tree 2e59ef400c9b79af6eeb80024c3923e21c915a8a
parent 48b47c561e41525061b5bc0cfd67d6367fd11dc4
author Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> 1231281623 -0800
committer Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 1231286349 -0800

UBIFS: do not use WB_SYNC_HOLD

WB_SYNC_HOLD is going to be zapped so we should not use it. Use
%WB_SYNC_NONE instead. Here is what akpm said:

"I think I'll just switch that to WB_SYNC_NONE.  The `wait==0' mode is
just an advisory thing to help the fs shove lots of data into the
queues.  If some gets missed then it'll be picked up on the second
->sync_fs call, with wait==1."

Thanks to Randy Dunlap for catching this.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>