ext4: don't pass entire map to check_eofblocks_fl
Since check_eofblocks_fl() only uses the m_lblk portion of the map
structure, we may as well pass that directly, rather than passing the
entire map, which IMHO obfuscates what parameters check_eofblocks_fl()
cares about. Not a big deal, but seems tidier and less confusing, to
me.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 627f7ae..e910720 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -3102,7 +3102,7 @@
* Handle EOFBLOCKS_FL flag, clearing it if necessary
*/
static int check_eofblocks_fl(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
- struct ext4_map_blocks *map,
+ ext4_lblk_t lblk,
struct ext4_ext_path *path,
unsigned int len)
{
@@ -3132,7 +3132,7 @@
* this turns out to be false, we can bail out from this
* function immediately.
*/
- if (map->m_lblk + len < le32_to_cpu(last_ex->ee_block) +
+ if (lblk + len < le32_to_cpu(last_ex->ee_block) +
ext4_ext_get_actual_len(last_ex))
return 0;
/*
@@ -3188,8 +3188,8 @@
path);
if (ret >= 0) {
ext4_update_inode_fsync_trans(handle, inode, 1);
- err = check_eofblocks_fl(handle, inode, map, path,
- map->m_len);
+ err = check_eofblocks_fl(handle, inode, map->m_lblk,
+ path, map->m_len);
} else
err = ret;
goto out2;
@@ -3219,7 +3219,8 @@
ret = ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized(handle, inode, map, path);
if (ret >= 0) {
ext4_update_inode_fsync_trans(handle, inode, 1);
- err = check_eofblocks_fl(handle, inode, map, path, map->m_len);
+ err = check_eofblocks_fl(handle, inode, map->m_lblk, path,
+ map->m_len);
if (err < 0)
goto out2;
}
@@ -3472,7 +3473,7 @@
map->m_flags |= EXT4_MAP_UNINIT;
}
- err = check_eofblocks_fl(handle, inode, map, path, ar.len);
+ err = check_eofblocks_fl(handle, inode, map->m_lblk, path, ar.len);
if (err)
goto out2;