inetpeer: get rid of ip_id_count

Ideally, we would need to generate IP ID using a per destination IP
generator.

linux kernels used inet_peer cache for this purpose, but this had a huge
cost on servers disabling MTU discovery.

1) each inet_peer struct consumes 192 bytes

2) inetpeer cache uses a binary tree of inet_peer structs,
   with a nominal size of ~66000 elements under load.

3) lookups in this tree are hitting a lot of cache lines, as tree depth
   is about 20.

4) If server deals with many tcp flows, we have a high probability of
   not finding the inet_peer, allocating a fresh one, inserting it in
   the tree with same initial ip_id_count, (cf secure_ip_id())

5) We garbage collect inet_peer aggressively.

IP ID generation do not have to be 'perfect'

Goal is trying to avoid duplicates in a short period of time,
so that reassembly units have a chance to complete reassembly of
fragments belonging to one message before receiving other fragments
with a recycled ID.

We simply use an array of generators, and a Jenkin hash using the dst IP
as a key.

ipv6_select_ident() is put back into net/ipv6/ip6_output.c where it
belongs (it is only used from this file)

secure_ip_id() and secure_ipv6_id() no longer are needed.

Rename ip_select_ident_more() to ip_select_ident_segs() to avoid
unnecessary decrement/increment of the number of segments.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
index 6e231ab..8d3b6b0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
 	iph->daddr    = (opt && opt->opt.srr ? opt->opt.faddr : daddr);
 	iph->saddr    = saddr;
 	iph->protocol = sk->sk_protocol;
-	ip_select_ident(skb, &rt->dst, sk);
+	ip_select_ident(skb, sk);
 
 	if (opt && opt->opt.optlen) {
 		iph->ihl += opt->opt.optlen>>2;
@@ -430,8 +430,7 @@
 		ip_options_build(skb, &inet_opt->opt, inet->inet_daddr, rt, 0);
 	}
 
-	ip_select_ident_more(skb, &rt->dst, sk,
-			     (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs ?: 1) - 1);
+	ip_select_ident_segs(skb, sk, skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs ?: 1);
 
 	/* TODO : should we use skb->sk here instead of sk ? */
 	skb->priority = sk->sk_priority;
@@ -1379,7 +1378,7 @@
 	iph->ttl = ttl;
 	iph->protocol = sk->sk_protocol;
 	ip_copy_addrs(iph, fl4);
-	ip_select_ident(skb, &rt->dst, sk);
+	ip_select_ident(skb, sk);
 
 	if (opt) {
 		iph->ihl += opt->optlen>>2;