Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | ============ |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 2 | SNMP counter |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 3 | ============ |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 4 | |
| 5 | This document explains the meaning of SNMP counters. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | General IPv4 counters |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 8 | ===================== |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 9 | All layer 4 packets and ICMP packets will change these counters, but |
| 10 | these counters won't be changed by layer 2 packets (such as STP) or |
| 11 | ARP packets. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | * IpInReceives |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 14 | |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 15 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInReceives`_ |
| 16 | |
| 17 | .. _RFC1213 ipInReceives: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-26 |
| 18 | |
| 19 | The number of packets received by the IP layer. It gets increasing at the |
| 20 | beginning of ip_rcv function, always be updated together with |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 21 | IpExtInOctets. It will be increased even if the packet is dropped |
| 22 | later (e.g. due to the IP header is invalid or the checksum is wrong |
| 23 | and so on). It indicates the number of aggregated segments after |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 24 | GRO/LRO. |
| 25 | |
| 26 | * IpInDelivers |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 27 | |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 28 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInDelivers`_ |
| 29 | |
| 30 | .. _RFC1213 ipInDelivers: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 |
| 31 | |
| 32 | The number of packets delivers to the upper layer protocols. E.g. TCP, UDP, |
| 33 | ICMP and so on. If no one listens on a raw socket, only kernel |
| 34 | supported protocols will be delivered, if someone listens on the raw |
| 35 | socket, all valid IP packets will be delivered. |
| 36 | |
| 37 | * IpOutRequests |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 38 | |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 39 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipOutRequests`_ |
| 40 | |
| 41 | .. _RFC1213 ipOutRequests: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 |
| 42 | |
| 43 | The number of packets sent via IP layer, for both single cast and |
| 44 | multicast packets, and would always be updated together with |
| 45 | IpExtOutOctets. |
| 46 | |
| 47 | * IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 48 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 49 | They are Linux kernel extensions, no RFC definitions. Please note, |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 50 | RFC1213 indeed defines ifInOctets and ifOutOctets, but they |
| 51 | are different things. The ifInOctets and ifOutOctets include the MAC |
| 52 | layer header size but IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets don't, they |
| 53 | only include the IP layer header and the IP layer data. |
| 54 | |
| 55 | * IpExtInNoECTPkts, IpExtInECT1Pkts, IpExtInECT0Pkts, IpExtInCEPkts |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 56 | |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 57 | They indicate the number of four kinds of ECN IP packets, please refer |
| 58 | `Explicit Congestion Notification`_ for more details. |
| 59 | |
| 60 | .. _Explicit Congestion Notification: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3168#page-6 |
| 61 | |
| 62 | These 4 counters calculate how many packets received per ECN |
| 63 | status. They count the real frame number regardless the LRO/GRO. So |
| 64 | for the same packet, you might find that IpInReceives count 1, but |
| 65 | IpExtInNoECTPkts counts 2 or more. |
| 66 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 67 | * IpInHdrErrors |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 68 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 69 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInHdrErrors`_. It indicates the packet is |
| 70 | dropped due to the IP header error. It might happen in both IP input |
| 71 | and IP forward paths. |
| 72 | |
| 73 | .. _RFC1213 ipInHdrErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-27 |
| 74 | |
| 75 | * IpInAddrErrors |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 76 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 77 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInAddrErrors`_. It will be increased in two |
| 78 | scenarios: (1) The IP address is invalid. (2) The destination IP |
| 79 | address is not a local address and IP forwarding is not enabled |
| 80 | |
| 81 | .. _RFC1213 ipInAddrErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-27 |
| 82 | |
| 83 | * IpExtInNoRoutes |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 84 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 85 | This counter means the packet is dropped when the IP stack receives a |
| 86 | packet and can't find a route for it from the route table. It might |
| 87 | happen when IP forwarding is enabled and the destination IP address is |
| 88 | not a local address and there is no route for the destination IP |
| 89 | address. |
| 90 | |
| 91 | * IpInUnknownProtos |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 92 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 93 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInUnknownProtos`_. It will be increased if the |
| 94 | layer 4 protocol is unsupported by kernel. If an application is using |
| 95 | raw socket, kernel will always deliver the packet to the raw socket |
| 96 | and this counter won't be increased. |
| 97 | |
| 98 | .. _RFC1213 ipInUnknownProtos: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-27 |
| 99 | |
| 100 | * IpExtInTruncatedPkts |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 101 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 102 | For IPv4 packet, it means the actual data size is smaller than the |
| 103 | "Total Length" field in the IPv4 header. |
| 104 | |
| 105 | * IpInDiscards |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 106 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 107 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInDiscards`_. It indicates the packet is dropped |
| 108 | in the IP receiving path and due to kernel internal reasons (e.g. no |
| 109 | enough memory). |
| 110 | |
| 111 | .. _RFC1213 ipInDiscards: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 |
| 112 | |
| 113 | * IpOutDiscards |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 114 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 115 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipOutDiscards`_. It indicates the packet is |
| 116 | dropped in the IP sending path and due to kernel internal reasons. |
| 117 | |
| 118 | .. _RFC1213 ipOutDiscards: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 |
| 119 | |
| 120 | * IpOutNoRoutes |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 121 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 122 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipOutNoRoutes`_. It indicates the packet is |
| 123 | dropped in the IP sending path and no route is found for it. |
| 124 | |
| 125 | .. _RFC1213 ipOutNoRoutes: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-29 |
| 126 | |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 127 | ICMP counters |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 128 | ============= |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 129 | * IcmpInMsgs and IcmpOutMsgs |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 130 | |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 131 | Defined by `RFC1213 icmpInMsgs`_ and `RFC1213 icmpOutMsgs`_ |
| 132 | |
| 133 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInMsgs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 |
| 134 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutMsgs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 |
| 135 | |
| 136 | As mentioned in the RFC1213, these two counters include errors, they |
| 137 | would be increased even if the ICMP packet has an invalid type. The |
| 138 | ICMP output path will check the header of a raw socket, so the |
| 139 | IcmpOutMsgs would still be updated if the IP header is constructed by |
| 140 | a userspace program. |
| 141 | |
| 142 | * ICMP named types |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 143 | |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 144 | | These counters include most of common ICMP types, they are: |
| 145 | | IcmpInDestUnreachs: `RFC1213 icmpInDestUnreachs`_ |
| 146 | | IcmpInTimeExcds: `RFC1213 icmpInTimeExcds`_ |
| 147 | | IcmpInParmProbs: `RFC1213 icmpInParmProbs`_ |
| 148 | | IcmpInSrcQuenchs: `RFC1213 icmpInSrcQuenchs`_ |
| 149 | | IcmpInRedirects: `RFC1213 icmpInRedirects`_ |
| 150 | | IcmpInEchos: `RFC1213 icmpInEchos`_ |
| 151 | | IcmpInEchoReps: `RFC1213 icmpInEchoReps`_ |
| 152 | | IcmpInTimestamps: `RFC1213 icmpInTimestamps`_ |
| 153 | | IcmpInTimestampReps: `RFC1213 icmpInTimestampReps`_ |
| 154 | | IcmpInAddrMasks: `RFC1213 icmpInAddrMasks`_ |
| 155 | | IcmpInAddrMaskReps: `RFC1213 icmpInAddrMaskReps`_ |
| 156 | | IcmpOutDestUnreachs: `RFC1213 icmpOutDestUnreachs`_ |
| 157 | | IcmpOutTimeExcds: `RFC1213 icmpOutTimeExcds`_ |
| 158 | | IcmpOutParmProbs: `RFC1213 icmpOutParmProbs`_ |
| 159 | | IcmpOutSrcQuenchs: `RFC1213 icmpOutSrcQuenchs`_ |
| 160 | | IcmpOutRedirects: `RFC1213 icmpOutRedirects`_ |
| 161 | | IcmpOutEchos: `RFC1213 icmpOutEchos`_ |
| 162 | | IcmpOutEchoReps: `RFC1213 icmpOutEchoReps`_ |
| 163 | | IcmpOutTimestamps: `RFC1213 icmpOutTimestamps`_ |
| 164 | | IcmpOutTimestampReps: `RFC1213 icmpOutTimestampReps`_ |
| 165 | | IcmpOutAddrMasks: `RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMasks`_ |
| 166 | | IcmpOutAddrMaskReps: `RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMaskReps`_ |
| 167 | |
| 168 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInDestUnreachs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 |
| 169 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInTimeExcds: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 |
| 170 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInParmProbs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| 171 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInSrcQuenchs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| 172 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInRedirects: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| 173 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInEchos: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| 174 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInEchoReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| 175 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInTimestamps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| 176 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInTimestampReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 |
| 177 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInAddrMasks: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 |
| 178 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInAddrMaskReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 |
| 179 | |
| 180 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutDestUnreachs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 |
| 181 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutTimeExcds: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 |
| 182 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutParmProbs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 |
| 183 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutSrcQuenchs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 |
| 184 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutRedirects: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 |
| 185 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutEchos: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 |
| 186 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutEchoReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 |
| 187 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutTimestamps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 |
| 188 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutTimestampReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 |
| 189 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMasks: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 |
| 190 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMaskReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-46 |
| 191 | |
| 192 | Every ICMP type has two counters: 'In' and 'Out'. E.g., for the ICMP |
| 193 | Echo packet, they are IcmpInEchos and IcmpOutEchos. Their meanings are |
| 194 | straightforward. The 'In' counter means kernel receives such a packet |
| 195 | and the 'Out' counter means kernel sends such a packet. |
| 196 | |
| 197 | * ICMP numeric types |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 198 | |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 199 | They are IcmpMsgInType[N] and IcmpMsgOutType[N], the [N] indicates the |
| 200 | ICMP type number. These counters track all kinds of ICMP packets. The |
| 201 | ICMP type number definition could be found in the `ICMP parameters`_ |
| 202 | document. |
| 203 | |
| 204 | .. _ICMP parameters: https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmp-parameters/icmp-parameters.xhtml |
| 205 | |
| 206 | For example, if the Linux kernel sends an ICMP Echo packet, the |
| 207 | IcmpMsgOutType8 would increase 1. And if kernel gets an ICMP Echo Reply |
| 208 | packet, IcmpMsgInType0 would increase 1. |
| 209 | |
| 210 | * IcmpInCsumErrors |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 211 | |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 212 | This counter indicates the checksum of the ICMP packet is |
| 213 | wrong. Kernel verifies the checksum after updating the IcmpInMsgs and |
| 214 | before updating IcmpMsgInType[N]. If a packet has bad checksum, the |
| 215 | IcmpInMsgs would be updated but none of IcmpMsgInType[N] would be updated. |
| 216 | |
| 217 | * IcmpInErrors and IcmpOutErrors |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 218 | |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 219 | Defined by `RFC1213 icmpInErrors`_ and `RFC1213 icmpOutErrors`_ |
| 220 | |
| 221 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 |
| 222 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 |
| 223 | |
| 224 | When an error occurs in the ICMP packet handler path, these two |
| 225 | counters would be updated. The receiving packet path use IcmpInErrors |
| 226 | and the sending packet path use IcmpOutErrors. When IcmpInCsumErrors |
| 227 | is increased, IcmpInErrors would always be increased too. |
| 228 | |
| 229 | relationship of the ICMP counters |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 230 | --------------------------------- |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 231 | The sum of IcmpMsgOutType[N] is always equal to IcmpOutMsgs, as they |
| 232 | are updated at the same time. The sum of IcmpMsgInType[N] plus |
| 233 | IcmpInErrors should be equal or larger than IcmpInMsgs. When kernel |
| 234 | receives an ICMP packet, kernel follows below logic: |
| 235 | |
| 236 | 1. increase IcmpInMsgs |
| 237 | 2. if has any error, update IcmpInErrors and finish the process |
| 238 | 3. update IcmpMsgOutType[N] |
| 239 | 4. handle the packet depending on the type, if has any error, update |
| 240 | IcmpInErrors and finish the process |
| 241 | |
| 242 | So if all errors occur in step (2), IcmpInMsgs should be equal to the |
| 243 | sum of IcmpMsgOutType[N] plus IcmpInErrors. If all errors occur in |
| 244 | step (4), IcmpInMsgs should be equal to the sum of |
| 245 | IcmpMsgOutType[N]. If the errors occur in both step (2) and step (4), |
| 246 | IcmpInMsgs should be less than the sum of IcmpMsgOutType[N] plus |
| 247 | IcmpInErrors. |
| 248 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 249 | General TCP counters |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 250 | ==================== |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 251 | * TcpInSegs |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 252 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 253 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpInSegs`_ |
| 254 | |
| 255 | .. _RFC1213 tcpInSegs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48 |
| 256 | |
| 257 | The number of packets received by the TCP layer. As mentioned in |
| 258 | RFC1213, it includes the packets received in error, such as checksum |
| 259 | error, invalid TCP header and so on. Only one error won't be included: |
| 260 | if the layer 2 destination address is not the NIC's layer 2 |
| 261 | address. It might happen if the packet is a multicast or broadcast |
| 262 | packet, or the NIC is in promiscuous mode. In these situations, the |
| 263 | packets would be delivered to the TCP layer, but the TCP layer will discard |
| 264 | these packets before increasing TcpInSegs. The TcpInSegs counter |
| 265 | isn't aware of GRO. So if two packets are merged by GRO, the TcpInSegs |
| 266 | counter would only increase 1. |
| 267 | |
| 268 | * TcpOutSegs |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 269 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 270 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpOutSegs`_ |
| 271 | |
| 272 | .. _RFC1213 tcpOutSegs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48 |
| 273 | |
| 274 | The number of packets sent by the TCP layer. As mentioned in RFC1213, |
| 275 | it excludes the retransmitted packets. But it includes the SYN, ACK |
| 276 | and RST packets. Doesn't like TcpInSegs, the TcpOutSegs is aware of |
| 277 | GSO, so if a packet would be split to 2 by GSO, TcpOutSegs will |
| 278 | increase 2. |
| 279 | |
| 280 | * TcpActiveOpens |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 281 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 282 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpActiveOpens`_ |
| 283 | |
| 284 | .. _RFC1213 tcpActiveOpens: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-47 |
| 285 | |
| 286 | It means the TCP layer sends a SYN, and come into the SYN-SENT |
| 287 | state. Every time TcpActiveOpens increases 1, TcpOutSegs should always |
| 288 | increase 1. |
| 289 | |
| 290 | * TcpPassiveOpens |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 291 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 292 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpPassiveOpens`_ |
| 293 | |
| 294 | .. _RFC1213 tcpPassiveOpens: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-47 |
| 295 | |
| 296 | It means the TCP layer receives a SYN, replies a SYN+ACK, come into |
| 297 | the SYN-RCVD state. |
| 298 | |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 299 | * TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 300 | |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 301 | When packets are received by the TCP layer and are not be read by the |
| 302 | application, the TCP layer will try to merge them. This counter |
| 303 | indicate how many packets are merged in such situation. If GRO is |
| 304 | enabled, lots of packets would be merged by GRO, these packets |
| 305 | wouldn't be counted to TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce. |
| 306 | |
| 307 | * TcpExtTCPAutoCorking |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 308 | |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 309 | When sending packets, the TCP layer will try to merge small packets to |
| 310 | a bigger one. This counter increase 1 for every packet merged in such |
| 311 | situation. Please refer to the LWN article for more details: |
| 312 | https://lwn.net/Articles/576263/ |
| 313 | |
| 314 | * TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 315 | |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 316 | This counter is explained by `kernel commit f19c29e3e391`_, I pasted the |
| 317 | explaination below:: |
| 318 | |
| 319 | TCPOrigDataSent: number of outgoing packets with original data (excluding |
| 320 | retransmission but including data-in-SYN). This counter is different from |
| 321 | TcpOutSegs because TcpOutSegs also tracks pure ACKs. TCPOrigDataSent is |
| 322 | more useful to track the TCP retransmission rate. |
| 323 | |
| 324 | * TCPSynRetrans |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 325 | |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 326 | This counter is explained by `kernel commit f19c29e3e391`_, I pasted the |
| 327 | explaination below:: |
| 328 | |
| 329 | TCPSynRetrans: number of SYN and SYN/ACK retransmits to break down |
| 330 | retransmissions into SYN, fast-retransmits, timeout retransmits, etc. |
| 331 | |
| 332 | * TCPFastOpenActiveFail |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 333 | |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 334 | This counter is explained by `kernel commit f19c29e3e391`_, I pasted the |
| 335 | explaination below:: |
| 336 | |
| 337 | TCPFastOpenActiveFail: Fast Open attempts (SYN/data) failed because |
| 338 | the remote does not accept it or the attempts timed out. |
| 339 | |
| 340 | .. _kernel commit f19c29e3e391: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=f19c29e3e391a66a273e9afebaf01917245148cd |
| 341 | |
| 342 | * TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 343 | |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 344 | When kernel receives a SYN from a client, and if the TCP accept queue |
| 345 | is full, kernel will drop the SYN and add 1 to TcpExtListenOverflows. |
| 346 | At the same time kernel will also add 1 to TcpExtListenDrops. When a |
| 347 | TCP socket is in LISTEN state, and kernel need to drop a packet, |
| 348 | kernel would always add 1 to TcpExtListenDrops. So increase |
| 349 | TcpExtListenOverflows would let TcpExtListenDrops increasing at the |
| 350 | same time, but TcpExtListenDrops would also increase without |
| 351 | TcpExtListenOverflows increasing, e.g. a memory allocation fail would |
| 352 | also let TcpExtListenDrops increase. |
| 353 | |
| 354 | Note: The above explanation is based on kernel 4.10 or above version, on |
| 355 | an old kernel, the TCP stack has different behavior when TCP accept |
| 356 | queue is full. On the old kernel, TCP stack won't drop the SYN, it |
| 357 | would complete the 3-way handshake. As the accept queue is full, TCP |
| 358 | stack will keep the socket in the TCP half-open queue. As it is in the |
| 359 | half open queue, TCP stack will send SYN+ACK on an exponential backoff |
| 360 | timer, after client replies ACK, TCP stack checks whether the accept |
| 361 | queue is still full, if it is not full, moves the socket to the accept |
| 362 | queue, if it is full, keeps the socket in the half-open queue, at next |
| 363 | time client replies ACK, this socket will get another chance to move |
| 364 | to the accept queue. |
| 365 | |
| 366 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 367 | TCP Fast Open |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 368 | ============= |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 369 | * TcpEstabResets |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 370 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 371 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpEstabResets`_. |
| 372 | |
| 373 | .. _RFC1213 tcpEstabResets: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48 |
| 374 | |
| 375 | * TcpAttemptFails |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 376 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 377 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpAttemptFails`_. |
| 378 | |
| 379 | .. _RFC1213 tcpAttemptFails: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48 |
| 380 | |
| 381 | * TcpOutRsts |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 382 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 383 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpOutRsts`_. The RFC says this counter indicates |
| 384 | the 'segments sent containing the RST flag', but in linux kernel, this |
| 385 | couner indicates the segments kerenl tried to send. The sending |
| 386 | process might be failed due to some errors (e.g. memory alloc failed). |
| 387 | |
| 388 | .. _RFC1213 tcpOutRsts: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-52 |
| 389 | |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 390 | * TcpExtTCPSpuriousRtxHostQueues |
| 391 | |
| 392 | When the TCP stack wants to retransmit a packet, and finds that packet |
| 393 | is not lost in the network, but the packet is not sent yet, the TCP |
| 394 | stack would give up the retransmission and update this counter. It |
| 395 | might happen if a packet stays too long time in a qdisc or driver |
| 396 | queue. |
| 397 | |
| 398 | * TcpEstabResets |
| 399 | |
| 400 | The socket receives a RST packet in Establish or CloseWait state. |
| 401 | |
| 402 | * TcpExtTCPKeepAlive |
| 403 | |
| 404 | This counter indicates many keepalive packets were sent. The keepalive |
| 405 | won't be enabled by default. A userspace program could enable it by |
| 406 | setting the SO_KEEPALIVE socket option. |
| 407 | |
| 408 | * TcpExtTCPSpuriousRTOs |
| 409 | |
| 410 | The spurious retransmission timeout detected by the `F-RTO`_ |
| 411 | algorithm. |
| 412 | |
| 413 | .. _F-RTO: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5682 |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 414 | |
| 415 | TCP Fast Path |
Randy Dunlap | 65e9a6d | 2019-03-17 17:17:45 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 416 | ============= |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 417 | When kernel receives a TCP packet, it has two paths to handler the |
| 418 | packet, one is fast path, another is slow path. The comment in kernel |
| 419 | code provides a good explanation of them, I pasted them below:: |
| 420 | |
| 421 | It is split into a fast path and a slow path. The fast path is |
| 422 | disabled when: |
| 423 | |
| 424 | - A zero window was announced from us |
| 425 | - zero window probing |
| 426 | is only handled properly on the slow path. |
| 427 | - Out of order segments arrived. |
| 428 | - Urgent data is expected. |
| 429 | - There is no buffer space left |
| 430 | - Unexpected TCP flags/window values/header lengths are received |
| 431 | (detected by checking the TCP header against pred_flags) |
| 432 | - Data is sent in both directions. The fast path only supports pure senders |
| 433 | or pure receivers (this means either the sequence number or the ack |
| 434 | value must stay constant) |
| 435 | - Unexpected TCP option. |
| 436 | |
| 437 | Kernel will try to use fast path unless any of the above conditions |
| 438 | are satisfied. If the packets are out of order, kernel will handle |
| 439 | them in slow path, which means the performance might be not very |
| 440 | good. Kernel would also come into slow path if the "Delayed ack" is |
| 441 | used, because when using "Delayed ack", the data is sent in both |
| 442 | directions. When the TCP window scale option is not used, kernel will |
| 443 | try to enable fast path immediately when the connection comes into the |
| 444 | established state, but if the TCP window scale option is used, kernel |
| 445 | will disable the fast path at first, and try to enable it after kernel |
| 446 | receives packets. |
| 447 | |
| 448 | * TcpExtTCPPureAcks and TcpExtTCPHPAcks |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 449 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 450 | If a packet set ACK flag and has no data, it is a pure ACK packet, if |
| 451 | kernel handles it in the fast path, TcpExtTCPHPAcks will increase 1, |
| 452 | if kernel handles it in the slow path, TcpExtTCPPureAcks will |
| 453 | increase 1. |
| 454 | |
| 455 | * TcpExtTCPHPHits |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 456 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 457 | If a TCP packet has data (which means it is not a pure ACK packet), |
| 458 | and this packet is handled in the fast path, TcpExtTCPHPHits will |
| 459 | increase 1. |
| 460 | |
| 461 | |
| 462 | TCP abort |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 463 | ========= |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 464 | * TcpExtTCPAbortOnData |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 465 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 466 | It means TCP layer has data in flight, but need to close the |
| 467 | connection. So TCP layer sends a RST to the other side, indicate the |
| 468 | connection is not closed very graceful. An easy way to increase this |
| 469 | counter is using the SO_LINGER option. Please refer to the SO_LINGER |
| 470 | section of the `socket man page`_: |
| 471 | |
| 472 | .. _socket man page: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/socket.7.html |
| 473 | |
| 474 | By default, when an application closes a connection, the close function |
| 475 | will return immediately and kernel will try to send the in-flight data |
| 476 | async. If you use the SO_LINGER option, set l_onoff to 1, and l_linger |
| 477 | to a positive number, the close function won't return immediately, but |
| 478 | wait for the in-flight data are acked by the other side, the max wait |
| 479 | time is l_linger seconds. If set l_onoff to 1 and set l_linger to 0, |
| 480 | when the application closes a connection, kernel will send a RST |
| 481 | immediately and increase the TcpExtTCPAbortOnData counter. |
| 482 | |
| 483 | * TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 484 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 485 | This counter means the application has unread data in the TCP layer when |
| 486 | the application wants to close the TCP connection. In such a situation, |
| 487 | kernel will send a RST to the other side of the TCP connection. |
| 488 | |
| 489 | * TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 490 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 491 | When an application closes a TCP connection, kernel still need to track |
| 492 | the connection, let it complete the TCP disconnect process. E.g. an |
| 493 | app calls the close method of a socket, kernel sends fin to the other |
| 494 | side of the connection, then the app has no relationship with the |
| 495 | socket any more, but kernel need to keep the socket, this socket |
| 496 | becomes an orphan socket, kernel waits for the reply of the other side, |
| 497 | and would come to the TIME_WAIT state finally. When kernel has no |
| 498 | enough memory to keep the orphan socket, kernel would send an RST to |
| 499 | the other side, and delete the socket, in such situation, kernel will |
| 500 | increase 1 to the TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory. Two conditions would trigger |
| 501 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory: |
| 502 | |
| 503 | 1. the memory used by the TCP protocol is higher than the third value of |
| 504 | the tcp_mem. Please refer the tcp_mem section in the `TCP man page`_: |
| 505 | |
| 506 | .. _TCP man page: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/tcp.7.html |
| 507 | |
| 508 | 2. the orphan socket count is higher than net.ipv4.tcp_max_orphans |
| 509 | |
| 510 | |
| 511 | * TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 512 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 513 | This counter will increase when any of the TCP timers expire. In such |
| 514 | situation, kernel won't send RST, just give up the connection. |
| 515 | |
| 516 | * TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 517 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 518 | When a TCP connection comes into FIN_WAIT_2 state, instead of waiting |
| 519 | for the fin packet from the other side, kernel could send a RST and |
| 520 | delete the socket immediately. This is not the default behavior of |
| 521 | Linux kernel TCP stack. By configuring the TCP_LINGER2 socket option, |
| 522 | you could let kernel follow this behavior. |
| 523 | |
| 524 | * TcpExtTCPAbortFailed |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 525 | |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 526 | The kernel TCP layer will send RST if the `RFC2525 2.17 section`_ is |
| 527 | satisfied. If an internal error occurs during this process, |
| 528 | TcpExtTCPAbortFailed will be increased. |
| 529 | |
| 530 | .. _RFC2525 2.17 section: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2525#page-50 |
| 531 | |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 532 | TCP Hybrid Slow Start |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 533 | ===================== |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 534 | The Hybrid Slow Start algorithm is an enhancement of the traditional |
| 535 | TCP congestion window Slow Start algorithm. It uses two pieces of |
| 536 | information to detect whether the max bandwidth of the TCP path is |
| 537 | approached. The two pieces of information are ACK train length and |
| 538 | increase in packet delay. For detail information, please refer the |
| 539 | `Hybrid Slow Start paper`_. Either ACK train length or packet delay |
| 540 | hits a specific threshold, the congestion control algorithm will come |
| 541 | into the Congestion Avoidance state. Until v4.20, two congestion |
| 542 | control algorithms are using Hybrid Slow Start, they are cubic (the |
| 543 | default congestion control algorithm) and cdg. Four snmp counters |
| 544 | relate with the Hybrid Slow Start algorithm. |
| 545 | |
| 546 | .. _Hybrid Slow Start paper: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/25e9/ef3f03315782c7f1cbcd31b587857adae7d1.pdf |
| 547 | |
| 548 | * TcpExtTCPHystartTrainDetect |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 549 | |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 550 | How many times the ACK train length threshold is detected |
| 551 | |
| 552 | * TcpExtTCPHystartTrainCwnd |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 553 | |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 554 | The sum of CWND detected by ACK train length. Dividing this value by |
| 555 | TcpExtTCPHystartTrainDetect is the average CWND which detected by the |
| 556 | ACK train length. |
| 557 | |
| 558 | * TcpExtTCPHystartDelayDetect |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 559 | |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 560 | How many times the packet delay threshold is detected. |
| 561 | |
| 562 | * TcpExtTCPHystartDelayCwnd |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 563 | |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 564 | The sum of CWND detected by packet delay. Dividing this value by |
| 565 | TcpExtTCPHystartDelayDetect is the average CWND which detected by the |
| 566 | packet delay. |
| 567 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 568 | TCP retransmission and congestion control |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 569 | ========================================= |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 570 | The TCP protocol has two retransmission mechanisms: SACK and fast |
| 571 | recovery. They are exclusive with each other. When SACK is enabled, |
| 572 | the kernel TCP stack would use SACK, or kernel would use fast |
| 573 | recovery. The SACK is a TCP option, which is defined in `RFC2018`_, |
| 574 | the fast recovery is defined in `RFC6582`_, which is also called |
| 575 | 'Reno'. |
| 576 | |
| 577 | The TCP congestion control is a big and complex topic. To understand |
| 578 | the related snmp counter, we need to know the states of the congestion |
| 579 | control state machine. There are 5 states: Open, Disorder, CWR, |
| 580 | Recovery and Loss. For details about these states, please refer page 5 |
| 581 | and page 6 of this document: |
| 582 | https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0e9c/968d09ab2e53e24c4dca5b2d67c7f7140f8e.pdf |
| 583 | |
| 584 | .. _RFC2018: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2018 |
| 585 | .. _RFC6582: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6582 |
| 586 | |
| 587 | * TcpExtTCPRenoRecovery and TcpExtTCPSackRecovery |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 588 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 589 | When the congestion control comes into Recovery state, if sack is |
| 590 | used, TcpExtTCPSackRecovery increases 1, if sack is not used, |
| 591 | TcpExtTCPRenoRecovery increases 1. These two counters mean the TCP |
| 592 | stack begins to retransmit the lost packets. |
| 593 | |
| 594 | * TcpExtTCPSACKReneging |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 595 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 596 | A packet was acknowledged by SACK, but the receiver has dropped this |
| 597 | packet, so the sender needs to retransmit this packet. In this |
| 598 | situation, the sender adds 1 to TcpExtTCPSACKReneging. A receiver |
| 599 | could drop a packet which has been acknowledged by SACK, although it is |
| 600 | unusual, it is allowed by the TCP protocol. The sender doesn't really |
| 601 | know what happened on the receiver side. The sender just waits until |
| 602 | the RTO expires for this packet, then the sender assumes this packet |
| 603 | has been dropped by the receiver. |
| 604 | |
| 605 | * TcpExtTCPRenoReorder |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 606 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 607 | The reorder packet is detected by fast recovery. It would only be used |
| 608 | if SACK is disabled. The fast recovery algorithm detects recorder by |
| 609 | the duplicate ACK number. E.g., if retransmission is triggered, and |
| 610 | the original retransmitted packet is not lost, it is just out of |
| 611 | order, the receiver would acknowledge multiple times, one for the |
| 612 | retransmitted packet, another for the arriving of the original out of |
| 613 | order packet. Thus the sender would find more ACks than its |
| 614 | expectation, and the sender knows out of order occurs. |
| 615 | |
| 616 | * TcpExtTCPTSReorder |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 617 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 618 | The reorder packet is detected when a hole is filled. E.g., assume the |
| 619 | sender sends packet 1,2,3,4,5, and the receiving order is |
| 620 | 1,2,4,5,3. When the sender receives the ACK of packet 3 (which will |
| 621 | fill the hole), two conditions will let TcpExtTCPTSReorder increase |
| 622 | 1: (1) if the packet 3 is not re-retransmitted yet. (2) if the packet |
| 623 | 3 is retransmitted but the timestamp of the packet 3's ACK is earlier |
| 624 | than the retransmission timestamp. |
| 625 | |
| 626 | * TcpExtTCPSACKReorder |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 627 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 628 | The reorder packet detected by SACK. The SACK has two methods to |
| 629 | detect reorder: (1) DSACK is received by the sender. It means the |
| 630 | sender sends the same packet more than one times. And the only reason |
| 631 | is the sender believes an out of order packet is lost so it sends the |
| 632 | packet again. (2) Assume packet 1,2,3,4,5 are sent by the sender, and |
| 633 | the sender has received SACKs for packet 2 and 5, now the sender |
| 634 | receives SACK for packet 4 and the sender doesn't retransmit the |
| 635 | packet yet, the sender would know packet 4 is out of order. The TCP |
| 636 | stack of kernel will increase TcpExtTCPSACKReorder for both of the |
| 637 | above scenarios. |
| 638 | |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 639 | * TcpExtTCPSlowStartRetrans |
| 640 | |
| 641 | The TCP stack wants to retransmit a packet and the congestion control |
| 642 | state is 'Loss'. |
| 643 | |
| 644 | * TcpExtTCPFastRetrans |
| 645 | |
| 646 | The TCP stack wants to retransmit a packet and the congestion control |
| 647 | state is not 'Loss'. |
| 648 | |
| 649 | * TcpExtTCPLostRetransmit |
| 650 | |
| 651 | A SACK points out that a retransmission packet is lost again. |
| 652 | |
| 653 | * TcpExtTCPRetransFail |
| 654 | |
| 655 | The TCP stack tries to deliver a retransmission packet to lower layers |
| 656 | but the lower layers return an error. |
| 657 | |
| 658 | * TcpExtTCPSynRetrans |
| 659 | |
| 660 | The TCP stack retransmits a SYN packet. |
| 661 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 662 | DSACK |
| 663 | ===== |
| 664 | The DSACK is defined in `RFC2883`_. The receiver uses DSACK to report |
| 665 | duplicate packets to the sender. There are two kinds of |
| 666 | duplications: (1) a packet which has been acknowledged is |
| 667 | duplicate. (2) an out of order packet is duplicate. The TCP stack |
| 668 | counts these two kinds of duplications on both receiver side and |
| 669 | sender side. |
| 670 | |
| 671 | .. _RFC2883 : https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2883 |
| 672 | |
| 673 | * TcpExtTCPDSACKOldSent |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 674 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 675 | The TCP stack receives a duplicate packet which has been acked, so it |
| 676 | sends a DSACK to the sender. |
| 677 | |
| 678 | * TcpExtTCPDSACKOfoSent |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 679 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 680 | The TCP stack receives an out of order duplicate packet, so it sends a |
| 681 | DSACK to the sender. |
| 682 | |
| 683 | * TcpExtTCPDSACKRecv |
Randy Dunlap | 65e9a6d | 2019-03-17 17:17:45 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 684 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 685 | The TCP stack receives a DSACK, which indicates an acknowledged |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 686 | duplicate packet is received. |
| 687 | |
| 688 | * TcpExtTCPDSACKOfoRecv |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 689 | |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 690 | The TCP stack receives a DSACK, which indicate an out of order |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 691 | duplicate packet is received. |
| 692 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 693 | invalid SACK and DSACK |
Randy Dunlap | 65e9a6d | 2019-03-17 17:17:45 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 694 | ====================== |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 695 | When a SACK (or DSACK) block is invalid, a corresponding counter would |
| 696 | be updated. The validation method is base on the start/end sequence |
| 697 | number of the SACK block. For more details, please refer the comment |
| 698 | of the function tcp_is_sackblock_valid in the kernel source code. A |
| 699 | SACK option could have up to 4 blocks, they are checked |
| 700 | individually. E.g., if 3 blocks of a SACk is invalid, the |
| 701 | corresponding counter would be updated 3 times. The comment of the |
| 702 | `Add counters for discarded SACK blocks`_ patch has additional |
| 703 | explaination: |
| 704 | |
| 705 | .. _Add counters for discarded SACK blocks: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=18f02545a9a16c9a89778b91a162ad16d510bb32 |
| 706 | |
| 707 | * TcpExtTCPSACKDiscard |
Randy Dunlap | 65e9a6d | 2019-03-17 17:17:45 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 708 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 709 | This counter indicates how many SACK blocks are invalid. If the invalid |
| 710 | SACK block is caused by ACK recording, the TCP stack will only ignore |
| 711 | it and won't update this counter. |
| 712 | |
| 713 | * TcpExtTCPDSACKIgnoredOld and TcpExtTCPDSACKIgnoredNoUndo |
Randy Dunlap | 65e9a6d | 2019-03-17 17:17:45 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 714 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 715 | When a DSACK block is invalid, one of these two counters would be |
| 716 | updated. Which counter will be updated depends on the undo_marker flag |
| 717 | of the TCP socket. If the undo_marker is not set, the TCP stack isn't |
| 718 | likely to re-transmit any packets, and we still receive an invalid |
| 719 | DSACK block, the reason might be that the packet is duplicated in the |
| 720 | middle of the network. In such scenario, TcpExtTCPDSACKIgnoredNoUndo |
| 721 | will be updated. If the undo_marker is set, TcpExtTCPDSACKIgnoredOld |
| 722 | will be updated. As implied in its name, it might be an old packet. |
| 723 | |
| 724 | SACK shift |
Randy Dunlap | 65e9a6d | 2019-03-17 17:17:45 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 725 | ========== |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 726 | The linux networking stack stores data in sk_buff struct (skb for |
| 727 | short). If a SACK block acrosses multiple skb, the TCP stack will try |
| 728 | to re-arrange data in these skb. E.g. if a SACK block acknowledges seq |
| 729 | 10 to 15, skb1 has seq 10 to 13, skb2 has seq 14 to 20. The seq 14 and |
| 730 | 15 in skb2 would be moved to skb1. This operation is 'shift'. If a |
| 731 | SACK block acknowledges seq 10 to 20, skb1 has seq 10 to 13, skb2 has |
| 732 | seq 14 to 20. All data in skb2 will be moved to skb1, and skb2 will be |
| 733 | discard, this operation is 'merge'. |
| 734 | |
| 735 | * TcpExtTCPSackShifted |
Randy Dunlap | 65e9a6d | 2019-03-17 17:17:45 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 736 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 737 | A skb is shifted |
| 738 | |
| 739 | * TcpExtTCPSackMerged |
Randy Dunlap | 65e9a6d | 2019-03-17 17:17:45 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 740 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 741 | A skb is merged |
| 742 | |
| 743 | * TcpExtTCPSackShiftFallback |
Randy Dunlap | 65e9a6d | 2019-03-17 17:17:45 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 744 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 745 | A skb should be shifted or merged, but the TCP stack doesn't do it for |
| 746 | some reasons. |
| 747 | |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 748 | TCP out of order |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 749 | ================ |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 750 | * TcpExtTCPOFOQueue |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 751 | |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 752 | The TCP layer receives an out of order packet and has enough memory |
| 753 | to queue it. |
| 754 | |
| 755 | * TcpExtTCPOFODrop |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 756 | |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 757 | The TCP layer receives an out of order packet but doesn't have enough |
| 758 | memory, so drops it. Such packets won't be counted into |
| 759 | TcpExtTCPOFOQueue. |
| 760 | |
| 761 | * TcpExtTCPOFOMerge |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 762 | |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 763 | The received out of order packet has an overlay with the previous |
| 764 | packet. the overlay part will be dropped. All of TcpExtTCPOFOMerge |
| 765 | packets will also be counted into TcpExtTCPOFOQueue. |
| 766 | |
| 767 | TCP PAWS |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 768 | ======== |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 769 | PAWS (Protection Against Wrapped Sequence numbers) is an algorithm |
| 770 | which is used to drop old packets. It depends on the TCP |
| 771 | timestamps. For detail information, please refer the `timestamp wiki`_ |
| 772 | and the `RFC of PAWS`_. |
| 773 | |
| 774 | .. _RFC of PAWS: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1323#page-17 |
| 775 | .. _timestamp wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_Control_Protocol#TCP_timestamps |
| 776 | |
| 777 | * TcpExtPAWSActive |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 778 | |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 779 | Packets are dropped by PAWS in Syn-Sent status. |
| 780 | |
| 781 | * TcpExtPAWSEstab |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 782 | |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 783 | Packets are dropped by PAWS in any status other than Syn-Sent. |
| 784 | |
| 785 | TCP ACK skip |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 786 | ============ |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 787 | In some scenarios, kernel would avoid sending duplicate ACKs too |
| 788 | frequently. Please find more details in the tcp_invalid_ratelimit |
| 789 | section of the `sysctl document`_. When kernel decides to skip an ACK |
| 790 | due to tcp_invalid_ratelimit, kernel would update one of below |
| 791 | counters to indicate the ACK is skipped in which scenario. The ACK |
| 792 | would only be skipped if the received packet is either a SYN packet or |
| 793 | it has no data. |
| 794 | |
| 795 | .. _sysctl document: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt |
| 796 | |
| 797 | * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 798 | |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 799 | The ACK is skipped in Syn-Recv status. The Syn-Recv status means the |
| 800 | TCP stack receives a SYN and replies SYN+ACK. Now the TCP stack is |
| 801 | waiting for an ACK. Generally, the TCP stack doesn't need to send ACK |
| 802 | in the Syn-Recv status. But in several scenarios, the TCP stack need |
| 803 | to send an ACK. E.g., the TCP stack receives the same SYN packet |
| 804 | repeately, the received packet does not pass the PAWS check, or the |
| 805 | received packet sequence number is out of window. In these scenarios, |
| 806 | the TCP stack needs to send ACK. If the ACk sending frequency is higher than |
| 807 | tcp_invalid_ratelimit allows, the TCP stack will skip sending ACK and |
| 808 | increase TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv. |
| 809 | |
| 810 | |
| 811 | * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedPAWS |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 812 | |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 813 | The ACK is skipped due to PAWS (Protect Against Wrapped Sequence |
| 814 | numbers) check fails. If the PAWS check fails in Syn-Recv, Fin-Wait-2 |
| 815 | or Time-Wait statuses, the skipped ACK would be counted to |
| 816 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv, TcpExtTCPACKSkippedFinWait2 or |
| 817 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedTimeWait. In all other statuses, the skipped ACK |
| 818 | would be counted to TcpExtTCPACKSkippedPAWS. |
| 819 | |
| 820 | * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 821 | |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 822 | The sequence number is out of window and the timestamp passes the PAWS |
| 823 | check and the TCP status is not Syn-Recv, Fin-Wait-2, and Time-Wait. |
| 824 | |
| 825 | * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedFinWait2 |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 826 | |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 827 | The ACK is skipped in Fin-Wait-2 status, the reason would be either |
| 828 | PAWS check fails or the received sequence number is out of window. |
| 829 | |
| 830 | * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedTimeWait |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 831 | |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 832 | Tha ACK is skipped in Time-Wait status, the reason would be either |
| 833 | PAWS check failed or the received sequence number is out of window. |
| 834 | |
| 835 | * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedChallenge |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 836 | |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 837 | The ACK is skipped if the ACK is a challenge ACK. The RFC 5961 defines |
| 838 | 3 kind of challenge ACK, please refer `RFC 5961 section 3.2`_, |
| 839 | `RFC 5961 section 4.2`_ and `RFC 5961 section 5.2`_. Besides these |
| 840 | three scenarios, In some TCP status, the linux TCP stack would also |
| 841 | send challenge ACKs if the ACK number is before the first |
| 842 | unacknowledged number (more strict than `RFC 5961 section 5.2`_). |
| 843 | |
| 844 | .. _RFC 5961 section 3.2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5961#page-7 |
| 845 | .. _RFC 5961 section 4.2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5961#page-9 |
| 846 | .. _RFC 5961 section 5.2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5961#page-11 |
| 847 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 848 | TCP receive window |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 849 | ================== |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 850 | * TcpExtTCPWantZeroWindowAdv |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 851 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 852 | Depending on current memory usage, the TCP stack tries to set receive |
| 853 | window to zero. But the receive window might still be a no-zero |
| 854 | value. For example, if the previous window size is 10, and the TCP |
| 855 | stack receives 3 bytes, the current window size would be 7 even if the |
| 856 | window size calculated by the memory usage is zero. |
| 857 | |
| 858 | * TcpExtTCPToZeroWindowAdv |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 859 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 860 | The TCP receive window is set to zero from a no-zero value. |
| 861 | |
| 862 | * TcpExtTCPFromZeroWindowAdv |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 863 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 864 | The TCP receive window is set to no-zero value from zero. |
| 865 | |
| 866 | |
| 867 | Delayed ACK |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 868 | =========== |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 869 | The TCP Delayed ACK is a technique which is used for reducing the |
| 870 | packet count in the network. For more details, please refer the |
| 871 | `Delayed ACK wiki`_ |
| 872 | |
| 873 | .. _Delayed ACK wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP_delayed_acknowledgment |
| 874 | |
| 875 | * TcpExtDelayedACKs |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 876 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 877 | A delayed ACK timer expires. The TCP stack will send a pure ACK packet |
| 878 | and exit the delayed ACK mode. |
| 879 | |
| 880 | * TcpExtDelayedACKLocked |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 881 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 882 | A delayed ACK timer expires, but the TCP stack can't send an ACK |
| 883 | immediately due to the socket is locked by a userspace program. The |
| 884 | TCP stack will send a pure ACK later (after the userspace program |
| 885 | unlock the socket). When the TCP stack sends the pure ACK later, the |
| 886 | TCP stack will also update TcpExtDelayedACKs and exit the delayed ACK |
| 887 | mode. |
| 888 | |
| 889 | * TcpExtDelayedACKLost |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 890 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 891 | It will be updated when the TCP stack receives a packet which has been |
| 892 | ACKed. A Delayed ACK loss might cause this issue, but it would also be |
| 893 | triggered by other reasons, such as a packet is duplicated in the |
| 894 | network. |
| 895 | |
| 896 | Tail Loss Probe (TLP) |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 897 | ===================== |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 898 | TLP is an algorithm which is used to detect TCP packet loss. For more |
| 899 | details, please refer the `TLP paper`_. |
| 900 | |
| 901 | .. _TLP paper: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dukkipati-tcpm-tcp-loss-probe-01 |
| 902 | |
| 903 | * TcpExtTCPLossProbes |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 904 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 905 | A TLP probe packet is sent. |
| 906 | |
| 907 | * TcpExtTCPLossProbeRecovery |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 908 | |
yupeng | a6c7c7a | 2019-01-11 15:07:24 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 909 | A packet loss is detected and recovered by TLP. |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 910 | |
yupeng | 132c4e9 | 2019-02-09 14:46:18 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 911 | TCP Fast Open |
| 912 | ============= |
| 913 | TCP Fast Open is a technology which allows data transfer before the |
| 914 | 3-way handshake complete. Please refer the `TCP Fast Open wiki`_ for a |
| 915 | general description. |
| 916 | |
| 917 | .. _TCP Fast Open wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP_Fast_Open |
| 918 | |
| 919 | * TcpExtTCPFastOpenActive |
| 920 | |
| 921 | When the TCP stack receives an ACK packet in the SYN-SENT status, and |
| 922 | the ACK packet acknowledges the data in the SYN packet, the TCP stack |
| 923 | understand the TFO cookie is accepted by the other side, then it |
| 924 | updates this counter. |
| 925 | |
| 926 | * TcpExtTCPFastOpenActiveFail |
| 927 | |
| 928 | This counter indicates that the TCP stack initiated a TCP Fast Open, |
| 929 | but it failed. This counter would be updated in three scenarios: (1) |
| 930 | the other side doesn't acknowledge the data in the SYN packet. (2) The |
| 931 | SYN packet which has the TFO cookie is timeout at least once. (3) |
| 932 | after the 3-way handshake, the retransmission timeout happens |
| 933 | net.ipv4.tcp_retries1 times, because some middle-boxes may black-hole |
| 934 | fast open after the handshake. |
| 935 | |
| 936 | * TcpExtTCPFastOpenPassive |
| 937 | |
| 938 | This counter indicates how many times the TCP stack accepts the fast |
| 939 | open request. |
| 940 | |
| 941 | * TcpExtTCPFastOpenPassiveFail |
| 942 | |
| 943 | This counter indicates how many times the TCP stack rejects the fast |
| 944 | open request. It is caused by either the TFO cookie is invalid or the |
| 945 | TCP stack finds an error during the socket creating process. |
| 946 | |
| 947 | * TcpExtTCPFastOpenListenOverflow |
| 948 | |
| 949 | When the pending fast open request number is larger than |
| 950 | fastopenq->max_qlen, the TCP stack will reject the fast open request |
| 951 | and update this counter. When this counter is updated, the TCP stack |
| 952 | won't update TcpExtTCPFastOpenPassive or |
| 953 | TcpExtTCPFastOpenPassiveFail. The fastopenq->max_qlen is set by the |
| 954 | TCP_FASTOPEN socket operation and it could not be larger than |
| 955 | net.core.somaxconn. For example: |
| 956 | |
| 957 | setsockopt(sfd, SOL_TCP, TCP_FASTOPEN, &qlen, sizeof(qlen)); |
| 958 | |
| 959 | * TcpExtTCPFastOpenCookieReqd |
| 960 | |
| 961 | This counter indicates how many times a client wants to request a TFO |
| 962 | cookie. |
| 963 | |
| 964 | SYN cookies |
| 965 | =========== |
| 966 | SYN cookies are used to mitigate SYN flood, for details, please refer |
| 967 | the `SYN cookies wiki`_. |
| 968 | |
| 969 | .. _SYN cookies wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SYN_cookies |
| 970 | |
| 971 | * TcpExtSyncookiesSent |
| 972 | |
| 973 | It indicates how many SYN cookies are sent. |
| 974 | |
| 975 | * TcpExtSyncookiesRecv |
| 976 | |
| 977 | How many reply packets of the SYN cookies the TCP stack receives. |
| 978 | |
| 979 | * TcpExtSyncookiesFailed |
| 980 | |
| 981 | The MSS decoded from the SYN cookie is invalid. When this counter is |
| 982 | updated, the received packet won't be treated as a SYN cookie and the |
| 983 | TcpExtSyncookiesRecv counter wont be updated. |
| 984 | |
| 985 | Challenge ACK |
| 986 | ============= |
| 987 | For details of challenge ACK, please refer the explaination of |
| 988 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedChallenge. |
| 989 | |
| 990 | * TcpExtTCPChallengeACK |
| 991 | |
| 992 | The number of challenge acks sent. |
| 993 | |
| 994 | * TcpExtTCPSYNChallenge |
| 995 | |
| 996 | The number of challenge acks sent in response to SYN packets. After |
| 997 | updates this counter, the TCP stack might send a challenge ACK and |
| 998 | update the TcpExtTCPChallengeACK counter, or it might also skip to |
| 999 | send the challenge and update the TcpExtTCPACKSkippedChallenge. |
| 1000 | |
| 1001 | prune |
| 1002 | ===== |
| 1003 | When a socket is under memory pressure, the TCP stack will try to |
| 1004 | reclaim memory from the receiving queue and out of order queue. One of |
| 1005 | the reclaiming method is 'collapse', which means allocate a big sbk, |
| 1006 | copy the contiguous skbs to the single big skb, and free these |
| 1007 | contiguous skbs. |
| 1008 | |
| 1009 | * TcpExtPruneCalled |
| 1010 | |
| 1011 | The TCP stack tries to reclaim memory for a socket. After updates this |
| 1012 | counter, the TCP stack will try to collapse the out of order queue and |
| 1013 | the receiving queue. If the memory is still not enough, the TCP stack |
| 1014 | will try to discard packets from the out of order queue (and update the |
| 1015 | TcpExtOfoPruned counter) |
| 1016 | |
| 1017 | * TcpExtOfoPruned |
| 1018 | |
| 1019 | The TCP stack tries to discard packet on the out of order queue. |
| 1020 | |
| 1021 | * TcpExtRcvPruned |
| 1022 | |
| 1023 | After 'collapse' and discard packets from the out of order queue, if |
| 1024 | the actually used memory is still larger than the max allowed memory, |
| 1025 | this counter will be updated. It means the 'prune' fails. |
| 1026 | |
| 1027 | * TcpExtTCPRcvCollapsed |
| 1028 | |
| 1029 | This counter indicates how many skbs are freed during 'collapse'. |
| 1030 | |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1031 | examples |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1032 | ======== |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1033 | |
| 1034 | ping test |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1035 | --------- |
yupeng | b08794a | 2018-11-10 13:38:12 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1036 | Run the ping command against the public dns server 8.8.8.8:: |
| 1037 | |
| 1038 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ping 8.8.8.8 -c 1 |
| 1039 | PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data. |
| 1040 | 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=17.8 ms |
| 1041 | |
| 1042 | --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics --- |
| 1043 | 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms |
| 1044 | rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 17.875/17.875/17.875/0.000 ms |
| 1045 | |
| 1046 | The nstayt result:: |
| 1047 | |
| 1048 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat |
| 1049 | #kernel |
| 1050 | IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| 1051 | IpInDelivers 1 0.0 |
| 1052 | IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| 1053 | IcmpInMsgs 1 0.0 |
| 1054 | IcmpInEchoReps 1 0.0 |
| 1055 | IcmpOutMsgs 1 0.0 |
| 1056 | IcmpOutEchos 1 0.0 |
| 1057 | IcmpMsgInType0 1 0.0 |
| 1058 | IcmpMsgOutType8 1 0.0 |
| 1059 | IpExtInOctets 84 0.0 |
| 1060 | IpExtOutOctets 84 0.0 |
| 1061 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| 1062 | |
| 1063 | The Linux server sent an ICMP Echo packet, so IpOutRequests, |
| 1064 | IcmpOutMsgs, IcmpOutEchos and IcmpMsgOutType8 were increased 1. The |
| 1065 | server got ICMP Echo Reply from 8.8.8.8, so IpInReceives, IcmpInMsgs, |
| 1066 | IcmpInEchoReps and IcmpMsgInType0 were increased 1. The ICMP Echo Reply |
| 1067 | was passed to the ICMP layer via IP layer, so IpInDelivers was |
| 1068 | increased 1. The default ping data size is 48, so an ICMP Echo packet |
| 1069 | and its corresponding Echo Reply packet are constructed by: |
| 1070 | |
| 1071 | * 14 bytes MAC header |
| 1072 | * 20 bytes IP header |
| 1073 | * 16 bytes ICMP header |
| 1074 | * 48 bytes data (default value of the ping command) |
| 1075 | |
| 1076 | So the IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets are 20+16+48=84. |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1077 | |
| 1078 | tcp 3-way handshake |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1079 | ------------------- |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1080 | On server side, we run:: |
| 1081 | |
| 1082 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lknv 0.0.0.0 9000 |
| 1083 | Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) |
| 1084 | |
| 1085 | On client side, we run:: |
| 1086 | |
| 1087 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -nv 192.168.122.251 9000 |
| 1088 | Connection to 192.168.122.251 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| 1089 | |
| 1090 | The server listened on tcp 9000 port, the client connected to it, they |
| 1091 | completed the 3-way handshake. |
| 1092 | |
| 1093 | On server side, we can find below nstat output:: |
| 1094 | |
| 1095 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i tcp |
| 1096 | TcpPassiveOpens 1 0.0 |
| 1097 | TcpInSegs 2 0.0 |
| 1098 | TcpOutSegs 1 0.0 |
| 1099 | TcpExtTCPPureAcks 1 0.0 |
| 1100 | |
| 1101 | On client side, we can find below nstat output:: |
| 1102 | |
| 1103 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i tcp |
| 1104 | TcpActiveOpens 1 0.0 |
| 1105 | TcpInSegs 1 0.0 |
| 1106 | TcpOutSegs 2 0.0 |
| 1107 | |
| 1108 | When the server received the first SYN, it replied a SYN+ACK, and came into |
| 1109 | SYN-RCVD state, so TcpPassiveOpens increased 1. The server received |
| 1110 | SYN, sent SYN+ACK, received ACK, so server sent 1 packet, received 2 |
| 1111 | packets, TcpInSegs increased 2, TcpOutSegs increased 1. The last ACK |
| 1112 | of the 3-way handshake is a pure ACK without data, so |
| 1113 | TcpExtTCPPureAcks increased 1. |
| 1114 | |
| 1115 | When the client sent SYN, the client came into the SYN-SENT state, so |
| 1116 | TcpActiveOpens increased 1, the client sent SYN, received SYN+ACK, sent |
| 1117 | ACK, so client sent 2 packets, received 1 packet, TcpInSegs increased |
| 1118 | 1, TcpOutSegs increased 2. |
| 1119 | |
| 1120 | TCP normal traffic |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1121 | ------------------ |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1122 | Run nc on server:: |
| 1123 | |
| 1124 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 0.0.0.0 9000 |
| 1125 | Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) |
| 1126 | |
| 1127 | Run nc on client:: |
| 1128 | |
| 1129 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| 1130 | Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| 1131 | |
| 1132 | Input a string in the nc client ('hello' in our example):: |
| 1133 | |
| 1134 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| 1135 | Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| 1136 | hello |
| 1137 | |
| 1138 | The client side nstat output:: |
| 1139 | |
| 1140 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat |
| 1141 | #kernel |
| 1142 | IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| 1143 | IpInDelivers 1 0.0 |
| 1144 | IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| 1145 | TcpInSegs 1 0.0 |
| 1146 | TcpOutSegs 1 0.0 |
| 1147 | TcpExtTCPPureAcks 1 0.0 |
| 1148 | TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent 1 0.0 |
| 1149 | IpExtInOctets 52 0.0 |
| 1150 | IpExtOutOctets 58 0.0 |
| 1151 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| 1152 | |
| 1153 | The server side nstat output:: |
| 1154 | |
| 1155 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat |
| 1156 | #kernel |
| 1157 | IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| 1158 | IpInDelivers 1 0.0 |
| 1159 | IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| 1160 | TcpInSegs 1 0.0 |
| 1161 | TcpOutSegs 1 0.0 |
| 1162 | IpExtInOctets 58 0.0 |
| 1163 | IpExtOutOctets 52 0.0 |
| 1164 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| 1165 | |
| 1166 | Input a string in nc client side again ('world' in our exmaple):: |
| 1167 | |
| 1168 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| 1169 | Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| 1170 | hello |
| 1171 | world |
| 1172 | |
| 1173 | Client side nstat output:: |
| 1174 | |
| 1175 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat |
| 1176 | #kernel |
| 1177 | IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| 1178 | IpInDelivers 1 0.0 |
| 1179 | IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| 1180 | TcpInSegs 1 0.0 |
| 1181 | TcpOutSegs 1 0.0 |
| 1182 | TcpExtTCPHPAcks 1 0.0 |
| 1183 | TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent 1 0.0 |
| 1184 | IpExtInOctets 52 0.0 |
| 1185 | IpExtOutOctets 58 0.0 |
| 1186 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| 1187 | |
| 1188 | |
| 1189 | Server side nstat output:: |
| 1190 | |
| 1191 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat |
| 1192 | #kernel |
| 1193 | IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| 1194 | IpInDelivers 1 0.0 |
| 1195 | IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| 1196 | TcpInSegs 1 0.0 |
| 1197 | TcpOutSegs 1 0.0 |
| 1198 | TcpExtTCPHPHits 1 0.0 |
| 1199 | IpExtInOctets 58 0.0 |
| 1200 | IpExtOutOctets 52 0.0 |
| 1201 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| 1202 | |
| 1203 | Compare the first client-side nstat and the second client-side nstat, |
| 1204 | we could find one difference: the first one had a 'TcpExtTCPPureAcks', |
| 1205 | but the second one had a 'TcpExtTCPHPAcks'. The first server-side |
| 1206 | nstat and the second server-side nstat had a difference too: the |
| 1207 | second server-side nstat had a TcpExtTCPHPHits, but the first |
| 1208 | server-side nstat didn't have it. The network traffic patterns were |
| 1209 | exactly the same: the client sent a packet to the server, the server |
| 1210 | replied an ACK. But kernel handled them in different ways. When the |
| 1211 | TCP window scale option is not used, kernel will try to enable fast |
| 1212 | path immediately when the connection comes into the established state, |
| 1213 | but if the TCP window scale option is used, kernel will disable the |
| 1214 | fast path at first, and try to enable it after kerenl receives |
| 1215 | packets. We could use the 'ss' command to verify whether the window |
| 1216 | scale option is used. e.g. run below command on either server or |
| 1217 | client:: |
| 1218 | |
| 1219 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ss -o state established -i '( dport = :9000 or sport = :9000 ) |
| 1220 | Netid Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port |
| 1221 | tcp 0 0 192.168.122.250:40654 192.168.122.251:9000 |
| 1222 | ts sack cubic wscale:7,7 rto:204 rtt:0.98/0.49 mss:1448 pmtu:1500 rcvmss:536 advmss:1448 cwnd:10 bytes_acked:1 segs_out:2 segs_in:1 send 118.2Mbps lastsnd:46572 lastrcv:46572 lastack:46572 pacing_rate 236.4Mbps rcv_space:29200 rcv_ssthresh:29200 minrtt:0.98 |
| 1223 | |
| 1224 | The 'wscale:7,7' means both server and client set the window scale |
| 1225 | option to 7. Now we could explain the nstat output in our test: |
| 1226 | |
| 1227 | In the first nstat output of client side, the client sent a packet, server |
| 1228 | reply an ACK, when kernel handled this ACK, the fast path was not |
| 1229 | enabled, so the ACK was counted into 'TcpExtTCPPureAcks'. |
| 1230 | |
| 1231 | In the second nstat output of client side, the client sent a packet again, |
| 1232 | and received another ACK from the server, in this time, the fast path is |
| 1233 | enabled, and the ACK was qualified for fast path, so it was handled by |
| 1234 | the fast path, so this ACK was counted into TcpExtTCPHPAcks. |
| 1235 | |
| 1236 | In the first nstat output of server side, fast path was not enabled, |
| 1237 | so there was no 'TcpExtTCPHPHits'. |
| 1238 | |
| 1239 | In the second nstat output of server side, the fast path was enabled, |
| 1240 | and the packet received from client qualified for fast path, so it |
| 1241 | was counted into 'TcpExtTCPHPHits'. |
| 1242 | |
| 1243 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1244 | --------------------- |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1245 | On the server side, we run below python script:: |
| 1246 | |
| 1247 | import socket |
| 1248 | import time |
| 1249 | |
| 1250 | port = 9000 |
| 1251 | |
| 1252 | s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 1253 | s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) |
| 1254 | s.listen(1) |
| 1255 | sock, addr = s.accept() |
| 1256 | while True: |
| 1257 | time.sleep(9999999) |
| 1258 | |
| 1259 | This python script listen on 9000 port, but doesn't read anything from |
| 1260 | the connection. |
| 1261 | |
| 1262 | On the client side, we send the string "hello" by nc:: |
| 1263 | |
| 1264 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ echo "hello" | nc nstat-b 9000 |
| 1265 | |
| 1266 | Then, we come back to the server side, the server has received the "hello" |
| 1267 | packet, and the TCP layer has acked this packet, but the application didn't |
| 1268 | read it yet. We type Ctrl-C to terminate the server script. Then we |
| 1269 | could find TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose increased 1 on the server side:: |
| 1270 | |
| 1271 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i abort |
| 1272 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose 1 0.0 |
| 1273 | |
| 1274 | If we run tcpdump on the server side, we could find the server sent a |
| 1275 | RST after we type Ctrl-C. |
| 1276 | |
| 1277 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory and TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1278 | --------------------------------------------------- |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1279 | Below is an example which let the orphan socket count be higher than |
| 1280 | net.ipv4.tcp_max_orphans. |
| 1281 | Change tcp_max_orphans to a smaller value on client:: |
| 1282 | |
| 1283 | sudo bash -c "echo 10 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_orphans" |
| 1284 | |
| 1285 | Client code (create 64 connection to server):: |
| 1286 | |
| 1287 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ cat client_orphan.py |
| 1288 | import socket |
| 1289 | import time |
| 1290 | |
| 1291 | server = 'nstat-b' # server address |
| 1292 | port = 9000 |
| 1293 | |
| 1294 | count = 64 |
| 1295 | |
| 1296 | connection_list = [] |
| 1297 | |
| 1298 | for i in range(64): |
| 1299 | s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 1300 | s.connect((server, port)) |
| 1301 | connection_list.append(s) |
| 1302 | print("connection_count: %d" % len(connection_list)) |
| 1303 | |
| 1304 | while True: |
| 1305 | time.sleep(99999) |
| 1306 | |
| 1307 | Server code (accept 64 connection from client):: |
| 1308 | |
| 1309 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ cat server_orphan.py |
| 1310 | import socket |
| 1311 | import time |
| 1312 | |
| 1313 | port = 9000 |
| 1314 | count = 64 |
| 1315 | |
| 1316 | s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 1317 | s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) |
| 1318 | s.listen(count) |
| 1319 | connection_list = [] |
| 1320 | while True: |
| 1321 | sock, addr = s.accept() |
| 1322 | connection_list.append((sock, addr)) |
| 1323 | print("connection_count: %d" % len(connection_list)) |
| 1324 | |
| 1325 | Run the python scripts on server and client. |
| 1326 | |
| 1327 | On server:: |
| 1328 | |
| 1329 | python3 server_orphan.py |
| 1330 | |
| 1331 | On client:: |
| 1332 | |
| 1333 | python3 client_orphan.py |
| 1334 | |
| 1335 | Run iptables on server:: |
| 1336 | |
| 1337 | sudo iptables -A INPUT -i ens3 -p tcp --destination-port 9000 -j DROP |
| 1338 | |
| 1339 | Type Ctrl-C on client, stop client_orphan.py. |
| 1340 | |
| 1341 | Check TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory on client:: |
| 1342 | |
| 1343 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort |
| 1344 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory 54 0.0 |
| 1345 | |
| 1346 | Check orphane socket count on client:: |
| 1347 | |
| 1348 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ss -s |
| 1349 | Total: 131 (kernel 0) |
| 1350 | TCP: 14 (estab 1, closed 0, orphaned 10, synrecv 0, timewait 0/0), ports 0 |
| 1351 | |
| 1352 | Transport Total IP IPv6 |
| 1353 | * 0 - - |
| 1354 | RAW 1 0 1 |
| 1355 | UDP 1 1 0 |
| 1356 | TCP 14 13 1 |
| 1357 | INET 16 14 2 |
| 1358 | FRAG 0 0 0 |
| 1359 | |
| 1360 | The explanation of the test: after run server_orphan.py and |
| 1361 | client_orphan.py, we set up 64 connections between server and |
| 1362 | client. Run the iptables command, the server will drop all packets from |
| 1363 | the client, type Ctrl-C on client_orphan.py, the system of the client |
| 1364 | would try to close these connections, and before they are closed |
| 1365 | gracefully, these connections became orphan sockets. As the iptables |
| 1366 | of the server blocked packets from the client, the server won't receive fin |
| 1367 | from the client, so all connection on clients would be stuck on FIN_WAIT_1 |
| 1368 | stage, so they will keep as orphan sockets until timeout. We have echo |
| 1369 | 10 to /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_orphans, so the client system would |
| 1370 | only keep 10 orphan sockets, for all other orphan sockets, the client |
| 1371 | system sent RST for them and delete them. We have 64 connections, so |
| 1372 | the 'ss -s' command shows the system has 10 orphan sockets, and the |
| 1373 | value of TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory was 54. |
| 1374 | |
| 1375 | An additional explanation about orphan socket count: You could find the |
| 1376 | exactly orphan socket count by the 'ss -s' command, but when kernel |
| 1377 | decide whither increases TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory and sends RST, kernel |
| 1378 | doesn't always check the exactly orphan socket count. For increasing |
| 1379 | performance, kernel checks an approximate count firstly, if the |
| 1380 | approximate count is more than tcp_max_orphans, kernel checks the |
| 1381 | exact count again. So if the approximate count is less than |
| 1382 | tcp_max_orphans, but exactly count is more than tcp_max_orphans, you |
| 1383 | would find TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory is not increased at all. If |
| 1384 | tcp_max_orphans is large enough, it won't occur, but if you decrease |
| 1385 | tcp_max_orphans to a small value like our test, you might find this |
| 1386 | issue. So in our test, the client set up 64 connections although the |
| 1387 | tcp_max_orphans is 10. If the client only set up 11 connections, we |
| 1388 | can't find the change of TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory. |
| 1389 | |
| 1390 | Continue the previous test, we wait for several minutes. Because of the |
| 1391 | iptables on the server blocked the traffic, the server wouldn't receive |
| 1392 | fin, and all the client's orphan sockets would timeout on the |
| 1393 | FIN_WAIT_1 state finally. So we wait for a few minutes, we could find |
| 1394 | 10 timeout on the client:: |
| 1395 | |
| 1396 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort |
| 1397 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout 10 0.0 |
| 1398 | |
| 1399 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1400 | ---------------------- |
yupeng | 80cc495 | 2018-11-16 11:17:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1401 | The server side code:: |
| 1402 | |
| 1403 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ cat server_linger.py |
| 1404 | import socket |
| 1405 | import time |
| 1406 | |
| 1407 | port = 9000 |
| 1408 | |
| 1409 | s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 1410 | s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) |
| 1411 | s.listen(1) |
| 1412 | sock, addr = s.accept() |
| 1413 | while True: |
| 1414 | time.sleep(9999999) |
| 1415 | |
| 1416 | The client side code:: |
| 1417 | |
| 1418 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ cat client_linger.py |
| 1419 | import socket |
| 1420 | import struct |
| 1421 | |
| 1422 | server = 'nstat-b' # server address |
| 1423 | port = 9000 |
| 1424 | |
| 1425 | s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 1426 | s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_LINGER, struct.pack('ii', 1, 10)) |
| 1427 | s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_TCP, socket.TCP_LINGER2, struct.pack('i', -1)) |
| 1428 | s.connect((server, port)) |
| 1429 | s.close() |
| 1430 | |
| 1431 | Run server_linger.py on server:: |
| 1432 | |
| 1433 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ python3 server_linger.py |
| 1434 | |
| 1435 | Run client_linger.py on client:: |
| 1436 | |
| 1437 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ python3 client_linger.py |
| 1438 | |
| 1439 | After run client_linger.py, check the output of nstat:: |
| 1440 | |
| 1441 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort |
| 1442 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger 1 0.0 |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1443 | |
| 1444 | TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1445 | -------------------- |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1446 | On the server, we run a program which listen on TCP port 9000, but |
| 1447 | doesn't read any data:: |
| 1448 | |
| 1449 | import socket |
| 1450 | import time |
| 1451 | port = 9000 |
| 1452 | s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 1453 | s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) |
| 1454 | s.listen(1) |
| 1455 | sock, addr = s.accept() |
| 1456 | while True: |
| 1457 | time.sleep(9999999) |
| 1458 | |
| 1459 | Save the above code as server_coalesce.py, and run:: |
| 1460 | |
| 1461 | python3 server_coalesce.py |
| 1462 | |
| 1463 | On the client, save below code as client_coalesce.py:: |
| 1464 | |
| 1465 | import socket |
| 1466 | server = 'nstat-b' |
| 1467 | port = 9000 |
| 1468 | s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 1469 | s.connect((server, port)) |
| 1470 | |
| 1471 | Run:: |
| 1472 | |
| 1473 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ python3 -i client_coalesce.py |
| 1474 | |
| 1475 | We use '-i' to come into the interactive mode, then a packet:: |
| 1476 | |
| 1477 | >>> s.send(b'foo') |
| 1478 | 3 |
| 1479 | |
| 1480 | Send a packet again:: |
| 1481 | |
| 1482 | >>> s.send(b'bar') |
| 1483 | 3 |
| 1484 | |
| 1485 | On the server, run nstat:: |
| 1486 | |
| 1487 | ubuntu@nstat-b:~$ nstat |
| 1488 | #kernel |
| 1489 | IpInReceives 2 0.0 |
| 1490 | IpInDelivers 2 0.0 |
| 1491 | IpOutRequests 2 0.0 |
| 1492 | TcpInSegs 2 0.0 |
| 1493 | TcpOutSegs 2 0.0 |
| 1494 | TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce 1 0.0 |
| 1495 | IpExtInOctets 110 0.0 |
| 1496 | IpExtOutOctets 104 0.0 |
| 1497 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 2 0.0 |
| 1498 | |
| 1499 | The client sent two packets, server didn't read any data. When |
| 1500 | the second packet arrived at server, the first packet was still in |
| 1501 | the receiving queue. So the TCP layer merged the two packets, and we |
| 1502 | could find the TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce increased 1. |
| 1503 | |
| 1504 | TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1505 | ------------------------------------------- |
yupeng | 712ee16 | 2018-11-25 23:35:46 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1506 | On server, run the nc command, listen on port 9000:: |
| 1507 | |
| 1508 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 0.0.0.0 9000 |
| 1509 | Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) |
| 1510 | |
| 1511 | On client, run 3 nc commands in different terminals:: |
| 1512 | |
| 1513 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| 1514 | Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| 1515 | |
| 1516 | The nc command only accepts 1 connection, and the accept queue length |
| 1517 | is 1. On current linux implementation, set queue length to n means the |
| 1518 | actual queue length is n+1. Now we create 3 connections, 1 is accepted |
| 1519 | by nc, 2 in accepted queue, so the accept queue is full. |
| 1520 | |
| 1521 | Before running the 4th nc, we clean the nstat history on the server:: |
| 1522 | |
| 1523 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat -n |
| 1524 | |
| 1525 | Run the 4th nc on the client:: |
| 1526 | |
| 1527 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| 1528 | |
| 1529 | If the nc server is running on kernel 4.10 or higher version, you |
| 1530 | won't see the "Connection to ... succeeded!" string, because kernel |
| 1531 | will drop the SYN if the accept queue is full. If the nc client is running |
| 1532 | on an old kernel, you would see that the connection is succeeded, |
| 1533 | because kernel would complete the 3 way handshake and keep the socket |
| 1534 | on half open queue. I did the test on kernel 4.15. Below is the nstat |
| 1535 | on the server:: |
| 1536 | |
| 1537 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat |
| 1538 | #kernel |
| 1539 | IpInReceives 4 0.0 |
| 1540 | IpInDelivers 4 0.0 |
| 1541 | TcpInSegs 4 0.0 |
| 1542 | TcpExtListenOverflows 4 0.0 |
| 1543 | TcpExtListenDrops 4 0.0 |
| 1544 | IpExtInOctets 240 0.0 |
| 1545 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 4 0.0 |
| 1546 | |
| 1547 | Both TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops were 4. If the time |
| 1548 | between the 4th nc and the nstat was longer, the value of |
| 1549 | TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops would be larger, because |
| 1550 | the SYN of the 4th nc was dropped, the client was retrying. |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1551 | |
| 1552 | IpInAddrErrors, IpExtInNoRoutes and IpOutNoRoutes |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1553 | ------------------------------------------------- |
yupeng | 8e2ea53 | 2018-12-12 00:14:10 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1554 | server A IP address: 192.168.122.250 |
| 1555 | server B IP address: 192.168.122.251 |
| 1556 | Prepare on server A, add a route to server B:: |
| 1557 | |
| 1558 | $ sudo ip route add 8.8.8.8/32 via 192.168.122.251 |
| 1559 | |
| 1560 | Prepare on server B, disable send_redirects for all interfaces:: |
| 1561 | |
| 1562 | $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.send_redirects=0 |
| 1563 | $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.ens3.send_redirects=0 |
| 1564 | $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.lo.send_redirects=0 |
| 1565 | $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.default.send_redirects=0 |
| 1566 | |
| 1567 | We want to let sever A send a packet to 8.8.8.8, and route the packet |
| 1568 | to server B. When server B receives such packet, it might send a ICMP |
| 1569 | Redirect message to server A, set send_redirects to 0 will disable |
| 1570 | this behavior. |
| 1571 | |
| 1572 | First, generate InAddrErrors. On server B, we disable IP forwarding:: |
| 1573 | |
| 1574 | $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=0 |
| 1575 | |
| 1576 | On server A, we send packets to 8.8.8.8:: |
| 1577 | |
| 1578 | $ nc -v 8.8.8.8 53 |
| 1579 | |
| 1580 | On server B, we check the output of nstat:: |
| 1581 | |
| 1582 | $ nstat |
| 1583 | #kernel |
| 1584 | IpInReceives 3 0.0 |
| 1585 | IpInAddrErrors 3 0.0 |
| 1586 | IpExtInOctets 180 0.0 |
| 1587 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 3 0.0 |
| 1588 | |
| 1589 | As we have let server A route 8.8.8.8 to server B, and we disabled IP |
| 1590 | forwarding on server B, Server A sent packets to server B, then server B |
| 1591 | dropped packets and increased IpInAddrErrors. As the nc command would |
| 1592 | re-send the SYN packet if it didn't receive a SYN+ACK, we could find |
| 1593 | multiple IpInAddrErrors. |
| 1594 | |
| 1595 | Second, generate IpExtInNoRoutes. On server B, we enable IP |
| 1596 | forwarding:: |
| 1597 | |
| 1598 | $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=1 |
| 1599 | |
| 1600 | Check the route table of server B and remove the default route:: |
| 1601 | |
| 1602 | $ ip route show |
| 1603 | default via 192.168.122.1 dev ens3 proto static |
| 1604 | 192.168.122.0/24 dev ens3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.122.251 |
| 1605 | $ sudo ip route delete default via 192.168.122.1 dev ens3 proto static |
| 1606 | |
| 1607 | On server A, we contact 8.8.8.8 again:: |
| 1608 | |
| 1609 | $ nc -v 8.8.8.8 53 |
| 1610 | nc: connect to 8.8.8.8 port 53 (tcp) failed: Network is unreachable |
| 1611 | |
| 1612 | On server B, run nstat:: |
| 1613 | |
| 1614 | $ nstat |
| 1615 | #kernel |
| 1616 | IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| 1617 | IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| 1618 | IcmpOutMsgs 1 0.0 |
| 1619 | IcmpOutDestUnreachs 1 0.0 |
| 1620 | IcmpMsgOutType3 1 0.0 |
| 1621 | IpExtInNoRoutes 1 0.0 |
| 1622 | IpExtInOctets 60 0.0 |
| 1623 | IpExtOutOctets 88 0.0 |
| 1624 | IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| 1625 | |
| 1626 | We enabled IP forwarding on server B, when server B received a packet |
| 1627 | which destination IP address is 8.8.8.8, server B will try to forward |
| 1628 | this packet. We have deleted the default route, there was no route for |
| 1629 | 8.8.8.8, so server B increase IpExtInNoRoutes and sent the "ICMP |
| 1630 | Destination Unreachable" message to server A. |
| 1631 | |
| 1632 | Third, generate IpOutNoRoutes. Run ping command on server B:: |
| 1633 | |
| 1634 | $ ping -c 1 8.8.8.8 |
| 1635 | connect: Network is unreachable |
| 1636 | |
| 1637 | Run nstat on server B:: |
| 1638 | |
| 1639 | $ nstat |
| 1640 | #kernel |
| 1641 | IpOutNoRoutes 1 0.0 |
| 1642 | |
| 1643 | We have deleted the default route on server B. Server B couldn't find |
| 1644 | a route for the 8.8.8.8 IP address, so server B increased |
| 1645 | IpOutNoRoutes. |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1646 | |
| 1647 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1648 | -------------------------- |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1649 | In this test, we send 3 same SYN packets from client to server. The |
| 1650 | first SYN will let server create a socket, set it to Syn-Recv status, |
| 1651 | and reply a SYN/ACK. The second SYN will let server reply the SYN/ACK |
| 1652 | again, and record the reply time (the duplicate ACK reply time). The |
| 1653 | third SYN will let server check the previous duplicate ACK reply time, |
| 1654 | and decide to skip the duplicate ACK, then increase the |
| 1655 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv counter. |
| 1656 | |
| 1657 | Run tcpdump to capture a SYN packet:: |
| 1658 | |
| 1659 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ sudo tcpdump -c 1 -w /tmp/syn.pcap port 9000 |
| 1660 | tcpdump: listening on ens3, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes |
| 1661 | |
| 1662 | Open another terminal, run nc command:: |
| 1663 | |
| 1664 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc nstat-b 9000 |
| 1665 | |
| 1666 | As the nstat-b didn't listen on port 9000, it should reply a RST, and |
| 1667 | the nc command exited immediately. It was enough for the tcpdump |
| 1668 | command to capture a SYN packet. A linux server might use hardware |
| 1669 | offload for the TCP checksum, so the checksum in the /tmp/syn.pcap |
| 1670 | might be not correct. We call tcprewrite to fix it:: |
| 1671 | |
| 1672 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ tcprewrite --infile=/tmp/syn.pcap --outfile=/tmp/syn_fixcsum.pcap --fixcsum |
| 1673 | |
| 1674 | On nstat-b, we run nc to listen on port 9000:: |
| 1675 | |
| 1676 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 9000 |
| 1677 | Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) |
| 1678 | |
| 1679 | On nstat-a, we blocked the packet from port 9000, or nstat-a would send |
| 1680 | RST to nstat-b:: |
| 1681 | |
| 1682 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --sport 9000 -j DROP |
| 1683 | |
| 1684 | Send 3 SYN repeatly to nstat-b:: |
| 1685 | |
| 1686 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ for i in {1..3}; do sudo tcpreplay -i ens3 /tmp/syn_fixcsum.pcap; done |
| 1687 | |
| 1688 | Check snmp cunter on nstat-b:: |
| 1689 | |
| 1690 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i skip |
| 1691 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv 1 0.0 |
| 1692 | |
| 1693 | As we expected, TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv is 1. |
| 1694 | |
| 1695 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedPAWS |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1696 | ----------------------- |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1697 | To trigger PAWS, we could send an old SYN. |
| 1698 | |
| 1699 | On nstat-b, let nc listen on port 9000:: |
| 1700 | |
| 1701 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 9000 |
| 1702 | Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) |
| 1703 | |
| 1704 | On nstat-a, run tcpdump to capture a SYN:: |
| 1705 | |
| 1706 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ sudo tcpdump -w /tmp/paws_pre.pcap -c 1 port 9000 |
| 1707 | tcpdump: listening on ens3, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes |
| 1708 | |
| 1709 | On nstat-a, run nc as a client to connect nstat-b:: |
| 1710 | |
| 1711 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| 1712 | Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| 1713 | |
| 1714 | Now the tcpdump has captured the SYN and exit. We should fix the |
| 1715 | checksum:: |
| 1716 | |
| 1717 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ tcprewrite --infile /tmp/paws_pre.pcap --outfile /tmp/paws.pcap --fixcsum |
| 1718 | |
| 1719 | Send the SYN packet twice:: |
| 1720 | |
| 1721 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ for i in {1..2}; do sudo tcpreplay -i ens3 /tmp/paws.pcap; done |
| 1722 | |
| 1723 | On nstat-b, check the snmp counter:: |
| 1724 | |
| 1725 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i skip |
| 1726 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedPAWS 1 0.0 |
| 1727 | |
| 1728 | We sent two SYN via tcpreplay, both of them would let PAWS check |
| 1729 | failed, the nstat-b replied an ACK for the first SYN, skipped the ACK |
| 1730 | for the second SYN, and updated TcpExtTCPACKSkippedPAWS. |
| 1731 | |
| 1732 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq |
Randy Dunlap | ae5220c | 2019-01-13 20:17:41 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1733 | ---------------------- |
yupeng | 2b965472 | 2018-12-29 21:46:38 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1734 | To trigger TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq, we send packets which have valid |
| 1735 | timestamp (to pass PAWS check) but the sequence number is out of |
| 1736 | window. The linux TCP stack would avoid to skip if the packet has |
| 1737 | data, so we need a pure ACK packet. To generate such a packet, we |
| 1738 | could create two sockets: one on port 9000, another on port 9001. Then |
| 1739 | we capture an ACK on port 9001, change the source/destination port |
| 1740 | numbers to match the port 9000 socket. Then we could trigger |
| 1741 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq via this packet. |
| 1742 | |
| 1743 | On nstat-b, open two terminals, run two nc commands to listen on both |
| 1744 | port 9000 and port 9001:: |
| 1745 | |
| 1746 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 9000 |
| 1747 | Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) |
| 1748 | |
| 1749 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 9001 |
| 1750 | Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9001) |
| 1751 | |
| 1752 | On nstat-a, run two nc clients:: |
| 1753 | |
| 1754 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| 1755 | Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| 1756 | |
| 1757 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9001 |
| 1758 | Connection to nstat-b 9001 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| 1759 | |
| 1760 | On nstat-a, run tcpdump to capture an ACK:: |
| 1761 | |
| 1762 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ sudo tcpdump -w /tmp/seq_pre.pcap -c 1 dst port 9001 |
| 1763 | tcpdump: listening on ens3, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes |
| 1764 | |
| 1765 | On nstat-b, send a packet via the port 9001 socket. E.g. we sent a |
| 1766 | string 'foo' in our example:: |
| 1767 | |
| 1768 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 9001 |
| 1769 | Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9001) |
| 1770 | Connection from nstat-a 42132 received! |
| 1771 | foo |
| 1772 | |
| 1773 | On nstat-a, the tcpdump should have caputred the ACK. We should check |
| 1774 | the source port numbers of the two nc clients:: |
| 1775 | |
| 1776 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ss -ta '( dport = :9000 || dport = :9001 )' | tee |
| 1777 | State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port |
| 1778 | ESTAB 0 0 192.168.122.250:50208 192.168.122.251:9000 |
| 1779 | ESTAB 0 0 192.168.122.250:42132 192.168.122.251:9001 |
| 1780 | |
| 1781 | Run tcprewrite, change port 9001 to port 9000, chagne port 42132 to |
| 1782 | port 50208:: |
| 1783 | |
| 1784 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ tcprewrite --infile /tmp/seq_pre.pcap --outfile /tmp/seq.pcap -r 9001:9000 -r 42132:50208 --fixcsum |
| 1785 | |
| 1786 | Now the /tmp/seq.pcap is the packet we need. Send it to nstat-b:: |
| 1787 | |
| 1788 | nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ for i in {1..2}; do sudo tcpreplay -i ens3 /tmp/seq.pcap; done |
| 1789 | |
| 1790 | Check TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq on nstat-b:: |
| 1791 | |
| 1792 | nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i skip |
| 1793 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq 1 0.0 |