sched/fair: Consider missed ticks in NOHZ_FULL in update_cpu_load_nohz()
Usually the tick can be stopped for an idle CPU in NOHZ. However in NOHZ_FULL
mode, a non-idle CPU's tick can also be stopped. However, update_cpu_load_nohz()
does not consider the case a non-idle CPU's tick has been stopped at all.
This patch makes the update_cpu_load_nohz() know if the calling path comes
from NOHZ_FULL or idle NOHZ.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1447115762-19734-3-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 404006a..309b1d5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4397,10 +4397,11 @@
/*
* Called from tick_nohz_idle_exit() -- try and fix up the ticks we missed.
*/
-void update_cpu_load_nohz(void)
+void update_cpu_load_nohz(int active)
{
struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
unsigned long curr_jiffies = READ_ONCE(jiffies);
+ unsigned long load = active ? weighted_cpuload(cpu_of(this_rq)) : 0;
unsigned long pending_updates;
if (curr_jiffies == this_rq->last_load_update_tick)
@@ -4411,10 +4412,11 @@
if (pending_updates) {
this_rq->last_load_update_tick = curr_jiffies;
/*
- * We were idle, this means load 0, the current load might be
- * !0 due to remote wakeups and the sort.
+ * In the regular NOHZ case, we were idle, this means load 0.
+ * In the NOHZ_FULL case, we were non-idle, we should consider
+ * its weighted load.
*/
- __update_cpu_load(this_rq, 0, pending_updates, 0);
+ __update_cpu_load(this_rq, load, pending_updates, active);
}
raw_spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
}