xfrm: don't check offload_handle for nonzero
The offload_handle should be an opaque data cookie for the driver
to use, much like the data cookie for a timer or alarm callback.
Thus, the XFRM stack should not be checking for non-zero, because
the driver might use that to store an array reference, which could
be zero, or some other zero but meaningful value.
We can remove the checks for non-zero because there are plenty
other attributes also being checked to see if there is an offload
in place for the SA in question.
Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/esp4_offload.c b/net/ipv4/esp4_offload.c
index 7cf755e..133589d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/esp4_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/esp4_offload.c
@@ -135,8 +135,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *esp4_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,
skb->encap_hdr_csum = 1;
- if (!(features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP) || !x->xso.offload_handle ||
- (x->xso.dev != skb->dev))
+ if (!(features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP) || x->xso.dev != skb->dev)
esp_features = features & ~(NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK);
else if (!(features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP_TX_CSUM))
esp_features = features & ~NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK;
@@ -179,8 +178,7 @@ static int esp_xmit(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb, netdev_features_
if (!xo)
return -EINVAL;
- if (!(features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP) || !x->xso.offload_handle ||
- (x->xso.dev != skb->dev)) {
+ if (!(features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP) || x->xso.dev != skb->dev) {
xo->flags |= CRYPTO_FALLBACK;
hw_offload = false;
}