perf: Fix sibling iteration
Mark noticed that the change to sibling_list changed some iteration
semantics; because previously we used group_list as list entry,
sibling events would always have an empty sibling_list.
But because we now use sibling_list for both list head and list entry,
siblings will report as having siblings.
Fix this with a custom for_each_sibling_event() iterator.
Fixes: 8343aae66167 ("perf/core: Remove perf_event::group_entry")
Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: vincent.weaver@maine.edu
Cc: alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com
Cc: valery.cherepennikov@intel.com
Cc: eranian@google.com
Cc: acme@redhat.com
Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davidcc@google.com
Cc: kan.liang@intel.com
Cc: Dmitry.Prohorov@intel.com
Cc: jolsa@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180315170129.GX4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c b/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
index 1c310a4..65b7e40 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
@@ -846,11 +846,11 @@ static int arm_ccn_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
!is_software_event(event->group_leader))
return -EINVAL;
- list_for_each_entry(sibling, &event->group_leader->sibling_list,
- sibling_list)
+ for_each_sibling_event(sibling, event->group_leader) {
if (sibling->pmu != event->pmu &&
!is_software_event(sibling))
return -EINVAL;
+ }
return 0;
}