gpio: sysfs: rename gpiochip registration functions
Rename the gpio-chip export/unexport functions to the more descriptive
names gpiochip_sysfs_register and gpiochip_sysfs_unregister.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
index 767b79a..aeb73ef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
@@ -765,13 +765,14 @@
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_unexport);
-int gpiochip_export(struct gpio_chip *chip)
+int gpiochip_sysfs_register(struct gpio_chip *chip)
{
struct device *dev;
- /* Many systems register gpio chips for SOC support very early,
+ /*
+ * Many systems add gpio chips for SOC support very early,
* before driver model support is available. In those cases we
- * export this later, in gpiolib_sysfs_init() ... here we just
+ * register later, in gpiolib_sysfs_init() ... here we just
* verify that _some_ field of gpio_class got initialized.
*/
if (!gpio_class.p)
@@ -791,7 +792,7 @@
return 0;
}
-void gpiochip_unexport(struct gpio_chip *chip)
+void gpiochip_sysfs_unregister(struct gpio_chip *chip)
{
struct gpio_desc *desc;
unsigned int i;
@@ -836,15 +837,16 @@
continue;
/*
- * TODO we yield gpio_lock here because gpiochip_export()
- * acquires a mutex. This is unsafe and needs to be fixed.
+ * TODO we yield gpio_lock here because
+ * gpiochip_sysfs_register() acquires a mutex. This is unsafe
+ * and needs to be fixed.
*
* Also it would be nice to use gpiochip_find() here so we
* can keep gpio_chips local to gpiolib.c, but the yield of
* gpio_lock prevents us from doing this.
*/
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
- status = gpiochip_export(chip);
+ status = gpiochip_sysfs_register(chip);
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);