Btrfs: use RB_ROOT to intialize rb_trees instead of setting rb_node to NULL
btrfs inialize rb trees in quite a number of places by settin rb_node =
NULL; The problem with this is that 17d9ddc72fb8bba0d4f678 in the
linux-next tree adds a new field to that struct which needs to be NULL for
the new rbtree library code to work properly. This patch uses RB_ROOT as
the intializer so all of the relevant fields will be NULL'd. Without the
patch I get a panic.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
index b2acc79..2a36e23 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
cur_trans->commit_done = 0;
cur_trans->start_time = get_seconds();
- cur_trans->delayed_refs.root.rb_node = NULL;
+ cur_trans->delayed_refs.root = RB_ROOT;
cur_trans->delayed_refs.num_entries = 0;
cur_trans->delayed_refs.num_heads_ready = 0;
cur_trans->delayed_refs.num_heads = 0;