percpu: Remove irqsafe_cpu_xxx variants
We simply say that regular this_cpu use must be safe regardless of
preemption and interrupt state. That has no material change for x86
and s390 implementations of this_cpu operations. However, arches that
do not provide their own implementation for this_cpu operations will
now get code generated that disables interrupts instead of preemption.
-tj: This is part of on-going percpu API cleanup. For detailed
discussion of the subject, please refer to the following thread.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1222078
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1112221154380.11787@router.home>
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index ed3334d..0011489 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1978,7 +1978,7 @@
page->pobjects = pobjects;
page->next = oldpage;
- } while (irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg(s->cpu_slab->partial, oldpage, page) != oldpage);
+ } while (this_cpu_cmpxchg(s->cpu_slab->partial, oldpage, page) != oldpage);
stat(s, CPU_PARTIAL_FREE);
return pobjects;
}
@@ -2304,7 +2304,7 @@
* Since this is without lock semantics the protection is only against
* code executing on this cpu *not* from access by other cpus.
*/
- if (unlikely(!irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_double(
+ if (unlikely(!this_cpu_cmpxchg_double(
s->cpu_slab->freelist, s->cpu_slab->tid,
object, tid,
get_freepointer_safe(s, object), next_tid(tid)))) {
@@ -2534,7 +2534,7 @@
if (likely(page == c->page)) {
set_freepointer(s, object, c->freelist);
- if (unlikely(!irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_double(
+ if (unlikely(!this_cpu_cmpxchg_double(
s->cpu_slab->freelist, s->cpu_slab->tid,
c->freelist, tid,
object, next_tid(tid)))) {