blob: 595b0757ad2bba4db9bbe868ed81126d55fc5952 [file] [log] [blame]
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002Control Group v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03003================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05004
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03005:Date: October, 2015
6:Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05007
8This is the authoritative documentation on the design, interface and
9conventions of cgroup v2. It describes all userland-visible aspects
10of cgroup including core and specific controller behaviors. All
11future changes must be reflected in this document. Documentation for
W. Trevor King9a2ddda2016-01-27 13:01:52 -080012v1 is available under Documentation/cgroup-v1/.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050013
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030014.. CONTENTS
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050015
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030016 1. Introduction
17 1-1. Terminology
18 1-2. What is cgroup?
19 2. Basic Operations
20 2-1. Mounting
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -040021 2-2. Organizing Processes and Threads
22 2-2-1. Processes
23 2-2-2. Threads
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030024 2-3. [Un]populated Notification
25 2-4. Controlling Controllers
26 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling
27 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint
28 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint
29 2-5. Delegation
30 2-5-1. Model of Delegation
31 2-5-2. Delegation Containment
32 2-6. Guidelines
33 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control
34 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions
35 3. Resource Distribution Models
36 3-1. Weights
37 3-2. Limits
38 3-3. Protections
39 3-4. Allocations
40 4. Interface Files
41 4-1. Format
42 4-2. Conventions
43 4-3. Core Interface Files
44 5. Controllers
45 5-1. CPU
46 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files
47 5-2. Memory
48 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files
49 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines
50 5-2-3. Memory Ownership
51 5-3. IO
52 5-3-1. IO Interface Files
53 5-3-2. Writeback
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -040054 5-3-3. IO Latency
55 5-3-3-1. How IO Latency Throttling Works
56 5-3-3-2. IO Latency Interface Files
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030057 5-4. PID
58 5-4-1. PID Interface Files
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -050059 5-5. Cpuset
60 5.5-1. Cpuset Interface Files
61 5-6. Device
62 5-7. RDMA
63 5-7-1. RDMA Interface Files
64 5-8. Misc
65 5-8-1. perf_event
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +010066 5-N. Non-normative information
67 5-N-1. CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
68 5-N-2. IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030069 6. Namespace
70 6-1. Basics
71 6-2. The Root and Views
72 6-3. Migration and setns(2)
73 6-4. Interaction with Other Namespaces
74 P. Information on Kernel Programming
75 P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback
76 D. Deprecated v1 Core Features
77 R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
78 R-1. Multiple Hierarchies
79 R-2. Thread Granularity
80 R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
81 R-4. Other Interface Issues
82 R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies
83 R-5-1. Memory
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050084
85
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030086Introduction
87============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050088
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030089Terminology
90-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050091
92"cgroup" stands for "control group" and is never capitalized. The
93singular form is used to designate the whole feature and also as a
94qualifier as in "cgroup controllers". When explicitly referring to
95multiple individual control groups, the plural form "cgroups" is used.
96
97
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030098What is cgroup?
99---------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500100
101cgroup is a mechanism to organize processes hierarchically and
102distribute system resources along the hierarchy in a controlled and
103configurable manner.
104
105cgroup is largely composed of two parts - the core and controllers.
106cgroup core is primarily responsible for hierarchically organizing
107processes. A cgroup controller is usually responsible for
108distributing a specific type of system resource along the hierarchy
109although there are utility controllers which serve purposes other than
110resource distribution.
111
112cgroups form a tree structure and every process in the system belongs
113to one and only one cgroup. All threads of a process belong to the
114same cgroup. On creation, all processes are put in the cgroup that
115the parent process belongs to at the time. A process can be migrated
116to another cgroup. Migration of a process doesn't affect already
117existing descendant processes.
118
119Following certain structural constraints, controllers may be enabled or
120disabled selectively on a cgroup. All controller behaviors are
121hierarchical - if a controller is enabled on a cgroup, it affects all
122processes which belong to the cgroups consisting the inclusive
123sub-hierarchy of the cgroup. When a controller is enabled on a nested
124cgroup, it always restricts the resource distribution further. The
125restrictions set closer to the root in the hierarchy can not be
126overridden from further away.
127
128
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300129Basic Operations
130================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500131
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300132Mounting
133--------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500134
135Unlike v1, cgroup v2 has only single hierarchy. The cgroup v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300136hierarchy can be mounted with the following mount command::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500137
138 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
139
140cgroup2 filesystem has the magic number 0x63677270 ("cgrp"). All
141controllers which support v2 and are not bound to a v1 hierarchy are
142automatically bound to the v2 hierarchy and show up at the root.
143Controllers which are not in active use in the v2 hierarchy can be
144bound to other hierarchies. This allows mixing v2 hierarchy with the
145legacy v1 multiple hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way.
146
147A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller
148is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy. Because per-cgroup
149controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may
150have lingering references, a controller may not show up immediately on
151the v2 hierarchy after the final umount of the previous hierarchy.
152Similarly, a controller should be fully disabled to be moved out of
153the unified hierarchy and it may take some time for the disabled
154controller to become available for other hierarchies; furthermore, due
155to inter-controller dependencies, other controllers may need to be
156disabled too.
157
158While useful for development and manual configurations, moving
159controllers dynamically between the v2 and other hierarchies is
160strongly discouraged for production use. It is recommended to decide
161the hierarchies and controller associations before starting using the
162controllers after system boot.
163
Johannes Weiner1619b6d2016-02-16 13:21:14 -0500164During transition to v2, system management software might still
165automount the v1 cgroup filesystem and so hijack all controllers
166during boot, before manual intervention is possible. To make testing
167and experimenting easier, the kernel parameter cgroup_no_v1= allows
168disabling controllers in v1 and make them always available in v2.
169
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400170cgroup v2 currently supports the following mount options.
171
172 nsdelegate
173
174 Consider cgroup namespaces as delegation boundaries. This
175 option is system wide and can only be set on mount or modified
176 through remount from the init namespace. The mount option is
177 ignored on non-init namespace mounts. Please refer to the
178 Delegation section for details.
179
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500180
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400181Organizing Processes and Threads
182--------------------------------
183
184Processes
185~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500186
187Initially, only the root cgroup exists to which all processes belong.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300188A child cgroup can be created by creating a sub-directory::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500189
190 # mkdir $CGROUP_NAME
191
192A given cgroup may have multiple child cgroups forming a tree
193structure. Each cgroup has a read-writable interface file
194"cgroup.procs". When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which
195belong to the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
196same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved to
197another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while reading.
198
199A process can be migrated into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
200target cgroup's "cgroup.procs" file. Only one process can be migrated
201on a single write(2) call. If a process is composed of multiple
202threads, writing the PID of any thread migrates all threads of the
203process.
204
205When a process forks a child process, the new process is born into the
206cgroup that the forking process belongs to at the time of the
207operation. After exit, a process stays associated with the cgroup
208that it belonged to at the time of exit until it's reaped; however, a
209zombie process does not appear in "cgroup.procs" and thus can't be
210moved to another cgroup.
211
212A cgroup which doesn't have any children or live processes can be
213destroyed by removing the directory. Note that a cgroup which doesn't
214have any children and is associated only with zombie processes is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300215considered empty and can be removed::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500216
217 # rmdir $CGROUP_NAME
218
219"/proc/$PID/cgroup" lists a process's cgroup membership. If legacy
220cgroup is in use in the system, this file may contain multiple lines,
221one for each hierarchy. The entry for cgroup v2 is always in the
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300222format "0::$PATH"::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500223
224 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
225 ...
226 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested
227
228If the process becomes a zombie and the cgroup it was associated with
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300229is removed subsequently, " (deleted)" is appended to the path::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500230
231 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
232 ...
233 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested (deleted)
234
235
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400236Threads
237~~~~~~~
238
239cgroup v2 supports thread granularity for a subset of controllers to
240support use cases requiring hierarchical resource distribution across
241the threads of a group of processes. By default, all threads of a
242process belong to the same cgroup, which also serves as the resource
243domain to host resource consumptions which are not specific to a
244process or thread. The thread mode allows threads to be spread across
245a subtree while still maintaining the common resource domain for them.
246
247Controllers which support thread mode are called threaded controllers.
248The ones which don't are called domain controllers.
249
250Marking a cgroup threaded makes it join the resource domain of its
251parent as a threaded cgroup. The parent may be another threaded
252cgroup whose resource domain is further up in the hierarchy. The root
253of a threaded subtree, that is, the nearest ancestor which is not
254threaded, is called threaded domain or thread root interchangeably and
255serves as the resource domain for the entire subtree.
256
257Inside a threaded subtree, threads of a process can be put in
258different cgroups and are not subject to the no internal process
259constraint - threaded controllers can be enabled on non-leaf cgroups
260whether they have threads in them or not.
261
262As the threaded domain cgroup hosts all the domain resource
263consumptions of the subtree, it is considered to have internal
264resource consumptions whether there are processes in it or not and
265can't have populated child cgroups which aren't threaded. Because the
266root cgroup is not subject to no internal process constraint, it can
267serve both as a threaded domain and a parent to domain cgroups.
268
269The current operation mode or type of the cgroup is shown in the
270"cgroup.type" file which indicates whether the cgroup is a normal
271domain, a domain which is serving as the domain of a threaded subtree,
272or a threaded cgroup.
273
274On creation, a cgroup is always a domain cgroup and can be made
275threaded by writing "threaded" to the "cgroup.type" file. The
276operation is single direction::
277
278 # echo threaded > cgroup.type
279
280Once threaded, the cgroup can't be made a domain again. To enable the
281thread mode, the following conditions must be met.
282
283- As the cgroup will join the parent's resource domain. The parent
284 must either be a valid (threaded) domain or a threaded cgroup.
285
Tejun Heo918a8c22017-07-23 08:18:26 -0400286- When the parent is an unthreaded domain, it must not have any domain
287 controllers enabled or populated domain children. The root is
288 exempt from this requirement.
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400289
290Topology-wise, a cgroup can be in an invalid state. Please consider
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +0100291the following topology::
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400292
293 A (threaded domain) - B (threaded) - C (domain, just created)
294
295C is created as a domain but isn't connected to a parent which can
296host child domains. C can't be used until it is turned into a
297threaded cgroup. "cgroup.type" file will report "domain (invalid)" in
298these cases. Operations which fail due to invalid topology use
299EOPNOTSUPP as the errno.
300
301A domain cgroup is turned into a threaded domain when one of its child
302cgroup becomes threaded or threaded controllers are enabled in the
303"cgroup.subtree_control" file while there are processes in the cgroup.
304A threaded domain reverts to a normal domain when the conditions
305clear.
306
307When read, "cgroup.threads" contains the list of the thread IDs of all
308threads in the cgroup. Except that the operations are per-thread
309instead of per-process, "cgroup.threads" has the same format and
310behaves the same way as "cgroup.procs". While "cgroup.threads" can be
311written to in any cgroup, as it can only move threads inside the same
312threaded domain, its operations are confined inside each threaded
313subtree.
314
315The threaded domain cgroup serves as the resource domain for the whole
316subtree, and, while the threads can be scattered across the subtree,
317all the processes are considered to be in the threaded domain cgroup.
318"cgroup.procs" in a threaded domain cgroup contains the PIDs of all
319processes in the subtree and is not readable in the subtree proper.
320However, "cgroup.procs" can be written to from anywhere in the subtree
321to migrate all threads of the matching process to the cgroup.
322
323Only threaded controllers can be enabled in a threaded subtree. When
324a threaded controller is enabled inside a threaded subtree, it only
325accounts for and controls resource consumptions associated with the
326threads in the cgroup and its descendants. All consumptions which
327aren't tied to a specific thread belong to the threaded domain cgroup.
328
329Because a threaded subtree is exempt from no internal process
330constraint, a threaded controller must be able to handle competition
331between threads in a non-leaf cgroup and its child cgroups. Each
332threaded controller defines how such competitions are handled.
333
334
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300335[Un]populated Notification
336--------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500337
338Each non-root cgroup has a "cgroup.events" file which contains
339"populated" field indicating whether the cgroup's sub-hierarchy has
340live processes in it. Its value is 0 if there is no live process in
341the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1. poll and [id]notify
342events are triggered when the value changes. This can be used, for
343example, to start a clean-up operation after all processes of a given
344sub-hierarchy have exited. The populated state updates and
345notifications are recursive. Consider the following sub-hierarchy
346where the numbers in the parentheses represent the numbers of processes
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300347in each cgroup::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500348
349 A(4) - B(0) - C(1)
350 \ D(0)
351
352A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0. After the one
353process in C exits, B and C's "populated" fields would flip to "0" and
354file modified events will be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of
355both cgroups.
356
357
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300358Controlling Controllers
359-----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500360
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300361Enabling and Disabling
362~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500363
364Each cgroup has a "cgroup.controllers" file which lists all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300365controllers available for the cgroup to enable::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500366
367 # cat cgroup.controllers
368 cpu io memory
369
370No controller is enabled by default. Controllers can be enabled and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300371disabled by writing to the "cgroup.subtree_control" file::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500372
373 # echo "+cpu +memory -io" > cgroup.subtree_control
374
375Only controllers which are listed in "cgroup.controllers" can be
376enabled. When multiple operations are specified as above, either they
377all succeed or fail. If multiple operations on the same controller
378are specified, the last one is effective.
379
380Enabling a controller in a cgroup indicates that the distribution of
381the target resource across its immediate children will be controlled.
382Consider the following sub-hierarchy. The enabled controllers are
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300383listed in parentheses::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500384
385 A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C()
386 \ D()
387
388As A has "cpu" and "memory" enabled, A will control the distribution
389of CPU cycles and memory to its children, in this case, B. As B has
390"memory" enabled but not "CPU", C and D will compete freely on CPU
391cycles but their division of memory available to B will be controlled.
392
393As a controller regulates the distribution of the target resource to
394the cgroup's children, enabling it creates the controller's interface
395files in the child cgroups. In the above example, enabling "cpu" on B
396would create the "cpu." prefixed controller interface files in C and
397D. Likewise, disabling "memory" from B would remove the "memory."
398prefixed controller interface files from C and D. This means that the
399controller interface files - anything which doesn't start with
400"cgroup." are owned by the parent rather than the cgroup itself.
401
402
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300403Top-down Constraint
404~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500405
406Resources are distributed top-down and a cgroup can further distribute
407a resource only if the resource has been distributed to it from the
408parent. This means that all non-root "cgroup.subtree_control" files
409can only contain controllers which are enabled in the parent's
410"cgroup.subtree_control" file. A controller can be enabled only if
411the parent has the controller enabled and a controller can't be
412disabled if one or more children have it enabled.
413
414
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300415No Internal Process Constraint
416~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500417
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400418Non-root cgroups can distribute domain resources to their children
419only when they don't have any processes of their own. In other words,
420only domain cgroups which don't contain any processes can have domain
421controllers enabled in their "cgroup.subtree_control" files.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500422
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400423This guarantees that, when a domain controller is looking at the part
424of the hierarchy which has it enabled, processes are always only on
425the leaves. This rules out situations where child cgroups compete
426against internal processes of the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500427
428The root cgroup is exempt from this restriction. Root contains
429processes and anonymous resource consumption which can't be associated
430with any other cgroups and requires special treatment from most
431controllers. How resource consumption in the root cgroup is governed
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +0100432is up to each controller (for more information on this topic please
433refer to the Non-normative information section in the Controllers
434chapter).
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500435
436Note that the restriction doesn't get in the way if there is no
437enabled controller in the cgroup's "cgroup.subtree_control". This is
438important as otherwise it wouldn't be possible to create children of a
439populated cgroup. To control resource distribution of a cgroup, the
440cgroup must create children and transfer all its processes to the
441children before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control"
442file.
443
444
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300445Delegation
446----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500447
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300448Model of Delegation
449~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500450
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400451A cgroup can be delegated in two ways. First, to a less privileged
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400452user by granting write access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs",
453"cgroup.threads" and "cgroup.subtree_control" files to the user.
454Second, if the "nsdelegate" mount option is set, automatically to a
455cgroup namespace on namespace creation.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500456
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400457Because the resource control interface files in a given directory
458control the distribution of the parent's resources, the delegatee
459shouldn't be allowed to write to them. For the first method, this is
460achieved by not granting access to these files. For the second, the
461kernel rejects writes to all files other than "cgroup.procs" and
462"cgroup.subtree_control" on a namespace root from inside the
463namespace.
464
465The end results are equivalent for both delegation types. Once
466delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory,
467organize processes inside it as it sees fit and further distribute the
468resources it received from the parent. The limits and other settings
469of all resource controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what
470happens in the delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the
471resource restrictions imposed by the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500472
473Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of
474cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however,
475this may be limited explicitly in the future.
476
477
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300478Delegation Containment
479~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500480
481A delegated sub-hierarchy is contained in the sense that processes
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400482can't be moved into or out of the sub-hierarchy by the delegatee.
483
484For delegations to a less privileged user, this is achieved by
485requiring the following conditions for a process with a non-root euid
486to migrate a target process into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
487"cgroup.procs" file.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500488
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500489- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
490
491- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
492 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
493
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500494The above two constraints ensure that while a delegatee may migrate
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500495processes around freely in the delegated sub-hierarchy it can't pull
496in from or push out to outside the sub-hierarchy.
497
498For an example, let's assume cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to
499user U0 who created C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300500all processes under C0 and C1 belong to U0::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500501
502 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00
503 ~ cgroup ~ \ C01
504 ~ hierarchy ~
505 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10
506
507Let's also say U0 wants to write the PID of a process which is
508currently in C10 into "C00/cgroup.procs". U0 has write access to the
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500509file; however, the common ancestor of the source cgroup C10 and the
510destination cgroup C00 is above the points of delegation and U0 would
511not have write access to its "cgroup.procs" files and thus the write
512will be denied with -EACCES.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500513
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400514For delegations to namespaces, containment is achieved by requiring
515that both the source and destination cgroups are reachable from the
516namespace of the process which is attempting the migration. If either
517is not reachable, the migration is rejected with -ENOENT.
518
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500519
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300520Guidelines
521----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500522
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300523Organize Once and Control
524~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500525
526Migrating a process across cgroups is a relatively expensive operation
527and stateful resources such as memory are not moved together with the
528process. This is an explicit design decision as there often exist
529inherent trade-offs between migration and various hot paths in terms
530of synchronization cost.
531
532As such, migrating processes across cgroups frequently as a means to
533apply different resource restrictions is discouraged. A workload
534should be assigned to a cgroup according to the system's logical and
535resource structure once on start-up. Dynamic adjustments to resource
536distribution can be made by changing controller configuration through
537the interface files.
538
539
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300540Avoid Name Collisions
541~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500542
543Interface files for a cgroup and its children cgroups occupy the same
544directory and it is possible to create children cgroups which collide
545with interface files.
546
547All cgroup core interface files are prefixed with "cgroup." and each
548controller's interface files are prefixed with the controller name and
549a dot. A controller's name is composed of lower case alphabets and
550'_'s but never begins with an '_' so it can be used as the prefix
551character for collision avoidance. Also, interface file names won't
552start or end with terms which are often used in categorizing workloads
553such as job, service, slice, unit or workload.
554
555cgroup doesn't do anything to prevent name collisions and it's the
556user's responsibility to avoid them.
557
558
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300559Resource Distribution Models
560============================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500561
562cgroup controllers implement several resource distribution schemes
563depending on the resource type and expected use cases. This section
564describes major schemes in use along with their expected behaviors.
565
566
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300567Weights
568-------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500569
570A parent's resource is distributed by adding up the weights of all
571active children and giving each the fraction matching the ratio of its
572weight against the sum. As only children which can make use of the
573resource at the moment participate in the distribution, this is
574work-conserving. Due to the dynamic nature, this model is usually
575used for stateless resources.
576
577All weights are in the range [1, 10000] with the default at 100. This
578allows symmetric multiplicative biases in both directions at fine
579enough granularity while staying in the intuitive range.
580
581As long as the weight is in range, all configuration combinations are
582valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
583process migrations.
584
585"cpu.weight" proportionally distributes CPU cycles to active children
586and is an example of this type.
587
588
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300589Limits
590------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500591
592A child can only consume upto the configured amount of the resource.
593Limits can be over-committed - the sum of the limits of children can
594exceed the amount of resource available to the parent.
595
596Limits are in the range [0, max] and defaults to "max", which is noop.
597
598As limits can be over-committed, all configuration combinations are
599valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
600process migrations.
601
602"io.max" limits the maximum BPS and/or IOPS that a cgroup can consume
603on an IO device and is an example of this type.
604
605
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300606Protections
607-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500608
609A cgroup is protected to be allocated upto the configured amount of
610the resource if the usages of all its ancestors are under their
611protected levels. Protections can be hard guarantees or best effort
612soft boundaries. Protections can also be over-committed in which case
613only upto the amount available to the parent is protected among
614children.
615
616Protections are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is
617noop.
618
619As protections can be over-committed, all configuration combinations
620are valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
621process migrations.
622
623"memory.low" implements best-effort memory protection and is an
624example of this type.
625
626
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300627Allocations
628-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500629
630A cgroup is exclusively allocated a certain amount of a finite
631resource. Allocations can't be over-committed - the sum of the
632allocations of children can not exceed the amount of resource
633available to the parent.
634
635Allocations are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is no
636resource.
637
638As allocations can't be over-committed, some configuration
639combinations are invalid and should be rejected. Also, if the
640resource is mandatory for execution of processes, process migrations
641may be rejected.
642
643"cpu.rt.max" hard-allocates realtime slices and is an example of this
644type.
645
646
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300647Interface Files
648===============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500649
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300650Format
651------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500652
653All interface files should be in one of the following formats whenever
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300654possible::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500655
656 New-line separated values
657 (when only one value can be written at once)
658
659 VAL0\n
660 VAL1\n
661 ...
662
663 Space separated values
664 (when read-only or multiple values can be written at once)
665
666 VAL0 VAL1 ...\n
667
668 Flat keyed
669
670 KEY0 VAL0\n
671 KEY1 VAL1\n
672 ...
673
674 Nested keyed
675
676 KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01...
677 KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11...
678 ...
679
680For a writable file, the format for writing should generally match
681reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or
682implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases.
683
684For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key
685can be written at a time. For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs
686may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified.
687
688
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300689Conventions
690-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500691
692- Settings for a single feature should be contained in a single file.
693
694- The root cgroup should be exempt from resource control and thus
695 shouldn't have resource control interface files. Also,
696 informational files on the root cgroup which end up showing global
697 information available elsewhere shouldn't exist.
698
699- If a controller implements weight based resource distribution, its
700 interface file should be named "weight" and have the range [1,
701 10000] with 100 as the default. The values are chosen to allow
702 enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it
703 intuitive (the default is 100%).
704
705- If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or
706 limit, the interface files should be named "min" and "max"
707 respectively. If a controller implements best effort resource
708 guarantee and/or limit, the interface files should be named "low"
709 and "high" respectively.
710
711 In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be
712 used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing.
713
714- If a setting has a configurable default value and keyed specific
715 overrides, the default entry should be keyed with "default" and
716 appear as the first entry in the file.
717
718 The default value can be updated by writing either "default $VAL" or
719 "$VAL".
720
721 When writing to update a specific override, "default" can be used as
722 the value to indicate removal of the override. Override entries
723 with "default" as the value must not appear when read.
724
725 For example, a setting which is keyed by major:minor device numbers
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300726 with integer values may look like the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500727
728 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
729 default 150
730 8:0 300
731
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300732 The default value can be updated by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500733
734 # echo 125 > cgroup-example-interface-file
735
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300736 or::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500737
738 # echo "default 125" > cgroup-example-interface-file
739
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300740 An override can be set by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500741
742 # echo "8:16 170" > cgroup-example-interface-file
743
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300744 and cleared by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500745
746 # echo "8:0 default" > cgroup-example-interface-file
747 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
748 default 125
749 8:16 170
750
751- For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file
752 "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs.
753 Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be
754 generated on the file.
755
756
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300757Core Interface Files
758--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500759
760All cgroup core files are prefixed with "cgroup."
761
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400762 cgroup.type
763
764 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
765 cgroups.
766
767 When read, it indicates the current type of the cgroup, which
768 can be one of the following values.
769
770 - "domain" : A normal valid domain cgroup.
771
772 - "domain threaded" : A threaded domain cgroup which is
773 serving as the root of a threaded subtree.
774
775 - "domain invalid" : A cgroup which is in an invalid state.
776 It can't be populated or have controllers enabled. It may
777 be allowed to become a threaded cgroup.
778
779 - "threaded" : A threaded cgroup which is a member of a
780 threaded subtree.
781
782 A cgroup can be turned into a threaded cgroup by writing
783 "threaded" to this file.
784
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500785 cgroup.procs
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500786 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
787 all cgroups.
788
789 When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which belong to
790 the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
791 same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved
792 to another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while
793 reading.
794
795 A PID can be written to migrate the process associated with
796 the PID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
797 following conditions.
798
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500799 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
800
801 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
802 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
803
804 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
805 should be granted along with the containing directory.
806
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400807 In a threaded cgroup, reading this file fails with EOPNOTSUPP
808 as all the processes belong to the thread root. Writing is
809 supported and moves every thread of the process to the cgroup.
810
811 cgroup.threads
812 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
813 all cgroups.
814
815 When read, it lists the TIDs of all threads which belong to
816 the cgroup one-per-line. The TIDs are not ordered and the
817 same TID may show up more than once if the thread got moved to
818 another cgroup and then back or the TID got recycled while
819 reading.
820
821 A TID can be written to migrate the thread associated with the
822 TID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
823 following conditions.
824
825 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.threads" file.
826
827 - The cgroup that the thread is currently in must be in the
828 same resource domain as the destination cgroup.
829
830 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
831 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
832
833 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
834 should be granted along with the containing directory.
835
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500836 cgroup.controllers
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500837 A read-only space separated values file which exists on all
838 cgroups.
839
840 It shows space separated list of all controllers available to
841 the cgroup. The controllers are not ordered.
842
843 cgroup.subtree_control
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500844 A read-write space separated values file which exists on all
845 cgroups. Starts out empty.
846
847 When read, it shows space separated list of the controllers
848 which are enabled to control resource distribution from the
849 cgroup to its children.
850
851 Space separated list of controllers prefixed with '+' or '-'
852 can be written to enable or disable controllers. A controller
853 name prefixed with '+' enables the controller and '-'
854 disables. If a controller appears more than once on the list,
855 the last one is effective. When multiple enable and disable
856 operations are specified, either all succeed or all fail.
857
858 cgroup.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500859 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
860 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
861 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
862 modified event.
863
864 populated
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500865 1 if the cgroup or its descendants contains any live
866 processes; otherwise, 0.
867
Roman Gushchin1a926e02017-07-28 18:28:44 +0100868 cgroup.max.descendants
869 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
870
871 Maximum allowed number of descent cgroups.
872 If the actual number of descendants is equal or larger,
873 an attempt to create a new cgroup in the hierarchy will fail.
874
875 cgroup.max.depth
876 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
877
878 Maximum allowed descent depth below the current cgroup.
879 If the actual descent depth is equal or larger,
880 an attempt to create a new child cgroup will fail.
881
Roman Gushchinec392252017-08-02 17:55:31 +0100882 cgroup.stat
883 A read-only flat-keyed file with the following entries:
884
885 nr_descendants
886 Total number of visible descendant cgroups.
887
888 nr_dying_descendants
889 Total number of dying descendant cgroups. A cgroup becomes
890 dying after being deleted by a user. The cgroup will remain
891 in dying state for some time undefined time (which can depend
892 on system load) before being completely destroyed.
893
894 A process can't enter a dying cgroup under any circumstances,
895 a dying cgroup can't revive.
896
897 A dying cgroup can consume system resources not exceeding
898 limits, which were active at the moment of cgroup deletion.
899
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500900
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300901Controllers
902===========
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500903
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300904CPU
905---
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500906
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500907The "cpu" controllers regulates distribution of CPU cycles. This
908controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for
909normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for
910realtime scheduling policy.
911
Tejun Heoc2f31b72017-12-05 09:10:17 -0800912WARNING: cgroup2 doesn't yet support control of realtime processes and
913the cpu controller can only be enabled when all RT processes are in
914the root cgroup. Be aware that system management software may already
915have placed RT processes into nonroot cgroups during the system boot
916process, and these processes may need to be moved to the root cgroup
917before the cpu controller can be enabled.
918
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500919
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300920CPU Interface Files
921~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500922
923All time durations are in microseconds.
924
925 cpu.stat
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500926 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700927 This file exists whether the controller is enabled or not.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500928
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700929 It always reports the following three stats:
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500930
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300931 - usage_usec
932 - user_usec
933 - system_usec
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700934
935 and the following three when the controller is enabled:
936
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300937 - nr_periods
938 - nr_throttled
939 - throttled_usec
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500940
941 cpu.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500942 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
943 cgroups. The default is "100".
944
945 The weight in the range [1, 10000].
946
Tejun Heo0d593632017-09-25 09:00:19 -0700947 cpu.weight.nice
948 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
949 cgroups. The default is "0".
950
951 The nice value is in the range [-20, 19].
952
953 This interface file is an alternative interface for
954 "cpu.weight" and allows reading and setting weight using the
955 same values used by nice(2). Because the range is smaller and
956 granularity is coarser for the nice values, the read value is
957 the closest approximation of the current weight.
958
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500959 cpu.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500960 A read-write two value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
961 The default is "max 100000".
962
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300963 The maximum bandwidth limit. It's in the following format::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500964
965 $MAX $PERIOD
966
967 which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each
968 $PERIOD duration. "max" for $MAX indicates no limit. If only
969 one number is written, $MAX is updated.
970
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -0700971 cpu.pressure
972 A read-only nested-key file which exists on non-root cgroups.
973
974 Shows pressure stall information for CPU. See
975 Documentation/accounting/psi.txt for details.
976
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500977
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300978Memory
979------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500980
981The "memory" controller regulates distribution of memory. Memory is
982stateful and implements both limit and protection models. Due to the
983intertwining between memory usage and reclaim pressure and the
984stateful nature of memory, the distribution model is relatively
985complex.
986
987While not completely water-tight, all major memory usages by a given
988cgroup are tracked so that the total memory consumption can be
989accounted and controlled to a reasonable extent. Currently, the
990following types of memory usages are tracked.
991
992- Userland memory - page cache and anonymous memory.
993
994- Kernel data structures such as dentries and inodes.
995
996- TCP socket buffers.
997
998The above list may expand in the future for better coverage.
999
1000
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001001Memory Interface Files
1002~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001003
1004All memory amounts are in bytes. If a value which is not aligned to
1005PAGE_SIZE is written, the value may be rounded up to the closest
1006PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
1007
1008 memory.current
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001009 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
1010 cgroups.
1011
1012 The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup
1013 and its descendants.
1014
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001015 memory.min
1016 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1017 cgroups. The default is "0".
1018
1019 Hard memory protection. If the memory usage of a cgroup
1020 is within its effective min boundary, the cgroup's memory
1021 won't be reclaimed under any conditions. If there is no
1022 unprotected reclaimable memory available, OOM killer
1023 is invoked.
1024
1025 Effective min boundary is limited by memory.min values of
1026 all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.min overcommitment
1027 (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
1028 than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
1029 the part of parent's protection proportional to its
1030 actual memory usage below memory.min.
1031
1032 Putting more memory than generally available under this
1033 protection is discouraged and may lead to constant OOMs.
1034
1035 If a memory cgroup is not populated with processes,
1036 its memory.min is ignored.
1037
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001038 memory.low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001039 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1040 cgroups. The default is "0".
1041
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001042 Best-effort memory protection. If the memory usage of a
1043 cgroup is within its effective low boundary, the cgroup's
1044 memory won't be reclaimed unless memory can be reclaimed
1045 from unprotected cgroups.
1046
1047 Effective low boundary is limited by memory.low values of
1048 all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.low overcommitment
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001049 (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001050 than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001051 the part of parent's protection proportional to its
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001052 actual memory usage below memory.low.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001053
1054 Putting more memory than generally available under this
1055 protection is discouraged.
1056
1057 memory.high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001058 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1059 cgroups. The default is "max".
1060
1061 Memory usage throttle limit. This is the main mechanism to
1062 control memory usage of a cgroup. If a cgroup's usage goes
1063 over the high boundary, the processes of the cgroup are
1064 throttled and put under heavy reclaim pressure.
1065
1066 Going over the high limit never invokes the OOM killer and
1067 under extreme conditions the limit may be breached.
1068
1069 memory.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001070 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1071 cgroups. The default is "max".
1072
1073 Memory usage hard limit. This is the final protection
1074 mechanism. If a cgroup's memory usage reaches this limit and
1075 can't be reduced, the OOM killer is invoked in the cgroup.
1076 Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit
1077 temporarily.
1078
1079 This is the ultimate protection mechanism. As long as the
1080 high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's
1081 utility is limited to providing the final safety net.
1082
Roman Gushchin3d8b38e2018-08-21 21:53:54 -07001083 memory.oom.group
1084 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1085 cgroups. The default value is "0".
1086
1087 Determines whether the cgroup should be treated as
1088 an indivisible workload by the OOM killer. If set,
1089 all tasks belonging to the cgroup or to its descendants
1090 (if the memory cgroup is not a leaf cgroup) are killed
1091 together or not at all. This can be used to avoid
1092 partial kills to guarantee workload integrity.
1093
1094 Tasks with the OOM protection (oom_score_adj set to -1000)
1095 are treated as an exception and are never killed.
1096
1097 If the OOM killer is invoked in a cgroup, it's not going
1098 to kill any tasks outside of this cgroup, regardless
1099 memory.oom.group values of ancestor cgroups.
1100
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001101 memory.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001102 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1103 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
1104 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
1105 modified event.
1106
1107 low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001108 The number of times the cgroup is reclaimed due to
1109 high memory pressure even though its usage is under
1110 the low boundary. This usually indicates that the low
1111 boundary is over-committed.
1112
1113 high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001114 The number of times processes of the cgroup are
1115 throttled and routed to perform direct memory reclaim
1116 because the high memory boundary was exceeded. For a
1117 cgroup whose memory usage is capped by the high limit
1118 rather than global memory pressure, this event's
1119 occurrences are expected.
1120
1121 max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001122 The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was
1123 about to go over the max boundary. If direct reclaim
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001124 fails to bring it down, the cgroup goes to OOM state.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001125
1126 oom
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001127 The number of time the cgroup's memory usage was
1128 reached the limit and allocation was about to fail.
1129
1130 Depending on context result could be invocation of OOM
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001131 killer and retrying allocation or failing allocation.
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001132
1133 Failed allocation in its turn could be returned into
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001134 userspace as -ENOMEM or silently ignored in cases like
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001135 disk readahead. For now OOM in memory cgroup kills
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001136 tasks iff shortage has happened inside page fault.
1137
Roman Gushchin7a1adfd2018-10-26 15:09:48 -07001138 This event is not raised if the OOM killer is not
1139 considered as an option, e.g. for failed high-order
1140 allocations.
1141
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001142 oom_kill
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001143 The number of processes belonging to this cgroup
1144 killed by any kind of OOM killer.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001145
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001146 memory.stat
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001147 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1148
1149 This breaks down the cgroup's memory footprint into different
1150 types of memory, type-specific details, and other information
1151 on the state and past events of the memory management system.
1152
1153 All memory amounts are in bytes.
1154
1155 The entries are ordered to be human readable, and new entries
1156 can show up in the middle. Don't rely on items remaining in a
1157 fixed position; use the keys to look up specific values!
1158
1159 anon
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001160 Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings such as
1161 brk(), sbrk(), and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS)
1162
1163 file
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001164 Amount of memory used to cache filesystem data,
1165 including tmpfs and shared memory.
1166
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001167 kernel_stack
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001168 Amount of memory allocated to kernel stacks.
1169
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001170 slab
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001171 Amount of memory used for storing in-kernel data
1172 structures.
1173
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001174 sock
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001175 Amount of memory used in network transmission buffers
1176
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001177 shmem
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001178 Amount of cached filesystem data that is swap-backed,
1179 such as tmpfs, shm segments, shared anonymous mmap()s
1180
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001181 file_mapped
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001182 Amount of cached filesystem data mapped with mmap()
1183
1184 file_dirty
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001185 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified but
1186 not yet written back to disk
1187
1188 file_writeback
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001189 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified and
1190 is currently being written back to disk
1191
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001192 inactive_anon, active_anon, inactive_file, active_file, unevictable
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001193 Amount of memory, swap-backed and filesystem-backed,
1194 on the internal memory management lists used by the
1195 page reclaim algorithm
1196
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001197 slab_reclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001198 Part of "slab" that might be reclaimed, such as
1199 dentries and inodes.
1200
1201 slab_unreclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001202 Part of "slab" that cannot be reclaimed on memory
1203 pressure.
1204
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001205 pgfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001206 Total number of page faults incurred
1207
1208 pgmajfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001209 Number of major page faults incurred
1210
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -07001211 workingset_refault
1212
1213 Number of refaults of previously evicted pages
1214
1215 workingset_activate
1216
1217 Number of refaulted pages that were immediately activated
1218
1219 workingset_nodereclaim
1220
1221 Number of times a shadow node has been reclaimed
1222
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001223 pgrefill
1224
1225 Amount of scanned pages (in an active LRU list)
1226
1227 pgscan
1228
1229 Amount of scanned pages (in an inactive LRU list)
1230
1231 pgsteal
1232
1233 Amount of reclaimed pages
1234
1235 pgactivate
1236
1237 Amount of pages moved to the active LRU list
1238
1239 pgdeactivate
1240
1241 Amount of pages moved to the inactive LRU lis
1242
1243 pglazyfree
1244
1245 Amount of pages postponed to be freed under memory pressure
1246
1247 pglazyfreed
1248
1249 Amount of reclaimed lazyfree pages
1250
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001251 memory.swap.current
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001252 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
1253 cgroups.
1254
1255 The total amount of swap currently being used by the cgroup
1256 and its descendants.
1257
1258 memory.swap.max
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001259 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1260 cgroups. The default is "max".
1261
1262 Swap usage hard limit. If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001263 limit, anonymous memory of the cgroup will not be swapped out.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001264
Tejun Heof3a53a32018-06-07 17:05:35 -07001265 memory.swap.events
1266 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1267 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
1268 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
1269 modified event.
1270
1271 max
1272 The number of times the cgroup's swap usage was about
1273 to go over the max boundary and swap allocation
1274 failed.
1275
1276 fail
1277 The number of times swap allocation failed either
1278 because of running out of swap system-wide or max
1279 limit.
1280
Tejun Heobe091022018-06-07 17:09:21 -07001281 When reduced under the current usage, the existing swap
1282 entries are reclaimed gradually and the swap usage may stay
1283 higher than the limit for an extended period of time. This
1284 reduces the impact on the workload and memory management.
1285
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001286 memory.pressure
1287 A read-only nested-key file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1288
1289 Shows pressure stall information for memory. See
1290 Documentation/accounting/psi.txt for details.
1291
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001292
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001293Usage Guidelines
1294~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001295
1296"memory.high" is the main mechanism to control memory usage.
1297Over-committing on high limit (sum of high limits > available memory)
1298and letting global memory pressure to distribute memory according to
1299usage is a viable strategy.
1300
1301Because breach of the high limit doesn't trigger the OOM killer but
1302throttles the offending cgroup, a management agent has ample
1303opportunities to monitor and take appropriate actions such as granting
1304more memory or terminating the workload.
1305
1306Determining whether a cgroup has enough memory is not trivial as
1307memory usage doesn't indicate whether the workload can benefit from
1308more memory. For example, a workload which writes data received from
1309network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
1310performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
1311pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
1312memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
1313memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
1314implemented yet.
1315
1316
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001317Memory Ownership
1318~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001319
1320A memory area is charged to the cgroup which instantiated it and stays
1321charged to the cgroup until the area is released. Migrating a process
1322to a different cgroup doesn't move the memory usages that it
1323instantiated while in the previous cgroup to the new cgroup.
1324
1325A memory area may be used by processes belonging to different cgroups.
1326To which cgroup the area will be charged is in-deterministic; however,
1327over time, the memory area is likely to end up in a cgroup which has
1328enough memory allowance to avoid high reclaim pressure.
1329
1330If a cgroup sweeps a considerable amount of memory which is expected
1331to be accessed repeatedly by other cgroups, it may make sense to use
1332POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED to relinquish the ownership of memory areas
1333belonging to the affected files to ensure correct memory ownership.
1334
1335
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001336IO
1337--
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001338
1339The "io" controller regulates the distribution of IO resources. This
1340controller implements both weight based and absolute bandwidth or IOPS
1341limit distribution; however, weight based distribution is available
1342only if cfq-iosched is in use and neither scheme is available for
1343blk-mq devices.
1344
1345
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001346IO Interface Files
1347~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001348
1349 io.stat
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001350 A read-only nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1351 cgroups.
1352
1353 Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered.
1354 The following nested keys are defined.
1355
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001356 ====== =====================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001357 rbytes Bytes read
1358 wbytes Bytes written
1359 rios Number of read IOs
1360 wios Number of write IOs
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001361 dbytes Bytes discarded
1362 dios Number of discard IOs
1363 ====== =====================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001364
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001365 An example read output follows:
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001366
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001367 8:16 rbytes=1459200 wbytes=314773504 rios=192 wios=353 dbytes=0 dios=0
1368 8:0 rbytes=90430464 wbytes=299008000 rios=8950 wios=1252 dbytes=50331648 dios=3021
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001369
1370 io.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001371 A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1372 The default is "default 100".
1373
1374 The first line is the default weight applied to devices
1375 without specific override. The rest are overrides keyed by
1376 $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The weights are in
1377 the range [1, 10000] and specifies the relative amount IO time
1378 the cgroup can use in relation to its siblings.
1379
1380 The default weight can be updated by writing either "default
1381 $WEIGHT" or simply "$WEIGHT". Overrides can be set by writing
1382 "$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" and unset by writing "$MAJ:$MIN default".
1383
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001384 An example read output follows::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001385
1386 default 100
1387 8:16 200
1388 8:0 50
1389
1390 io.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001391 A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1392 cgroups.
1393
1394 BPS and IOPS based IO limit. Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN
1395 device numbers and not ordered. The following nested keys are
1396 defined.
1397
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001398 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001399 rbps Max read bytes per second
1400 wbps Max write bytes per second
1401 riops Max read IO operations per second
1402 wiops Max write IO operations per second
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001403 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001404
1405 When writing, any number of nested key-value pairs can be
1406 specified in any order. "max" can be specified as the value
1407 to remove a specific limit. If the same key is specified
1408 multiple times, the outcome is undefined.
1409
1410 BPS and IOPS are measured in each IO direction and IOs are
1411 delayed if limit is reached. Temporary bursts are allowed.
1412
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001413 Setting read limit at 2M BPS and write at 120 IOPS for 8:16::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001414
1415 echo "8:16 rbps=2097152 wiops=120" > io.max
1416
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001417 Reading returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001418
1419 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=120
1420
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001421 Write IOPS limit can be removed by writing the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001422
1423 echo "8:16 wiops=max" > io.max
1424
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001425 Reading now returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001426
1427 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=max
1428
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001429 io.pressure
1430 A read-only nested-key file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1431
1432 Shows pressure stall information for IO. See
1433 Documentation/accounting/psi.txt for details.
1434
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001435
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001436Writeback
1437~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001438
1439Page cache is dirtied through buffered writes and shared mmaps and
1440written asynchronously to the backing filesystem by the writeback
1441mechanism. Writeback sits between the memory and IO domains and
1442regulates the proportion of dirty memory by balancing dirtying and
1443write IOs.
1444
1445The io controller, in conjunction with the memory controller,
1446implements control of page cache writeback IOs. The memory controller
1447defines the memory domain that dirty memory ratio is calculated and
1448maintained for and the io controller defines the io domain which
1449writes out dirty pages for the memory domain. Both system-wide and
1450per-cgroup dirty memory states are examined and the more restrictive
1451of the two is enforced.
1452
1453cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying
1454filesystem. Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4
1455and btrfs. On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are attributed to
1456the root cgroup.
1457
1458There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management
1459which affects how cgroup ownership is tracked. Memory is tracked per
1460page while writeback per inode. For the purpose of writeback, an
1461inode is assigned to a cgroup and all IO requests to write dirty pages
1462from the inode are attributed to that cgroup.
1463
1464As cgroup ownership for memory is tracked per page, there can be pages
1465which are associated with different cgroups than the one the inode is
1466associated with. These are called foreign pages. The writeback
1467constantly keeps track of foreign pages and, if a particular foreign
1468cgroup becomes the majority over a certain period of time, switches
1469the ownership of the inode to that cgroup.
1470
1471While this model is enough for most use cases where a given inode is
1472mostly dirtied by a single cgroup even when the main writing cgroup
1473changes over time, use cases where multiple cgroups write to a single
1474inode simultaneously are not supported well. In such circumstances, a
1475significant portion of IOs are likely to be attributed incorrectly.
1476As memory controller assigns page ownership on the first use and
1477doesn't update it until the page is released, even if writeback
1478strictly follows page ownership, multiple cgroups dirtying overlapping
1479areas wouldn't work as expected. It's recommended to avoid such usage
1480patterns.
1481
1482The sysctl knobs which affect writeback behavior are applied to cgroup
1483writeback as follows.
1484
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001485 vm.dirty_background_ratio, vm.dirty_ratio
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001486 These ratios apply the same to cgroup writeback with the
1487 amount of available memory capped by limits imposed by the
1488 memory controller and system-wide clean memory.
1489
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001490 vm.dirty_background_bytes, vm.dirty_bytes
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001491 For cgroup writeback, this is calculated into ratio against
1492 total available memory and applied the same way as
1493 vm.dirty[_background]_ratio.
1494
1495
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001496IO Latency
1497~~~~~~~~~~
1498
1499This is a cgroup v2 controller for IO workload protection. You provide a group
1500with a latency target, and if the average latency exceeds that target the
1501controller will throttle any peers that have a lower latency target than the
1502protected workload.
1503
1504The limits are only applied at the peer level in the hierarchy. This means that
1505in the diagram below, only groups A, B, and C will influence each other, and
1506groups D and F will influence each other. Group G will influence nobody.
1507
1508 [root]
1509 / | \
1510 A B C
1511 / \ |
1512 D F G
1513
1514
1515So the ideal way to configure this is to set io.latency in groups A, B, and C.
1516Generally you do not want to set a value lower than the latency your device
1517supports. Experiment to find the value that works best for your workload.
1518Start at higher than the expected latency for your device and watch the
Dennis Zhou (Facebook)c480bcf2018-08-01 23:15:41 -07001519avg_lat value in io.stat for your workload group to get an idea of the
1520latency you see during normal operation. Use the avg_lat value as a basis for
1521your real setting, setting at 10-15% higher than the value in io.stat.
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001522
1523How IO Latency Throttling Works
1524~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1525
1526io.latency is work conserving; so as long as everybody is meeting their latency
1527target the controller doesn't do anything. Once a group starts missing its
1528target it begins throttling any peer group that has a higher target than itself.
1529This throttling takes 2 forms:
1530
1531- Queue depth throttling. This is the number of outstanding IO's a group is
1532 allowed to have. We will clamp down relatively quickly, starting at no limit
1533 and going all the way down to 1 IO at a time.
1534
1535- Artificial delay induction. There are certain types of IO that cannot be
1536 throttled without possibly adversely affecting higher priority groups. This
1537 includes swapping and metadata IO. These types of IO are allowed to occur
1538 normally, however they are "charged" to the originating group. If the
1539 originating group is being throttled you will see the use_delay and delay
1540 fields in io.stat increase. The delay value is how many microseconds that are
1541 being added to any process that runs in this group. Because this number can
1542 grow quite large if there is a lot of swapping or metadata IO occurring we
1543 limit the individual delay events to 1 second at a time.
1544
1545Once the victimized group starts meeting its latency target again it will start
1546unthrottling any peer groups that were throttled previously. If the victimized
1547group simply stops doing IO the global counter will unthrottle appropriately.
1548
1549IO Latency Interface Files
1550~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1551
1552 io.latency
1553 This takes a similar format as the other controllers.
1554
1555 "MAJOR:MINOR target=<target time in microseconds"
1556
1557 io.stat
1558 If the controller is enabled you will see extra stats in io.stat in
1559 addition to the normal ones.
1560
1561 depth
1562 This is the current queue depth for the group.
1563
1564 avg_lat
Dennis Zhou (Facebook)c480bcf2018-08-01 23:15:41 -07001565 This is an exponential moving average with a decay rate of 1/exp
1566 bound by the sampling interval. The decay rate interval can be
1567 calculated by multiplying the win value in io.stat by the
1568 corresponding number of samples based on the win value.
1569
1570 win
1571 The sampling window size in milliseconds. This is the minimum
1572 duration of time between evaluation events. Windows only elapse
1573 with IO activity. Idle periods extend the most recent window.
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001574
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001575PID
1576---
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001577
1578The process number controller is used to allow a cgroup to stop any
1579new tasks from being fork()'d or clone()'d after a specified limit is
1580reached.
1581
1582The number of tasks in a cgroup can be exhausted in ways which other
1583controllers cannot prevent, thus warranting its own controller. For
1584example, a fork bomb is likely to exhaust the number of tasks before
1585hitting memory restrictions.
1586
1587Note that PIDs used in this controller refer to TIDs, process IDs as
1588used by the kernel.
1589
1590
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001591PID Interface Files
1592~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001593
1594 pids.max
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001595 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1596 cgroups. The default is "max".
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001597
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001598 Hard limit of number of processes.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001599
1600 pids.current
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001601 A read-only single value file which exists on all cgroups.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001602
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001603 The number of processes currently in the cgroup and its
1604 descendants.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001605
1606Organisational operations are not blocked by cgroup policies, so it is
1607possible to have pids.current > pids.max. This can be done by either
1608setting the limit to be smaller than pids.current, or attaching enough
1609processes to the cgroup such that pids.current is larger than
1610pids.max. However, it is not possible to violate a cgroup PID policy
1611through fork() or clone(). These will return -EAGAIN if the creation
1612of a new process would cause a cgroup policy to be violated.
1613
1614
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001615Cpuset
1616------
1617
1618The "cpuset" controller provides a mechanism for constraining
1619the CPU and memory node placement of tasks to only the resources
1620specified in the cpuset interface files in a task's current cgroup.
1621This is especially valuable on large NUMA systems where placing jobs
1622on properly sized subsets of the systems with careful processor and
1623memory placement to reduce cross-node memory access and contention
1624can improve overall system performance.
1625
1626The "cpuset" controller is hierarchical. That means the controller
1627cannot use CPUs or memory nodes not allowed in its parent.
1628
1629
1630Cpuset Interface Files
1631~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1632
1633 cpuset.cpus
1634 A read-write multiple values file which exists on non-root
1635 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1636
1637 It lists the requested CPUs to be used by tasks within this
1638 cgroup. The actual list of CPUs to be granted, however, is
1639 subjected to constraints imposed by its parent and can differ
1640 from the requested CPUs.
1641
1642 The CPU numbers are comma-separated numbers or ranges.
1643 For example:
1644
1645 # cat cpuset.cpus
1646 0-4,6,8-10
1647
1648 An empty value indicates that the cgroup is using the same
1649 setting as the nearest cgroup ancestor with a non-empty
1650 "cpuset.cpus" or all the available CPUs if none is found.
1651
1652 The value of "cpuset.cpus" stays constant until the next update
1653 and won't be affected by any CPU hotplug events.
1654
1655 cpuset.cpus.effective
Waiman Long5776cec2018-11-08 10:08:43 -05001656 A read-only multiple values file which exists on all
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001657 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1658
1659 It lists the onlined CPUs that are actually granted to this
1660 cgroup by its parent. These CPUs are allowed to be used by
1661 tasks within the current cgroup.
1662
1663 If "cpuset.cpus" is empty, the "cpuset.cpus.effective" file shows
1664 all the CPUs from the parent cgroup that can be available to
1665 be used by this cgroup. Otherwise, it should be a subset of
1666 "cpuset.cpus" unless none of the CPUs listed in "cpuset.cpus"
1667 can be granted. In this case, it will be treated just like an
1668 empty "cpuset.cpus".
1669
1670 Its value will be affected by CPU hotplug events.
1671
1672 cpuset.mems
1673 A read-write multiple values file which exists on non-root
1674 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1675
1676 It lists the requested memory nodes to be used by tasks within
1677 this cgroup. The actual list of memory nodes granted, however,
1678 is subjected to constraints imposed by its parent and can differ
1679 from the requested memory nodes.
1680
1681 The memory node numbers are comma-separated numbers or ranges.
1682 For example:
1683
1684 # cat cpuset.mems
1685 0-1,3
1686
1687 An empty value indicates that the cgroup is using the same
1688 setting as the nearest cgroup ancestor with a non-empty
1689 "cpuset.mems" or all the available memory nodes if none
1690 is found.
1691
1692 The value of "cpuset.mems" stays constant until the next update
1693 and won't be affected by any memory nodes hotplug events.
1694
1695 cpuset.mems.effective
Waiman Long5776cec2018-11-08 10:08:43 -05001696 A read-only multiple values file which exists on all
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001697 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1698
1699 It lists the onlined memory nodes that are actually granted to
1700 this cgroup by its parent. These memory nodes are allowed to
1701 be used by tasks within the current cgroup.
1702
1703 If "cpuset.mems" is empty, it shows all the memory nodes from the
1704 parent cgroup that will be available to be used by this cgroup.
1705 Otherwise, it should be a subset of "cpuset.mems" unless none of
1706 the memory nodes listed in "cpuset.mems" can be granted. In this
1707 case, it will be treated just like an empty "cpuset.mems".
1708
1709 Its value will be affected by memory nodes hotplug events.
1710
1711
Roman Gushchin4ad5a322017-12-13 19:49:03 +00001712Device controller
1713-----------------
1714
1715Device controller manages access to device files. It includes both
1716creation of new device files (using mknod), and access to the
1717existing device files.
1718
1719Cgroup v2 device controller has no interface files and is implemented
1720on top of cgroup BPF. To control access to device files, a user may
1721create bpf programs of the BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE type and attach them
1722to cgroups. On an attempt to access a device file, corresponding
1723BPF programs will be executed, and depending on the return value
1724the attempt will succeed or fail with -EPERM.
1725
1726A BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program takes a pointer to the bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx
1727structure, which describes the device access attempt: access type
1728(mknod/read/write) and device (type, major and minor numbers).
1729If the program returns 0, the attempt fails with -EPERM, otherwise
1730it succeeds.
1731
1732An example of BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program may be found in the kernel
1733source tree in the tools/testing/selftests/bpf/dev_cgroup.c file.
1734
1735
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001736RDMA
1737----
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05001738
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001739The "rdma" controller regulates the distribution and accounting of
1740of RDMA resources.
1741
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001742RDMA Interface Files
1743~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001744
1745 rdma.max
1746 A readwrite nested-keyed file that exists for all the cgroups
1747 except root that describes current configured resource limit
1748 for a RDMA/IB device.
1749
1750 Lines are keyed by device name and are not ordered.
1751 Each line contains space separated resource name and its configured
1752 limit that can be distributed.
1753
1754 The following nested keys are defined.
1755
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001756 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001757 hca_handle Maximum number of HCA Handles
1758 hca_object Maximum number of HCA Objects
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001759 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001760
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001761 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001762
1763 mlx4_0 hca_handle=2 hca_object=2000
1764 ocrdma1 hca_handle=3 hca_object=max
1765
1766 rdma.current
1767 A read-only file that describes current resource usage.
1768 It exists for all the cgroup except root.
1769
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001770 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001771
1772 mlx4_0 hca_handle=1 hca_object=20
1773 ocrdma1 hca_handle=1 hca_object=23
1774
1775
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001776Misc
1777----
Tejun Heo63f1ca52017-02-02 13:50:35 -05001778
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001779perf_event
1780~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05001781
1782perf_event controller, if not mounted on a legacy hierarchy, is
1783automatically enabled on the v2 hierarchy so that perf events can
1784always be filtered by cgroup v2 path. The controller can still be
1785moved to a legacy hierarchy after v2 hierarchy is populated.
1786
1787
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +01001788Non-normative information
1789-------------------------
1790
1791This section contains information that isn't considered to be a part of
1792the stable kernel API and so is subject to change.
1793
1794
1795CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
1796~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1797
1798When distributing CPU cycles in the root cgroup each thread in this
1799cgroup is treated as if it was hosted in a separate child cgroup of the
1800root cgroup. This child cgroup weight is dependent on its thread nice
1801level.
1802
1803For details of this mapping see sched_prio_to_weight array in
1804kernel/sched/core.c file (values from this array should be scaled
1805appropriately so the neutral - nice 0 - value is 100 instead of 1024).
1806
1807
1808IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
1809~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1810
1811Root cgroup processes are hosted in an implicit leaf child node.
1812When distributing IO resources this implicit child node is taken into
1813account as if it was a normal child cgroup of the root cgroup with a
1814weight value of 200.
1815
1816
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001817Namespace
1818=========
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001819
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001820Basics
1821------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001822
1823cgroup namespace provides a mechanism to virtualize the view of the
1824"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file and cgroup mounts. The CLONE_NEWCGROUP clone
1825flag can be used with clone(2) and unshare(2) to create a new cgroup
1826namespace. The process running inside the cgroup namespace will have
1827its "/proc/$PID/cgroup" output restricted to cgroupns root. The
1828cgroupns root is the cgroup of the process at the time of creation of
1829the cgroup namespace.
1830
1831Without cgroup namespace, the "/proc/$PID/cgroup" file shows the
1832complete path of the cgroup of a process. In a container setup where
1833a set of cgroups and namespaces are intended to isolate processes the
1834"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file may leak potential system level information
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001835to the isolated processes. For Example::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001836
1837 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1838 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
1839
1840The path '/batchjobs/container_id1' can be considered as system-data
1841and undesirable to expose to the isolated processes. cgroup namespace
1842can be used to restrict visibility of this path. For example, before
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001843creating a cgroup namespace, one would see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001844
1845 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
1846 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:37 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026531835]
1847 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1848 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
1849
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001850After unsharing a new namespace, the view changes::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001851
1852 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
1853 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:35 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026532183]
1854 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1855 0::/
1856
1857When some thread from a multi-threaded process unshares its cgroup
1858namespace, the new cgroupns gets applied to the entire process (all
1859the threads). This is natural for the v2 hierarchy; however, for the
1860legacy hierarchies, this may be unexpected.
1861
1862A cgroup namespace is alive as long as there are processes inside or
1863mounts pinning it. When the last usage goes away, the cgroup
1864namespace is destroyed. The cgroupns root and the actual cgroups
1865remain.
1866
1867
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001868The Root and Views
1869------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001870
1871The 'cgroupns root' for a cgroup namespace is the cgroup in which the
1872process calling unshare(2) is running. For example, if a process in
1873/batchjobs/container_id1 cgroup calls unshare, cgroup
1874/batchjobs/container_id1 becomes the cgroupns root. For the
1875init_cgroup_ns, this is the real root ('/') cgroup.
1876
1877The cgroupns root cgroup does not change even if the namespace creator
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001878process later moves to a different cgroup::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001879
1880 # ~/unshare -c # unshare cgroupns in some cgroup
1881 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1882 0::/
1883 # mkdir sub_cgrp_1
1884 # echo 0 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
1885 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1886 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1887
1888Each process gets its namespace-specific view of "/proc/$PID/cgroup"
1889
1890Processes running inside the cgroup namespace will be able to see
1891cgroup paths (in /proc/self/cgroup) only inside their root cgroup.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001892From within an unshared cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001893
1894 # sleep 100000 &
1895 [1] 7353
1896 # echo 7353 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
1897 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1898 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1899
1900From the initial cgroup namespace, the real cgroup path will be
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001901visible::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001902
1903 $ cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1904 0::/batchjobs/container_id1/sub_cgrp_1
1905
1906From a sibling cgroup namespace (that is, a namespace rooted at a
1907different cgroup), the cgroup path relative to its own cgroup
1908namespace root will be shown. For instance, if PID 7353's cgroup
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001909namespace root is at '/batchjobs/container_id2', then it will see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001910
1911 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1912 0::/../container_id2/sub_cgrp_1
1913
1914Note that the relative path always starts with '/' to indicate that
1915its relative to the cgroup namespace root of the caller.
1916
1917
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001918Migration and setns(2)
1919----------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001920
1921Processes inside a cgroup namespace can move into and out of the
1922namespace root if they have proper access to external cgroups. For
1923example, from inside a namespace with cgroupns root at
1924/batchjobs/container_id1, and assuming that the global hierarchy is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001925still accessible inside cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001926
1927 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1928 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1929 # echo 7353 > batchjobs/container_id2/cgroup.procs
1930 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1931 0::/../container_id2
1932
1933Note that this kind of setup is not encouraged. A task inside cgroup
1934namespace should only be exposed to its own cgroupns hierarchy.
1935
1936setns(2) to another cgroup namespace is allowed when:
1937
1938(a) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its current user namespace
1939(b) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against the target cgroup
1940 namespace's userns
1941
1942No implicit cgroup changes happen with attaching to another cgroup
1943namespace. It is expected that the someone moves the attaching
1944process under the target cgroup namespace root.
1945
1946
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001947Interaction with Other Namespaces
1948---------------------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001949
1950Namespace specific cgroup hierarchy can be mounted by a process
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001951running inside a non-init cgroup namespace::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001952
1953 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
1954
1955This will mount the unified cgroup hierarchy with cgroupns root as the
1956filesystem root. The process needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its user and
1957mount namespaces.
1958
1959The virtualization of /proc/self/cgroup file combined with restricting
1960the view of cgroup hierarchy by namespace-private cgroupfs mount
1961provides a properly isolated cgroup view inside the container.
1962
1963
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001964Information on Kernel Programming
1965=================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001966
1967This section contains kernel programming information in the areas
1968where interacting with cgroup is necessary. cgroup core and
1969controllers are not covered.
1970
1971
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001972Filesystem Support for Writeback
1973--------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001974
1975A filesystem can support cgroup writeback by updating
1976address_space_operations->writepage[s]() to annotate bio's using the
1977following two functions.
1978
1979 wbc_init_bio(@wbc, @bio)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001980 Should be called for each bio carrying writeback data and
Dennis Zhoub5f29542018-11-01 17:24:10 -04001981 associates the bio with the inode's owner cgroup. Can be
1982 called anytime between bio allocation and submission.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001983
1984 wbc_account_io(@wbc, @page, @bytes)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001985 Should be called for each data segment being written out.
1986 While this function doesn't care exactly when it's called
1987 during the writeback session, it's the easiest and most
1988 natural to call it as data segments are added to a bio.
1989
1990With writeback bio's annotated, cgroup support can be enabled per
1991super_block by setting SB_I_CGROUPWB in ->s_iflags. This allows for
1992selective disabling of cgroup writeback support which is helpful when
1993certain filesystem features, e.g. journaled data mode, are
1994incompatible.
1995
1996wbc_init_bio() binds the specified bio to its cgroup. Depending on
1997the configuration, the bio may be executed at a lower priority and if
1998the writeback session is holding shared resources, e.g. a journal
1999entry, may lead to priority inversion. There is no one easy solution
2000for the problem. Filesystems can try to work around specific problem
Dennis Zhoub5f29542018-11-01 17:24:10 -04002001cases by skipping wbc_init_bio() or using bio_associate_blkcg()
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002002directly.
2003
2004
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002005Deprecated v1 Core Features
2006===========================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002007
2008- Multiple hierarchies including named ones are not supported.
2009
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -04002010- All v1 mount options are not supported.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002011
2012- The "tasks" file is removed and "cgroup.procs" is not sorted.
2013
2014- "cgroup.clone_children" is removed.
2015
2016- /proc/cgroups is meaningless for v2. Use "cgroup.controllers" file
2017 at the root instead.
2018
2019
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002020Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
2021====================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002022
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002023Multiple Hierarchies
2024--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002025
2026cgroup v1 allowed an arbitrary number of hierarchies and each
2027hierarchy could host any number of controllers. While this seemed to
2028provide a high level of flexibility, it wasn't useful in practice.
2029
2030For example, as there is only one instance of each controller, utility
2031type controllers such as freezer which can be useful in all
2032hierarchies could only be used in one. The issue is exacerbated by
2033the fact that controllers couldn't be moved to another hierarchy once
2034hierarchies were populated. Another issue was that all controllers
2035bound to a hierarchy were forced to have exactly the same view of the
2036hierarchy. It wasn't possible to vary the granularity depending on
2037the specific controller.
2038
2039In practice, these issues heavily limited which controllers could be
2040put on the same hierarchy and most configurations resorted to putting
2041each controller on its own hierarchy. Only closely related ones, such
2042as the cpu and cpuacct controllers, made sense to be put on the same
2043hierarchy. This often meant that userland ended up managing multiple
2044similar hierarchies repeating the same steps on each hierarchy
2045whenever a hierarchy management operation was necessary.
2046
2047Furthermore, support for multiple hierarchies came at a steep cost.
2048It greatly complicated cgroup core implementation but more importantly
2049the support for multiple hierarchies restricted how cgroup could be
2050used in general and what controllers was able to do.
2051
2052There was no limit on how many hierarchies there might be, which meant
2053that a thread's cgroup membership couldn't be described in finite
2054length. The key might contain any number of entries and was unlimited
2055in length, which made it highly awkward to manipulate and led to
2056addition of controllers which existed only to identify membership,
2057which in turn exacerbated the original problem of proliferating number
2058of hierarchies.
2059
2060Also, as a controller couldn't have any expectation regarding the
2061topologies of hierarchies other controllers might be on, each
2062controller had to assume that all other controllers were attached to
2063completely orthogonal hierarchies. This made it impossible, or at
2064least very cumbersome, for controllers to cooperate with each other.
2065
2066In most use cases, putting controllers on hierarchies which are
2067completely orthogonal to each other isn't necessary. What usually is
2068called for is the ability to have differing levels of granularity
2069depending on the specific controller. In other words, hierarchy may
2070be collapsed from leaf towards root when viewed from specific
2071controllers. For example, a given configuration might not care about
2072how memory is distributed beyond a certain level while still wanting
2073to control how CPU cycles are distributed.
2074
2075
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002076Thread Granularity
2077------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002078
2079cgroup v1 allowed threads of a process to belong to different cgroups.
2080This didn't make sense for some controllers and those controllers
2081ended up implementing different ways to ignore such situations but
2082much more importantly it blurred the line between API exposed to
2083individual applications and system management interface.
2084
2085Generally, in-process knowledge is available only to the process
2086itself; thus, unlike service-level organization of processes,
2087categorizing threads of a process requires active participation from
2088the application which owns the target process.
2089
2090cgroup v1 had an ambiguously defined delegation model which got abused
2091in combination with thread granularity. cgroups were delegated to
2092individual applications so that they can create and manage their own
2093sub-hierarchies and control resource distributions along them. This
2094effectively raised cgroup to the status of a syscall-like API exposed
2095to lay programs.
2096
2097First of all, cgroup has a fundamentally inadequate interface to be
2098exposed this way. For a process to access its own knobs, it has to
2099extract the path on the target hierarchy from /proc/self/cgroup,
2100construct the path by appending the name of the knob to the path, open
2101and then read and/or write to it. This is not only extremely clunky
2102and unusual but also inherently racy. There is no conventional way to
2103define transaction across the required steps and nothing can guarantee
2104that the process would actually be operating on its own sub-hierarchy.
2105
2106cgroup controllers implemented a number of knobs which would never be
2107accepted as public APIs because they were just adding control knobs to
2108system-management pseudo filesystem. cgroup ended up with interface
2109knobs which were not properly abstracted or refined and directly
2110revealed kernel internal details. These knobs got exposed to
2111individual applications through the ill-defined delegation mechanism
2112effectively abusing cgroup as a shortcut to implementing public APIs
2113without going through the required scrutiny.
2114
2115This was painful for both userland and kernel. Userland ended up with
2116misbehaving and poorly abstracted interfaces and kernel exposing and
2117locked into constructs inadvertently.
2118
2119
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002120Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
2121-------------------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002122
2123cgroup v1 allowed threads to be in any cgroups which created an
2124interesting problem where threads belonging to a parent cgroup and its
2125children cgroups competed for resources. This was nasty as two
2126different types of entities competed and there was no obvious way to
2127settle it. Different controllers did different things.
2128
2129The cpu controller considered threads and cgroups as equivalents and
2130mapped nice levels to cgroup weights. This worked for some cases but
2131fell flat when children wanted to be allocated specific ratios of CPU
2132cycles and the number of internal threads fluctuated - the ratios
2133constantly changed as the number of competing entities fluctuated.
2134There also were other issues. The mapping from nice level to weight
2135wasn't obvious or universal, and there were various other knobs which
2136simply weren't available for threads.
2137
2138The io controller implicitly created a hidden leaf node for each
2139cgroup to host the threads. The hidden leaf had its own copies of all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002140the knobs with ``leaf_`` prefixed. While this allowed equivalent
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002141control over internal threads, it was with serious drawbacks. It
2142always added an extra layer of nesting which wouldn't be necessary
2143otherwise, made the interface messy and significantly complicated the
2144implementation.
2145
2146The memory controller didn't have a way to control what happened
2147between internal tasks and child cgroups and the behavior was not
2148clearly defined. There were attempts to add ad-hoc behaviors and
2149knobs to tailor the behavior to specific workloads which would have
2150led to problems extremely difficult to resolve in the long term.
2151
2152Multiple controllers struggled with internal tasks and came up with
2153different ways to deal with it; unfortunately, all the approaches were
2154severely flawed and, furthermore, the widely different behaviors
2155made cgroup as a whole highly inconsistent.
2156
2157This clearly is a problem which needs to be addressed from cgroup core
2158in a uniform way.
2159
2160
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002161Other Interface Issues
2162----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002163
2164cgroup v1 grew without oversight and developed a large number of
2165idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies. One issue on the cgroup core side
2166was how an empty cgroup was notified - a userland helper binary was
2167forked and executed for each event. The event delivery wasn't
2168recursive or delegatable. The limitations of the mechanism also led
2169to in-kernel event delivery filtering mechanism further complicating
2170the interface.
2171
2172Controller interfaces were problematic too. An extreme example is
2173controllers completely ignoring hierarchical organization and treating
2174all cgroups as if they were all located directly under the root
2175cgroup. Some controllers exposed a large amount of inconsistent
2176implementation details to userland.
2177
2178There also was no consistency across controllers. When a new cgroup
2179was created, some controllers defaulted to not imposing extra
2180restrictions while others disallowed any resource usage until
2181explicitly configured. Configuration knobs for the same type of
2182control used widely differing naming schemes and formats. Statistics
2183and information knobs were named arbitrarily and used different
2184formats and units even in the same controller.
2185
2186cgroup v2 establishes common conventions where appropriate and updates
2187controllers so that they expose minimal and consistent interfaces.
2188
2189
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002190Controller Issues and Remedies
2191------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002192
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002193Memory
2194~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002195
2196The original lower boundary, the soft limit, is defined as a limit
2197that is per default unset. As a result, the set of cgroups that
2198global reclaim prefers is opt-in, rather than opt-out. The costs for
2199optimizing these mostly negative lookups are so high that the
2200implementation, despite its enormous size, does not even provide the
2201basic desirable behavior. First off, the soft limit has no
2202hierarchical meaning. All configured groups are organized in a global
2203rbtree and treated like equal peers, regardless where they are located
2204in the hierarchy. This makes subtree delegation impossible. Second,
2205the soft limit reclaim pass is so aggressive that it not just
2206introduces high allocation latencies into the system, but also impacts
2207system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature
2208becomes self-defeating.
2209
2210The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07002211reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it's within its low,
2212which makes delegation of subtrees possible.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002213
2214The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict
2215limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called.
2216But this generally goes against the goal of making the most out of the
2217available memory. The memory consumption of workloads varies during
2218runtime, and that requires users to overcommit. But doing that with a
2219strict upper limit requires either a fairly accurate prediction of the
2220working set size or adding slack to the limit. Since working set size
2221estimation is hard and error prone, and getting it wrong results in
2222OOM kills, most users tend to err on the side of a looser limit and
2223end up wasting precious resources.
2224
2225The memory.high boundary on the other hand can be set much more
2226conservatively. When hit, it throttles allocations by forcing them
2227into direct reclaim to work off the excess, but it never invokes the
2228OOM killer. As a result, a high boundary that is chosen too
2229aggressively will not terminate the processes, but instead it will
2230lead to gradual performance degradation. The user can monitor this
2231and make corrections until the minimal memory footprint that still
2232gives acceptable performance is found.
2233
2234In extreme cases, with many concurrent allocations and a complete
2235breakdown of reclaim progress within the group, the high boundary can
2236be exceeded. But even then it's mostly better to satisfy the
2237allocation from the slack available in other groups or the rest of the
2238system than killing the group. Otherwise, memory.max is there to
2239limit this type of spillover and ultimately contain buggy or even
2240malicious applications.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08002241
Johannes Weinerb6e6edc2016-03-17 14:20:28 -07002242Setting the original memory.limit_in_bytes below the current usage was
2243subject to a race condition, where concurrent charges could cause the
2244limit setting to fail. memory.max on the other hand will first set the
2245limit to prevent new charges, and then reclaim and OOM kill until the
2246new limit is met - or the task writing to memory.max is killed.
2247
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08002248The combined memory+swap accounting and limiting is replaced by real
2249control over swap space.
2250
2251The main argument for a combined memory+swap facility in the original
2252cgroup design was that global or parental pressure would always be
2253able to swap all anonymous memory of a child group, regardless of the
2254child's own (possibly untrusted) configuration. However, untrusted
2255groups can sabotage swapping by other means - such as referencing its
2256anonymous memory in a tight loop - and an admin can not assume full
2257swappability when overcommitting untrusted jobs.
2258
2259For trusted jobs, on the other hand, a combined counter is not an
2260intuitive userspace interface, and it flies in the face of the idea
2261that cgroup controllers should account and limit specific physical
2262resources. Swap space is a resource like all others in the system,
2263and that's why unified hierarchy allows distributing it separately.