IPoIB/cm: Reduce connected mode TX object size
Since IPoIB connected mode does not NETIF_F_SG, we only have one DMA
mapping per send, so we don't need a mapping[] array. Define a new
struct with a single u64 mapping member and use it for the CM tx_ring.
Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <eli@mellanox.co.il>
Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib.h b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib.h
index a89b9fb..0281c8f 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib.h
@@ -157,6 +157,11 @@
u64 mapping[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1];
};
+struct ipoib_cm_tx_buf {
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+ u64 mapping;
+};
+
struct ib_cm_id;
struct ipoib_cm_data {
@@ -215,7 +220,7 @@
struct net_device *dev;
struct ipoib_neigh *neigh;
struct ipoib_path *path;
- struct ipoib_tx_buf *tx_ring;
+ struct ipoib_cm_tx_buf *tx_ring;
unsigned tx_head;
unsigned tx_tail;
unsigned long flags;
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c
index 87f9f3e..0f2d304 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@
void ipoib_cm_send(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ipoib_cm_tx *tx)
{
struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
- struct ipoib_tx_buf *tx_req;
+ struct ipoib_cm_tx_buf *tx_req;
u64 addr;
if (unlikely(skb->len > tx->mtu)) {
@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@
return;
}
- tx_req->mapping[0] = addr;
+ tx_req->mapping = addr;
if (unlikely(post_send(priv, tx, tx->tx_head & (ipoib_sendq_size - 1),
addr, skb->len))) {
@@ -759,7 +759,7 @@
struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
struct ipoib_cm_tx *tx = wc->qp->qp_context;
unsigned int wr_id = wc->wr_id & ~IPOIB_OP_CM;
- struct ipoib_tx_buf *tx_req;
+ struct ipoib_cm_tx_buf *tx_req;
unsigned long flags;
ipoib_dbg_data(priv, "cm send completion: id %d, status: %d\n",
@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@
tx_req = &tx->tx_ring[wr_id];
- ib_dma_unmap_single(priv->ca, tx_req->mapping[0], tx_req->skb->len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+ ib_dma_unmap_single(priv->ca, tx_req->mapping, tx_req->skb->len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
/* FIXME: is this right? Shouldn't we only increment on success? */
++dev->stats.tx_packets;
@@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@
static void ipoib_cm_tx_destroy(struct ipoib_cm_tx *p)
{
struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(p->dev);
- struct ipoib_tx_buf *tx_req;
+ struct ipoib_cm_tx_buf *tx_req;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned long begin;
@@ -1171,7 +1171,7 @@
while ((int) p->tx_tail - (int) p->tx_head < 0) {
tx_req = &p->tx_ring[p->tx_tail & (ipoib_sendq_size - 1)];
- ib_dma_unmap_single(priv->ca, tx_req->mapping[0], tx_req->skb->len,
+ ib_dma_unmap_single(priv->ca, tx_req->mapping, tx_req->skb->len,
DMA_TO_DEVICE);
dev_kfree_skb_any(tx_req->skb);
++p->tx_tail;