selinux: Fix wrong checks for selinux_policycap_netpeer
selinux_sock_rcv_skb_compat and selinux_ip_postroute_compat are just
called if selinux_policycap_netpeer is not set. However in these
functions we check if selinux_policycap_netpeer is set. This leads
to some dead code and to the fact that selinux_xfrm_postroute_last
is never executed. This patch removes the dead code and the checks
for selinux_policycap_netpeer in the compatibility functions.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index c8b359f..b4e1ca0 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -3915,7 +3915,6 @@
{
int err = 0;
struct sk_security_struct *sksec = sk->sk_security;
- u32 peer_sid;
u32 sk_sid = sksec->sid;
struct common_audit_data ad;
char *addrp;
@@ -3934,20 +3933,10 @@
return err;
}
- if (selinux_policycap_netpeer) {
- err = selinux_skb_peerlbl_sid(skb, family, &peer_sid);
- if (err)
- return err;
- err = avc_has_perm(sk_sid, peer_sid,
- SECCLASS_PEER, PEER__RECV, &ad);
- if (err)
- selinux_netlbl_err(skb, err, 0);
- } else {
- err = selinux_netlbl_sock_rcv_skb(sksec, skb, family, &ad);
- if (err)
- return err;
- err = selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(sksec->sid, skb, &ad);
- }
+ err = selinux_netlbl_sock_rcv_skb(sksec, skb, family, &ad);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ err = selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(sksec->sid, skb, &ad);
return err;
}
@@ -4442,9 +4431,8 @@
SECCLASS_PACKET, PACKET__SEND, &ad))
return NF_DROP_ERR(-ECONNREFUSED);
- if (selinux_policycap_netpeer)
- if (selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(sksec->sid, skb, &ad, proto))
- return NF_DROP_ERR(-ECONNREFUSED);
+ if (selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(sksec->sid, skb, &ad, proto))
+ return NF_DROP_ERR(-ECONNREFUSED);
return NF_ACCEPT;
}