tree 3765525491b572d522a6e3491abde750234461b5
parent 55994c2c38a1101f84cdf277b228f830af8a9c1b
author Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> 1463091100 -0700
committer Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> 1463150148 -0700

drm/i915/gen9: Calculate watermarks during atomic 'check' (v2)

Moving watermark calculation into the check phase will allow us to to
reject display configurations for which there are no valid watermark
values before we start trying to program the hardware (although those
tests will come in a subsequent patch).

Another advantage of moving this calculation to the check phase is that
we can calculate the watermarks in a single shot as part of the atomic
transaction.  The watermark interfaces we inherited from our legacy
modesetting days are a bit broken in the atomic design because they use
per-crtc entry points but actually re-calculate and re-program something
that is really more of a global state.  That worked okay in the legacy
modesetting world because operations only ever updated a single CRTC at
a time.  However in the atomic world, a transaction can involve multiple
CRTC's, which means we wind up computing and programming the watermarks
NxN times (where N is the number of CRTC's involved).  With this patch
we eliminate the redundant re-calculation of watermark data for atomic
states (which was the cause of the WARN_ON(!wm_changed) problems that
have plagued us for a while).

We still need to work on the 'commit' side of watermark handling so that
we aren't doing redundant NxN programming of watermarks, but that's
content for future patches.

v2:
 - Bail out of skl_write_wm_values() if the CRTC isn't active.  Now that
   we set dirty_pipes to ~0 if the active pipes change (because
   we need to deal with DDB changes), we can now wind up here for
   disabled pipes, whereas we couldn't before.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89055
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92181
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463091100-13747-1-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com