mm, vmscan: add mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low tracepoint
Currently we have tracepoints for both active and inactive LRU lists
reclaim but we do not have any which would tell us why we we decided to
age the active list. Without that it is quite hard to diagnose
active/inactive lists balancing. Add mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low
tracepoint to tell us this information.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-8-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 8cc90bd..de400d1 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2048,11 +2048,11 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
* 10TB 320 32GB
*/
static bool inactive_list_is_low(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file,
- struct scan_control *sc)
+ struct scan_control *sc, bool trace)
{
unsigned long inactive_ratio;
- unsigned long inactive;
- unsigned long active;
+ unsigned long total_inactive, inactive;
+ unsigned long total_active, active;
unsigned long gb;
struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
int zid;
@@ -2064,8 +2064,8 @@ static bool inactive_list_is_low(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file,
if (!file && !total_swap_pages)
return false;
- inactive = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, file * LRU_FILE);
- active = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, file * LRU_FILE + LRU_ACTIVE);
+ total_inactive = inactive = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, file * LRU_FILE);
+ total_active = active = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, file * LRU_FILE + LRU_ACTIVE);
/*
* For zone-constrained allocations, it is necessary to check if
@@ -2092,6 +2092,11 @@ static bool inactive_list_is_low(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file,
else
inactive_ratio = 1;
+ if (trace)
+ trace_mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low(pgdat->node_id,
+ sc->reclaim_idx,
+ total_inactive, inactive,
+ total_active, active, inactive_ratio, file);
return inactive * inactive_ratio < active;
}
@@ -2099,7 +2104,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_list(enum lru_list lru, unsigned long nr_to_scan,
struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
{
if (is_active_lru(lru)) {
- if (inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, is_file_lru(lru), sc))
+ if (inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, is_file_lru(lru), sc, true))
shrink_active_list(nr_to_scan, lruvec, sc, lru);
return 0;
}
@@ -2230,7 +2235,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
* lruvec even if it has plenty of old anonymous pages unless the
* system is under heavy pressure.
*/
- if (!inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, true, sc) &&
+ if (!inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, true, sc, false) &&
lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE) >> sc->priority) {
scan_balance = SCAN_FILE;
goto out;
@@ -2455,7 +2460,7 @@ static void shrink_node_memcg(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct mem_cgroup *memc
* Even if we did not try to evict anon pages at all, we want to
* rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio.
*/
- if (inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, sc))
+ if (inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, sc, true))
shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, lruvec,
sc, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON);
}
@@ -3105,7 +3110,7 @@ static void age_active_anon(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
do {
struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(pgdat, memcg);
- if (inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, sc))
+ if (inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, sc, true))
shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, lruvec,
sc, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON);