[IA64] Take defensive stance on ia64_pal_get_brand_info()
Stephane thought he saw a problem here (but was just confused
by the return value from ia64_pal_get_brand_info()). But we
should be more defensive here in case an prototype PAL for
a future processor doesn't implement this PAL call.
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
index be39845..ad567b8d 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -674,6 +674,7 @@
{
char brand[128];
+ memcpy(brand, "Unknown", 8);
if (ia64_pal_get_brand_info(brand)) {
if (family == 0x7)
memcpy(brand, "Merced", 7);
@@ -681,8 +682,7 @@
case 0: memcpy(brand, "McKinley", 9); break;
case 1: memcpy(brand, "Madison", 8); break;
case 2: memcpy(brand, "Madison up to 9M cache", 23); break;
- } else
- memcpy(brand, "Unknown", 8);
+ }
}
if (brandname[0] == '\0')
return strcpy(brandname, brand);