bus: ti-sysc: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
diff --git a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
index c2e3b1c..9df1e67 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
@@ -3111,9 +3111,8 @@ static int sysc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto unprepare;
pm_runtime_enable(ddata->dev);
- error = pm_runtime_get_sync(ddata->dev);
+ error = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ddata->dev);
if (error < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(ddata->dev);
pm_runtime_disable(ddata->dev);
goto unprepare;
}
@@ -3171,9 +3170,8 @@ static int sysc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ddata->idle_work);
- error = pm_runtime_get_sync(ddata->dev);
+ error = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ddata->dev);
if (error < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(ddata->dev);
pm_runtime_disable(ddata->dev);
goto unprepare;
}