Gitiles
Code Review Sign In
review.shift-gmbh.com / SHIFTPHONES / kernel / shift / mainline / 99e15a079959a70d0e13c61c8b39a400f6e1e18a
commit99e15a079959a70d0e13c61c8b39a400f6e1e18a[log] [tgz]
authorLaurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>Tue Apr 17 16:33:28 2018 +0200
committerSuren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>Fri Jan 22 18:01:34 2021 +0000
tree02ff025f0009a199e1177c13240f9bd2b79ec7a6
parent736ae8bde8da3c54dc1f32519785a57e631bb29f [diff]
FROMLIST: mm: speculative page fault handler return VMA

When the speculative page fault handler is returning VM_RETRY, there is a
chance that VMA fetched without grabbing the mmap_sem can be reused by the
legacy page fault handler.  By reusing it, we avoid calling find_vma()
again. To achieve, that we must ensure that the VMA structure will not be
freed in our back. This is done by getting the reference on it (get_vma())
and by assuming that the caller will call the new service
can_reuse_spf_vma() once it has grabbed the mmap_sem.

can_reuse_spf_vma() is first checking that the VMA is still in the RB tree
, and then that the VMA's boundaries matched the passed address and release
the reference on the VMA so that it can be freed if needed.

In the case the VMA is freed, can_reuse_spf_vma() will have returned false
as the VMA is no more in the RB tree.

In the architecture page fault handler, the call to the new service
reuse_spf_or_find_vma() should be made in place of find_vma(), this will
handle the check on the spf_vma and if needed call find_vma().

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Change-Id: Ia56dcf807e8bddf6788fd696dd80372db35476f0
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1523975611-15978-23-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
Bug: 161210518
Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
2 files changed
tree: 02ff025f0009a199e1177c13240f9bd2b79ec7a6
  1. android/
  2. arch/
  3. block/
  4. certs/
  5. crypto/
  6. Documentation/
  7. drivers/
  8. fs/
  9. include/
  10. init/
  11. ipc/
  12. kernel/
  13. lib/
  14. LICENSES/
  15. mm/
  16. net/
  17. samples/
  18. scripts/
  19. security/
  20. sound/
  21. tools/
  22. usr/
  23. virt/
  24. .clang-format
  25. .cocciconfig
  26. .get_maintainer.ignore
  27. .gitattributes
  28. .gitignore
  29. .mailmap
  30. build.config.aarch64
  31. build.config.allmodconfig
  32. build.config.allmodconfig.aarch64
  33. build.config.allmodconfig.arm
  34. build.config.allmodconfig.x86_64
  35. build.config.arm
  36. build.config.common
  37. build.config.db845c
  38. build.config.gki
  39. build.config.gki-debug.aarch64
  40. build.config.gki-debug.x86_64
  41. build.config.gki.aarch64
  42. build.config.gki.x86_64
  43. build.config.gki_kasan
  44. build.config.gki_kasan.aarch64
  45. build.config.gki_kasan.x86_64
  46. build.config.x86_64
  47. COPYING
  48. CREDITS
  49. Kbuild
  50. Kconfig
  51. MAINTAINERS
  52. Makefile
  53. README
  54. README.md
README.md

How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels

  1. BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

    • Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux, additions of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() require an in-tree modular driver that uses the symbol -- so include the new driver or changes to an existing driver in the same patchset as the export.
    • When sending patches upstream, the commit message must contain a clear case for why the patch is needed and beneficial to the community. Enabling out-of-tree drivers or functionality is not not a persuasive case.

  2. LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with kernel-team@android.com. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

Common Kernel patch requirements

  • All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass script/checkpatch.pl
  • Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
  • If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:, FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:, or ANDROID:.
  • All patches must have a Change-Id: tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html)
  • If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a Bug: tag.
  • All patches must have a Signed-off-by: tag by the author and the submitter

Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type

Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:

  • If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
    • tag the patch subject with UPSTREAM:.
    • add upstream commit information with a (cherry picked from commit ...) line
    • Example:
      • if the upstream commit message is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
  • then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
        UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with BACKPORT: instead of UPSTREAM:.
    • use the same tags as UPSTREAM:
    • add comments about the changes under the (cherry picked from commit ...) line
    • Example:
        BACKPORT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        [joe: Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>

Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:,

  • If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet been merged into Linux mainline
    • tag the patch subject with FROMGIT:
    • add info on where the patch came from as (cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>). This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't use linux-next for example).
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMGIT:
    • Example:
      • if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
  • then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
        FROMGIT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        (cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
    • tag the patch subject with FROMLIST:
    • add a Link: tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org
    • add a Bug: tag with the Android bug (required for patches not accepted into a maintainer tree)
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMLIST:
    • Example:
        FROMLIST: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171517.GA17557@someone.com/
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>

Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:

  • If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Fixes: tag that cites the patch with the bug
    • Example:
        ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c

        This is the detailed description of the important fix

        Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch is a new feature
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Bug: tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)