Pablo Neira Ayuso | 19b351f | 2018-03-28 15:00:43 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | Netfilter's flowtable infrastructure |
| 2 | ==================================== |
| 3 | |
| 4 | This documentation describes the software flowtable infrastructure available in |
| 5 | Netfilter since Linux kernel 4.16. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Overview |
| 8 | -------- |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Initial packets follow the classic forwarding path, once the flow enters the |
| 11 | established state according to the conntrack semantics (ie. we have seen traffic |
| 12 | in both directions), then you can decide to offload the flow to the flowtable |
| 13 | from the forward chain via the 'flow offload' action available in nftables. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Packets that find an entry in the flowtable (ie. flowtable hit) are sent to the |
| 16 | output netdevice via neigh_xmit(), hence, they bypass the classic forwarding |
| 17 | path (the visible effect is that you do not see these packets from any of the |
| 18 | netfilter hooks coming after the ingress). In case of flowtable miss, the packet |
| 19 | follows the classic forward path. |
| 20 | |
| 21 | The flowtable uses a resizable hashtable, lookups are based on the following |
| 22 | 7-tuple selectors: source, destination, layer 3 and layer 4 protocols, source |
| 23 | and destination ports and the input interface (useful in case there are several |
| 24 | conntrack zones in place). |
| 25 | |
| 26 | Flowtables are populated via the 'flow offload' nftables action, so the user can |
| 27 | selectively specify what flows are placed into the flow table. Hence, packets |
| 28 | follow the classic forwarding path unless the user explicitly instruct packets |
| 29 | to use this new alternative forwarding path via nftables policy. |
| 30 | |
| 31 | This is represented in Fig.1, which describes the classic forwarding path |
| 32 | including the Netfilter hooks and the flowtable fastpath bypass. |
| 33 | |
| 34 | userspace process |
| 35 | ^ | |
| 36 | | | |
| 37 | _____|____ ____\/___ |
| 38 | / \ / \ |
| 39 | | input | | output | |
| 40 | \__________/ \_________/ |
| 41 | ^ | |
| 42 | | | |
| 43 | _________ __________ --------- _____\/_____ |
| 44 | / \ / \ |Routing | / \ |
| 45 | --> ingress ---> prerouting ---> |decision| | postrouting |--> neigh_xmit |
| 46 | \_________/ \__________/ ---------- \____________/ ^ |
| 47 | | ^ | | ^ | |
| 48 | flowtable | | ____\/___ | | |
| 49 | | | | / \ | | |
| 50 | __\/___ | --------->| forward |------------ | |
| 51 | |-----| | \_________/ | |
| 52 | |-----| | 'flow offload' rule | |
| 53 | |-----| | adds entry to | |
| 54 | |_____| | flowtable | |
| 55 | | | | |
| 56 | / \ | | |
| 57 | /hit\_no_| | |
| 58 | \ ? / | |
| 59 | \ / | |
| 60 | |__yes_________________fastpath bypass ____________________________| |
| 61 | |
| 62 | Fig.1 Netfilter hooks and flowtable interactions |
| 63 | |
| 64 | The flowtable entry also stores the NAT configuration, so all packets are |
| 65 | mangled according to the NAT policy that matches the initial packets that went |
| 66 | through the classic forwarding path. The TTL is decremented before calling |
| 67 | neigh_xmit(). Fragmented traffic is passed up to follow the classic forwarding |
| 68 | path given that the transport selectors are missing, therefore flowtable lookup |
| 69 | is not possible. |
| 70 | |
| 71 | Example configuration |
| 72 | --------------------- |
| 73 | |
| 74 | Enabling the flowtable bypass is relatively easy, you only need to create a |
| 75 | flowtable and add one rule to your forward chain. |
| 76 | |
| 77 | table inet x { |
| 78 | flowtable f { |
| 79 | hook ingress priority 0 devices = { eth0, eth1 }; |
| 80 | } |
| 81 | chain y { |
| 82 | type filter hook forward priority 0; policy accept; |
| 83 | ip protocol tcp flow offload @f |
| 84 | counter packets 0 bytes 0 |
| 85 | } |
| 86 | } |
| 87 | |
| 88 | This example adds the flowtable 'f' to the ingress hook of the eth0 and eth1 |
| 89 | netdevices. You can create as many flowtables as you want in case you need to |
| 90 | perform resource partitioning. The flowtable priority defines the order in which |
| 91 | hooks are run in the pipeline, this is convenient in case you already have a |
| 92 | nftables ingress chain (make sure the flowtable priority is smaller than the |
| 93 | nftables ingress chain hence the flowtable runs before in the pipeline). |
| 94 | |
| 95 | The 'flow offload' action from the forward chain 'y' adds an entry to the |
| 96 | flowtable for the TCP syn-ack packet coming in the reply direction. Once the |
| 97 | flow is offloaded, you will observe that the counter rule in the example above |
| 98 | does not get updated for the packets that are being forwarded through the |
| 99 | forwarding bypass. |
| 100 | |
| 101 | More reading |
| 102 | ------------ |
| 103 | |
| 104 | This documentation is based on the LWN.net articles [1][2]. Rafal Milecki also |
| 105 | made a very complete and comprehensive summary called "A state of network |
| 106 | acceleration" that describes how things were before this infrastructure was |
| 107 | mailined [3] and it also makes a rough summary of this work [4]. |
| 108 | |
| 109 | [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/738214/ |
| 110 | [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/742164/ |
| 111 | [3] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2018-January/010830.html |
| 112 | [4] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2018-January/010829.html |