btrfs: use explicit initializer for seq_elem
Using {} as initializer for struct seq_elem does not properly initialize
the list_head member, but it currently works because it gets set through
btrfs_get_tree_mod_seq if 'seq' is 0.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index f55721f..9de772e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
@@ -1206,7 +1206,7 @@
struct ulist *roots = NULL;
struct ulist_iterator uiter;
struct ulist_node *node;
- struct seq_list elem = {};
+ struct seq_list elem = SEQ_LIST_INIT(elem);
int ret = 0;
tmp = ulist_alloc(GFP_NOFS);
@@ -1610,7 +1610,7 @@
struct ulist *roots = NULL;
struct ulist_node *ref_node = NULL;
struct ulist_node *root_node = NULL;
- struct seq_list tree_mod_seq_elem = {};
+ struct seq_list tree_mod_seq_elem = SEQ_LIST_INIT(tree_mod_seq_elem);
struct ulist_iterator ref_uiter;
struct ulist_iterator root_uiter;