uprobes: Introduce arch_uprobe_enable/disable_step()

As Oleg pointed out in [0] uprobe should not use the ptrace interface
for enabling/disabling single stepping.

[0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120730141638.GA5306@redhat.com

Add the new "__weak arch" helpers which simply call user_*_single_step()
as a preparation. This is only needed to not break the powerpc port, we
will fold this logic into arch_uprobe_pre/post_xol() hooks later.

We should also change handle_singlestep(), _disable_step(&uprobe->arch)
should be called before put_uprobe().

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index e4a906c..912ef48 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1444,6 +1444,16 @@
 	return uprobe;
 }
 
+void __weak arch_uprobe_enable_step(struct arch_uprobe *arch)
+{
+	user_enable_single_step(current);
+}
+
+void __weak arch_uprobe_disable_step(struct arch_uprobe *arch)
+{
+	user_disable_single_step(current);
+}
+
 /*
  * Run handler and ask thread to singlestep.
  * Ensure all non-fatal signals cannot interrupt thread while it singlesteps.
@@ -1490,7 +1500,7 @@
 
 	utask->state = UTASK_SSTEP;
 	if (!pre_ssout(uprobe, regs, bp_vaddr)) {
-		user_enable_single_step(current);
+		arch_uprobe_enable_step(&uprobe->arch);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1526,10 +1536,10 @@
 	else
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 
+	arch_uprobe_disable_step(&uprobe->arch);
 	put_uprobe(uprobe);
 	utask->active_uprobe = NULL;
 	utask->state = UTASK_RUNNING;
-	user_disable_single_step(current);
 	xol_free_insn_slot(current);
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);