list debugging: use WARN() instead of BUG()
Arjan noted that the list_head debugging is BUG'ing when it detects
corruption. By causing the box to panic immediately, we're possibly
losing some bug reports. Changing this to a WARN() should mean we at the
least start seeing reports collected at kerneloops.org
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/lib/list_debug.c b/lib/list_debug.c
index 45c03fd..1a39f4e 100644
--- a/lib/list_debug.c
+++ b/lib/list_debug.c
@@ -20,18 +20,14 @@
struct list_head *prev,
struct list_head *next)
{
- if (unlikely(next->prev != prev)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "list_add corruption. next->prev should be "
- "prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
- prev, next->prev, next);
- BUG();
- }
- if (unlikely(prev->next != next)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "list_add corruption. prev->next should be "
- "next (%p), but was %p. (prev=%p).\n",
- next, prev->next, prev);
- BUG();
- }
+ WARN(next->prev != prev,
+ "list_add corruption. next->prev should be "
+ "prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
+ prev, next->prev, next);
+ WARN(prev->next != next,
+ "list_add corruption. prev->next should be "
+ "next (%p), but was %p. (prev=%p).\n",
+ next, prev->next, prev);
next->prev = new;
new->next = next;
new->prev = prev;
@@ -47,16 +43,12 @@
*/
void list_del(struct list_head *entry)
{
- if (unlikely(entry->prev->next != entry)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, "
- "but was %p\n", entry, entry->prev->next);
- BUG();
- }
- if (unlikely(entry->next->prev != entry)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "list_del corruption. next->prev should be %p, "
- "but was %p\n", entry, entry->next->prev);
- BUG();
- }
+ WARN(entry->prev->next != entry,
+ "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, "
+ "but was %p\n", entry, entry->prev->next);
+ WARN(entry->next->prev != entry,
+ "list_del corruption. next->prev should be %p, "
+ "but was %p\n", entry, entry->next->prev);
__list_del(entry->prev, entry->next);
entry->next = LIST_POISON1;
entry->prev = LIST_POISON2;