btrfs: Fix misleading indentation reported by smatch
This patch avoids that building the BTRFS source code with smatch
triggers complaints about inconsistent indenting.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index bdd5091..e0e0f3d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -6313,7 +6313,7 @@ static int update_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
if (list_empty(&cache->dirty_list)) {
list_add_tail(&cache->dirty_list,
&trans->transaction->dirty_bgs);
- trans->transaction->num_dirty_bgs++;
+ trans->transaction->num_dirty_bgs++;
btrfs_get_block_group(cache);
}
spin_unlock(&trans->transaction->dirty_bgs_lock);
@@ -7568,7 +7568,7 @@ static noinline int find_free_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
* for the proper type.
*/
if (!block_group_bits(block_group, flags)) {
- u64 extra = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP |
+ u64 extra = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP |
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 |
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 |
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 |
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index b077544..0c4b9f3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -2507,8 +2507,8 @@ static int btrfs_search_path_in_tree_user(struct inode *inode,
static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_ino_lookup(struct file *file,
void __user *argp)
{
- struct btrfs_ioctl_ino_lookup_args *args;
- struct inode *inode;
+ struct btrfs_ioctl_ino_lookup_args *args;
+ struct inode *inode;
int ret = 0;
args = memdup_user(argp, sizeof(*args));
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/reada.c b/fs/btrfs/reada.c
index 40f1bce..4be425f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/reada.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/reada.c
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static struct reada_extent *reada_find_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
dev = bbio->stripes[nzones].dev;
/* cannot read ahead on missing device. */
- if (!dev->bdev)
+ if (!dev->bdev)
continue;
zone = reada_find_zone(dev, logical, bbio);