fs/ext4: fix comments mentioning i_mutex
inode->i_mutex has been replaced with inode->i_rwsem long ago. Fix
comments still mentioning i_mutex.
Signed-off-by: hongnanli <hongnan.li@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220121070611.21618-1-hongnan.li@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index f368dd5..d2a29fc 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1223,7 +1223,7 @@ static int ext4_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
/*
* __block_write_begin may have instantiated a few blocks
* outside i_size. Trim these off again. Don't need
- * i_size_read because we hold i_mutex.
+ * i_size_read because we hold i_rwsem.
*
* Add inode to orphan list in case we crash before
* truncate finishes
@@ -3972,7 +3972,7 @@ int ext4_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length)
}
- /* Wait all existing dio workers, newcomers will block on i_mutex */
+ /* Wait all existing dio workers, newcomers will block on i_rwsem */
inode_dio_wait(inode);
/*
@@ -4122,7 +4122,7 @@ int ext4_truncate(struct inode *inode)
/*
* There is a possibility that we're either freeing the inode
* or it's a completely new inode. In those cases we might not
- * have i_mutex locked because it's not necessary.
+ * have i_rwsem locked because it's not necessary.
*/
if (!(inode->i_state & (I_NEW|I_FREEING)))
WARN_ON(!inode_is_locked(inode));
@@ -5264,7 +5264,7 @@ static void ext4_wait_for_tail_page_commit(struct inode *inode)
* transaction are already on disk (truncate waits for pages under
* writeback).
*
- * Called with inode->i_mutex down.
+ * Called with inode->i_rwsem down.
*/
int ext4_setattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct dentry *dentry,
struct iattr *attr)