drm/i915: Remove obsolete seqno parameter from 'i915_add_request'
There is no longer any need to retrieve a seqno value from an i915_add_request()
call. The calling code already knows which request structure is being processed
(it can only be ring->OLR). And as the request itself is now used in preference
to the basic seqno value, the latter is now redundant in this situation.
For: VIZ-4377
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Daniel <Thomas.Daniel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 3f56f50..c403bac 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1164,7 +1164,7 @@
ret = 0;
if (req == req->ring->outstanding_lazy_request)
- ret = i915_add_request(req->ring, NULL);
+ ret = i915_add_request(req->ring);
return ret;
}
@@ -2412,8 +2412,7 @@
int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
struct drm_file *file,
- struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
- u32 *out_seqno)
+ struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
@@ -2512,8 +2511,6 @@
round_jiffies_up_relative(HZ));
intel_mark_busy(dev_priv->dev);
- if (out_seqno)
- *out_seqno = request->seqno;
return 0;
}