bpf/verifier: improve disassembly of BPF_NEG instructions
BPF_NEG takes only one operand, unlike the bulk of BPF_ALU[64] which are
compound-assignments. So give it its own format in print_bpf_insn().
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index e8d7bb8..4cf9b72 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -351,6 +351,11 @@ static void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
verbose("BUG_alu64_%02x\n", insn->code);
else
print_bpf_end_insn(env, insn);
+ } else if (BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_NEG) {
+ verbose("(%02x) r%d = %s-r%d\n",
+ insn->code, insn->dst_reg,
+ class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
+ insn->dst_reg);
} else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
verbose("(%02x) %sr%d %s %sr%d\n",
insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",