Btrfs: only update disk_i_size as we remove extents
This fixes a problem where if we fail a truncate we will leave the i_size set
where we wanted to truncate to instead of where we were able to truncate to.
Fix this by making btrfs_truncate_inode_items do the disk_i_size update as it
removes extents, that way it will always be consistent with where its extents
are. Then if the truncate fails at all we can update the in-ram i_size with
what we have on disk and delete the orphan item. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index f0e41b8..6091ba9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3861,6 +3861,7 @@
u64 extent_num_bytes = 0;
u64 extent_offset = 0;
u64 item_end = 0;
+ u64 last_size = (u64)-1;
u32 found_type = (u8)-1;
int found_extent;
int del_item;
@@ -3958,6 +3959,11 @@
if (found_type != BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY)
goto delete;
+ if (del_item)
+ last_size = found_key.offset;
+ else
+ last_size = new_size;
+
if (extent_type != BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
u64 num_dec;
extent_start = btrfs_file_extent_disk_bytenr(leaf, fi);
@@ -4069,6 +4075,8 @@
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret);
}
error:
+ if (last_size != (u64)-1)
+ btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, last_size, NULL);
btrfs_free_path(path);
return err;
}
@@ -4397,8 +4405,26 @@
btrfs_inode_resume_unlocked_dio(inode);
ret = btrfs_truncate(inode);
- if (ret && inode->i_nlink)
- btrfs_orphan_del(NULL, inode);
+ if (ret && inode->i_nlink) {
+ int err;
+
+ /*
+ * failed to truncate, disk_i_size is only adjusted down
+ * as we remove extents, so it should represent the true
+ * size of the inode, so reset the in memory size and
+ * delete our orphan entry.
+ */
+ trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root);
+ if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
+ btrfs_orphan_del(NULL, inode);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ i_size_write(inode, BTRFS_I(inode)->disk_i_size);
+ err = btrfs_orphan_del(trans, inode);
+ if (err)
+ btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, err);
+ btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
+ }
}
return ret;
@@ -7537,7 +7563,6 @@
u64 min_size = btrfs_calc_trunc_metadata_size(root, 1);
btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, inode->i_size & (~mask), (u64)-1);
- btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, inode->i_size, NULL);
/*
* Yes ladies and gentelment, this is indeed ugly. The fact is we have