ext4: Do not try to validate extents on special files
The EXTENTS_FL flag should never be set on special files, but if it
is, don't bother trying to validate that the extents tree is valid,
since only files, directories, and non-fast symlinks will ever have an
extent data structure. We perhaps should flag the filesystem as being
corrupted if we see a special file (named pipes, device nodes, Unix
domain sockets, etc.) with the EXTENTS_FL flag, but e2fsck doesn't
currently check this case, so we'll just ignore this for now, since
it's harmless.
Without this fix, a special device with the extents flag is flagged as
an error by the kernel, so it is impossible to access or delete the
inode, but e2fsck doesn't see it as a problem, leading to
confused/frustrated users.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 1146003..e91f978 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -4407,6 +4407,7 @@
(__u64)(le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_version_hi)) << 32;
}
+ ret = 0;
if (ei->i_file_acl &&
((ei->i_file_acl <
(le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_first_data_block) +
@@ -4418,8 +4419,11 @@
ret = -EIO;
goto bad_inode;
} else if (ei->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL) {
- /* Validate extent which is part of inode */
- ret = ext4_ext_check_inode(inode);
+ if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
+ (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) &&
+ !ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink(inode)))
+ /* Validate extent which is part of inode */
+ ret = ext4_ext_check_inode(inode);
} else if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
(S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) &&
!ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink(inode))) {