stm class: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c
index 4f932a4..603b4a99 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ struct stp_policy_node {
unsigned int first_channel;
unsigned int last_channel;
/* this is the one that's exposed to the attributes */
- unsigned char priv[0];
+ unsigned char priv[];
};
void *stp_policy_node_priv(struct stp_policy_node *pn)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/stm.h b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/stm.h
index 3569439..a9be49f 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/stm.h
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/stm.h
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ void *stp_policy_node_priv(struct stp_policy_node *pn);
struct stp_master {
unsigned int nr_free;
- unsigned long chan_map[0];
+ unsigned long chan_map[];
};
struct stm_device {
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct stm_device {
const struct config_item_type *pdrv_node_type;
/* master allocation */
spinlock_t mc_lock;
- struct stp_master *masters[0];
+ struct stp_master *masters[];
};
#define to_stm_device(_d) \