old, new, val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
223
224 for (;;) {
225 new = (val & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) | tail;
Waiman Long64d816c2015-11-09 19:09:21 -0500226 /*
Will Deacon9d4646d2018-04-26 11:34:25 +0100227 * We can use relaxed semantics since the caller ensures that
228 * the MCS node is properly initialized before updating the
229 * tail.
Waiman Long64d816c2015-11-09 19:09:21 -0500230 */
Will Deacon9d4646d2018-04-26 11:34:25 +0100231 old = atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->val, val, new);
Waiman Long6403bd72015-04-24 14:56:33 -0400232 if (old == val)
233 break;
234
235 val = old;
236 }
237 return old;
238}
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)69f9cae2015-04-24 14:56:34 -0400239#endif /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */
Waiman Long6403bd72015-04-24 14:56:33 -0400240
241/**
Peter Zijlstra7aa54be2018-09-26 13:01:20 +0200242 * queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire - fetch the whole lock value and set pending
243 * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure
244 * Return: The previous lock value
245 *
246 * *,*,* -> *,1,*
247 */
248#ifndef queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire
249static __always_inline u32 queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire(struct qspinlock *lock)
250{
251 return atomic_fetch_or_acquire(_Q_PENDING_VAL, &lock->val);
252}
253#endif
254
255/**
Waiman Long2c83e8e2015-04-24 14:56:35 -0400256 * set_locked - Set the lock bit and own the lock
257 * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
258 *
259 * *,*,0 -> *,0,1
260 */
261static __always_inline void set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
262{
Will Deacon625e88b2018-04-26 11:34:16 +0100263 WRITE_ONCE(lock->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL);
Waiman Long2c83e8e2015-04-24 14:56:35 -0400264}
265
Waiman Longa23db282015-04-24 14:56:37 -0400266
267/*
268 * Generate the native code for queued_spin_unlock_slowpath(); provide NOPs for
269 * all the PV callbacks.
270 */
271
272static __always_inline void __pv_init_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) { }
Waiman Longcd0272f2015-11-09 19:09:27 -0500273static __always_inline void __pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node,
274 struct mcs_spinlock *prev) { }
Waiman Long75d22702015-07-11 16:36:52 -0400275static __always_inline void __pv_kick_node(struct qspinlock *lock,
276 struct mcs_spinlock *node) { }
Waiman Long1c4941f2015-11-10 16:18:56 -0500277static __always_inline u32 __pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock,
278 struct mcs_spinlock *node)
279 { return 0; }
Waiman Longa23db282015-04-24 14:56:37 -0400280
281#define pv_enabled() false
282
283#define pv_init_node __pv_init_node
284#define pv_wait_node __pv_wait_node
285#define pv_kick_node __pv_kick_node
Waiman Long1c4941f2015-11-10 16:18:56 -0500286#define pv_wait_head_or_lock __pv_wait_head_or_lock
Waiman Longa23db282015-04-24 14:56:37 -0400287
288#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
289#define queued_spin_lock_slowpath native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
290#endif
291
292#endif /* _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH */
293
Waiman Long2c83e8e2015-04-24 14:56:35 -0400294/**
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400295 * queued_spin_lock_slowpath - acquire the queued spinlock
296 * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
297 * @val: Current value of the queued spinlock 32-bit word
298 *
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)c1fb1592015-04-24 14:56:32 -0400299 * (queue tail, pending bit, lock value)
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400300 *
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)c1fb1592015-04-24 14:56:32 -0400301 * fast : slow : unlock
302 * : :
303 * uncontended (0,0,0) -:--> (0,0,1) ------------------------------:--> (*,*,0)
304 * : | ^--------.------. / :
305 * : v \ \ | :
306 * pending : (0,1,1) +--> (0,1,0) \ | :
307 * : | ^--' | | :
308 * : v | | :
309 * uncontended : (n,x,y) +--> (n,0,0) --' | :
310 * queue : | ^--' | :
311 * : v | :
312 * contended : (*,x,y) +--> (*,0,0) ---> (*,0,1) -' :
313 * queue : ^--' :
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400314 */
315void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
316{
317 struct mcs_spinlock *prev, *next, *node;
Will Deacon59fb5862018-04-26 11:34:19 +0100318 u32 old, tail;
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400319 int idx;
320
321 BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_NR_CPUS >= (1U << _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS));
322
Waiman Longa23db282015-04-24 14:56:37 -0400323 if (pv_enabled())
Waiman Long81d3dc92018-04-26 11:34:27 +0100324 goto pv_queue;
Waiman Longa23db282015-04-24 14:56:37 -0400325
Peter Zijlstra43b3f022015-09-04 17:25:23 +0200326 if (virt_spin_lock(lock))
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)2aa79af2015-04-24 14:56:36 -0400327 return;
328
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)c1fb1592015-04-24 14:56:32 -0400329 /*
Will Deacon65122762018-04-26 11:34:17 +0100330 * Wait for in-progress pending->locked hand-overs with a bounded
331 * number of spins so that we guarantee forward progress.
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)c1fb1592015-04-24 14:56:32 -0400332 *
333 * 0,1,0 -> 0,0,1
334 */
335 if (val == _Q_PENDING_VAL) {
Will Deacon65122762018-04-26 11:34:17 +0100336 int cnt = _Q_PENDING_LOOPS;
337 val = atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&lock->val,
338 (VAL != _Q_PENDING_VAL) || !cnt--);
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)c1fb1592015-04-24 14:56:32 -0400339 }
340
341 /*
Will Deacon59fb5862018-04-26 11:34:19 +0100342 * If we observe any contention; queue.
343 */
344 if (val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK)
345 goto queue;
346
347 /*
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)c1fb1592015-04-24 14:56:32 -0400348 * trylock || pending
349 *
Peter Zijlstra756b1df2018-09-26 13:01:19 +0200350 * 0,0,* -> 0,1,* -> 0,0,1 pending, trylock
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)c1fb1592015-04-24 14:56:32 -0400351 */
Peter Zijlstra7aa54be2018-09-26 13:01:20 +0200352 val = queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire(lock);
Peter Zijlstra756b1df2018-09-26 13:01:19 +0200353
Peter Zijlstra53bf57f2018-09-26 13:01:18 +0200354 /*
Peter Zijlstra756b1df2018-09-26 13:01:19 +0200355 * If we observe contention, there is a concurrent locker.
356 *
357 * Undo and queue; our setting of PENDING might have made the
358 * n,0,0 -> 0,0,0 transition fail and it will now be waiting
359 * on @next to become !NULL.
Peter Zijlstra53bf57f2018-09-26 13:01:18 +0200360 */
361 if (unlikely(val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK)) {
Peter Zijlstra756b1df2018-09-26 13:01:19 +0200362
363 /* Undo PENDING if we set it. */
Peter Zijlstra53bf57f2018-09-26 13:01:18 +0200364 if (!(val & _Q_PENDING_MASK))
365 clear_pending(lock);
Peter Zijlstra756b1df2018-09-26 13:01:19 +0200366
Peter Zijlstra53bf57f2018-09-26 13:01:18 +0200367 goto queue;
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)c1fb1592015-04-24 14:56:32 -0400368 }
369
370 /*
Peter Zijlstra53bf57f2018-09-26 13:01:18 +0200371 * We're pending, wait for the owner to go away.
372 *
373 * 0,1,1 -> 0,1,0
374 *
375 * this wait loop must be a load-acquire such that we match the
376 * store-release that clears the locked bit and create lock
377 * sequentiality; this is because not all
378 * clear_pending_set_locked() implementations imply full
379 * barriers.
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)c1fb1592015-04-24 14:56:32 -0400380 */
Peter Zijlstra53bf57f2018-09-26 13:01:18 +0200381 if (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)
382 atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_MASK));
383
384 /*
385 * take ownership and clear the pending bit.
386 *
387 * 0,1,0 -> 0,0,1
388 */
389 clear_pending_set_locked(lock);
Waiman Longad53fa12019-04-04 13:43:16 -0400390 lockevent_inc(lock_pending);
Peter Zijlstra53bf57f2018-09-26 13:01:18 +0200391 return;
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)c1fb1592015-04-24 14:56:32 -0400392
393 /*
394 * End of pending bit optimistic spinning and beginning of MCS
395 * queuing.
396 */
397queue:
Waiman Longad53fa12019-04-04 13:43:16 -0400398 lockevent_inc(lock_slowpath);
Waiman Long81d3dc92018-04-26 11:34:27 +0100399pv_queue:
Waiman Long0fa809c2018-10-16 09:45:07 -0400400 node = this_cpu_ptr(&qnodes[0].mcs);
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400401 idx = node->count++;
402 tail = encode_tail(smp_processor_id(), idx);
403
Waiman Longd682b592019-01-29 22:53:45 +0100404 /*
405 * 4 nodes are allocated based on the assumption that there will
406 * not be nested NMIs taking spinlocks. That may not be true in
407 * some architectures even though the chance of needing more than
408 * 4 nodes will still be extremely unlikely. When that happens,
409 * we fall back to spinning on the lock directly without using
410 * any MCS node. This is not the most elegant solution, but is
411 * simple enough.
412 */
413 if (unlikely(idx >= MAX_NODES)) {
Waiman Longad53fa12019-04-04 13:43:16 -0400414 lockevent_inc(lock_no_node);
Waiman Longd682b592019-01-29 22:53:45 +0100415 while (!queued_spin_trylock(lock))
416 cpu_relax();
417 goto release;
418 }
419
Waiman Long0fa809c2018-10-16 09:45:07 -0400420 node = grab_mcs_node(node, idx);
Will Deacon11dc1322018-02-13 13:22:57 +0000421
422 /*
Waiman Long12221092018-10-16 09:45:06 -0400423 * Keep counts of non-zero index values:
424 */
Waiman Longad53fa12019-04-04 13:43:16 -0400425 lockevent_cond_inc(lock_use_node2 + idx - 1, idx);
Waiman Long12221092018-10-16 09:45:06 -0400426
427 /*
Will Deacon11dc1322018-02-13 13:22:57 +0000428 * Ensure that we increment the head node->count before initialising
429 * the actual node. If the compiler is kind enough to reorder these
430 * stores, then an IRQ could overwrite our assignments.
431 */
432 barrier();
433
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400434 node->locked = 0;
435 node->next = NULL;
Waiman Longa23db282015-04-24 14:56:37 -0400436 pv_init_node(node);
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400437
438 /*
Waiman Long6403bd72015-04-24 14:56:33 -0400439 * We touched a (possibly) cold cacheline in the per-cpu queue node;
440 * attempt the trylock once more in the hope someone let go while we
441 * weren't watching.
442 */
443 if (queued_spin_trylock(lock))
444 goto release;
445
446 /*
Will Deacon9d4646d2018-04-26 11:34:25 +0100447 * Ensure that the initialisation of @node is complete before we
448 * publish the updated tail via xchg_tail() and potentially link
449 * @node into the waitqueue via WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node) below.
450 */
451 smp_wmb();
452
453 /*
454 * Publish the updated tail.
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)c1fb1592015-04-24 14:56:32 -0400455 * We have already touched the queueing cacheline; don't bother with
456 * pending stuff.
457 *
Waiman Long6403bd72015-04-24 14:56:33 -0400458 * p,*,* -> n,*,*
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400459 */
Waiman Long6403bd72015-04-24 14:56:33 -0400460 old = xchg_tail(lock, tail);
Waiman Longaa687442015-11-09 19:09:23 -0500461 next = NULL;
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400462
463 /*
464 * if there was a previous node; link it and wait until reaching the
465 * head of the waitqueue.
466 */
Waiman Long6403bd72015-04-24 14:56:33 -0400467 if (old & _Q_TAIL_MASK) {
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400468 prev = decode_tail(old);
Peter Zijlstra8d53fa12016-06-08 09:12:30 +0200469
Will Deacon9d4646d2018-04-26 11:34:25 +0100470 /* Link @node into the waitqueue. */
471 WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node);
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400472
Waiman Longcd0272f2015-11-09 19:09:27 -0500473 pv_wait_node(node, prev);
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400474 arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(&node->locked);
Waiman Long81b55982015-11-09 19:09:22 -0500475
476 /*
477 * While waiting for the MCS lock, the next pointer may have
478 * been set by another lock waiter. We optimistically load
479 * the next pointer & prefetch the cacheline for writing
480 * to reduce latency in the upcoming MCS unlock operation.
481 */
482 next = READ_ONCE(node->next);
483 if (next)
484 prefetchw(next);
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400485 }
486
487 /*
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)c1fb1592015-04-24 14:56:32 -0400488 * we're at the head of the waitqueue, wait for the owner & pending to
489 * go away.
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400490 *
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)c1fb1592015-04-24 14:56:32 -0400491 * *,x,y -> *,0,0
Waiman Long2c83e8e2015-04-24 14:56:35 -0400492 *
493 * this wait loop must use a load-acquire such that we match the
494 * store-release that clears the locked bit and create lock
495 * sequentiality; this is because the set_locked() function below
496 * does not imply a full barrier.
497 *
Waiman Long1c4941f2015-11-10 16:18:56 -0500498 * The PV pv_wait_head_or_lock function, if active, will acquire
499 * the lock and return a non-zero value. So we have to skip the
Will Deaconf9c811fa2018-04-26 11:34:21 +0100500 * atomic_cond_read_acquire() call. As the next PV queue head hasn't
501 * been designated yet, there is no way for the locked value to become
Waiman Long1c4941f2015-11-10 16:18:56 -0500502 * _Q_SLOW_VAL. So both the set_locked() and the
503 * atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed() calls will be safe.
504 *
505 * If PV isn't active, 0 will be returned instead.
506 *
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400507 */
Waiman Long1c4941f2015-11-10 16:18:56 -0500508 if ((val = pv_wait_head_or_lock(lock, node)))
509 goto locked;
510
Will Deaconf9c811fa2018-04-26 11:34:21 +0100511 val = atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK));
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400512
Waiman Long1c4941f2015-11-10 16:18:56 -0500513locked:
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400514 /*
515 * claim the lock:
516 *
Peter Zijlstra (Intel)c1fb1592015-04-24 14:56:32 -0400517 * n,0,0 -> 0,0,1 : lock, uncontended
Will Deacon59fb5862018-04-26 11:34:19 +0100518 * *,*,0 -> *,*,1 : lock, contended
Waiman Long2c83e8e2015-04-24 14:56:35 -0400519 *
Will Deacon59fb5862018-04-26 11:34:19 +0100520 * If the queue head is the only one in the queue (lock value == tail)
521 * and nobody is pending, clear the tail code and grab the lock.
522 * Otherwise, we only need to grab the lock.
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400523 */
Will Deaconc61da582018-04-26 11:34:20 +0100524
Will Deaconae75d902018-04-26 11:34:26 +0100525 /*
Peter Zijlstra756b1df2018-09-26 13:01:19 +0200526 * In the PV case we might already have _Q_LOCKED_VAL set, because
527 * of lock stealing; therefore we must also allow:
Will Deaconae75d902018-04-26 11:34:26 +0100528 *
Peter Zijlstra756b1df2018-09-26 13:01:19 +0200529 * n,0,1 -> 0,0,1
530 *
531 * Note: at this point: (val & _Q_PENDING_MASK) == 0, because of the
532 * above wait condition, therefore any concurrent setting of
533 * PENDING will make the uncontended transition fail.
Will Deaconae75d902018-04-26 11:34:26 +0100534 */
Peter Zijlstra756b1df2018-09-26 13:01:19 +0200535 if ((val & _Q_TAIL_MASK) == tail) {
536 if (atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->val, &val, _Q_LOCKED_VAL))
537 goto release; /* No contention */
538 }
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400539
Peter Zijlstra756b1df2018-09-26 13:01:19 +0200540 /*
541 * Either somebody is queued behind us or _Q_PENDING_VAL got set
542 * which will then detect the remaining tail and queue behind us
543 * ensuring we'll see a @next.
544 */
Will Deaconc61da582018-04-26 11:34:20 +0100545 set_locked(lock);
546
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400547 /*
Waiman Longaa687442015-11-09 19:09:23 -0500548 * contended path; wait for next if not observed yet, release.
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400549 */
Will Deaconc131a192018-04-26 11:34:23 +0100550 if (!next)
551 next = smp_cond_load_relaxed(&node->next, (VAL));
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400552
Waiman Long2c83e8e2015-04-24 14:56:35 -0400553 arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(&next->locked);
Waiman Long75d22702015-07-11 16:36:52 -0400554 pv_kick_node(lock, next);
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400555
556release:
557 /*
558 * release the node
559 */
Waiman Long0fa809c2018-10-16 09:45:07 -0400560 __this_cpu_dec(qnodes[0].mcs.count);
Waiman Longa33fda32015-04-24 14:56:30 -0400561}
562EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
Waiman Longa23db282015-04-24 14:56:37 -0400563
564/*
565 * Generate the paravirt code for queued_spin_unlock_slowpath().
566 */
567#if !defined(_GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH) && defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS)
568#define _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH
569
570#undef pv_enabled
571#define pv_enabled() true
572
573#undef pv_init_node
574#undef pv_wait_node
575#undef pv_kick_node
Waiman Long1c4941f2015-11-10 16:18:56 -0500576#undef pv_wait_head_or_lock
Waiman Longa23db282015-04-24 14:56:37 -0400577
578#undef queued_spin_lock_slowpath
579#define queued_spin_lock_slowpath __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
580
581#include "qspinlock_paravirt.h"
582#include "qspinlock.c"
583
Zhenzhong Duan05eee612019-10-23 19:16:22 +0800584bool nopvspin __initdata;
585static __init int parse_nopvspin(char *arg)
586{
587 nopvspin = true;
588 return 0;
589}
590early_param("nopvspin", parse_nopvspin);
Waiman Longa23db282015-04-24 14:56:37 -0400591#endif