libata: stop overloading port_info->private_data
port_info->private_data is currently used for two purposes - to record
private data about the port_info or to specify host->private_data to
use when allocating ata_host.
This overloading is confusing and counter-intuitive in that
port_info->private_data becomes host->private_data instead of
port->private_data. In addition, port_info and host don't correspond
to each other 1-to-1. Currently, the first non-NULL
port_info->private_data is used.
This patch makes port_info->private_data just be what it is -
private_data for the port_info where LLD can jot down extra info.
libata no longer sets host->private_data to the first non-NULL
port_info->private_data, @host_priv argument is added to
ata_pci_init_one() instead. LLDs which use ata_pci_init_one() can use
this argument to pass in pointer to host private data. LLDs which
don't should use init-register model anyway and can initialize
host->private_data directly.
Adding @host_priv instead of using init-register model for LLDs which
use ata_pci_init_one() is suggested by Alan Cox.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_hpt37x.c b/drivers/ata/pata_hpt37x.c
index a43c1975..fb37e3a 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_hpt37x.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_hpt37x.c
@@ -831,10 +831,8 @@
};
static const int MHz[4] = { 33, 40, 50, 66 };
- const struct ata_port_info *port;
void *private_data = NULL;
- struct ata_port_info port_info;
- const struct ata_port_info *ppi[] = { &port_info, NULL };
+ const struct ata_port_info *ppi[] = { NULL, NULL };
u8 irqmask;
u32 class_rev;
@@ -866,17 +864,17 @@
switch(class_rev) {
case 3:
- port = &info_hpt370;
+ ppi[0] = &info_hpt370;
chip_table = &hpt370;
prefer_dpll = 0;
break;
case 4:
- port = &info_hpt370a;
+ ppi[0] = &info_hpt370a;
chip_table = &hpt370a;
prefer_dpll = 0;
break;
case 5:
- port = &info_hpt372;
+ ppi[0] = &info_hpt372;
chip_table = &hpt372;
break;
default:
@@ -889,21 +887,21 @@
/* 372N if rev >= 2*/
if (class_rev >= 2)
return -ENODEV;
- port = &info_hpt372;
+ ppi[0] = &info_hpt372;
chip_table = &hpt372a;
break;
case PCI_DEVICE_ID_TTI_HPT302:
/* 302N if rev > 1 */
if (class_rev > 1)
return -ENODEV;
- port = &info_hpt372;
+ ppi[0] = &info_hpt372;
/* Check this */
chip_table = &hpt302;
break;
case PCI_DEVICE_ID_TTI_HPT371:
if (class_rev > 1)
return -ENODEV;
- port = &info_hpt372;
+ ppi[0] = &info_hpt372;
chip_table = &hpt371;
/* Single channel device, master is not present
but the BIOS (or us for non x86) must mark it
@@ -914,7 +912,7 @@
break;
case PCI_DEVICE_ID_TTI_HPT374:
chip_table = &hpt374;
- port = &info_hpt374;
+ ppi[0] = &info_hpt374;
break;
default:
printk(KERN_ERR "pata_hpt37x: PCI table is bogus please report (%d).\n", dev->device);
@@ -993,7 +991,7 @@
int dpll, adjust;
/* Compute DPLL */
- dpll = (port->udma_mask & 0xC0) ? 3 : 2;
+ dpll = (ppi[0]->udma_mask & 0xC0) ? 3 : 2;
f_low = (MHz[clock_slot] * 48) / MHz[dpll];
f_high = f_low + 2;
@@ -1033,19 +1031,16 @@
* about lack of UDMA133 support on lower clocks
*/
- if (clock_slot < 2 && port == &info_hpt370)
- port = &info_hpt370_33;
- if (clock_slot < 2 && port == &info_hpt370a)
- port = &info_hpt370a_33;
+ if (clock_slot < 2 && ppi[0] == &info_hpt370)
+ ppi[0] = &info_hpt370_33;
+ if (clock_slot < 2 && ppi[0] == &info_hpt370a)
+ ppi[0] = &info_hpt370a_33;
printk(KERN_INFO "pata_hpt37x: %s using %dMHz bus clock.\n",
chip_table->name, MHz[clock_slot]);
}
/* Now kick off ATA set up */
- port_info = *port;
- port_info.private_data = private_data;
-
- return ata_pci_init_one(dev, ppi, &hpt37x_sht);
+ return ata_pci_init_one(dev, ppi, &hpt37x_sht, private_data);
}
static const struct pci_device_id hpt37x[] = {