blob: ce3e05e41724ae18fb0a3b8d3ae4be79538840a2 [file] [log] [blame]
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002Control Group v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03003================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05004
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03005:Date: October, 2015
6:Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05007
8This is the authoritative documentation on the design, interface and
9conventions of cgroup v2. It describes all userland-visible aspects
10of cgroup including core and specific controller behaviors. All
11future changes must be reflected in this document. Documentation for
Jakub Kicinski373e8ff2020-02-27 16:06:53 -080012v1 is available under :ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/index.rst <cgroup-v1>`.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050013
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030014.. CONTENTS
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050015
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030016 1. Introduction
17 1-1. Terminology
18 1-2. What is cgroup?
19 2. Basic Operations
20 2-1. Mounting
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -040021 2-2. Organizing Processes and Threads
22 2-2-1. Processes
23 2-2-2. Threads
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030024 2-3. [Un]populated Notification
25 2-4. Controlling Controllers
26 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling
27 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint
28 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint
29 2-5. Delegation
30 2-5-1. Model of Delegation
31 2-5-2. Delegation Containment
32 2-6. Guidelines
33 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control
34 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions
35 3. Resource Distribution Models
36 3-1. Weights
37 3-2. Limits
38 3-3. Protections
39 3-4. Allocations
40 4. Interface Files
41 4-1. Format
42 4-2. Conventions
43 4-3. Core Interface Files
44 5. Controllers
45 5-1. CPU
46 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files
47 5-2. Memory
48 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files
49 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines
50 5-2-3. Memory Ownership
51 5-3. IO
52 5-3-1. IO Interface Files
53 5-3-2. Writeback
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -040054 5-3-3. IO Latency
55 5-3-3-1. How IO Latency Throttling Works
56 5-3-3-2. IO Latency Interface Files
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030057 5-4. PID
58 5-4-1. PID Interface Files
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -050059 5-5. Cpuset
60 5.5-1. Cpuset Interface Files
61 5-6. Device
62 5-7. RDMA
63 5-7-1. RDMA Interface Files
Giuseppe Scrivanofaced7e2019-12-16 20:38:31 +010064 5-8. HugeTLB
65 5.8-1. HugeTLB Interface Files
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -050066 5-8. Misc
67 5-8-1. perf_event
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +010068 5-N. Non-normative information
69 5-N-1. CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
70 5-N-2. IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030071 6. Namespace
72 6-1. Basics
73 6-2. The Root and Views
74 6-3. Migration and setns(2)
75 6-4. Interaction with Other Namespaces
76 P. Information on Kernel Programming
77 P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback
78 D. Deprecated v1 Core Features
79 R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
80 R-1. Multiple Hierarchies
81 R-2. Thread Granularity
82 R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
83 R-4. Other Interface Issues
84 R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies
85 R-5-1. Memory
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050086
87
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030088Introduction
89============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050090
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030091Terminology
92-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050093
94"cgroup" stands for "control group" and is never capitalized. The
95singular form is used to designate the whole feature and also as a
96qualifier as in "cgroup controllers". When explicitly referring to
97multiple individual control groups, the plural form "cgroups" is used.
98
99
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300100What is cgroup?
101---------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500102
103cgroup is a mechanism to organize processes hierarchically and
104distribute system resources along the hierarchy in a controlled and
105configurable manner.
106
107cgroup is largely composed of two parts - the core and controllers.
108cgroup core is primarily responsible for hierarchically organizing
109processes. A cgroup controller is usually responsible for
110distributing a specific type of system resource along the hierarchy
111although there are utility controllers which serve purposes other than
112resource distribution.
113
114cgroups form a tree structure and every process in the system belongs
115to one and only one cgroup. All threads of a process belong to the
116same cgroup. On creation, all processes are put in the cgroup that
117the parent process belongs to at the time. A process can be migrated
118to another cgroup. Migration of a process doesn't affect already
119existing descendant processes.
120
121Following certain structural constraints, controllers may be enabled or
122disabled selectively on a cgroup. All controller behaviors are
123hierarchical - if a controller is enabled on a cgroup, it affects all
124processes which belong to the cgroups consisting the inclusive
125sub-hierarchy of the cgroup. When a controller is enabled on a nested
126cgroup, it always restricts the resource distribution further. The
127restrictions set closer to the root in the hierarchy can not be
128overridden from further away.
129
130
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300131Basic Operations
132================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500133
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300134Mounting
135--------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500136
137Unlike v1, cgroup v2 has only single hierarchy. The cgroup v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300138hierarchy can be mounted with the following mount command::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500139
140 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
141
142cgroup2 filesystem has the magic number 0x63677270 ("cgrp"). All
143controllers which support v2 and are not bound to a v1 hierarchy are
144automatically bound to the v2 hierarchy and show up at the root.
145Controllers which are not in active use in the v2 hierarchy can be
146bound to other hierarchies. This allows mixing v2 hierarchy with the
147legacy v1 multiple hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way.
148
149A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller
150is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy. Because per-cgroup
151controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may
152have lingering references, a controller may not show up immediately on
153the v2 hierarchy after the final umount of the previous hierarchy.
154Similarly, a controller should be fully disabled to be moved out of
155the unified hierarchy and it may take some time for the disabled
156controller to become available for other hierarchies; furthermore, due
157to inter-controller dependencies, other controllers may need to be
158disabled too.
159
160While useful for development and manual configurations, moving
161controllers dynamically between the v2 and other hierarchies is
162strongly discouraged for production use. It is recommended to decide
163the hierarchies and controller associations before starting using the
164controllers after system boot.
165
Johannes Weiner1619b6d2016-02-16 13:21:14 -0500166During transition to v2, system management software might still
167automount the v1 cgroup filesystem and so hijack all controllers
168during boot, before manual intervention is possible. To make testing
169and experimenting easier, the kernel parameter cgroup_no_v1= allows
170disabling controllers in v1 and make them always available in v2.
171
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400172cgroup v2 currently supports the following mount options.
173
174 nsdelegate
175
176 Consider cgroup namespaces as delegation boundaries. This
177 option is system wide and can only be set on mount or modified
178 through remount from the init namespace. The mount option is
179 ignored on non-init namespace mounts. Please refer to the
180 Delegation section for details.
181
Chris Down9852ae32019-05-31 22:30:22 -0700182 memory_localevents
183
184 Only populate memory.events with data for the current cgroup,
185 and not any subtrees. This is legacy behaviour, the default
186 behaviour without this option is to include subtree counts.
187 This option is system wide and can only be set on mount or
188 modified through remount from the init namespace. The mount
189 option is ignored on non-init namespace mounts.
190
Johannes Weiner8a931f82020-04-01 21:07:07 -0700191 memory_recursiveprot
192
193 Recursively apply memory.min and memory.low protection to
194 entire subtrees, without requiring explicit downward
195 propagation into leaf cgroups. This allows protecting entire
196 subtrees from one another, while retaining free competition
197 within those subtrees. This should have been the default
198 behavior but is a mount-option to avoid regressing setups
199 relying on the original semantics (e.g. specifying bogusly
200 high 'bypass' protection values at higher tree levels).
201
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500202
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400203Organizing Processes and Threads
204--------------------------------
205
206Processes
207~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500208
209Initially, only the root cgroup exists to which all processes belong.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300210A child cgroup can be created by creating a sub-directory::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500211
212 # mkdir $CGROUP_NAME
213
214A given cgroup may have multiple child cgroups forming a tree
215structure. Each cgroup has a read-writable interface file
216"cgroup.procs". When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which
217belong to the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
218same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved to
219another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while reading.
220
221A process can be migrated into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
222target cgroup's "cgroup.procs" file. Only one process can be migrated
223on a single write(2) call. If a process is composed of multiple
224threads, writing the PID of any thread migrates all threads of the
225process.
226
227When a process forks a child process, the new process is born into the
228cgroup that the forking process belongs to at the time of the
229operation. After exit, a process stays associated with the cgroup
230that it belonged to at the time of exit until it's reaped; however, a
231zombie process does not appear in "cgroup.procs" and thus can't be
232moved to another cgroup.
233
234A cgroup which doesn't have any children or live processes can be
235destroyed by removing the directory. Note that a cgroup which doesn't
236have any children and is associated only with zombie processes is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300237considered empty and can be removed::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500238
239 # rmdir $CGROUP_NAME
240
241"/proc/$PID/cgroup" lists a process's cgroup membership. If legacy
242cgroup is in use in the system, this file may contain multiple lines,
243one for each hierarchy. The entry for cgroup v2 is always in the
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300244format "0::$PATH"::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500245
246 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
247 ...
248 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested
249
250If the process becomes a zombie and the cgroup it was associated with
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300251is removed subsequently, " (deleted)" is appended to the path::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500252
253 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
254 ...
255 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested (deleted)
256
257
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400258Threads
259~~~~~~~
260
261cgroup v2 supports thread granularity for a subset of controllers to
262support use cases requiring hierarchical resource distribution across
263the threads of a group of processes. By default, all threads of a
264process belong to the same cgroup, which also serves as the resource
265domain to host resource consumptions which are not specific to a
266process or thread. The thread mode allows threads to be spread across
267a subtree while still maintaining the common resource domain for them.
268
269Controllers which support thread mode are called threaded controllers.
270The ones which don't are called domain controllers.
271
272Marking a cgroup threaded makes it join the resource domain of its
273parent as a threaded cgroup. The parent may be another threaded
274cgroup whose resource domain is further up in the hierarchy. The root
275of a threaded subtree, that is, the nearest ancestor which is not
276threaded, is called threaded domain or thread root interchangeably and
277serves as the resource domain for the entire subtree.
278
279Inside a threaded subtree, threads of a process can be put in
280different cgroups and are not subject to the no internal process
281constraint - threaded controllers can be enabled on non-leaf cgroups
282whether they have threads in them or not.
283
284As the threaded domain cgroup hosts all the domain resource
285consumptions of the subtree, it is considered to have internal
286resource consumptions whether there are processes in it or not and
287can't have populated child cgroups which aren't threaded. Because the
288root cgroup is not subject to no internal process constraint, it can
289serve both as a threaded domain and a parent to domain cgroups.
290
291The current operation mode or type of the cgroup is shown in the
292"cgroup.type" file which indicates whether the cgroup is a normal
293domain, a domain which is serving as the domain of a threaded subtree,
294or a threaded cgroup.
295
296On creation, a cgroup is always a domain cgroup and can be made
297threaded by writing "threaded" to the "cgroup.type" file. The
298operation is single direction::
299
300 # echo threaded > cgroup.type
301
302Once threaded, the cgroup can't be made a domain again. To enable the
303thread mode, the following conditions must be met.
304
305- As the cgroup will join the parent's resource domain. The parent
306 must either be a valid (threaded) domain or a threaded cgroup.
307
Tejun Heo918a8c22017-07-23 08:18:26 -0400308- When the parent is an unthreaded domain, it must not have any domain
309 controllers enabled or populated domain children. The root is
310 exempt from this requirement.
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400311
312Topology-wise, a cgroup can be in an invalid state. Please consider
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +0100313the following topology::
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400314
315 A (threaded domain) - B (threaded) - C (domain, just created)
316
317C is created as a domain but isn't connected to a parent which can
318host child domains. C can't be used until it is turned into a
319threaded cgroup. "cgroup.type" file will report "domain (invalid)" in
320these cases. Operations which fail due to invalid topology use
321EOPNOTSUPP as the errno.
322
323A domain cgroup is turned into a threaded domain when one of its child
324cgroup becomes threaded or threaded controllers are enabled in the
325"cgroup.subtree_control" file while there are processes in the cgroup.
326A threaded domain reverts to a normal domain when the conditions
327clear.
328
329When read, "cgroup.threads" contains the list of the thread IDs of all
330threads in the cgroup. Except that the operations are per-thread
331instead of per-process, "cgroup.threads" has the same format and
332behaves the same way as "cgroup.procs". While "cgroup.threads" can be
333written to in any cgroup, as it can only move threads inside the same
334threaded domain, its operations are confined inside each threaded
335subtree.
336
337The threaded domain cgroup serves as the resource domain for the whole
338subtree, and, while the threads can be scattered across the subtree,
339all the processes are considered to be in the threaded domain cgroup.
340"cgroup.procs" in a threaded domain cgroup contains the PIDs of all
341processes in the subtree and is not readable in the subtree proper.
342However, "cgroup.procs" can be written to from anywhere in the subtree
343to migrate all threads of the matching process to the cgroup.
344
345Only threaded controllers can be enabled in a threaded subtree. When
346a threaded controller is enabled inside a threaded subtree, it only
347accounts for and controls resource consumptions associated with the
348threads in the cgroup and its descendants. All consumptions which
349aren't tied to a specific thread belong to the threaded domain cgroup.
350
351Because a threaded subtree is exempt from no internal process
352constraint, a threaded controller must be able to handle competition
353between threads in a non-leaf cgroup and its child cgroups. Each
354threaded controller defines how such competitions are handled.
355
356
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300357[Un]populated Notification
358--------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500359
360Each non-root cgroup has a "cgroup.events" file which contains
361"populated" field indicating whether the cgroup's sub-hierarchy has
362live processes in it. Its value is 0 if there is no live process in
363the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1. poll and [id]notify
364events are triggered when the value changes. This can be used, for
365example, to start a clean-up operation after all processes of a given
366sub-hierarchy have exited. The populated state updates and
367notifications are recursive. Consider the following sub-hierarchy
368where the numbers in the parentheses represent the numbers of processes
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300369in each cgroup::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500370
371 A(4) - B(0) - C(1)
372 \ D(0)
373
374A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0. After the one
375process in C exits, B and C's "populated" fields would flip to "0" and
376file modified events will be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of
377both cgroups.
378
379
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300380Controlling Controllers
381-----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500382
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300383Enabling and Disabling
384~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500385
386Each cgroup has a "cgroup.controllers" file which lists all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300387controllers available for the cgroup to enable::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500388
389 # cat cgroup.controllers
390 cpu io memory
391
392No controller is enabled by default. Controllers can be enabled and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300393disabled by writing to the "cgroup.subtree_control" file::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500394
395 # echo "+cpu +memory -io" > cgroup.subtree_control
396
397Only controllers which are listed in "cgroup.controllers" can be
398enabled. When multiple operations are specified as above, either they
399all succeed or fail. If multiple operations on the same controller
400are specified, the last one is effective.
401
402Enabling a controller in a cgroup indicates that the distribution of
403the target resource across its immediate children will be controlled.
404Consider the following sub-hierarchy. The enabled controllers are
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300405listed in parentheses::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500406
407 A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C()
408 \ D()
409
410As A has "cpu" and "memory" enabled, A will control the distribution
411of CPU cycles and memory to its children, in this case, B. As B has
412"memory" enabled but not "CPU", C and D will compete freely on CPU
413cycles but their division of memory available to B will be controlled.
414
415As a controller regulates the distribution of the target resource to
416the cgroup's children, enabling it creates the controller's interface
417files in the child cgroups. In the above example, enabling "cpu" on B
418would create the "cpu." prefixed controller interface files in C and
419D. Likewise, disabling "memory" from B would remove the "memory."
420prefixed controller interface files from C and D. This means that the
421controller interface files - anything which doesn't start with
422"cgroup." are owned by the parent rather than the cgroup itself.
423
424
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300425Top-down Constraint
426~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500427
428Resources are distributed top-down and a cgroup can further distribute
429a resource only if the resource has been distributed to it from the
430parent. This means that all non-root "cgroup.subtree_control" files
431can only contain controllers which are enabled in the parent's
432"cgroup.subtree_control" file. A controller can be enabled only if
433the parent has the controller enabled and a controller can't be
434disabled if one or more children have it enabled.
435
436
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300437No Internal Process Constraint
438~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500439
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400440Non-root cgroups can distribute domain resources to their children
441only when they don't have any processes of their own. In other words,
442only domain cgroups which don't contain any processes can have domain
443controllers enabled in their "cgroup.subtree_control" files.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500444
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400445This guarantees that, when a domain controller is looking at the part
446of the hierarchy which has it enabled, processes are always only on
447the leaves. This rules out situations where child cgroups compete
448against internal processes of the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500449
450The root cgroup is exempt from this restriction. Root contains
451processes and anonymous resource consumption which can't be associated
452with any other cgroups and requires special treatment from most
453controllers. How resource consumption in the root cgroup is governed
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +0100454is up to each controller (for more information on this topic please
455refer to the Non-normative information section in the Controllers
456chapter).
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500457
458Note that the restriction doesn't get in the way if there is no
459enabled controller in the cgroup's "cgroup.subtree_control". This is
460important as otherwise it wouldn't be possible to create children of a
461populated cgroup. To control resource distribution of a cgroup, the
462cgroup must create children and transfer all its processes to the
463children before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control"
464file.
465
466
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300467Delegation
468----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500469
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300470Model of Delegation
471~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500472
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400473A cgroup can be delegated in two ways. First, to a less privileged
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400474user by granting write access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs",
475"cgroup.threads" and "cgroup.subtree_control" files to the user.
476Second, if the "nsdelegate" mount option is set, automatically to a
477cgroup namespace on namespace creation.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500478
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400479Because the resource control interface files in a given directory
480control the distribution of the parent's resources, the delegatee
481shouldn't be allowed to write to them. For the first method, this is
482achieved by not granting access to these files. For the second, the
483kernel rejects writes to all files other than "cgroup.procs" and
484"cgroup.subtree_control" on a namespace root from inside the
485namespace.
486
487The end results are equivalent for both delegation types. Once
488delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory,
489organize processes inside it as it sees fit and further distribute the
490resources it received from the parent. The limits and other settings
491of all resource controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what
492happens in the delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the
493resource restrictions imposed by the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500494
495Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of
496cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however,
497this may be limited explicitly in the future.
498
499
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300500Delegation Containment
501~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500502
503A delegated sub-hierarchy is contained in the sense that processes
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400504can't be moved into or out of the sub-hierarchy by the delegatee.
505
506For delegations to a less privileged user, this is achieved by
507requiring the following conditions for a process with a non-root euid
508to migrate a target process into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
509"cgroup.procs" file.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500510
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500511- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
512
513- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
514 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
515
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500516The above two constraints ensure that while a delegatee may migrate
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500517processes around freely in the delegated sub-hierarchy it can't pull
518in from or push out to outside the sub-hierarchy.
519
520For an example, let's assume cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to
521user U0 who created C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300522all processes under C0 and C1 belong to U0::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500523
524 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00
525 ~ cgroup ~ \ C01
526 ~ hierarchy ~
527 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10
528
529Let's also say U0 wants to write the PID of a process which is
530currently in C10 into "C00/cgroup.procs". U0 has write access to the
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500531file; however, the common ancestor of the source cgroup C10 and the
532destination cgroup C00 is above the points of delegation and U0 would
533not have write access to its "cgroup.procs" files and thus the write
534will be denied with -EACCES.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500535
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400536For delegations to namespaces, containment is achieved by requiring
537that both the source and destination cgroups are reachable from the
538namespace of the process which is attempting the migration. If either
539is not reachable, the migration is rejected with -ENOENT.
540
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500541
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300542Guidelines
543----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500544
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300545Organize Once and Control
546~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500547
548Migrating a process across cgroups is a relatively expensive operation
549and stateful resources such as memory are not moved together with the
550process. This is an explicit design decision as there often exist
551inherent trade-offs between migration and various hot paths in terms
552of synchronization cost.
553
554As such, migrating processes across cgroups frequently as a means to
555apply different resource restrictions is discouraged. A workload
556should be assigned to a cgroup according to the system's logical and
557resource structure once on start-up. Dynamic adjustments to resource
558distribution can be made by changing controller configuration through
559the interface files.
560
561
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300562Avoid Name Collisions
563~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500564
565Interface files for a cgroup and its children cgroups occupy the same
566directory and it is possible to create children cgroups which collide
567with interface files.
568
569All cgroup core interface files are prefixed with "cgroup." and each
570controller's interface files are prefixed with the controller name and
571a dot. A controller's name is composed of lower case alphabets and
572'_'s but never begins with an '_' so it can be used as the prefix
573character for collision avoidance. Also, interface file names won't
574start or end with terms which are often used in categorizing workloads
575such as job, service, slice, unit or workload.
576
577cgroup doesn't do anything to prevent name collisions and it's the
578user's responsibility to avoid them.
579
580
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300581Resource Distribution Models
582============================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500583
584cgroup controllers implement several resource distribution schemes
585depending on the resource type and expected use cases. This section
586describes major schemes in use along with their expected behaviors.
587
588
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300589Weights
590-------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500591
592A parent's resource is distributed by adding up the weights of all
593active children and giving each the fraction matching the ratio of its
594weight against the sum. As only children which can make use of the
595resource at the moment participate in the distribution, this is
596work-conserving. Due to the dynamic nature, this model is usually
597used for stateless resources.
598
599All weights are in the range [1, 10000] with the default at 100. This
600allows symmetric multiplicative biases in both directions at fine
601enough granularity while staying in the intuitive range.
602
603As long as the weight is in range, all configuration combinations are
604valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
605process migrations.
606
607"cpu.weight" proportionally distributes CPU cycles to active children
608and is an example of this type.
609
610
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300611Limits
612------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500613
614A child can only consume upto the configured amount of the resource.
615Limits can be over-committed - the sum of the limits of children can
616exceed the amount of resource available to the parent.
617
618Limits are in the range [0, max] and defaults to "max", which is noop.
619
620As limits can be over-committed, all configuration combinations are
621valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
622process migrations.
623
624"io.max" limits the maximum BPS and/or IOPS that a cgroup can consume
625on an IO device and is an example of this type.
626
627
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300628Protections
629-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500630
Chris Down9783aa92019-10-06 17:58:32 -0700631A cgroup is protected upto the configured amount of the resource
632as long as the usages of all its ancestors are under their
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500633protected levels. Protections can be hard guarantees or best effort
634soft boundaries. Protections can also be over-committed in which case
635only upto the amount available to the parent is protected among
636children.
637
638Protections are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is
639noop.
640
641As protections can be over-committed, all configuration combinations
642are valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
643process migrations.
644
645"memory.low" implements best-effort memory protection and is an
646example of this type.
647
648
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300649Allocations
650-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500651
652A cgroup is exclusively allocated a certain amount of a finite
653resource. Allocations can't be over-committed - the sum of the
654allocations of children can not exceed the amount of resource
655available to the parent.
656
657Allocations are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is no
658resource.
659
660As allocations can't be over-committed, some configuration
661combinations are invalid and should be rejected. Also, if the
662resource is mandatory for execution of processes, process migrations
663may be rejected.
664
665"cpu.rt.max" hard-allocates realtime slices and is an example of this
666type.
667
668
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300669Interface Files
670===============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500671
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300672Format
673------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500674
675All interface files should be in one of the following formats whenever
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300676possible::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500677
678 New-line separated values
679 (when only one value can be written at once)
680
681 VAL0\n
682 VAL1\n
683 ...
684
685 Space separated values
686 (when read-only or multiple values can be written at once)
687
688 VAL0 VAL1 ...\n
689
690 Flat keyed
691
692 KEY0 VAL0\n
693 KEY1 VAL1\n
694 ...
695
696 Nested keyed
697
698 KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01...
699 KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11...
700 ...
701
702For a writable file, the format for writing should generally match
703reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or
704implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases.
705
706For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key
707can be written at a time. For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs
708may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified.
709
710
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300711Conventions
712-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500713
714- Settings for a single feature should be contained in a single file.
715
716- The root cgroup should be exempt from resource control and thus
Boris Burkov936f2a72020-05-27 14:43:19 -0700717 shouldn't have resource control interface files.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500718
Tejun Heoa5e112e2019-05-13 12:37:17 -0700719- The default time unit is microseconds. If a different unit is ever
720 used, an explicit unit suffix must be present.
721
722- A parts-per quantity should use a percentage decimal with at least
723 two digit fractional part - e.g. 13.40.
724
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500725- If a controller implements weight based resource distribution, its
726 interface file should be named "weight" and have the range [1,
727 10000] with 100 as the default. The values are chosen to allow
728 enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it
729 intuitive (the default is 100%).
730
731- If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or
732 limit, the interface files should be named "min" and "max"
733 respectively. If a controller implements best effort resource
734 guarantee and/or limit, the interface files should be named "low"
735 and "high" respectively.
736
737 In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be
738 used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing.
739
740- If a setting has a configurable default value and keyed specific
741 overrides, the default entry should be keyed with "default" and
742 appear as the first entry in the file.
743
744 The default value can be updated by writing either "default $VAL" or
745 "$VAL".
746
747 When writing to update a specific override, "default" can be used as
748 the value to indicate removal of the override. Override entries
749 with "default" as the value must not appear when read.
750
751 For example, a setting which is keyed by major:minor device numbers
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300752 with integer values may look like the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500753
754 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
755 default 150
756 8:0 300
757
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300758 The default value can be updated by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500759
760 # echo 125 > cgroup-example-interface-file
761
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300762 or::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500763
764 # echo "default 125" > cgroup-example-interface-file
765
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300766 An override can be set by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500767
768 # echo "8:16 170" > cgroup-example-interface-file
769
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300770 and cleared by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500771
772 # echo "8:0 default" > cgroup-example-interface-file
773 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
774 default 125
775 8:16 170
776
777- For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file
778 "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs.
779 Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be
780 generated on the file.
781
782
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300783Core Interface Files
784--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500785
786All cgroup core files are prefixed with "cgroup."
787
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400788 cgroup.type
789
790 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
791 cgroups.
792
793 When read, it indicates the current type of the cgroup, which
794 can be one of the following values.
795
796 - "domain" : A normal valid domain cgroup.
797
798 - "domain threaded" : A threaded domain cgroup which is
799 serving as the root of a threaded subtree.
800
801 - "domain invalid" : A cgroup which is in an invalid state.
802 It can't be populated or have controllers enabled. It may
803 be allowed to become a threaded cgroup.
804
805 - "threaded" : A threaded cgroup which is a member of a
806 threaded subtree.
807
808 A cgroup can be turned into a threaded cgroup by writing
809 "threaded" to this file.
810
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500811 cgroup.procs
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500812 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
813 all cgroups.
814
815 When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which belong to
816 the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
817 same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved
818 to another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while
819 reading.
820
821 A PID can be written to migrate the process associated with
822 the PID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
823 following conditions.
824
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500825 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
826
827 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
828 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
829
830 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
831 should be granted along with the containing directory.
832
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400833 In a threaded cgroup, reading this file fails with EOPNOTSUPP
834 as all the processes belong to the thread root. Writing is
835 supported and moves every thread of the process to the cgroup.
836
837 cgroup.threads
838 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
839 all cgroups.
840
841 When read, it lists the TIDs of all threads which belong to
842 the cgroup one-per-line. The TIDs are not ordered and the
843 same TID may show up more than once if the thread got moved to
844 another cgroup and then back or the TID got recycled while
845 reading.
846
847 A TID can be written to migrate the thread associated with the
848 TID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
849 following conditions.
850
851 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.threads" file.
852
853 - The cgroup that the thread is currently in must be in the
854 same resource domain as the destination cgroup.
855
856 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
857 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
858
859 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
860 should be granted along with the containing directory.
861
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500862 cgroup.controllers
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500863 A read-only space separated values file which exists on all
864 cgroups.
865
866 It shows space separated list of all controllers available to
867 the cgroup. The controllers are not ordered.
868
869 cgroup.subtree_control
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500870 A read-write space separated values file which exists on all
871 cgroups. Starts out empty.
872
873 When read, it shows space separated list of the controllers
874 which are enabled to control resource distribution from the
875 cgroup to its children.
876
877 Space separated list of controllers prefixed with '+' or '-'
878 can be written to enable or disable controllers. A controller
879 name prefixed with '+' enables the controller and '-'
880 disables. If a controller appears more than once on the list,
881 the last one is effective. When multiple enable and disable
882 operations are specified, either all succeed or all fail.
883
884 cgroup.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500885 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
886 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
887 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
888 modified event.
889
890 populated
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500891 1 if the cgroup or its descendants contains any live
892 processes; otherwise, 0.
Roman Gushchinafe471e2019-04-19 10:03:09 -0700893 frozen
894 1 if the cgroup is frozen; otherwise, 0.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500895
Roman Gushchin1a926e02017-07-28 18:28:44 +0100896 cgroup.max.descendants
897 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
898
899 Maximum allowed number of descent cgroups.
900 If the actual number of descendants is equal or larger,
901 an attempt to create a new cgroup in the hierarchy will fail.
902
903 cgroup.max.depth
904 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
905
906 Maximum allowed descent depth below the current cgroup.
907 If the actual descent depth is equal or larger,
908 an attempt to create a new child cgroup will fail.
909
Roman Gushchinec392252017-08-02 17:55:31 +0100910 cgroup.stat
911 A read-only flat-keyed file with the following entries:
912
913 nr_descendants
914 Total number of visible descendant cgroups.
915
916 nr_dying_descendants
917 Total number of dying descendant cgroups. A cgroup becomes
918 dying after being deleted by a user. The cgroup will remain
919 in dying state for some time undefined time (which can depend
920 on system load) before being completely destroyed.
921
922 A process can't enter a dying cgroup under any circumstances,
923 a dying cgroup can't revive.
924
925 A dying cgroup can consume system resources not exceeding
926 limits, which were active at the moment of cgroup deletion.
927
Roman Gushchinafe471e2019-04-19 10:03:09 -0700928 cgroup.freeze
929 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
930 Allowed values are "0" and "1". The default is "0".
931
932 Writing "1" to the file causes freezing of the cgroup and all
933 descendant cgroups. This means that all belonging processes will
934 be stopped and will not run until the cgroup will be explicitly
935 unfrozen. Freezing of the cgroup may take some time; when this action
936 is completed, the "frozen" value in the cgroup.events control file
937 will be updated to "1" and the corresponding notification will be
938 issued.
939
940 A cgroup can be frozen either by its own settings, or by settings
941 of any ancestor cgroups. If any of ancestor cgroups is frozen, the
942 cgroup will remain frozen.
943
944 Processes in the frozen cgroup can be killed by a fatal signal.
945 They also can enter and leave a frozen cgroup: either by an explicit
946 move by a user, or if freezing of the cgroup races with fork().
947 If a process is moved to a frozen cgroup, it stops. If a process is
948 moved out of a frozen cgroup, it becomes running.
949
950 Frozen status of a cgroup doesn't affect any cgroup tree operations:
951 it's possible to delete a frozen (and empty) cgroup, as well as
952 create new sub-cgroups.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500953
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300954Controllers
955===========
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500956
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300957CPU
958---
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500959
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500960The "cpu" controllers regulates distribution of CPU cycles. This
961controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for
962normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for
963realtime scheduling policy.
964
Patrick Bellasi2480c092019-08-22 14:28:06 +0100965In all the above models, cycles distribution is defined only on a temporal
966base and it does not account for the frequency at which tasks are executed.
967The (optional) utilization clamping support allows to hint the schedutil
968cpufreq governor about the minimum desired frequency which should always be
969provided by a CPU, as well as the maximum desired frequency, which should not
970be exceeded by a CPU.
971
Tejun Heoc2f31b72017-12-05 09:10:17 -0800972WARNING: cgroup2 doesn't yet support control of realtime processes and
973the cpu controller can only be enabled when all RT processes are in
974the root cgroup. Be aware that system management software may already
975have placed RT processes into nonroot cgroups during the system boot
976process, and these processes may need to be moved to the root cgroup
977before the cpu controller can be enabled.
978
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500979
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300980CPU Interface Files
981~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500982
983All time durations are in microseconds.
984
985 cpu.stat
Boris Burkov936f2a72020-05-27 14:43:19 -0700986 A read-only flat-keyed file.
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700987 This file exists whether the controller is enabled or not.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500988
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700989 It always reports the following three stats:
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500990
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300991 - usage_usec
992 - user_usec
993 - system_usec
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700994
995 and the following three when the controller is enabled:
996
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300997 - nr_periods
998 - nr_throttled
999 - throttled_usec
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001000
1001 cpu.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001002 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1003 cgroups. The default is "100".
1004
1005 The weight in the range [1, 10000].
1006
Tejun Heo0d593632017-09-25 09:00:19 -07001007 cpu.weight.nice
1008 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1009 cgroups. The default is "0".
1010
1011 The nice value is in the range [-20, 19].
1012
1013 This interface file is an alternative interface for
1014 "cpu.weight" and allows reading and setting weight using the
1015 same values used by nice(2). Because the range is smaller and
1016 granularity is coarser for the nice values, the read value is
1017 the closest approximation of the current weight.
1018
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001019 cpu.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001020 A read-write two value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1021 The default is "max 100000".
1022
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001023 The maximum bandwidth limit. It's in the following format::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001024
1025 $MAX $PERIOD
1026
1027 which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each
1028 $PERIOD duration. "max" for $MAX indicates no limit. If only
1029 one number is written, $MAX is updated.
1030
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001031 cpu.pressure
1032 A read-only nested-key file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1033
1034 Shows pressure stall information for CPU. See
Jakub Kicinski373e8ff2020-02-27 16:06:53 -08001035 :ref:`Documentation/accounting/psi.rst <psi>` for details.
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001036
Patrick Bellasi2480c092019-08-22 14:28:06 +01001037 cpu.uclamp.min
1038 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1039 The default is "0", i.e. no utilization boosting.
1040
1041 The requested minimum utilization (protection) as a percentage
1042 rational number, e.g. 12.34 for 12.34%.
1043
1044 This interface allows reading and setting minimum utilization clamp
1045 values similar to the sched_setattr(2). This minimum utilization
1046 value is used to clamp the task specific minimum utilization clamp.
1047
1048 The requested minimum utilization (protection) is always capped by
1049 the current value for the maximum utilization (limit), i.e.
1050 `cpu.uclamp.max`.
1051
1052 cpu.uclamp.max
1053 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1054 The default is "max". i.e. no utilization capping
1055
1056 The requested maximum utilization (limit) as a percentage rational
1057 number, e.g. 98.76 for 98.76%.
1058
1059 This interface allows reading and setting maximum utilization clamp
1060 values similar to the sched_setattr(2). This maximum utilization
1061 value is used to clamp the task specific maximum utilization clamp.
1062
1063
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001064
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001065Memory
1066------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001067
1068The "memory" controller regulates distribution of memory. Memory is
1069stateful and implements both limit and protection models. Due to the
1070intertwining between memory usage and reclaim pressure and the
1071stateful nature of memory, the distribution model is relatively
1072complex.
1073
1074While not completely water-tight, all major memory usages by a given
1075cgroup are tracked so that the total memory consumption can be
1076accounted and controlled to a reasonable extent. Currently, the
1077following types of memory usages are tracked.
1078
1079- Userland memory - page cache and anonymous memory.
1080
1081- Kernel data structures such as dentries and inodes.
1082
1083- TCP socket buffers.
1084
1085The above list may expand in the future for better coverage.
1086
1087
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001088Memory Interface Files
1089~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001090
1091All memory amounts are in bytes. If a value which is not aligned to
1092PAGE_SIZE is written, the value may be rounded up to the closest
1093PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
1094
1095 memory.current
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001096 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
1097 cgroups.
1098
1099 The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup
1100 and its descendants.
1101
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001102 memory.min
1103 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1104 cgroups. The default is "0".
1105
1106 Hard memory protection. If the memory usage of a cgroup
1107 is within its effective min boundary, the cgroup's memory
1108 won't be reclaimed under any conditions. If there is no
1109 unprotected reclaimable memory available, OOM killer
Chris Down9783aa92019-10-06 17:58:32 -07001110 is invoked. Above the effective min boundary (or
1111 effective low boundary if it is higher), pages are reclaimed
1112 proportionally to the overage, reducing reclaim pressure for
1113 smaller overages.
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001114
Jakub Kicinskid0c3bac2020-02-27 16:06:49 -08001115 Effective min boundary is limited by memory.min values of
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001116 all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.min overcommitment
1117 (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
1118 than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
1119 the part of parent's protection proportional to its
1120 actual memory usage below memory.min.
1121
1122 Putting more memory than generally available under this
1123 protection is discouraged and may lead to constant OOMs.
1124
1125 If a memory cgroup is not populated with processes,
1126 its memory.min is ignored.
1127
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001128 memory.low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001129 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1130 cgroups. The default is "0".
1131
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001132 Best-effort memory protection. If the memory usage of a
1133 cgroup is within its effective low boundary, the cgroup's
Jon Haslam6ee0fac2019-09-25 12:56:04 -07001134 memory won't be reclaimed unless there is no reclaimable
1135 memory available in unprotected cgroups.
Jonathan Corbet822bbba2019-10-29 04:43:29 -06001136 Above the effective low boundary (or
Chris Down9783aa92019-10-06 17:58:32 -07001137 effective min boundary if it is higher), pages are reclaimed
1138 proportionally to the overage, reducing reclaim pressure for
1139 smaller overages.
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001140
1141 Effective low boundary is limited by memory.low values of
1142 all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.low overcommitment
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001143 (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001144 than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001145 the part of parent's protection proportional to its
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001146 actual memory usage below memory.low.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001147
1148 Putting more memory than generally available under this
1149 protection is discouraged.
1150
1151 memory.high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001152 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1153 cgroups. The default is "max".
1154
1155 Memory usage throttle limit. This is the main mechanism to
1156 control memory usage of a cgroup. If a cgroup's usage goes
1157 over the high boundary, the processes of the cgroup are
1158 throttled and put under heavy reclaim pressure.
1159
1160 Going over the high limit never invokes the OOM killer and
1161 under extreme conditions the limit may be breached.
1162
1163 memory.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001164 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1165 cgroups. The default is "max".
1166
1167 Memory usage hard limit. This is the final protection
1168 mechanism. If a cgroup's memory usage reaches this limit and
1169 can't be reduced, the OOM killer is invoked in the cgroup.
1170 Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit
1171 temporarily.
1172
Konstantin Khlebnikovdb33ec32020-06-07 21:42:55 -07001173 In default configuration regular 0-order allocations always
1174 succeed unless OOM killer chooses current task as a victim.
1175
1176 Some kinds of allocations don't invoke the OOM killer.
1177 Caller could retry them differently, return into userspace
1178 as -ENOMEM or silently ignore in cases like disk readahead.
1179
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001180 This is the ultimate protection mechanism. As long as the
1181 high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's
1182 utility is limited to providing the final safety net.
1183
Roman Gushchin3d8b38e2018-08-21 21:53:54 -07001184 memory.oom.group
1185 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1186 cgroups. The default value is "0".
1187
1188 Determines whether the cgroup should be treated as
1189 an indivisible workload by the OOM killer. If set,
1190 all tasks belonging to the cgroup or to its descendants
1191 (if the memory cgroup is not a leaf cgroup) are killed
1192 together or not at all. This can be used to avoid
1193 partial kills to guarantee workload integrity.
1194
1195 Tasks with the OOM protection (oom_score_adj set to -1000)
1196 are treated as an exception and are never killed.
1197
1198 If the OOM killer is invoked in a cgroup, it's not going
1199 to kill any tasks outside of this cgroup, regardless
1200 memory.oom.group values of ancestor cgroups.
1201
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001202 memory.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001203 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1204 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
1205 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
1206 modified event.
1207
Shakeel Butt1e577f92019-07-11 20:55:55 -07001208 Note that all fields in this file are hierarchical and the
1209 file modified event can be generated due to an event down the
1210 hierarchy. For for the local events at the cgroup level see
1211 memory.events.local.
1212
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001213 low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001214 The number of times the cgroup is reclaimed due to
1215 high memory pressure even though its usage is under
1216 the low boundary. This usually indicates that the low
1217 boundary is over-committed.
1218
1219 high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001220 The number of times processes of the cgroup are
1221 throttled and routed to perform direct memory reclaim
1222 because the high memory boundary was exceeded. For a
1223 cgroup whose memory usage is capped by the high limit
1224 rather than global memory pressure, this event's
1225 occurrences are expected.
1226
1227 max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001228 The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was
1229 about to go over the max boundary. If direct reclaim
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001230 fails to bring it down, the cgroup goes to OOM state.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001231
1232 oom
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001233 The number of time the cgroup's memory usage was
1234 reached the limit and allocation was about to fail.
1235
Roman Gushchin7a1adfd2018-10-26 15:09:48 -07001236 This event is not raised if the OOM killer is not
1237 considered as an option, e.g. for failed high-order
Konstantin Khlebnikovdb33ec32020-06-07 21:42:55 -07001238 allocations or if caller asked to not retry attempts.
Roman Gushchin7a1adfd2018-10-26 15:09:48 -07001239
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001240 oom_kill
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001241 The number of processes belonging to this cgroup
1242 killed by any kind of OOM killer.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001243
Shakeel Butt1e577f92019-07-11 20:55:55 -07001244 memory.events.local
1245 Similar to memory.events but the fields in the file are local
1246 to the cgroup i.e. not hierarchical. The file modified event
1247 generated on this file reflects only the local events.
1248
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001249 memory.stat
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001250 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1251
1252 This breaks down the cgroup's memory footprint into different
1253 types of memory, type-specific details, and other information
1254 on the state and past events of the memory management system.
1255
1256 All memory amounts are in bytes.
1257
1258 The entries are ordered to be human readable, and new entries
1259 can show up in the middle. Don't rely on items remaining in a
1260 fixed position; use the keys to look up specific values!
1261
1262 anon
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001263 Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings such as
1264 brk(), sbrk(), and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS)
1265
1266 file
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001267 Amount of memory used to cache filesystem data,
1268 including tmpfs and shared memory.
1269
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001270 kernel_stack
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001271 Amount of memory allocated to kernel stacks.
1272
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001273 slab
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001274 Amount of memory used for storing in-kernel data
1275 structures.
1276
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001277 sock
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001278 Amount of memory used in network transmission buffers
1279
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001280 shmem
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001281 Amount of cached filesystem data that is swap-backed,
1282 such as tmpfs, shm segments, shared anonymous mmap()s
1283
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001284 file_mapped
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001285 Amount of cached filesystem data mapped with mmap()
1286
1287 file_dirty
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001288 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified but
1289 not yet written back to disk
1290
1291 file_writeback
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001292 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified and
1293 is currently being written back to disk
1294
Chris Down1ff9e6e2019-03-05 15:48:09 -08001295 anon_thp
1296 Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings backed by
1297 transparent hugepages
1298
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001299 inactive_anon, active_anon, inactive_file, active_file, unevictable
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001300 Amount of memory, swap-backed and filesystem-backed,
1301 on the internal memory management lists used by the
Chris Down1603c8d2019-11-30 17:50:19 -08001302 page reclaim algorithm.
1303
1304 As these represent internal list state (eg. shmem pages are on anon
1305 memory management lists), inactive_foo + active_foo may not be equal to
1306 the value for the foo counter, since the foo counter is type-based, not
1307 list-based.
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001308
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001309 slab_reclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001310 Part of "slab" that might be reclaimed, such as
1311 dentries and inodes.
1312
1313 slab_unreclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001314 Part of "slab" that cannot be reclaimed on memory
1315 pressure.
1316
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001317 pgfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001318 Total number of page faults incurred
1319
1320 pgmajfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001321 Number of major page faults incurred
1322
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -07001323 workingset_refault
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -07001324 Number of refaults of previously evicted pages
1325
1326 workingset_activate
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -07001327 Number of refaulted pages that were immediately activated
1328
Yafang Shaoa6f55762020-06-01 21:49:32 -07001329 workingset_restore
1330 Number of restored pages which have been detected as an active
1331 workingset before they got reclaimed.
1332
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -07001333 workingset_nodereclaim
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -07001334 Number of times a shadow node has been reclaimed
1335
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001336 pgrefill
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001337 Amount of scanned pages (in an active LRU list)
1338
1339 pgscan
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001340 Amount of scanned pages (in an inactive LRU list)
1341
1342 pgsteal
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001343 Amount of reclaimed pages
1344
1345 pgactivate
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001346 Amount of pages moved to the active LRU list
1347
1348 pgdeactivate
Chris Down03189e82019-11-11 14:44:38 +00001349 Amount of pages moved to the inactive LRU list
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001350
1351 pglazyfree
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001352 Amount of pages postponed to be freed under memory pressure
1353
1354 pglazyfreed
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001355 Amount of reclaimed lazyfree pages
1356
Chris Down1ff9e6e2019-03-05 15:48:09 -08001357 thp_fault_alloc
Chris Down1ff9e6e2019-03-05 15:48:09 -08001358 Number of transparent hugepages which were allocated to satisfy
1359 a page fault, including COW faults. This counter is not present
1360 when CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is not set.
1361
1362 thp_collapse_alloc
Chris Down1ff9e6e2019-03-05 15:48:09 -08001363 Number of transparent hugepages which were allocated to allow
1364 collapsing an existing range of pages. This counter is not
1365 present when CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is not set.
1366
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001367 memory.swap.current
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001368 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
1369 cgroups.
1370
1371 The total amount of swap currently being used by the cgroup
1372 and its descendants.
1373
Jakub Kicinski4b82ab42020-06-01 21:49:52 -07001374 memory.swap.high
1375 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1376 cgroups. The default is "max".
1377
1378 Swap usage throttle limit. If a cgroup's swap usage exceeds
1379 this limit, all its further allocations will be throttled to
1380 allow userspace to implement custom out-of-memory procedures.
1381
1382 This limit marks a point of no return for the cgroup. It is NOT
1383 designed to manage the amount of swapping a workload does
1384 during regular operation. Compare to memory.swap.max, which
1385 prohibits swapping past a set amount, but lets the cgroup
1386 continue unimpeded as long as other memory can be reclaimed.
1387
1388 Healthy workloads are not expected to reach this limit.
1389
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001390 memory.swap.max
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001391 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1392 cgroups. The default is "max".
1393
1394 Swap usage hard limit. If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001395 limit, anonymous memory of the cgroup will not be swapped out.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001396
Tejun Heof3a53a32018-06-07 17:05:35 -07001397 memory.swap.events
1398 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1399 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
1400 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
1401 modified event.
1402
Jakub Kicinski4b82ab42020-06-01 21:49:52 -07001403 high
1404 The number of times the cgroup's swap usage was over
1405 the high threshold.
1406
Tejun Heof3a53a32018-06-07 17:05:35 -07001407 max
1408 The number of times the cgroup's swap usage was about
1409 to go over the max boundary and swap allocation
1410 failed.
1411
1412 fail
1413 The number of times swap allocation failed either
1414 because of running out of swap system-wide or max
1415 limit.
1416
Tejun Heobe091022018-06-07 17:09:21 -07001417 When reduced under the current usage, the existing swap
1418 entries are reclaimed gradually and the swap usage may stay
1419 higher than the limit for an extended period of time. This
1420 reduces the impact on the workload and memory management.
1421
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001422 memory.pressure
1423 A read-only nested-key file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1424
1425 Shows pressure stall information for memory. See
Jakub Kicinski373e8ff2020-02-27 16:06:53 -08001426 :ref:`Documentation/accounting/psi.rst <psi>` for details.
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001427
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001428
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001429Usage Guidelines
1430~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001431
1432"memory.high" is the main mechanism to control memory usage.
1433Over-committing on high limit (sum of high limits > available memory)
1434and letting global memory pressure to distribute memory according to
1435usage is a viable strategy.
1436
1437Because breach of the high limit doesn't trigger the OOM killer but
1438throttles the offending cgroup, a management agent has ample
1439opportunities to monitor and take appropriate actions such as granting
1440more memory or terminating the workload.
1441
1442Determining whether a cgroup has enough memory is not trivial as
1443memory usage doesn't indicate whether the workload can benefit from
1444more memory. For example, a workload which writes data received from
1445network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
1446performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
1447pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
1448memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
1449memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
1450implemented yet.
1451
1452
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001453Memory Ownership
1454~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001455
1456A memory area is charged to the cgroup which instantiated it and stays
1457charged to the cgroup until the area is released. Migrating a process
1458to a different cgroup doesn't move the memory usages that it
1459instantiated while in the previous cgroup to the new cgroup.
1460
1461A memory area may be used by processes belonging to different cgroups.
1462To which cgroup the area will be charged is in-deterministic; however,
1463over time, the memory area is likely to end up in a cgroup which has
1464enough memory allowance to avoid high reclaim pressure.
1465
1466If a cgroup sweeps a considerable amount of memory which is expected
1467to be accessed repeatedly by other cgroups, it may make sense to use
1468POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED to relinquish the ownership of memory areas
1469belonging to the affected files to ensure correct memory ownership.
1470
1471
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001472IO
1473--
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001474
1475The "io" controller regulates the distribution of IO resources. This
1476controller implements both weight based and absolute bandwidth or IOPS
1477limit distribution; however, weight based distribution is available
1478only if cfq-iosched is in use and neither scheme is available for
1479blk-mq devices.
1480
1481
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001482IO Interface Files
1483~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001484
1485 io.stat
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001486 A read-only nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1487 cgroups.
1488
1489 Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered.
1490 The following nested keys are defined.
1491
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001492 ====== =====================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001493 rbytes Bytes read
1494 wbytes Bytes written
1495 rios Number of read IOs
1496 wios Number of write IOs
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001497 dbytes Bytes discarded
1498 dios Number of discard IOs
1499 ====== =====================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001500
Jakub Kicinski69654d32020-02-27 16:06:51 -08001501 An example read output follows::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001502
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001503 8:16 rbytes=1459200 wbytes=314773504 rios=192 wios=353 dbytes=0 dios=0
1504 8:0 rbytes=90430464 wbytes=299008000 rios=8950 wios=1252 dbytes=50331648 dios=3021
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001505
Tejun Heo7caa4712019-08-28 15:05:58 -07001506 io.cost.qos
1507 A read-write nested-keyed file with exists only on the root
1508 cgroup.
1509
1510 This file configures the Quality of Service of the IO cost
1511 model based controller (CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_IOCOST) which
1512 currently implements "io.weight" proportional control. Lines
1513 are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The
1514 line for a given device is populated on the first write for
1515 the device on "io.cost.qos" or "io.cost.model". The following
1516 nested keys are defined.
1517
1518 ====== =====================================
1519 enable Weight-based control enable
1520 ctrl "auto" or "user"
1521 rpct Read latency percentile [0, 100]
1522 rlat Read latency threshold
1523 wpct Write latency percentile [0, 100]
1524 wlat Write latency threshold
1525 min Minimum scaling percentage [1, 10000]
1526 max Maximum scaling percentage [1, 10000]
1527 ====== =====================================
1528
1529 The controller is disabled by default and can be enabled by
1530 setting "enable" to 1. "rpct" and "wpct" parameters default
1531 to zero and the controller uses internal device saturation
1532 state to adjust the overall IO rate between "min" and "max".
1533
1534 When a better control quality is needed, latency QoS
1535 parameters can be configured. For example::
1536
1537 8:16 enable=1 ctrl=auto rpct=95.00 rlat=75000 wpct=95.00 wlat=150000 min=50.00 max=150.0
1538
1539 shows that on sdb, the controller is enabled, will consider
1540 the device saturated if the 95th percentile of read completion
1541 latencies is above 75ms or write 150ms, and adjust the overall
1542 IO issue rate between 50% and 150% accordingly.
1543
1544 The lower the saturation point, the better the latency QoS at
1545 the cost of aggregate bandwidth. The narrower the allowed
1546 adjustment range between "min" and "max", the more conformant
1547 to the cost model the IO behavior. Note that the IO issue
1548 base rate may be far off from 100% and setting "min" and "max"
1549 blindly can lead to a significant loss of device capacity or
1550 control quality. "min" and "max" are useful for regulating
1551 devices which show wide temporary behavior changes - e.g. a
1552 ssd which accepts writes at the line speed for a while and
1553 then completely stalls for multiple seconds.
1554
1555 When "ctrl" is "auto", the parameters are controlled by the
1556 kernel and may change automatically. Setting "ctrl" to "user"
1557 or setting any of the percentile and latency parameters puts
1558 it into "user" mode and disables the automatic changes. The
1559 automatic mode can be restored by setting "ctrl" to "auto".
1560
1561 io.cost.model
1562 A read-write nested-keyed file with exists only on the root
1563 cgroup.
1564
1565 This file configures the cost model of the IO cost model based
1566 controller (CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_IOCOST) which currently
1567 implements "io.weight" proportional control. Lines are keyed
1568 by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The line for a
1569 given device is populated on the first write for the device on
1570 "io.cost.qos" or "io.cost.model". The following nested keys
1571 are defined.
1572
1573 ===== ================================
1574 ctrl "auto" or "user"
1575 model The cost model in use - "linear"
1576 ===== ================================
1577
1578 When "ctrl" is "auto", the kernel may change all parameters
1579 dynamically. When "ctrl" is set to "user" or any other
1580 parameters are written to, "ctrl" become "user" and the
1581 automatic changes are disabled.
1582
1583 When "model" is "linear", the following model parameters are
1584 defined.
1585
1586 ============= ========================================
1587 [r|w]bps The maximum sequential IO throughput
1588 [r|w]seqiops The maximum 4k sequential IOs per second
1589 [r|w]randiops The maximum 4k random IOs per second
1590 ============= ========================================
1591
1592 From the above, the builtin linear model determines the base
1593 costs of a sequential and random IO and the cost coefficient
1594 for the IO size. While simple, this model can cover most
1595 common device classes acceptably.
1596
1597 The IO cost model isn't expected to be accurate in absolute
1598 sense and is scaled to the device behavior dynamically.
1599
Tejun Heo8504dea2019-08-28 15:06:00 -07001600 If needed, tools/cgroup/iocost_coef_gen.py can be used to
1601 generate device-specific coefficients.
1602
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001603 io.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001604 A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1605 The default is "default 100".
1606
1607 The first line is the default weight applied to devices
1608 without specific override. The rest are overrides keyed by
1609 $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The weights are in
1610 the range [1, 10000] and specifies the relative amount IO time
1611 the cgroup can use in relation to its siblings.
1612
1613 The default weight can be updated by writing either "default
1614 $WEIGHT" or simply "$WEIGHT". Overrides can be set by writing
1615 "$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" and unset by writing "$MAJ:$MIN default".
1616
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001617 An example read output follows::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001618
1619 default 100
1620 8:16 200
1621 8:0 50
1622
1623 io.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001624 A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1625 cgroups.
1626
1627 BPS and IOPS based IO limit. Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN
1628 device numbers and not ordered. The following nested keys are
1629 defined.
1630
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001631 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001632 rbps Max read bytes per second
1633 wbps Max write bytes per second
1634 riops Max read IO operations per second
1635 wiops Max write IO operations per second
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001636 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001637
1638 When writing, any number of nested key-value pairs can be
1639 specified in any order. "max" can be specified as the value
1640 to remove a specific limit. If the same key is specified
1641 multiple times, the outcome is undefined.
1642
1643 BPS and IOPS are measured in each IO direction and IOs are
1644 delayed if limit is reached. Temporary bursts are allowed.
1645
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001646 Setting read limit at 2M BPS and write at 120 IOPS for 8:16::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001647
1648 echo "8:16 rbps=2097152 wiops=120" > io.max
1649
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001650 Reading returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001651
1652 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=120
1653
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001654 Write IOPS limit can be removed by writing the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001655
1656 echo "8:16 wiops=max" > io.max
1657
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001658 Reading now returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001659
1660 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=max
1661
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001662 io.pressure
1663 A read-only nested-key file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1664
1665 Shows pressure stall information for IO. See
Jakub Kicinski373e8ff2020-02-27 16:06:53 -08001666 :ref:`Documentation/accounting/psi.rst <psi>` for details.
Johannes Weiner2ce71352018-10-26 15:06:31 -07001667
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001668
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001669Writeback
1670~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001671
1672Page cache is dirtied through buffered writes and shared mmaps and
1673written asynchronously to the backing filesystem by the writeback
1674mechanism. Writeback sits between the memory and IO domains and
1675regulates the proportion of dirty memory by balancing dirtying and
1676write IOs.
1677
1678The io controller, in conjunction with the memory controller,
1679implements control of page cache writeback IOs. The memory controller
1680defines the memory domain that dirty memory ratio is calculated and
1681maintained for and the io controller defines the io domain which
1682writes out dirty pages for the memory domain. Both system-wide and
1683per-cgroup dirty memory states are examined and the more restrictive
1684of the two is enforced.
1685
1686cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying
1687filesystem. Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4
1688and btrfs. On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are attributed to
1689the root cgroup.
1690
1691There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management
1692which affects how cgroup ownership is tracked. Memory is tracked per
1693page while writeback per inode. For the purpose of writeback, an
1694inode is assigned to a cgroup and all IO requests to write dirty pages
1695from the inode are attributed to that cgroup.
1696
1697As cgroup ownership for memory is tracked per page, there can be pages
1698which are associated with different cgroups than the one the inode is
1699associated with. These are called foreign pages. The writeback
1700constantly keeps track of foreign pages and, if a particular foreign
1701cgroup becomes the majority over a certain period of time, switches
1702the ownership of the inode to that cgroup.
1703
1704While this model is enough for most use cases where a given inode is
1705mostly dirtied by a single cgroup even when the main writing cgroup
1706changes over time, use cases where multiple cgroups write to a single
1707inode simultaneously are not supported well. In such circumstances, a
1708significant portion of IOs are likely to be attributed incorrectly.
1709As memory controller assigns page ownership on the first use and
1710doesn't update it until the page is released, even if writeback
1711strictly follows page ownership, multiple cgroups dirtying overlapping
1712areas wouldn't work as expected. It's recommended to avoid such usage
1713patterns.
1714
1715The sysctl knobs which affect writeback behavior are applied to cgroup
1716writeback as follows.
1717
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001718 vm.dirty_background_ratio, vm.dirty_ratio
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001719 These ratios apply the same to cgroup writeback with the
1720 amount of available memory capped by limits imposed by the
1721 memory controller and system-wide clean memory.
1722
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001723 vm.dirty_background_bytes, vm.dirty_bytes
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001724 For cgroup writeback, this is calculated into ratio against
1725 total available memory and applied the same way as
1726 vm.dirty[_background]_ratio.
1727
1728
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001729IO Latency
1730~~~~~~~~~~
1731
1732This is a cgroup v2 controller for IO workload protection. You provide a group
1733with a latency target, and if the average latency exceeds that target the
1734controller will throttle any peers that have a lower latency target than the
1735protected workload.
1736
1737The limits are only applied at the peer level in the hierarchy. This means that
1738in the diagram below, only groups A, B, and C will influence each other, and
Randy Dunlap34b43442019-02-06 16:59:00 -08001739groups D and F will influence each other. Group G will influence nobody::
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001740
1741 [root]
1742 / | \
1743 A B C
1744 / \ |
1745 D F G
1746
1747
1748So the ideal way to configure this is to set io.latency in groups A, B, and C.
1749Generally you do not want to set a value lower than the latency your device
1750supports. Experiment to find the value that works best for your workload.
1751Start at higher than the expected latency for your device and watch the
Dennis Zhou (Facebook)c480bcf2018-08-01 23:15:41 -07001752avg_lat value in io.stat for your workload group to get an idea of the
1753latency you see during normal operation. Use the avg_lat value as a basis for
1754your real setting, setting at 10-15% higher than the value in io.stat.
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001755
1756How IO Latency Throttling Works
1757~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1758
1759io.latency is work conserving; so as long as everybody is meeting their latency
1760target the controller doesn't do anything. Once a group starts missing its
1761target it begins throttling any peer group that has a higher target than itself.
1762This throttling takes 2 forms:
1763
1764- Queue depth throttling. This is the number of outstanding IO's a group is
1765 allowed to have. We will clamp down relatively quickly, starting at no limit
1766 and going all the way down to 1 IO at a time.
1767
1768- Artificial delay induction. There are certain types of IO that cannot be
1769 throttled without possibly adversely affecting higher priority groups. This
1770 includes swapping and metadata IO. These types of IO are allowed to occur
1771 normally, however they are "charged" to the originating group. If the
1772 originating group is being throttled you will see the use_delay and delay
1773 fields in io.stat increase. The delay value is how many microseconds that are
1774 being added to any process that runs in this group. Because this number can
1775 grow quite large if there is a lot of swapping or metadata IO occurring we
1776 limit the individual delay events to 1 second at a time.
1777
1778Once the victimized group starts meeting its latency target again it will start
1779unthrottling any peer groups that were throttled previously. If the victimized
1780group simply stops doing IO the global counter will unthrottle appropriately.
1781
1782IO Latency Interface Files
1783~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1784
1785 io.latency
1786 This takes a similar format as the other controllers.
1787
1788 "MAJOR:MINOR target=<target time in microseconds"
1789
1790 io.stat
1791 If the controller is enabled you will see extra stats in io.stat in
1792 addition to the normal ones.
1793
1794 depth
1795 This is the current queue depth for the group.
1796
1797 avg_lat
Dennis Zhou (Facebook)c480bcf2018-08-01 23:15:41 -07001798 This is an exponential moving average with a decay rate of 1/exp
1799 bound by the sampling interval. The decay rate interval can be
1800 calculated by multiplying the win value in io.stat by the
1801 corresponding number of samples based on the win value.
1802
1803 win
1804 The sampling window size in milliseconds. This is the minimum
1805 duration of time between evaluation events. Windows only elapse
1806 with IO activity. Idle periods extend the most recent window.
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001807
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001808PID
1809---
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001810
1811The process number controller is used to allow a cgroup to stop any
1812new tasks from being fork()'d or clone()'d after a specified limit is
1813reached.
1814
1815The number of tasks in a cgroup can be exhausted in ways which other
1816controllers cannot prevent, thus warranting its own controller. For
1817example, a fork bomb is likely to exhaust the number of tasks before
1818hitting memory restrictions.
1819
1820Note that PIDs used in this controller refer to TIDs, process IDs as
1821used by the kernel.
1822
1823
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001824PID Interface Files
1825~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001826
1827 pids.max
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001828 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1829 cgroups. The default is "max".
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001830
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001831 Hard limit of number of processes.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001832
1833 pids.current
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001834 A read-only single value file which exists on all cgroups.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001835
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001836 The number of processes currently in the cgroup and its
1837 descendants.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001838
1839Organisational operations are not blocked by cgroup policies, so it is
1840possible to have pids.current > pids.max. This can be done by either
1841setting the limit to be smaller than pids.current, or attaching enough
1842processes to the cgroup such that pids.current is larger than
1843pids.max. However, it is not possible to violate a cgroup PID policy
1844through fork() or clone(). These will return -EAGAIN if the creation
1845of a new process would cause a cgroup policy to be violated.
1846
1847
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001848Cpuset
1849------
1850
1851The "cpuset" controller provides a mechanism for constraining
1852the CPU and memory node placement of tasks to only the resources
1853specified in the cpuset interface files in a task's current cgroup.
1854This is especially valuable on large NUMA systems where placing jobs
1855on properly sized subsets of the systems with careful processor and
1856memory placement to reduce cross-node memory access and contention
1857can improve overall system performance.
1858
1859The "cpuset" controller is hierarchical. That means the controller
1860cannot use CPUs or memory nodes not allowed in its parent.
1861
1862
1863Cpuset Interface Files
1864~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1865
1866 cpuset.cpus
1867 A read-write multiple values file which exists on non-root
1868 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1869
1870 It lists the requested CPUs to be used by tasks within this
1871 cgroup. The actual list of CPUs to be granted, however, is
1872 subjected to constraints imposed by its parent and can differ
1873 from the requested CPUs.
1874
1875 The CPU numbers are comma-separated numbers or ranges.
Jakub Kicinskif3431ba2020-02-27 16:06:52 -08001876 For example::
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001877
1878 # cat cpuset.cpus
1879 0-4,6,8-10
1880
1881 An empty value indicates that the cgroup is using the same
1882 setting as the nearest cgroup ancestor with a non-empty
1883 "cpuset.cpus" or all the available CPUs if none is found.
1884
1885 The value of "cpuset.cpus" stays constant until the next update
1886 and won't be affected by any CPU hotplug events.
1887
1888 cpuset.cpus.effective
Waiman Long5776cec2018-11-08 10:08:43 -05001889 A read-only multiple values file which exists on all
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001890 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1891
1892 It lists the onlined CPUs that are actually granted to this
1893 cgroup by its parent. These CPUs are allowed to be used by
1894 tasks within the current cgroup.
1895
1896 If "cpuset.cpus" is empty, the "cpuset.cpus.effective" file shows
1897 all the CPUs from the parent cgroup that can be available to
1898 be used by this cgroup. Otherwise, it should be a subset of
1899 "cpuset.cpus" unless none of the CPUs listed in "cpuset.cpus"
1900 can be granted. In this case, it will be treated just like an
1901 empty "cpuset.cpus".
1902
1903 Its value will be affected by CPU hotplug events.
1904
1905 cpuset.mems
1906 A read-write multiple values file which exists on non-root
1907 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1908
1909 It lists the requested memory nodes to be used by tasks within
1910 this cgroup. The actual list of memory nodes granted, however,
1911 is subjected to constraints imposed by its parent and can differ
1912 from the requested memory nodes.
1913
1914 The memory node numbers are comma-separated numbers or ranges.
Jakub Kicinskif3431ba2020-02-27 16:06:52 -08001915 For example::
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001916
1917 # cat cpuset.mems
1918 0-1,3
1919
1920 An empty value indicates that the cgroup is using the same
1921 setting as the nearest cgroup ancestor with a non-empty
1922 "cpuset.mems" or all the available memory nodes if none
1923 is found.
1924
1925 The value of "cpuset.mems" stays constant until the next update
1926 and won't be affected by any memory nodes hotplug events.
1927
1928 cpuset.mems.effective
Waiman Long5776cec2018-11-08 10:08:43 -05001929 A read-only multiple values file which exists on all
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05001930 cpuset-enabled cgroups.
1931
1932 It lists the onlined memory nodes that are actually granted to
1933 this cgroup by its parent. These memory nodes are allowed to
1934 be used by tasks within the current cgroup.
1935
1936 If "cpuset.mems" is empty, it shows all the memory nodes from the
1937 parent cgroup that will be available to be used by this cgroup.
1938 Otherwise, it should be a subset of "cpuset.mems" unless none of
1939 the memory nodes listed in "cpuset.mems" can be granted. In this
1940 case, it will be treated just like an empty "cpuset.mems".
1941
1942 Its value will be affected by memory nodes hotplug events.
1943
Tejun Heob1e3aeb2018-11-13 12:03:33 -08001944 cpuset.cpus.partition
Waiman Long90e92f22018-11-08 10:08:45 -05001945 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1946 cpuset-enabled cgroups. This flag is owned by the parent cgroup
1947 and is not delegatable.
1948
1949 It accepts only the following input values when written to.
1950
Jon Haslam6ee0fac2019-09-25 12:56:04 -07001951 "root" - a partition root
Tejun Heob1e3aeb2018-11-13 12:03:33 -08001952 "member" - a non-root member of a partition
Waiman Long90e92f22018-11-08 10:08:45 -05001953
1954 When set to be a partition root, the current cgroup is the
1955 root of a new partition or scheduling domain that comprises
1956 itself and all its descendants except those that are separate
1957 partition roots themselves and their descendants. The root
1958 cgroup is always a partition root.
1959
1960 There are constraints on where a partition root can be set.
1961 It can only be set in a cgroup if all the following conditions
1962 are true.
1963
1964 1) The "cpuset.cpus" is not empty and the list of CPUs are
1965 exclusive, i.e. they are not shared by any of its siblings.
1966 2) The parent cgroup is a partition root.
1967 3) The "cpuset.cpus" is also a proper subset of the parent's
1968 "cpuset.cpus.effective".
1969 4) There is no child cgroups with cpuset enabled. This is for
1970 eliminating corner cases that have to be handled if such a
1971 condition is allowed.
1972
1973 Setting it to partition root will take the CPUs away from the
1974 effective CPUs of the parent cgroup. Once it is set, this
1975 file cannot be reverted back to "member" if there are any child
1976 cgroups with cpuset enabled.
1977
1978 A parent partition cannot distribute all its CPUs to its
1979 child partitions. There must be at least one cpu left in the
1980 parent partition.
1981
1982 Once becoming a partition root, changes to "cpuset.cpus" is
1983 generally allowed as long as the first condition above is true,
1984 the change will not take away all the CPUs from the parent
1985 partition and the new "cpuset.cpus" value is a superset of its
1986 children's "cpuset.cpus" values.
1987
1988 Sometimes, external factors like changes to ancestors'
1989 "cpuset.cpus" or cpu hotplug can cause the state of the partition
1990 root to change. On read, the "cpuset.sched.partition" file
1991 can show the following values.
1992
1993 "member" Non-root member of a partition
1994 "root" Partition root
1995 "root invalid" Invalid partition root
1996
1997 It is a partition root if the first 2 partition root conditions
1998 above are true and at least one CPU from "cpuset.cpus" is
1999 granted by the parent cgroup.
2000
2001 A partition root can become invalid if none of CPUs requested
2002 in "cpuset.cpus" can be granted by the parent cgroup or the
2003 parent cgroup is no longer a partition root itself. In this
2004 case, it is not a real partition even though the restriction
2005 of the first partition root condition above will still apply.
2006 The cpu affinity of all the tasks in the cgroup will then be
2007 associated with CPUs in the nearest ancestor partition.
2008
2009 An invalid partition root can be transitioned back to a
2010 real partition root if at least one of the requested CPUs
2011 can now be granted by its parent. In this case, the cpu
2012 affinity of all the tasks in the formerly invalid partition
2013 will be associated to the CPUs of the newly formed partition.
2014 Changing the partition state of an invalid partition root to
2015 "member" is always allowed even if child cpusets are present.
2016
Waiman Long4ec22e92018-11-08 10:08:35 -05002017
Roman Gushchin4ad5a322017-12-13 19:49:03 +00002018Device controller
2019-----------------
2020
2021Device controller manages access to device files. It includes both
2022creation of new device files (using mknod), and access to the
2023existing device files.
2024
2025Cgroup v2 device controller has no interface files and is implemented
2026on top of cgroup BPF. To control access to device files, a user may
2027create bpf programs of the BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE type and attach them
2028to cgroups. On an attempt to access a device file, corresponding
2029BPF programs will be executed, and depending on the return value
2030the attempt will succeed or fail with -EPERM.
2031
2032A BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program takes a pointer to the bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx
2033structure, which describes the device access attempt: access type
2034(mknod/read/write) and device (type, major and minor numbers).
2035If the program returns 0, the attempt fails with -EPERM, otherwise
2036it succeeds.
2037
2038An example of BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program may be found in the kernel
2039source tree in the tools/testing/selftests/bpf/dev_cgroup.c file.
2040
2041
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002042RDMA
2043----
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05002044
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00002045The "rdma" controller regulates the distribution and accounting of
2046of RDMA resources.
2047
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002048RDMA Interface Files
2049~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00002050
2051 rdma.max
2052 A readwrite nested-keyed file that exists for all the cgroups
2053 except root that describes current configured resource limit
2054 for a RDMA/IB device.
2055
2056 Lines are keyed by device name and are not ordered.
2057 Each line contains space separated resource name and its configured
2058 limit that can be distributed.
2059
2060 The following nested keys are defined.
2061
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002062 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00002063 hca_handle Maximum number of HCA Handles
2064 hca_object Maximum number of HCA Objects
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002065 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00002066
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002067 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00002068
2069 mlx4_0 hca_handle=2 hca_object=2000
2070 ocrdma1 hca_handle=3 hca_object=max
2071
2072 rdma.current
2073 A read-only file that describes current resource usage.
2074 It exists for all the cgroup except root.
2075
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002076 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00002077
2078 mlx4_0 hca_handle=1 hca_object=20
2079 ocrdma1 hca_handle=1 hca_object=23
2080
Giuseppe Scrivanofaced7e2019-12-16 20:38:31 +01002081HugeTLB
2082-------
2083
2084The HugeTLB controller allows to limit the HugeTLB usage per control group and
2085enforces the controller limit during page fault.
2086
2087HugeTLB Interface Files
2088~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2089
2090 hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.current
2091 Show current usage for "hugepagesize" hugetlb. It exists for all
2092 the cgroup except root.
2093
2094 hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.max
2095 Set/show the hard limit of "hugepagesize" hugetlb usage.
2096 The default value is "max". It exists for all the cgroup except root.
2097
2098 hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.events
2099 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
2100
2101 max
2102 The number of allocation failure due to HugeTLB limit
2103
2104 hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.events.local
2105 Similar to hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.events but the fields in the file
2106 are local to the cgroup i.e. not hierarchical. The file modified event
2107 generated on this file reflects only the local events.
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00002108
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002109Misc
2110----
Tejun Heo63f1ca52017-02-02 13:50:35 -05002111
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002112perf_event
2113~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05002114
2115perf_event controller, if not mounted on a legacy hierarchy, is
2116automatically enabled on the v2 hierarchy so that perf events can
2117always be filtered by cgroup v2 path. The controller can still be
2118moved to a legacy hierarchy after v2 hierarchy is populated.
2119
2120
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +01002121Non-normative information
2122-------------------------
2123
2124This section contains information that isn't considered to be a part of
2125the stable kernel API and so is subject to change.
2126
2127
2128CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
2129~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2130
2131When distributing CPU cycles in the root cgroup each thread in this
2132cgroup is treated as if it was hosted in a separate child cgroup of the
2133root cgroup. This child cgroup weight is dependent on its thread nice
2134level.
2135
2136For details of this mapping see sched_prio_to_weight array in
2137kernel/sched/core.c file (values from this array should be scaled
2138appropriately so the neutral - nice 0 - value is 100 instead of 1024).
2139
2140
2141IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
2142~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2143
2144Root cgroup processes are hosted in an implicit leaf child node.
2145When distributing IO resources this implicit child node is taken into
2146account as if it was a normal child cgroup of the root cgroup with a
2147weight value of 200.
2148
2149
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002150Namespace
2151=========
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002152
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002153Basics
2154------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002155
2156cgroup namespace provides a mechanism to virtualize the view of the
2157"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file and cgroup mounts. The CLONE_NEWCGROUP clone
2158flag can be used with clone(2) and unshare(2) to create a new cgroup
2159namespace. The process running inside the cgroup namespace will have
2160its "/proc/$PID/cgroup" output restricted to cgroupns root. The
2161cgroupns root is the cgroup of the process at the time of creation of
2162the cgroup namespace.
2163
2164Without cgroup namespace, the "/proc/$PID/cgroup" file shows the
2165complete path of the cgroup of a process. In a container setup where
2166a set of cgroups and namespaces are intended to isolate processes the
2167"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file may leak potential system level information
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002168to the isolated processes. For Example::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002169
2170 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
2171 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
2172
2173The path '/batchjobs/container_id1' can be considered as system-data
2174and undesirable to expose to the isolated processes. cgroup namespace
2175can be used to restrict visibility of this path. For example, before
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002176creating a cgroup namespace, one would see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002177
2178 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
2179 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:37 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026531835]
2180 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
2181 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
2182
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002183After unsharing a new namespace, the view changes::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002184
2185 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
2186 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:35 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026532183]
2187 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
2188 0::/
2189
2190When some thread from a multi-threaded process unshares its cgroup
2191namespace, the new cgroupns gets applied to the entire process (all
2192the threads). This is natural for the v2 hierarchy; however, for the
2193legacy hierarchies, this may be unexpected.
2194
2195A cgroup namespace is alive as long as there are processes inside or
2196mounts pinning it. When the last usage goes away, the cgroup
2197namespace is destroyed. The cgroupns root and the actual cgroups
2198remain.
2199
2200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002201The Root and Views
2202------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002203
2204The 'cgroupns root' for a cgroup namespace is the cgroup in which the
2205process calling unshare(2) is running. For example, if a process in
2206/batchjobs/container_id1 cgroup calls unshare, cgroup
2207/batchjobs/container_id1 becomes the cgroupns root. For the
2208init_cgroup_ns, this is the real root ('/') cgroup.
2209
2210The cgroupns root cgroup does not change even if the namespace creator
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002211process later moves to a different cgroup::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002212
2213 # ~/unshare -c # unshare cgroupns in some cgroup
2214 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
2215 0::/
2216 # mkdir sub_cgrp_1
2217 # echo 0 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
2218 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
2219 0::/sub_cgrp_1
2220
2221Each process gets its namespace-specific view of "/proc/$PID/cgroup"
2222
2223Processes running inside the cgroup namespace will be able to see
2224cgroup paths (in /proc/self/cgroup) only inside their root cgroup.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002225From within an unshared cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002226
2227 # sleep 100000 &
2228 [1] 7353
2229 # echo 7353 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
2230 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
2231 0::/sub_cgrp_1
2232
2233From the initial cgroup namespace, the real cgroup path will be
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002234visible::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002235
2236 $ cat /proc/7353/cgroup
2237 0::/batchjobs/container_id1/sub_cgrp_1
2238
2239From a sibling cgroup namespace (that is, a namespace rooted at a
2240different cgroup), the cgroup path relative to its own cgroup
2241namespace root will be shown. For instance, if PID 7353's cgroup
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002242namespace root is at '/batchjobs/container_id2', then it will see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002243
2244 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
2245 0::/../container_id2/sub_cgrp_1
2246
2247Note that the relative path always starts with '/' to indicate that
2248its relative to the cgroup namespace root of the caller.
2249
2250
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002251Migration and setns(2)
2252----------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002253
2254Processes inside a cgroup namespace can move into and out of the
2255namespace root if they have proper access to external cgroups. For
2256example, from inside a namespace with cgroupns root at
2257/batchjobs/container_id1, and assuming that the global hierarchy is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002258still accessible inside cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002259
2260 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
2261 0::/sub_cgrp_1
2262 # echo 7353 > batchjobs/container_id2/cgroup.procs
2263 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
2264 0::/../container_id2
2265
2266Note that this kind of setup is not encouraged. A task inside cgroup
2267namespace should only be exposed to its own cgroupns hierarchy.
2268
2269setns(2) to another cgroup namespace is allowed when:
2270
2271(a) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its current user namespace
2272(b) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against the target cgroup
2273 namespace's userns
2274
2275No implicit cgroup changes happen with attaching to another cgroup
2276namespace. It is expected that the someone moves the attaching
2277process under the target cgroup namespace root.
2278
2279
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002280Interaction with Other Namespaces
2281---------------------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002282
2283Namespace specific cgroup hierarchy can be mounted by a process
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002284running inside a non-init cgroup namespace::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06002285
2286 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
2287
2288This will mount the unified cgroup hierarchy with cgroupns root as the
2289filesystem root. The process needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its user and
2290mount namespaces.
2291
2292The virtualization of /proc/self/cgroup file combined with restricting
2293the view of cgroup hierarchy by namespace-private cgroupfs mount
2294provides a properly isolated cgroup view inside the container.
2295
2296
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002297Information on Kernel Programming
2298=================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002299
2300This section contains kernel programming information in the areas
2301where interacting with cgroup is necessary. cgroup core and
2302controllers are not covered.
2303
2304
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002305Filesystem Support for Writeback
2306--------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002307
2308A filesystem can support cgroup writeback by updating
2309address_space_operations->writepage[s]() to annotate bio's using the
2310following two functions.
2311
2312 wbc_init_bio(@wbc, @bio)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002313 Should be called for each bio carrying writeback data and
Dennis Zhoufd42df32018-12-05 12:10:34 -05002314 associates the bio with the inode's owner cgroup and the
2315 corresponding request queue. This must be called after
2316 a queue (device) has been associated with the bio and
2317 before submission.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002318
Tejun Heo34e51a52019-06-27 13:39:49 -07002319 wbc_account_cgroup_owner(@wbc, @page, @bytes)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002320 Should be called for each data segment being written out.
2321 While this function doesn't care exactly when it's called
2322 during the writeback session, it's the easiest and most
2323 natural to call it as data segments are added to a bio.
2324
2325With writeback bio's annotated, cgroup support can be enabled per
2326super_block by setting SB_I_CGROUPWB in ->s_iflags. This allows for
2327selective disabling of cgroup writeback support which is helpful when
2328certain filesystem features, e.g. journaled data mode, are
2329incompatible.
2330
2331wbc_init_bio() binds the specified bio to its cgroup. Depending on
2332the configuration, the bio may be executed at a lower priority and if
2333the writeback session is holding shared resources, e.g. a journal
2334entry, may lead to priority inversion. There is no one easy solution
2335for the problem. Filesystems can try to work around specific problem
Dennis Zhoufd42df32018-12-05 12:10:34 -05002336cases by skipping wbc_init_bio() and using bio_associate_blkg()
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002337directly.
2338
2339
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002340Deprecated v1 Core Features
2341===========================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002342
2343- Multiple hierarchies including named ones are not supported.
2344
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -04002345- All v1 mount options are not supported.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002346
2347- The "tasks" file is removed and "cgroup.procs" is not sorted.
2348
2349- "cgroup.clone_children" is removed.
2350
2351- /proc/cgroups is meaningless for v2. Use "cgroup.controllers" file
2352 at the root instead.
2353
2354
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002355Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
2356====================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002357
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002358Multiple Hierarchies
2359--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002360
2361cgroup v1 allowed an arbitrary number of hierarchies and each
2362hierarchy could host any number of controllers. While this seemed to
2363provide a high level of flexibility, it wasn't useful in practice.
2364
2365For example, as there is only one instance of each controller, utility
2366type controllers such as freezer which can be useful in all
2367hierarchies could only be used in one. The issue is exacerbated by
2368the fact that controllers couldn't be moved to another hierarchy once
2369hierarchies were populated. Another issue was that all controllers
2370bound to a hierarchy were forced to have exactly the same view of the
2371hierarchy. It wasn't possible to vary the granularity depending on
2372the specific controller.
2373
2374In practice, these issues heavily limited which controllers could be
2375put on the same hierarchy and most configurations resorted to putting
2376each controller on its own hierarchy. Only closely related ones, such
2377as the cpu and cpuacct controllers, made sense to be put on the same
2378hierarchy. This often meant that userland ended up managing multiple
2379similar hierarchies repeating the same steps on each hierarchy
2380whenever a hierarchy management operation was necessary.
2381
2382Furthermore, support for multiple hierarchies came at a steep cost.
2383It greatly complicated cgroup core implementation but more importantly
2384the support for multiple hierarchies restricted how cgroup could be
2385used in general and what controllers was able to do.
2386
2387There was no limit on how many hierarchies there might be, which meant
2388that a thread's cgroup membership couldn't be described in finite
2389length. The key might contain any number of entries and was unlimited
2390in length, which made it highly awkward to manipulate and led to
2391addition of controllers which existed only to identify membership,
2392which in turn exacerbated the original problem of proliferating number
2393of hierarchies.
2394
2395Also, as a controller couldn't have any expectation regarding the
2396topologies of hierarchies other controllers might be on, each
2397controller had to assume that all other controllers were attached to
2398completely orthogonal hierarchies. This made it impossible, or at
2399least very cumbersome, for controllers to cooperate with each other.
2400
2401In most use cases, putting controllers on hierarchies which are
2402completely orthogonal to each other isn't necessary. What usually is
2403called for is the ability to have differing levels of granularity
2404depending on the specific controller. In other words, hierarchy may
2405be collapsed from leaf towards root when viewed from specific
2406controllers. For example, a given configuration might not care about
2407how memory is distributed beyond a certain level while still wanting
2408to control how CPU cycles are distributed.
2409
2410
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002411Thread Granularity
2412------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002413
2414cgroup v1 allowed threads of a process to belong to different cgroups.
2415This didn't make sense for some controllers and those controllers
2416ended up implementing different ways to ignore such situations but
2417much more importantly it blurred the line between API exposed to
2418individual applications and system management interface.
2419
2420Generally, in-process knowledge is available only to the process
2421itself; thus, unlike service-level organization of processes,
2422categorizing threads of a process requires active participation from
2423the application which owns the target process.
2424
2425cgroup v1 had an ambiguously defined delegation model which got abused
2426in combination with thread granularity. cgroups were delegated to
2427individual applications so that they can create and manage their own
2428sub-hierarchies and control resource distributions along them. This
2429effectively raised cgroup to the status of a syscall-like API exposed
2430to lay programs.
2431
2432First of all, cgroup has a fundamentally inadequate interface to be
2433exposed this way. For a process to access its own knobs, it has to
2434extract the path on the target hierarchy from /proc/self/cgroup,
2435construct the path by appending the name of the knob to the path, open
2436and then read and/or write to it. This is not only extremely clunky
2437and unusual but also inherently racy. There is no conventional way to
2438define transaction across the required steps and nothing can guarantee
2439that the process would actually be operating on its own sub-hierarchy.
2440
2441cgroup controllers implemented a number of knobs which would never be
2442accepted as public APIs because they were just adding control knobs to
2443system-management pseudo filesystem. cgroup ended up with interface
2444knobs which were not properly abstracted or refined and directly
2445revealed kernel internal details. These knobs got exposed to
2446individual applications through the ill-defined delegation mechanism
2447effectively abusing cgroup as a shortcut to implementing public APIs
2448without going through the required scrutiny.
2449
2450This was painful for both userland and kernel. Userland ended up with
2451misbehaving and poorly abstracted interfaces and kernel exposing and
2452locked into constructs inadvertently.
2453
2454
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002455Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
2456-------------------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002457
2458cgroup v1 allowed threads to be in any cgroups which created an
2459interesting problem where threads belonging to a parent cgroup and its
2460children cgroups competed for resources. This was nasty as two
2461different types of entities competed and there was no obvious way to
2462settle it. Different controllers did different things.
2463
2464The cpu controller considered threads and cgroups as equivalents and
2465mapped nice levels to cgroup weights. This worked for some cases but
2466fell flat when children wanted to be allocated specific ratios of CPU
2467cycles and the number of internal threads fluctuated - the ratios
2468constantly changed as the number of competing entities fluctuated.
2469There also were other issues. The mapping from nice level to weight
2470wasn't obvious or universal, and there were various other knobs which
2471simply weren't available for threads.
2472
2473The io controller implicitly created a hidden leaf node for each
2474cgroup to host the threads. The hidden leaf had its own copies of all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002475the knobs with ``leaf_`` prefixed. While this allowed equivalent
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002476control over internal threads, it was with serious drawbacks. It
2477always added an extra layer of nesting which wouldn't be necessary
2478otherwise, made the interface messy and significantly complicated the
2479implementation.
2480
2481The memory controller didn't have a way to control what happened
2482between internal tasks and child cgroups and the behavior was not
2483clearly defined. There were attempts to add ad-hoc behaviors and
2484knobs to tailor the behavior to specific workloads which would have
2485led to problems extremely difficult to resolve in the long term.
2486
2487Multiple controllers struggled with internal tasks and came up with
2488different ways to deal with it; unfortunately, all the approaches were
2489severely flawed and, furthermore, the widely different behaviors
2490made cgroup as a whole highly inconsistent.
2491
2492This clearly is a problem which needs to be addressed from cgroup core
2493in a uniform way.
2494
2495
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002496Other Interface Issues
2497----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002498
2499cgroup v1 grew without oversight and developed a large number of
2500idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies. One issue on the cgroup core side
2501was how an empty cgroup was notified - a userland helper binary was
2502forked and executed for each event. The event delivery wasn't
2503recursive or delegatable. The limitations of the mechanism also led
2504to in-kernel event delivery filtering mechanism further complicating
2505the interface.
2506
2507Controller interfaces were problematic too. An extreme example is
2508controllers completely ignoring hierarchical organization and treating
2509all cgroups as if they were all located directly under the root
2510cgroup. Some controllers exposed a large amount of inconsistent
2511implementation details to userland.
2512
2513There also was no consistency across controllers. When a new cgroup
2514was created, some controllers defaulted to not imposing extra
2515restrictions while others disallowed any resource usage until
2516explicitly configured. Configuration knobs for the same type of
2517control used widely differing naming schemes and formats. Statistics
2518and information knobs were named arbitrarily and used different
2519formats and units even in the same controller.
2520
2521cgroup v2 establishes common conventions where appropriate and updates
2522controllers so that they expose minimal and consistent interfaces.
2523
2524
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002525Controller Issues and Remedies
2526------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002527
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002528Memory
2529~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002530
2531The original lower boundary, the soft limit, is defined as a limit
2532that is per default unset. As a result, the set of cgroups that
2533global reclaim prefers is opt-in, rather than opt-out. The costs for
2534optimizing these mostly negative lookups are so high that the
2535implementation, despite its enormous size, does not even provide the
2536basic desirable behavior. First off, the soft limit has no
2537hierarchical meaning. All configured groups are organized in a global
2538rbtree and treated like equal peers, regardless where they are located
2539in the hierarchy. This makes subtree delegation impossible. Second,
2540the soft limit reclaim pass is so aggressive that it not just
2541introduces high allocation latencies into the system, but also impacts
2542system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature
2543becomes self-defeating.
2544
2545The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
Chris Down9783aa92019-10-06 17:58:32 -07002546reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it's within its
2547effective low, which makes delegation of subtrees possible. It also
2548enjoys having reclaim pressure proportional to its overage when
2549above its effective low.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002550
2551The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict
2552limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called.
2553But this generally goes against the goal of making the most out of the
2554available memory. The memory consumption of workloads varies during
2555runtime, and that requires users to overcommit. But doing that with a
2556strict upper limit requires either a fairly accurate prediction of the
2557working set size or adding slack to the limit. Since working set size
2558estimation is hard and error prone, and getting it wrong results in
2559OOM kills, most users tend to err on the side of a looser limit and
2560end up wasting precious resources.
2561
2562The memory.high boundary on the other hand can be set much more
2563conservatively. When hit, it throttles allocations by forcing them
2564into direct reclaim to work off the excess, but it never invokes the
2565OOM killer. As a result, a high boundary that is chosen too
2566aggressively will not terminate the processes, but instead it will
2567lead to gradual performance degradation. The user can monitor this
2568and make corrections until the minimal memory footprint that still
2569gives acceptable performance is found.
2570
2571In extreme cases, with many concurrent allocations and a complete
2572breakdown of reclaim progress within the group, the high boundary can
2573be exceeded. But even then it's mostly better to satisfy the
2574allocation from the slack available in other groups or the rest of the
2575system than killing the group. Otherwise, memory.max is there to
2576limit this type of spillover and ultimately contain buggy or even
2577malicious applications.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08002578
Johannes Weinerb6e6edc2016-03-17 14:20:28 -07002579Setting the original memory.limit_in_bytes below the current usage was
2580subject to a race condition, where concurrent charges could cause the
2581limit setting to fail. memory.max on the other hand will first set the
2582limit to prevent new charges, and then reclaim and OOM kill until the
2583new limit is met - or the task writing to memory.max is killed.
2584
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08002585The combined memory+swap accounting and limiting is replaced by real
2586control over swap space.
2587
2588The main argument for a combined memory+swap facility in the original
2589cgroup design was that global or parental pressure would always be
2590able to swap all anonymous memory of a child group, regardless of the
2591child's own (possibly untrusted) configuration. However, untrusted
2592groups can sabotage swapping by other means - such as referencing its
2593anonymous memory in a tight loop - and an admin can not assume full
2594swappability when overcommitting untrusted jobs.
2595
2596For trusted jobs, on the other hand, a combined counter is not an
2597intuitive userspace interface, and it flies in the face of the idea
2598that cgroup controllers should account and limit specific physical
2599resources. Swap space is a resource like all others in the system,
2600and that's why unified hierarchy allows distributing it separately.