clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.
Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:
@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;
@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c b/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
index 28037d0..1961e35 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
@@ -58,16 +58,16 @@ u32 acpi_pm_read_verified(void)
return v2;
}
-static cycle_t acpi_pm_read(struct clocksource *cs)
+static u64 acpi_pm_read(struct clocksource *cs)
{
- return (cycle_t)read_pmtmr();
+ return (u64)read_pmtmr();
}
static struct clocksource clocksource_acpi_pm = {
.name = "acpi_pm",
.rating = 200,
.read = acpi_pm_read,
- .mask = (cycle_t)ACPI_PM_MASK,
+ .mask = (u64)ACPI_PM_MASK,
.flags = CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS,
};
@@ -81,9 +81,9 @@ static int __init acpi_pm_good_setup(char *__str)
}
__setup("acpi_pm_good", acpi_pm_good_setup);
-static cycle_t acpi_pm_read_slow(struct clocksource *cs)
+static u64 acpi_pm_read_slow(struct clocksource *cs)
{
- return (cycle_t)acpi_pm_read_verified();
+ return (u64)acpi_pm_read_verified();
}
static inline void acpi_pm_need_workaround(void)
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_LE,
*/
static int verify_pmtmr_rate(void)
{
- cycle_t value1, value2;
+ u64 value1, value2;
unsigned long count, delta;
mach_prepare_counter();
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int verify_pmtmr_rate(void)
static int __init init_acpi_pm_clocksource(void)
{
- cycle_t value1, value2;
+ u64 value1, value2;
unsigned int i, j = 0;
if (!pmtmr_ioport)