rcu: Rename cond_resched_rcu_qs() to cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs()
Commit e31d28b6ab8f ("trace: Eliminate cond_resched_rcu_qs() in favor
of cond_resched()") substituted cond_resched() for the earlier call
to cond_resched_rcu_qs(). However, the new-age cond_resched() does
not do anything to help RCU-tasks grace periods because (1) RCU-tasks
is only enabled when CONFIG_PREEMPT=y and (2) cond_resched() is a
complete no-op when preemption is enabled. This situation results
in hangs when running the trace benchmarks.
A number of potential fixes were discussed on LKML
(https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180224151240.0d63a059@vmware.local.home),
including making cond_resched() not be a no-op; making cond_resched()
not be a no-op, but only when running tracing benchmarks; reverting
the aforementioned commit (which works because cond_resched_rcu_qs()
does provide an RCU-tasks quiescent state; and adding a call to the
scheduler/RCU rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch() function. All were
deemed unsatisfactory, either due to added cond_resched() overhead or
due to magic functions inviting cargo culting.
This commit renames cond_resched_rcu_qs() to cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(),
which provides a clear hint as to what this function is doing and
why and where it should be used, and then replaces the call to
cond_resched() with cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() in the trace benchmark's
benchmark_event_kthread() function.
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/trace_benchmark.c
index 22fee76..80e0b2a 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_benchmark.c
@@ -159,13 +159,13 @@ static int benchmark_event_kthread(void *arg)
* wants to run, schedule in, but if the CPU is idle,
* we'll keep burning cycles.
*
- * Note the _rcu_qs() version of cond_resched() will
+ * Note the tasks_rcu_qs() version of cond_resched() will
* notify synchronize_rcu_tasks() that this thread has
* passed a quiescent state for rcu_tasks. Otherwise
* this thread will never voluntarily schedule which would
* block synchronize_rcu_tasks() indefinitely.
*/
- cond_resched();
+ cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs();
}
return 0;