task_work: cleanup notification modes
A previous commit changed the notification mode from true/false to an
int, allowing notify-no, notify-yes, or signal-notify. This was
backwards compatible in the sense that any existing true/false user
would translate to either 0 (on notification sent) or 1, the latter
which mapped to TWA_RESUME. TWA_SIGNAL was assigned a value of 2.
Clean this up properly, and define a proper enum for the notification
mode. Now we have:
- TWA_NONE. This is 0, same as before the original change, meaning no
notification requested.
- TWA_RESUME. This is 1, same as before the original change, meaning
that we use TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME.
- TWA_SIGNAL. This uses TIF_SIGPENDING/JOBCTL_TASK_WORK for the
notification.
Clean up all the callers, switching their 0/1/false/true to using the
appropriate TWA_* mode for notifications.
Fixes: e91b48162332 ("task_work: teach task_work_add() to do signal_wake_up()")
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index e1726f4..6b50288 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1976,7 +1976,8 @@ static int io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, bool twa_signal_ok)
{
struct task_struct *tsk = req->task;
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
- int ret, notify;
+ enum task_work_notify_mode notify;
+ int ret;
if (tsk->flags & PF_EXITING)
return -ESRCH;
@@ -1987,7 +1988,7 @@ static int io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, bool twa_signal_ok)
* processing task_work. There's no reliable way to tell if TWA_RESUME
* will do the job.
*/
- notify = 0;
+ notify = TWA_NONE;
if (!(ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) && twa_signal_ok)
notify = TWA_SIGNAL;
@@ -2056,7 +2057,7 @@ static void io_req_task_queue(struct io_kiocb *req)
init_task_work(&req->task_work, io_req_task_cancel);
tsk = io_wq_get_task(req->ctx->io_wq);
- task_work_add(tsk, &req->task_work, 0);
+ task_work_add(tsk, &req->task_work, TWA_NONE);
wake_up_process(tsk);
}
}
@@ -2177,7 +2178,7 @@ static void io_free_req_deferred(struct io_kiocb *req)
struct task_struct *tsk;
tsk = io_wq_get_task(req->ctx->io_wq);
- task_work_add(tsk, &req->task_work, 0);
+ task_work_add(tsk, &req->task_work, TWA_NONE);
wake_up_process(tsk);
}
}
@@ -3291,7 +3292,7 @@ static int io_async_buf_func(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode,
/* queue just for cancelation */
init_task_work(&req->task_work, io_req_task_cancel);
tsk = io_wq_get_task(req->ctx->io_wq);
- task_work_add(tsk, &req->task_work, 0);
+ task_work_add(tsk, &req->task_work, TWA_NONE);
wake_up_process(tsk);
}
return 1;
@@ -4857,7 +4858,7 @@ static int __io_async_wake(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_poll_iocb *poll,
WRITE_ONCE(poll->canceled, true);
tsk = io_wq_get_task(req->ctx->io_wq);
- task_work_add(tsk, &req->task_work, 0);
+ task_work_add(tsk, &req->task_work, TWA_NONE);
wake_up_process(tsk);
}
return 1;