x86/dumpstack: Fix printk_address for direct addresses

Consider a kernel crash in a module, simulated the following way:

 static int my_init(void)
 {
         char *map = (void *)0x5;
         *map = 3;
         return 0;
 }
 module_init(my_init);

When we turn off FRAME_POINTERs, the very first instruction in
that function causes a BUG. The problem is that we print IP in
the BUG report using %pB (from printk_address). And %pB
decrements the pointer by one to fix printing addresses of
functions with tail calls.

This was added in commit 71f9e59800e5ad4 ("x86, dumpstack: Use
%pB format specifier for stack trace") to fix the call stack
printouts.

So instead of correct output:

  BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000005
  IP: [<ffffffffa01ac000>] my_init+0x0/0x10 [pb173]

We get:

  BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000005
  IP: [<ffffffffa0152000>] 0xffffffffa0151fff

To fix that, we use %pS only for stack addresses printouts (via
newly added printk_stack_address) and %pB for regs->ip (via
printk_address). I.e. we revert to the old behaviour for all
except call stacks. And since from all those reliable is 1, we
remove that parameter from printk_address.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: joe@perches.com
Cc: jirislaby@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1382706418-8435-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index deb6421..d9c12d3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -25,12 +25,17 @@
 int kstack_depth_to_print = 3 * STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE;
 static int die_counter;
 
-void printk_address(unsigned long address, int reliable)
+static void printk_stack_address(unsigned long address, int reliable)
 {
 	pr_cont(" [<%p>] %s%pB\n",
 		(void *)address, reliable ? "" : "? ", (void *)address);
 }
 
+void printk_address(unsigned long address)
+{
+	pr_cont(" [<%p>] %pS\n", (void *)address, (void *)address);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
 static void
 print_ftrace_graph_addr(unsigned long addr, void *data,
@@ -151,7 +156,7 @@
 {
 	touch_nmi_watchdog();
 	printk(data);
-	printk_address(addr, reliable);
+	printk_stack_address(addr, reliable);
 }
 
 static const struct stacktrace_ops print_trace_ops = {
@@ -281,7 +286,7 @@
 #else
 	/* Executive summary in case the oops scrolled away */
 	printk(KERN_ALERT "RIP ");
-	printk_address(regs->ip, 1);
+	printk_address(regs->ip);
 	printk(" RSP <%016lx>\n", regs->sp);
 #endif
 	return 0;