uprobes: Introduce arch_uprobe_enable/disable_step()
As Oleg pointed out in [0] uprobe should not use the ptrace interface
for enabling/disabling single stepping.
[0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120730141638.GA5306@redhat.com
Add the new "__weak arch" helpers which simply call user_*_single_step()
as a preparation. This is only needed to not break the powerpc port, we
will fold this logic into arch_uprobe_pre/post_xol() hooks later.
We should also change handle_singlestep(), _disable_step(&uprobe->arch)
should be called before put_uprobe().
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index e4a906c..912ef48 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1444,6 +1444,16 @@
return uprobe;
}
+void __weak arch_uprobe_enable_step(struct arch_uprobe *arch)
+{
+ user_enable_single_step(current);
+}
+
+void __weak arch_uprobe_disable_step(struct arch_uprobe *arch)
+{
+ user_disable_single_step(current);
+}
+
/*
* Run handler and ask thread to singlestep.
* Ensure all non-fatal signals cannot interrupt thread while it singlesteps.
@@ -1490,7 +1500,7 @@
utask->state = UTASK_SSTEP;
if (!pre_ssout(uprobe, regs, bp_vaddr)) {
- user_enable_single_step(current);
+ arch_uprobe_enable_step(&uprobe->arch);
return;
}
@@ -1526,10 +1536,10 @@
else
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ arch_uprobe_disable_step(&uprobe->arch);
put_uprobe(uprobe);
utask->active_uprobe = NULL;
utask->state = UTASK_RUNNING;
- user_disable_single_step(current);
xol_free_insn_slot(current);
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);